Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Urogynecology Journal
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom

Authors: G. Thiagamoorthy, A. Johnson, R. Thakar, A. H. Sultan

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Perineal trauma affects approximately 350,000 women per annum in the United Kingdom (UK) and is associated with considerable morbidity. Symptoms are most severe following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) compared with other grades of perineal trauma. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidelines indicate that the rate of OASIS is 1 % of vaginal deliveries. In 2011, the RCOG implemented the “Maternity Dashboard” so that units could benchmark their performance against national standards of which OASIS is a component. Our primary objective was to establish the national rate of OASIS and audit variations in incidence and management of obstetric perineal trauma.

Methods

We carried out a questionnaire-based survey auditing national practice. Every UK maternity unit was contacted regarding perineal outcomes after all deliveries between January 2009 and January 2010.

Results

215 of the 265 units in the UK responded (81 %). 692,259 of the 790,197 deliveries in the UK for the same period were sampled (88 %). 75 % delivered vaginally. The median national OASIS rate was 2.85 % (0–8 %). 20.2 % of women delivering vaginally had episiotomies; none were midline. 12.4 % of second-degree tears were not repaired in low-risk units compared with 5.9 % in high-risk units. 57.1 % of units used the perineal trauma classification of the RCOG.

Conclusions

This study provides comprehensive data regarding the incidence and management of perineal trauma across the UK. Clinicians and policy-makers, both local and at the RCOG, can devise up-to-date realistic guidelines on the anticipated rate of OASIS and help to assess the compliancy of units with guidelines on the appropriate management of perineal trauma.
Literature
1.
Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darbya L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359:2217–2223PubMedCrossRef
2.
Signorello L, Harlow B, Chekos A, Repke J (2001) Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: A retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:881–890PubMedCrossRef
3.
Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JOL, Rogers R (2003) Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(6):1543–1550PubMedCrossRef
4.
Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C (2004) Incidence, severity and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(4):1199–1204PubMedCrossRef
5.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI (1994) Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 308(6933):887–891PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2005) Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 247(2):224–237CrossRef
7.
Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones P (2000) Occult anal sphincters—myth or reality? Br J Obstet Gynecol 113:195–200CrossRef
8.
National Institute of Health and Clinical excellence (2007) Intrapartum care: care of health women and their babies during childbirth. NICE, London
9.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2007) Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears. Green Top Guidelines, no. 29. RCOG, London
10.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2008) Maternity dashboard clinical performance and governance and score card. Good Practice, no. 7. RCOG, London
11.
12.
13.
Laine K, Skjeldestad F, Sandvik L, Staff A (2012) Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study. BMJ Open 2:e001649PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
Groutz A, Hasson J, Wengier A, Gold R, Skornick-Rapaport A, Lessing J, Gordon D (2011) Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: prevalence and risk factors in the third millennium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(4):347.e1–347.e4CrossRef
15.
Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW (2006) Occult anal sphincter injuries—myth or reality? BJOG 113(2):195–200PubMedCrossRef
16.
Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2009) Structured hands-on training in repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): an audit of clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(11):1397CrossRef
17.
Laine K, Skjeldestad FE, Sanda B, Horne H, Spydslaug A, Staff A (2011) Prevalence and risk factors for anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(4):319–324PubMedCrossRef
18.
Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2000) Long term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 355:260–265PubMedCrossRef
19.
Brown HW, Wexner SD, Lukacz ES (2013) Factors associated with care seeking among women with accidental bowel leakage. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(2):66–71PubMedCrossRef
20.
Fleming VE, Hagen S, Niven C (2003) Does perineal suturing make a difference? The suns trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 110(7):684–689CrossRef
21.
Norton C, Christiansen J, Butler U et al (2002) Anal incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury R, Wein A (eds). Incontinence, 2nd edn. Health Publications, Plymouth, pp 985–1044
22.
Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH (2010) Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(3):368–374PubMedCrossRef
23.
Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L et al (2007) Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(3):217.e1–217.e5CrossRef
24.
De Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME, Struijk PC et al (2001) Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: functional outcome and risk factors for fecal incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80(9):830–834PubMedCrossRef
25.
Reinbold D, Eboue C, Morello R et al (2011) From the impact of French guidelines to reduce episiotomy’s rate. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 41(1):62–68CrossRef
26.
Asch D, Jedrziewski M, Christakis N (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50:1129–1136PubMedCrossRef
27.
Cook J, Dickinson H, Eccles M (2009) Response rates in postal surveys of health care professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. Bio Med Cent Health Serv Res 9:160CrossRef
28.
Treece E, Treece J (1986) Elements of research in nursing. Mosby, St. Louis, MO
29.
Bowling A (2004) Data collection methods in quantitative research: questionnaires, interviews and their response rates. In: Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Open University Press, Maidenhead
30.
Sultan AH, Stanton SL (1996) Preserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth—elective caesarean section? BJOG 103:731–734CrossRef
Metadata
Title
National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom
Authors
G. Thiagamoorthy
A. Johnson
R. Thakar
A. H. Sultan
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2406-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 12/2014 Go to the issue

IUJ Video

Overlapping sphincteroplasty and posterior repair

Original Article

Maternal lower urinary tract injury at the time of Cesarean delivery

Original

Symptom persistence in a community cohort of women with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS): 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up from the RICE cohort

Original Article

Effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, tadalafil, on continence reflex in rats

Case Report

Transient large urinoma following hysterectomy

Erratum

Erratum to: Iatrogenic genitourinary fistula: an 18-year retrospective review of 805 injuries