Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2019

01-05-2019 | Digital Volume Tomography | Original Article

Relationship between alveolar bone thickness, tooth root morphology, and sagittal skeletal pattern

A cone beam computed tomography study

Authors: İpek Coşkun, DDS, PhD, Associate Professor Dr. Burçak Kaya, DDS, PhD

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this work was to examine the relationship between sagittal facial pattern and thickness of alveolar bone in conjunction with root morphology of teeth by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods

The study was carried out on the CBCT scans from 3 group of patients (n = 20 in each group). The first group involved skeletal class 1, the second group involved skeletal class 2, and the third group involved skeletal class 3 patients. In all, 14 permanent teeth and interdental regions in the maxilla and mandible were evaluated. Root length and root width were measured on each tooth. Buccal cortical bone thickness, cancellous bone thickness, and lingual cortical bone thicknesses were measured in each interdental region. Analysis of variance, Kruskall–Wallis H and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for statistical comparisons.

Results

No significant difference was found between the groups for root length, root width, buccal cortical bone and lingual cortical bone thickness. A significant difference was observed between the groups for cancellous bone thickness as it was thicker in skeletal class 2 group. Cortical bone was thicker in the mandible compared to maxilla on both buccal and lingual sides and it was thicker in the posterior region compared to the anterior region on the buccal side.

Conclusions

Differences in cancellous bone thickness between different sagittal facial patterns and differences in cortical bone thickness between different alveolar regions should be taken into consideration when planning orthodontic tooth movements and anchorage mechanics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Al-Masri MM, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, Al-Eed MS (2015) Evaluation of bone thickness and density in the lower incisors’ region in adults with different types of skeletal malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography. J Contemp Dent Pract 16:630–637CrossRefPubMed Al-Masri MM, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, Al-Eed MS (2015) Evaluation of bone thickness and density in the lower incisors’ region in adults with different types of skeletal malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography. J Contemp Dent Pract 16:630–637CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Baumgaertel S (2010) Predrilling of the implant site: is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:825–829CrossRefPubMed Baumgaertel S (2010) Predrilling of the implant site: is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:825–829CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Baysal A, Ucar FI, Buyuk SK, Ozer T, Uysal T (2013) Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod 43:134–140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baysal A, Ucar FI, Buyuk SK, Ozer T, Uysal T (2013) Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod 43:134–140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Buschang PH, Carillo R, Ozenbaugh B, Rossouw PE (2008) 2008 survey of AAO members on miniscrew usage. J Clin Orthod 42:513–518PubMed Buschang PH, Carillo R, Ozenbaugh B, Rossouw PE (2008) 2008 survey of AAO members on miniscrew usage. J Clin Orthod 42:513–518PubMed
5.
go back to reference Carranza FA, Bernard GW (2002) The tooth-supporting structures. In: Carranza F, Newman M, Takei H (eds) Clinical periodontology, 9th edn. W. B. Saunders, Philadephia, pp 45–52 Carranza FA, Bernard GW (2002) The tooth-supporting structures. In: Carranza F, Newman M, Takei H (eds) Clinical periodontology, 9th edn. W. B. Saunders, Philadephia, pp 45–52
6.
go back to reference Daegling DJ, Hotzman JL (2003) Functional significance of cortical bone distribution in anthropoid mandibles: an in vitro assessment of bone strain under combined loads. Am J Phys Anthropol 122:38–50CrossRefPubMed Daegling DJ, Hotzman JL (2003) Functional significance of cortical bone distribution in anthropoid mandibles: an in vitro assessment of bone strain under combined loads. Am J Phys Anthropol 122:38–50CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T (2006) Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129(721):e7–12 Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T (2006) Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129(721):e7–12
8.
go back to reference Enhos S, Uysal T, Yagci A, Veli I, Ucar FI, Ozer T (2012) Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 82:868–874CrossRefPubMed Enhos S, Uysal T, Yagci A, Veli I, Ucar FI, Ozer T (2012) Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 82:868–874CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Eraydın F, Germec-Cakan D, Tozlu M, Ozdemir FI (2018) Three-dimensional evaluation of alveolar bone thickness of mandibular anterior teeth in different dentofacial types. Niger J Clin Pract 21:519–524PubMed Eraydın F, Germec-Cakan D, Tozlu M, Ozdemir FI (2018) Three-dimensional evaluation of alveolar bone thickness of mandibular anterior teeth in different dentofacial types. Niger J Clin Pract 21:519–524PubMed
10.
go back to reference Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH (2011) Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:495–503CrossRefPubMed Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH (2011) Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:495–503CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C (2010) Optimal sites for orthodontic miniimplant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. angle Orthod 80:939–951CrossRefPubMed Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C (2010) Optimal sites for orthodontic miniimplant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. angle Orthod 80:939–951CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Garib DG, Yatebe MS, Ozawa TO, Silva OGF (2010) Alveolar bone morphology under the perspective of the computed tomography: Defining the biological limits of tooth movement. Dental Press J Orthod 15:192–205CrossRef Garib DG, Yatebe MS, Ozawa TO, Silva OGF (2010) Alveolar bone morphology under the perspective of the computed tomography: Defining the biological limits of tooth movement. Dental Press J Orthod 15:192–205CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Holmes DC, Loftus JT (1997) Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 23:104–111PubMed Holmes DC, Loftus JT (1997) Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 23:104–111PubMed
14.
go back to reference Horner KA, Behrents RG, Kim KB, Buschang PH (2012) Cortical bone and ridge thickness of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142:170–178CrossRefPubMed Horner KA, Behrents RG, Kim KB, Buschang PH (2012) Cortical bone and ridge thickness of hyperdivergent and hypodivergent adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142:170–178CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ichim I, Kieser JA, Swain MV (2007) Functional significance of strain distribution in the human mandible under masticatory load: numerical predictions. Arch Oral Biol 52:465–473CrossRefPubMed Ichim I, Kieser JA, Swain MV (2007) Functional significance of strain distribution in the human mandible under masticatory load: numerical predictions. Arch Oral Biol 52:465–473CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kim SY, Lim SH, Gang SN, Kim HJ (2013) Crown and root lengths of incisors, canines, and premolars measured by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with malocclusions. korean J Orthod 43:271–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim SY, Lim SH, Gang SN, Kim HJ (2013) Crown and root lengths of incisors, canines, and premolars measured by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with malocclusions. korean J Orthod 43:271–278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Kim Y, Park JU, Kook YA (2009) Alveolar bone loss around incisors in surgical skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod 79:676–682CrossRefPubMed Kim Y, Park JU, Kook YA (2009) Alveolar bone loss around incisors in surgical skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod 79:676–682CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kook YA, Kim G, Kim Y (2012) Comparison of alveolar bone loss around incisors in normal occlusion samples and surgical skeletal class III patients. Angle Orthod 82:645–652CrossRefPubMed Kook YA, Kim G, Kim Y (2012) Comparison of alveolar bone loss around incisors in normal occlusion samples and surgical skeletal class III patients. Angle Orthod 82:645–652CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Li H, Zhang H, Smales RJ, Zhang Y, Ni Y, Ma J, Wang L (2014) Effect of 3 vertical facial patterns on alveolar bone quality at selected miniscrew implant sites. Implant Dent 23:92–97CrossRefPubMed Li H, Zhang H, Smales RJ, Zhang Y, Ni Y, Ma J, Wang L (2014) Effect of 3 vertical facial patterns on alveolar bone quality at selected miniscrew implant sites. Implant Dent 23:92–97CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K (2001) Relationship among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 23:15–23CrossRefPubMed Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K (2001) Relationship among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 23:15–23CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Motoyoshi M, Matsuoka M, Shimizu N (2007) Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:695–699CrossRefPubMed Motoyoshi M, Matsuoka M, Shimizu N (2007) Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:695–699CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N (2007) Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22:779–284PubMed Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N (2007) Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22:779–284PubMed
23.
go back to reference Nahm KY, Kang JH, Moon SC, Choi YS, Kook YA, Kim SH, Huang J (2012) Alveolar bone loss around incisors in Class I bidentoalveolar protrusion patients: a retrospective three-dimensional cone beam CT study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:481–488CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nahm KY, Kang JH, Moon SC, Choi YS, Kook YA, Kim SH, Huang J (2012) Alveolar bone loss around incisors in Class I bidentoalveolar protrusion patients: a retrospective three-dimensional cone beam CT study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:481–488CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Ono A, Motoyoshi M, Shimizu N (2008) Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:334–340CrossRefPubMed Ono A, Motoyoshi M, Shimizu N (2008) Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:334–340CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D (2013) Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143:190–196CrossRefPubMed Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec-Cakan D (2013) Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143:190–196CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Park J, Cho HJ (2009) Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136(314):e1–12 Park J, Cho HJ (2009) Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136(314):e1–12
27.
go back to reference Park JH, Hong JY, Ahn HW, Kim SJ (2018) Correlation between periodontal soft tissue and hard tissue surrounding incisors in skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod 88:91–99CrossRefPubMed Park JH, Hong JY, Ahn HW, Kim SJ (2018) Correlation between periodontal soft tissue and hard tissue surrounding incisors in skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod 88:91–99CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Rossi M, Bruno G, De Stefani A, Perri A, Graccco A (2017) Quantitative CBCT evaluation of maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and density variability for orthodontic miniplate placement. Int Orthod 15:610–624PubMed Rossi M, Bruno G, De Stefani A, Perri A, Graccco A (2017) Quantitative CBCT evaluation of maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness and density variability for orthodontic miniplate placement. Int Orthod 15:610–624PubMed
29.
go back to reference Schwartz-Dabney CL, Dechow PC (2003) Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 120:252–277CrossRefPubMed Schwartz-Dabney CL, Dechow PC (2003) Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 120:252–277CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH (2010) Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:100–108CrossRef Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH (2010) Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:100–108CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, Miller AJ (2009) Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:491–500CrossRefPubMed Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, Maki K, Gansky SA, Hatcher D, Miller AJ (2009) Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:491–500CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, Tjellström A (1991) Relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6:442–447PubMed Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, Tjellström A (1991) Relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6:442–447PubMed
33.
go back to reference Usui T, Uematsu S, Kanegae H, Morimoto T, Kurihara S (2007) Change in maximum occlusal force in association with maxillofacial growth. Orthod Craniofac Res 10:226–234CrossRefPubMed Usui T, Uematsu S, Kanegae H, Morimoto T, Kurihara S (2007) Change in maximum occlusal force in association with maxillofacial growth. Orthod Craniofac Res 10:226–234CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Van Essen NL, Anderson IA, Hunter PJ, Carman J, Clarke RD, Pullan AJ (2005) Anatomically based modelling of the human skull and jaw. Cells Tissues Organs 180:44–53CrossRefPubMed Van Essen NL, Anderson IA, Hunter PJ, Carman J, Clarke RD, Pullan AJ (2005) Anatomically based modelling of the human skull and jaw. Cells Tissues Organs 180:44–53CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Weinmann J, Sicher H (1955) Bone and bones, 2nd edn. C. V. Mosby, St Louis Weinmann J, Sicher H (1955) Bone and bones, 2nd edn. C. V. Mosby, St Louis
36.
go back to reference Yagci A, Veli I, Uysal T, Ucar FI, Ozer T, Enhos S (2012) Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. angle Orthod 82:67–74CrossRefPubMed Yagci A, Veli I, Uysal T, Ucar FI, Ozer T, Enhos S (2012) Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. angle Orthod 82:67–74CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Relationship between alveolar bone thickness, tooth root morphology, and sagittal skeletal pattern
A cone beam computed tomography study
Authors
İpek Coşkun, DDS, PhD
Associate Professor Dr. Burçak Kaya, DDS, PhD
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Medizin
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00175-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2019 Go to the issue

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO