Top

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Published in:

Open Access 01-05-2019 | Original Article

Relationship between periodontal status of mandibular incisors and selected cephalometric parameters

Preliminary results

Authors: Edyta Kalina, Małgorzata Zadurska, Ewa Sobieska, Bartłomiej Górski

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 3/2019

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the correlation between the periodontal tissue of mandibular incisors and several dentoalveolar and skeletal cephalometric parameters.

Materials and methods

The sample consisted of 35 patients (mean age 26.42 ± 8.02 years). Eligibility criteria included good overall health status with no history of dental trauma, congenital defects, active periodontal diseases, restorative and prosthetic treatment in the area of the mandibular incisors. Gingival recession width and height (GRW, GRH), gingival thickness (GT), width of keratinized gingiva (WKT) and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were evaluated at 140 lower incisors. Incisors inclination (1-:ML), skeletal class (ANB, WITS), intermaxillary angle (NL:ML) and mandibular symphysis dimensions (symph. length and width) were assessed in cephalograms. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used for statistical analysis at the P < 0.05 level.

Results

A statistically significant positive moderate correlation was found for GT and WITS and also symph. length. WKT correlated positively with ANB, WITS and symph. length, with moderate strength of the correlation. GRW, GRH and CAL did not correlate with any cephalometric parameters.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicated evidence for an association between WKT and GT and some cephalometric variables—ANB, WITS, and symphysis length.

Agudio G et al (2009) Periodontal conditions of sites treated with gingival-augmentation surgery compared to untreated contralateral homologous sites: A 10- to 27-year long-term study. J Periodontol 80:1399–1405CrossRefPubMed

Albander JM (2002) Global risk factors and risk indicators for periodontal diseases. Periodontol 29:177–206CrossRef

Artun J, Groberty D (2001) Periodontal status of mandibular incisors after pronounced orthodontic advancement during adolescence: A follow up evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:2–10CrossRefPubMed

Aziz T, Flores-Mir C (2011) A systematic review of the association between appliance-induced labial movement of mandibular incisors and gingival recession. Aust Orthod J 27:33–39PubMed

Boke F, Gazioglu C, Akkaya S, Akkaya M (2014) Relationship between orthodontic treatment and gingival health: A retrospective study. Eur J Dent 8:373–370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Closs LQ, Bortolini LF, Dos Santos-Pinto A, Rösing CK (2104) Association between post-orthodontic treatment, gingival margin alterations and symphysis dimensions. Acta Odontol Latinoam 27:125–130

Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC (1982) Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. A four year report. J Periodontol 53:349–352CrossRefPubMed

Geiger AM, Wasserman BH (1976) Relationship of occlusion and periodontal disease: Part IX—incisor inclination and periodontal status. Angle Orthod 46:99–110PubMed

Goldsman S (1959) The variations in skeletal and denture patterns in excellent adult facial types. Angle Orthod 29:63–92

10.

Handleman CS (1996) The anterior alveolus : Its important in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod 66:95–110

11.

Hoang N, Nelson G, Hatcher D, Oberoi S (2016) Evaluation of mandibular anterior alveolus in different skeletal pattern. Prog Orthod. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0135-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsukada H, Sato Y (1999) Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships. Angle Orthod 69:534–538PubMed

13.

Janson GR, Metaxas A, Woodside DG (1994) Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:409–418CrossRefPubMed

14.

Joss-Vassalli I, Grebenstein C, Topouzelis N, Sculean A, Katsaros C (2010) Orthodontic therapy and megingival recession: A systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 13:127–141CrossRefPubMed

15.

Kaley J, Philips C (1991) Factors related to root resorption in edgewise practice. Angle Orthod 61:125–132PubMed

16.

Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois J (2003) Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: An evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 74:557–562CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ (2008) Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: A key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc 36:193–198PubMed

18.

Kao RT, Pasquinelli K (2002) Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: A key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 30:521–526PubMed

19.

Kaya Y, Alkan O, Alkan EA, Keskin S (2018) Gingival thickness of maxillary and mandibular anterior regions in subjects with different craniofacial morphologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 154:356–364CrossRefPubMed

20.

Kaya Y, Alkan O, Keskin S (2017) An evaluation of the gingival biotype and the width of keratinized gingiva in the mandibular anterior region of individuals with different dental malocclusion groups and levels of crowding. Korean J Orthod 47:176–185CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Kim DM, Neiva R (2015) Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: A systematic review from the AAP regeneration workshop. J Periodontol 86:56–72CrossRef

22.

Kloukos D, Eliades T, Sculean A, Katsaros C (2014) Indication and timing of soft tissue augmentation at maxillary and mandibular incisors in orthodontic patients. A systematic review. Eur J Orthod 36:442–449CrossRefPubMed

23.

Materese G, Isola G, Ramaglia L, Dalessandri D, Lucchese A, Alibrandi A et al (2016) Periodontal biotype: Characteristic, prevalence and dimensions related to dental malocclusion. Minerva Stomatol 65:231–238

24.

Mazurova K, Kopp JB, Renkema AM, Pandis N, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS (2017) Gingival recession in mandibular incisors and symphysis morphology—a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Orthod. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx046 CrossRef

25.

Melsen B, Allais D (2005) Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: A retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127:552–561CrossRefPubMed

26.

Molina-Berlanga N, Llopis-Perez J, Flores-Mir C, Puigdollers A (2013) Lower incisor, dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among Class I and III malocclusion patients with different facial vertical skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod 83:948–955CrossRefPubMed

27.

Morris JW, Campbell PM, Tadlock LP, Boley J, Buschang PH (2017) Prevalence of gingival recession after orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 151:851–859CrossRefPubMed

28.

Nevins M, Nevins ML, Camelo M et al (2010) The clinical efficacy of DynaMatrix extracellular membrane in augmenting keratinized tissue. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 30:151–161PubMed

29.

Park JH, Hong JY, Ahn HW, Kim SJ (2018) Correlation between periodontal soft tissue and hard tissue surrounding incisors in skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod 88:91–99CrossRefPubMed

30.

Renkema AM, Fudalej PS, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C (2013) Gingival recessions and the change of inclination of mandibular incisors during orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 35:249–255CrossRefPubMed

31.

Renkema AM, Navratilova Z, Mazurova K, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS (2015) Gingival labial recessions and the post-treatment proclination of mandibular incisors. Eur J Orthod 37:508–513CrossRefPubMed

32.

Sadek MM, Sabet NE, Hassan IT (2015) Alveolar bone mapping in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions. Eur J Orthod 37:194–201CrossRefPubMed

33.

Salkin LM, Freedman AL, Stein MD, Bassiouny MA (1987) A longitudinal study of untreated mucogingival defecst. J Periodontol 58:164–166CrossRefPubMed

34.

Salti L et al (2017) Estimating effects of craniofacial morphology on gingival recession and clinical attachment loss. J Clin Periodontol 44(4):363–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12661 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Scheyer ET, Sanz M, Dibart S et al (2015) Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: A consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol 86:73–76CrossRef

36.

Shah R, Sowmya NK, Mehta DS (2015) Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters. Contemp Clin Dent 6:167–171CrossRef

37.

Siciliani G, Cozza P, Sciarretta MG (1990) Functional anterior limits of dentition. Mondo Ortod 15:259–264PubMed

38.

Sperry TP, Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW (1977) The role of dental compensations in the orthodontic treatment of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 47:293–299PubMed

39.

Van der Beek MC, Hoeksma JB, Prahl-Andersen B (1991) Vertical facial growth: a longitudinal study from 7 to 14 years of age. Eur J Orthod 13:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.3.202 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Vasconcelos G, Kjellsen K, Preus H, Vandevska-Radunovic V, Hansen BF (2012) Prevalence and severity of gingival recession in mandibular incisors after orthodontic treatment. A case-control retrospective study. Angle Orthod 82(1):42–47. https://doi.org/10.2319/021411-108.1 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F, Thilander B (1987) Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol 14:121–129CrossRefPubMed

42.

Yared KFG, Zenobio EG, Pacheco W (2006) Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130(1):6.e1–6.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.015 CrossRef

43.

Zawawi KH, Al-Harthi SM, l‑Zahrani MS (2012) Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to dental malocclusion. Saudi Med J 33:671–675PubMed

Title: Relationship between periodontal status of mandibular incisors and selected cephalometric parameters
Preliminary results
Authors: Edyta Kalina
Małgorzata Zadurska
Ewa Sobieska
Bartłomiej Górski
Publication date: 01-05-2019
Publisher: Springer Medizin
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00170-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Relationship between periodontal status of mandibular incisors and selected cephalometric parameters

Preliminary results

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Anterior joint space narrowing in patients with temporomandibular disorder

Relationship between alveolar bone thickness, tooth root morphology, and sagittal skeletal pattern

Expression of lubricin in rat posterior mandibular condylar cartilage following functional mandibular forward repositioning

Influence of enamel sealing with a light-cured filled sealant before bracket bonding on the bond failure rate during fixed orthodontic therapy

Mitteilungen der DGKFO