Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coronal alignment is a predictor of the rotational geometry of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

There is a lot of inter-individual variation in the rotational anatomy of the distal femur. This study was set up to define the rotational anatomy of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee and to investigate its relationship with the overall coronal alignment and gender.

Methods

CT-scans of 231 patients with end-stage knee osteo-arthritis prior to TKA surgery were obtained. This represents the biggest series published on rational geometry of the distal femur in literature so far.

Results

The posterior condylar line (PCL) was on average 1.6° (SD 1.9) internally rotated relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA). The perpendicular to trochlear anteroposterior axis (⊥TRAx) was on average 4.8° (SD 3.3°) externally rotated relative to the sTEA. The relationship between the PCL and the sTEA was statistically different in the different coronal alignment groups (p < 0.001): 1.0° (SD 1.8°) in varus knees, 2.1° (SD 1.8°) in neutral knees and 2.6° (SD 1.8°) in valgus knees. The same was true for the ⊥TRAx in these 3 groups (p < 0.02).There was a clear linear relationship between the overall coronal alignment and the rotational geometry of the distal femur. For every 1° in coronal alignment increment from varus to valgus, there is a 0.1° increment in posterior condylar angle (PCL vs sTEA).

Conclusion

The PCL was on average 1.6° internally rotated relative to the sTEA in the osteo-arthritic knee. The relationship between the PCL and the sTEA was statistically different in the different coronal alignment groups.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A (2008) Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2751–2755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T (1999) Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 366:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE (1995) Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1331–1334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T (2005) The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. J Arthroplasty 20:1060–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS (1993) Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:40–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD (1998) The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:111–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis DA (2008) Measured resection: an outdated technique in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 31:940–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fehring TK (2000) Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:72–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffin FM, Insall JN, Scuderi GR (1998) The posterior condylar angle in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 13:812–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanada H, Whiteside L, Steiger J, Dyer P, Naito M (2007) Bone landmarks are more reliable than tensioned gaps in TKA component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:629–633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hungerford DS, Kenna RV (1983) Preliminary experience with a total knee prosthesis with porous coating used without cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 176:95–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2004) Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75:74–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim D, Seong SC, Lee MC, Lee S (2012) Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:337–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. LaPrade RF, Engebretsen AH, Ly TV, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L (2007) The anatomy of the medial part of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2000–2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laskin RS (1995) Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:657–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Luyckx T, Peeters T, Vandenneucker H, Victor J, Bellemans J (2012) Is adapted measured resection superior to gap-balancing in determining femoral component rotation in total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1271–1276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsuda S, Matsuda H, Miyagi T, Sasaki K, Iwamoto Y, Miura H (1998) Femoral condyle geometry in the normal and varus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 349:183–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Mawatari T, Tokunaga M, Nabeyama R, Iwamoto Y (2004) Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Res 22:104–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Merican AM, Ghosh KM, Iranpour F, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2011) The effect of femoral component rotation on the kinematics of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1479–1487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagamine R, Miura H, Inoue Y, Urabe K, Matsuda S, Okamoto Y, Nishizawa M, Iwamoto Y (1998) Reliability of the anteroposterior axis and the posterior condylar axis for determining rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 3:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE (1996) Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:35–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tashiro Y, Uemura M, Matsuda S, Okazaki K, Kawahara S, Hashizume M, Iwamoto Y (2012) Articular cartilage of the posterior condyle can affect rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1463–1469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Victor J (2009) Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:365–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Van Glabbeek F, Parizel P, Bellemans J (2009) A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a ct-based kinematic study using cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:683–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Whiteside L, Arima J (1995) The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:168–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, Hirasawa Y (2001) Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 16:493–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD (1987) The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:873–880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Pellenberg, Belgium

    T. Luyckx & J. Bellemans

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

    F. Zambianchi & F. Catani

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

    J. Victor

Authors
  1. T. Luyckx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Zambianchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Catani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Bellemans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Victor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Luyckx.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luyckx, T., Zambianchi, F., Catani, F. et al. Coronal alignment is a predictor of the rotational geometry of the distal femur in the osteo-arthritic knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 2331–2337 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2306-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2306-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation