Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Knee

The combined Whiteside’s and posterior condylar line as a reliable reference to describe axial distal femoral anatomy in patient-specific instrument planning

Authors: Frederic Paternostre, Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab, Emmanuel Thienpont

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Aligning the femoral component in the axial plane parallel to the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) has been generally recommended. In this retrospective study on the axial anatomy of the distal femur, as determined by the patient-specific instruments (PSI) planning tool based on MRI and 3D reconstructions, the different rotational axes were compared. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of posterior axial anatomy on anterior anatomy and to compare the different angles of rotation obtained by a PSI-planning engineer.

Methods

The preoperative planning of 77 PSI patients with a mean (SD) age of 65.6 (9.6) years undergoing primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis was analysed for rotational anatomy of the distal femur. The angles between the posterior condylar line (PCL) and the SEA called posterior condylar angle (PCA), between Whiteside’s line and the SEA and finally between Whiteside’s line and the PCL, were retrieved from the PSI axial rotation planning screen.

Results

The mean (SD) PCA was 3.2° (1.4°). The mean (SD) angle between Whiteside’s line and the SEA was 91.4° (2.2°), and the mean (SD) angle between Whiteside’s line and the PCL was 94.5° (2.3°). No significant difference for this last rotational parameter was found in between varus and valgus knees.

Conclusion

Patient-specific instrument’s preoperative planning found consistent angles to describe the distal femoral anatomy as previously published in the literature. The angle between Whiteside’s line and the PCL as measured on PSI planning is a mean angle of 94.5° (2.3°) for both varus and valgus knees. Setting a fixed PCA of 5° of external rotation referenced of the PCL makes this planning repeatable during conventional surgery.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, Level III.
Literature
1.
Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T (1999) Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 366:155–163PubMedCrossRef
2.
Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT (1993) The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:170–177PubMed
3.
Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE (1995) Femoral rotational alignment, based on the antero-posterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1331–1334
4.
Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T (2005) The functional flexion–extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis. J Arthroplast 20:1060–1067CrossRef
5.
Baldini A, Anderson JA, Cerulli-Mariani P, Kalyvas J, Pavlov H, Sculco TP (2007) Patellofemoral evaluation after total knee arthroplasty. Validation of a new weight-bearing axial radiographic view. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:1810–1817CrossRef
6.
Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moermans A (2002) Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84:50–53CrossRef
7.
Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47PubMed
8.
Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, Leardini A, Bianchi L, Digennaro V, Giannini S (2008) Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:765–771CrossRef
9.
Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C (2013) A prospective randomized controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Jt J 95:354–359CrossRef
10.
Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:111–118PubMedCrossRef
11.
Cinotti G, Ripani FR, Sessa P, Giannicola G (2012) Combining different rotational alignment axes with navigation may reduce the need for lateral retinacular release in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36:1595–1600PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
Clarke HD (2012) Changes in posterior condylar offset after total knee arthroplasty cannot be determined by radiographic measurements alone. J Arthroplast 27:1155–1158CrossRef
13.
Coughlin KM, Incavo SJ, Churchill DL, Beynnon BD (2003) Tibial axis and patellar position relative to the femoral epicondylar axis during squatting. J Arthroplast 18:1048–1055CrossRef
14.
Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, Rubinstein D, Humphries S (2003) Three-dimensional morphology and kinematics of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality: part II. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85(suppl 4):97–104
15.
Feinstein WK, Noble PC, Kamaric E, Tullos HS (1996) Anatomic alignment of the patellar groove. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:64–73PubMedCrossRef
16.
Griffin FM, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1998) The posterior condylar angle in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplast 13:812–815CrossRef
17.
Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Poilvache PL (2000) Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J Arthroplast 15:354–359CrossRef
18.
Hanada H, Whiteside LA, Steiger J, Dyer P, Naito M (2007) Bone landmarks are more reliable than tensioned gaps in TKA component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:137–142PubMedCrossRef
19.
Heesterbeek PJ, Keijsers NL, Wymenga AB (2011) Femoral component rotation after balanced gap total knee replacement is not a predictor for postoperative patella position. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1131–1136PubMedCrossRef
20.
Hungerford DS, Kenna RV (1983) Preliminary experience with a total knee prosthesis with porous coating used without cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 176:95–107PubMed
21.
Hollister AM, Jatana A, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG (1993) The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:259–268PubMed
22.
Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA (2008) Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics 31:857–863PubMedCrossRef
23.
Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Ishii H, Toyabe S (2011) Changes in the medial and lateral posterior condylar offset in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26:255–259CrossRef
24.
Jenny JY, Boeri C (2004) Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scandal 75:74–77CrossRef
25.
Jerosch J, Peuker E, Philipps B, Filler T (2002) Interindividual reproducibility in perioperative rotational alignment of femoral components in knee prosthetic surgery using the transepicondylar axis. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc 10:194–197CrossRef
26.
Kinzel V, Ledger M, Shakespeare D (2005) Can the epicondylar axis be defined accurately in total knee arthroplasty? Knee 12:293–296PubMedCrossRef
27.
Kobayashi T, Suzuki M, Sasho T, Nakagawa K, Tsuneizumi Y, Takahashi K (2012) Lateral laxity in flexion increases the postoperative flexion angle in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 27:260–265CrossRef
28.
Laskin RS (1995) Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 10:657–660CrossRef
29.
Luo CF (2004) Reference axes for reconstruction of the knee. Knee 4:251–257CrossRef
30.
Luyckx T, Zambianchi F, Catani F, Bellemans J, Victor J (2013) Coronal alignment is a predictor of the rotational geometry of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2331–2337PubMedCrossRef
31.
Matsuda S, Matsuda H, Miyagi T, Sasaki K, Iwamoto Y, Miura H (1998) Femoral condyle geometry in the normal and the varus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 349:183–188PubMedCrossRef
32.
Merican AM, Ghosh KM, Iranpour F, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2011) The effect of femoral component rotation on the kinematics of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1479–1487PubMedCrossRef
33.
Middleton FR, Palmer SH (2007) How accurate is Whiteside’s line as a reference axis in total knee arthroplasty? Knee 14:204–207PubMedCrossRef
34.
Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE (2001) Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:38–45PubMedCrossRef
35.
Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:745–749
36.
Nagamine R, Miura H, Inoue Y, Urabe K, Matsuda S, Okamoto Y, Nishizawa M, Iwamoto Y (1998) Reliability of the anteroposterior axis and the posterior condylar axis for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 3:194–198PubMedCrossRef
37.
Newbern DG, Faris PM, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Meding JB, Berend ME (2006) A clinical comparison of patellar tracking using the transepicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis. J Arthroplast 21:1141–1146CrossRef
38.
Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gullick BC, Lombardi AV Jr (2012) Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:99–107PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
39.
Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, Ruh EL, Howell SM, Barrack RL (2012) Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:895–902PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
40.
Olcott CW, Scott RD (1999) The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:39–42PubMed
41.
Piriou P, Peronne E, Ouanezar H (2013) Rotational alignment of the femoral component using trochlear navigation during total knee arthroplasty: a dual-enter study of 145 cases. J Arthroplast 28:1107–1111CrossRef
42.
Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Tullos HS (1993) The effect of femoral component position on the kinematics of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:122–129PubMed
43.
Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ (2005) The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:2276–2280CrossRef
44.
Staubli HU, Dürrenmatt U, Porcellini B, Rauschning W (1999) Anatomy and surface geometry of the patellofemoral joint in the axial plane. J Bone Jt Surg Br 81:452–458CrossRef
45.
Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson J, Peters CL (2013) Patient-specific total knee arthroplasy required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:169–174PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
46.
Suter T, Zanetti M, Schmid M, Romero J (2006) Reproducibility of measurement of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty using computer tomography. J Arthroplast 21:744–748CrossRef
47.
Van der Linden-van der Zwaag HMJ, Bos J, van der Heide HJL, Nelissen RG (2011) A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop 35:845–850PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
48.
Van der Linden-van der Zwaag HM, Valstar ER, van der Molen AJ, Nelissen RG (2008) Transepicondylar axis accuracy in computer assisted knee surgery: a comparison of the CT-based measured axis versus the CAS-determined axis. Comput Aided Surg 13:200–206PubMedCrossRef
49.
Vanin N, Panzica M, Dikos G, Krettek C, Hankemeier S (2011) Rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: intraoperative inter-and intraobserver reliability of Whiteside’s line. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1477–1480PubMedCrossRef
50.
Victor J (2009) Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:365–372PubMedCrossRef
51.
Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Van Glabbeek F, Parizel P, Bellemans J (2009) A common reference frame for describing rotational alignment of the distal femur. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91:683–690CrossRef
52.
53.
Whiteside LA, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172PubMed
54.
Yau WP, Leung A, Liu KG, Yan CH, Wong LL, Chiu KY (2007) Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22:1150–1161CrossRef
55.
Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD (1987) The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:873–880
Metadata
Title
The combined Whiteside’s and posterior condylar line as a reliable reference to describe axial distal femoral anatomy in patient-specific instrument planning
Authors
Frederic Paternostre
Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab
Emmanuel Thienpont
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2836-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2014 Go to the issue

Knee

A morphometric study of normal and varus knees

Knee

Differences in component and limb alignment between computer-assisted and conventional surgery total knee arthroplasty

Knee

Assessment of in vivo loading history of the patellofemoral joint: a study combining patellar position, tilt, alignment and bone SPECT/CT

Knee

Computer-assisted surgery improves rotational positioning of the femoral component but not the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty

Knee

The adductor ratio: a new tool for joint line reconstruction in revision TKA

Knee

Strong correlation between the morphology of the proximal femur and the geometry of the distal femoral trochlea