Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 19, 2014

Position at birth as an important factor for the occurrence of anal sphincter tears: a retrospective cohort study

  • Christian Haslinger EMAIL logo , Tilo Burkhardt , Bernhard Stoiber , Roland Zimmermann and Leonhard Schäffer

Abstract

Objective: This work aimed to analyze the association between maternal position at birth in spontaneous deliveries and the occurrence of anal sphincter tears (AST) given the lack of evidence related to the least traumatic birth position.

Study design: A total of 7832 vaginal deliveries were included. Vaginal-operative deliveries and deliveries with fundal pressure were excluded. Birth positions on bed, in water, kneeling, and in a squatting position on a low stool were compared. Birth position on bed was considered as the reference group, and a logistic regression analysis adjusting for important fetomaternal parameters was performed.

Results: The overall incidence of AST was 1.1%. AST rate was significantly increased in squatting (2.9%) and kneeling (2.1%) positions compared with birth position on bed (1.0%) or in water (0.9%). Logistic regression analysis revealed a significantly higher risk for ASTs in squatting (OR 2.92, CI 95% 1.04–8.18) and in kneeling positions (OR 2.14, CI 95% 1.05–4.37) compared with the reference group on bed. When adjusting for risk factors, birth in a kneeling position remained significantly associated with ASTs (adj. OR 2.21, CI 95% 1.07–4.54).

Conclusions: Birth in squatting or in kneeling position is associated with an elevated risk for ASTs. Birth in water is not associated with an increased risk for AST. Based on the results, women should be informed about the association of certain birth positions with the occurrence of AST.


Corresponding author: Christian Haslinger, MD, Division of Obstetrics University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland, Phone: +0041-44-255-5103, E-mail:

References

[1] Altman D, Ragnar I, Ekström A, Tydén T, Olsson SE. Anal sphincter lacerations and upright delivery postures–a risk analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18:141–6.10.1007/s00192-006-0123-9Search in Google Scholar

[2] Belmonte-Montes C, Hagerman G, Vega-Yepez PA, Hernández-de-Anda E, Fonseca-Morales V. Anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery in primiparous females. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1244–8.10.1007/BF02234778Search in Google Scholar

[3] Christianson LM, Bovbjerg VE, McDavitt EC, Hullfish KL. Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:255–60.10.1067/mob.2003.547Search in Google Scholar

[4] Dahlen HG, Dowling H, Tracy M, Schmied V, Tracy S. Maternal and perinatal outcomes amongst low risk women giving birth in water compared to six birth positions on land. A descriptive cross sectional study in a birth centre over 12 years. Midwifery 2013;29:759–64.10.1016/j.midw.2012.07.002Search in Google Scholar

[5] de Jong PR, Johanson RB, Baxen P, Adrians VD, van der Westhuisen S, Jones PW. Randomised trial comparing the upright and supine positions for the second stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:567–71.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11534.xSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg. 2008;247:224–37.10.1097/SLA.0b013e318142cdf4Search in Google Scholar

[7] Eskandar O, Shet D. Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:119–22.10.1080/01443610802665090Search in Google Scholar

[8] Fitzgerald MP, Weber AM, Howden N, Cundiff GW, Brown MB. Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:29–34.10.1097/01.AOG.0000242616.56617.ffSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Gardosi J, Hutson N, B-Lynch C. Randomised, controlled trial of squatting in the second stage of labour. Lancet. 19898;2:74–7.10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90315-2Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gottvall K, Allebeck P, Ekéus C. Risk factors for anal sphincter tears: the importance of maternal position at birth. BJOG. 2007;114:1266–72.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01482.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Shehmar M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD002006.10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Hudelist G, Gelle’n J, Singer C, Ruecklinger E, Czerwenka K, Kandolf O, et al. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:875–81.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Jandér C, Lyrenäs S. Third and fourth degree perineal tears. Predictor factors in a referral hospital. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:229–34.10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080003229.xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Pollack J, Nordenstam J, Brismar S, Lopez A, Altman D, Zetterstrom J. Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a five-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1397–402.10.1097/01.AOG.0000147597.45349.e8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Wennerholm UB, Gåreberg B, Nyberg K, Hagberg H. Anal sphincter tears: prospective study of obstetric risk factors. BJOG. 2000;107:926–31.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11093.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1905–11.10.1056/NEJM199312233292601Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Wheeler TL 2nd, Richter HE. Delivery method, anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: new information on a persistent problem. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:474–79.10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282ef4142Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Zetterström J, López A, Anzén B, Norman M, Holmström B, Mellgren A. Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:21–28.10.1097/00006250-199907000-00005Search in Google Scholar

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2014-5-21
Accepted: 2014-7-17
Published Online: 2014-8-19
Published in Print: 2015-11-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 22.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2014-0172/html
Scroll to top button