Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs & Aging 1/2022

01-01-2022 | Insulins | Review Article

Clinical Considerations for Insulin Therapy in Older Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Authors: Gunjan Y. Gandhi, Arshag D. Mooradian

Published in: Drugs & Aging | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes represents an autoimmune condition with a strong inherited background, and its incidence is increasing worldwide. About 25% of such cases are diagnosed in adulthood, some even as late as the ninth decade of life. The number of older adults with type 1 diabetes is increasing due to improvements in care and decreased mortality rate. However, there is a lack of clinical trials in people older than 70 years of age with type 1 diabetes complicated with comorbidities, frailty, and dependency. The management of type 1 diabetes and the goals of therapy should be individualized based on the patient's health status and life expectancy. In healthier older adults, insulin treatment regimens (multiple daily insulin injections or insulin pump therapy) that approximate the normal physiology of insulin secretion should be used to achieve lower glycemic goals, while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia with frequent glucose monitoring (preferably using continuous glucose monitoring systems). For frail individuals with poor health, simpler insulin regimens and less stringent glycemic targets would be more appropriate. Poor cognition, vision and hearing, impaired mobility, depression, and chronic pain can interfere with complex insulin regimens. In these individuals, the principal goals of therapy are to reduce the acute effects of hyperglycemia, minimize hypoglycemia risk, and optimize quality of life. The newer insulin preparations and technological advances in insulin delivery and blood glucose monitoring have enhanced the management of type 1 diabetes in all age groups.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Sinclair AJ, Dunning T, Dhatariya K. Clinical guidelines for type 1 diabetes mellitus with an emphasis on older adults: an executive summary. Diabet Med. 2020;37(1):53–70.PubMedCrossRef Sinclair AJ, Dunning T, Dhatariya K. Clinical guidelines for type 1 diabetes mellitus with an emphasis on older adults: an executive summary. Diabet Med. 2020;37(1):53–70.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Adults O. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S168–79. Adults O. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S168–79.
6.
go back to reference LeRoith D, Biessels GJ, Braithwaite SS, Casanueva FF, Draznin B, Halter JB, et al. Treatment of diabetes in older adults: an Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(5):1520–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef LeRoith D, Biessels GJ, Braithwaite SS, Casanueva FF, Draznin B, Halter JB, et al. Treatment of diabetes in older adults: an Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(5):1520–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S15-s33. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S15-s33.
8.
go back to reference Chiang JL, Kirkman MS, Laffel LM, Peters AL. Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(7):2034–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chiang JL, Kirkman MS, Laffel LM, Peters AL. Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(7):2034–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Villareal DT, Banks M, Siener C, Sinacore DR, Klein S. Physical frailty and body composition in obese elderly men and women. Obes Res. 2004;12(6):913–20.PubMedCrossRef Villareal DT, Banks M, Siener C, Sinacore DR, Klein S. Physical frailty and body composition in obese elderly men and women. Obes Res. 2004;12(6):913–20.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Miller SL, Wolfe RR. The danger of weight loss in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12(7):487–91.PubMedCrossRef Miller SL, Wolfe RR. The danger of weight loss in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12(7):487–91.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shapses SA, Riedt CS. Bone, body weight, and weight reduction: what are the concerns? J Nutr. 2006;136(6):1453–6.PubMedCrossRef Shapses SA, Riedt CS. Bone, body weight, and weight reduction: what are the concerns? J Nutr. 2006;136(6):1453–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Buman MP, Hekler EB, Haskell WL, Pruitt L, Conway TL, Cain KL, et al. Objective light-intensity physical activity associations with rated health in older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(10):1155–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Buman MP, Hekler EB, Haskell WL, Pruitt L, Conway TL, Cain KL, et al. Objective light-intensity physical activity associations with rated health in older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(10):1155–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Weight gain associated with intensive therapy in the diabetes control and complications trial. The DCCT Research Group. Diabetes Care. 1988;11(7):567–73. Weight gain associated with intensive therapy in the diabetes control and complications trial. The DCCT Research Group. Diabetes Care. 1988;11(7):567–73.
14.
go back to reference Zoffmann V, Vistisen D, Due-Christensen M. A cross-sectional study of glycaemic control, complications and psychosocial functioning among 18- to 35-year-old adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2014;31(4):493–9.PubMedCrossRef Zoffmann V, Vistisen D, Due-Christensen M. A cross-sectional study of glycaemic control, complications and psychosocial functioning among 18- to 35-year-old adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2014;31(4):493–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hamann A, Matthaei S, Rosak C, Silvestre L. A randomized clinical trial comparing breakfast, dinner, or bedtime administration of insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1738–44.PubMedCrossRef Hamann A, Matthaei S, Rosak C, Silvestre L. A randomized clinical trial comparing breakfast, dinner, or bedtime administration of insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1738–44.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Plank J, Bodenlenz M, Sinner F, Magnes C, Görzer E, Regittnig W, et al. A double-blind, randomized, dose-response study investigating the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the long-acting insulin analog detemir. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(5):1107–12.PubMedCrossRef Plank J, Bodenlenz M, Sinner F, Magnes C, Görzer E, Regittnig W, et al. A double-blind, randomized, dose-response study investigating the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the long-acting insulin analog detemir. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(5):1107–12.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Ashoor HM, Antony J, Beyene J, Veroniki AA, Isaranuwatchai W, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of long acting versus intermediate acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g5459.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tricco AC, Ashoor HM, Antony J, Beyene J, Veroniki AA, Isaranuwatchai W, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of long acting versus intermediate acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g5459.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Singh SR, Ahmad F, Lal A, Yu C, Bai Z, Bennett H. Efficacy and safety of insulin analogues for the management of diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2009;180(4):385–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Singh SR, Ahmad F, Lal A, Yu C, Bai Z, Bennett H. Efficacy and safety of insulin analogues for the management of diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2009;180(4):385–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jonassen I, Havelund S, Hoeg-Jensen T, Steensgaard DB, Wahlund PO, Ribel U. Design of the novel protraction mechanism of insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting basal insulin. Pharm Res. 2012;29(8):2104–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jonassen I, Havelund S, Hoeg-Jensen T, Steensgaard DB, Wahlund PO, Ribel U. Design of the novel protraction mechanism of insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting basal insulin. Pharm Res. 2012;29(8):2104–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Heller S, Buse J, Fisher M, Garg S, Marre M, Merker L, et al. Insulin degludec, an ultra-longacting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (BEGIN Basal-Bolus Type 1): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9825):1489–97.PubMedCrossRef Heller S, Buse J, Fisher M, Garg S, Marre M, Merker L, et al. Insulin degludec, an ultra-longacting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (BEGIN Basal-Bolus Type 1): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9825):1489–97.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mathieu C, Hollander P, Miranda-Palma B, Cooper J, Franek E, Russell-Jones D, et al. Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec in a flexible dosing regimen vs insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes (BEGIN: Flex T1): a 26-week randomized, treat-to-target trial with a 26-week extension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):1154–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mathieu C, Hollander P, Miranda-Palma B, Cooper J, Franek E, Russell-Jones D, et al. Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec in a flexible dosing regimen vs insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes (BEGIN: Flex T1): a 26-week randomized, treat-to-target trial with a 26-week extension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):1154–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lane W, Bailey TS, Gerety G, Gumprecht J, Philis-Tsimikas A, Hansen CT, et al. Effect of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine u100 on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: the SWITCH 1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(1):33–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lane W, Bailey TS, Gerety G, Gumprecht J, Philis-Tsimikas A, Hansen CT, et al. Effect of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine u100 on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: the SWITCH 1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(1):33–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Holleman F, van den Brand JJ, Hoven RA, van der Linden JM, van der Tweel I, Hoekstra JB, et al. Comparison of LysB28, ProB29-human insulin analog and regular human insulin in the correction of incidental hyperglycemia. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(12):1426–9.PubMedCrossRef Holleman F, van den Brand JJ, Hoven RA, van der Linden JM, van der Tweel I, Hoekstra JB, et al. Comparison of LysB28, ProB29-human insulin analog and regular human insulin in the correction of incidental hyperglycemia. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(12):1426–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Raskin P, Guthrie RA, Leiter L, Riis A, Jovanovic L. Use of insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, as the mealtime insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(5):583–8.PubMedCrossRef Raskin P, Guthrie RA, Leiter L, Riis A, Jovanovic L. Use of insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, as the mealtime insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(5):583–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rave K, Klein O, Frick AD, Becker RH. Advantage of premeal-injected insulin glulisine compared with regular human insulin in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1812–7.PubMedCrossRef Rave K, Klein O, Frick AD, Becker RH. Advantage of premeal-injected insulin glulisine compared with regular human insulin in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1812–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fullerton B, Siebenhofer A, Jeitler K, Horvath K, Semlitsch T, Berghold A, et al. Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(6):Cd012161.PubMedCentral Fullerton B, Siebenhofer A, Jeitler K, Horvath K, Semlitsch T, Berghold A, et al. Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(6):Cd012161.PubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference An inhaled insulin (Afrezza). JAMA. 2015;313(21):2176–7. An inhaled insulin (Afrezza). JAMA. 2015;313(21):2176–7.
28.
go back to reference Hermansen K, Fontaine P, Kukolja KK, Peterkova V, Leth G, Gall MA. Insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin aspart) versus traditional human insulins (NPH insulin and regular human insulin) in basal-bolus therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004;47(4):622–9.PubMedCrossRef Hermansen K, Fontaine P, Kukolja KK, Peterkova V, Leth G, Gall MA. Insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin aspart) versus traditional human insulins (NPH insulin and regular human insulin) in basal-bolus therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004;47(4):622–9.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bantle JP, Neal L, Frankamp LM. Effects of the anatomical region used for insulin injections on glycemia in type I diabetes subjects. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(12):1592–7.PubMedCrossRef Bantle JP, Neal L, Frankamp LM. Effects of the anatomical region used for insulin injections on glycemia in type I diabetes subjects. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(12):1592–7.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Galloway JA, Spradlin CT, Nelson RL, Wentworth SM, Davidson JA, Swarner JL. Factors influencing the absorption, serum insulin concentration, and blood glucose responses after injections of regular insulin and various insulin mixtures. Diabetes Care. 1981;4(3):366–76.PubMedCrossRef Galloway JA, Spradlin CT, Nelson RL, Wentworth SM, Davidson JA, Swarner JL. Factors influencing the absorption, serum insulin concentration, and blood glucose responses after injections of regular insulin and various insulin mixtures. Diabetes Care. 1981;4(3):366–76.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Henriksen JE, Vaag A, Hansen IR, Lauritzen M, Djurhuus MS, Beck-Nielsen H. Absorption of NPH (isophane) insulin in resting diabetic patients: evidence for subcutaneous injection in the thigh as the preferred site. Diabet Med. 1991;8(5):453–7.PubMedCrossRef Henriksen JE, Vaag A, Hansen IR, Lauritzen M, Djurhuus MS, Beck-Nielsen H. Absorption of NPH (isophane) insulin in resting diabetic patients: evidence for subcutaneous injection in the thigh as the preferred site. Diabet Med. 1991;8(5):453–7.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Koivisto VA, Felig P. Alterations in insulin absorption and in blood glucose control associated with varying insulin injection sites in diabetic patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(1):59–61.PubMedCrossRef Koivisto VA, Felig P. Alterations in insulin absorption and in blood glucose control associated with varying insulin injection sites in diabetic patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(1):59–61.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Henriksen JE, Djurhuus MS, Vaag A, Thye-Rønn P, Knudsen D, Hother-Nielsen O, et al. Impact of injection sites for soluble insulin on glycaemic control in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients treated with a multiple insulin injection regimen. Diabetologia. 1993;36(8):752–8.PubMedCrossRef Henriksen JE, Djurhuus MS, Vaag A, Thye-Rønn P, Knudsen D, Hother-Nielsen O, et al. Impact of injection sites for soluble insulin on glycaemic control in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients treated with a multiple insulin injection regimen. Diabetologia. 1993;36(8):752–8.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Sindelka G, Heinemann L, Berger M, Frenck W, Chantelau E. Effect of insulin concentration, subcutaneous fat thickness and skin temperature on subcutaneous insulin absorption in healthy subjects. Diabetologia. 1994;37(4):377–80.PubMedCrossRef Sindelka G, Heinemann L, Berger M, Frenck W, Chantelau E. Effect of insulin concentration, subcutaneous fat thickness and skin temperature on subcutaneous insulin absorption in healthy subjects. Diabetologia. 1994;37(4):377–80.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kalra S, Mithal A, Sahay R, John M, Unnikrishnan AG, Saboo B, et al. Indian injection technique study: population characteristics and injection practices. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(3):637–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kalra S, Mithal A, Sahay R, John M, Unnikrishnan AG, Saboo B, et al. Indian injection technique study: population characteristics and injection practices. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(3):637–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Messer LH, Berget C, Forlenza GP. A clinical guide to advanced diabetes devices and closed-loop systems using the CARES Paradigm. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(8):462–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Messer LH, Berget C, Forlenza GP. A clinical guide to advanced diabetes devices and closed-loop systems using the CARES Paradigm. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(8):462–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Weiss R, Garg SK, Bode BW, Bailey TS, Ahmann AJ, Schultz KA, et al. Hypoglycemia reduction and changes in hemoglobin A1c in the ASPIRE in-home study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(8):542–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Weiss R, Garg SK, Bode BW, Bailey TS, Ahmann AJ, Schultz KA, et al. Hypoglycemia reduction and changes in hemoglobin A1c in the ASPIRE in-home study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17(8):542–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Forlenza GP, Li Z, Buckingham BA, Pinsker JE, Cengiz E, Wadwa RP, et al. Predictive low-glucose suspend reduces hypoglycemia in adults, adolescents, and children with type 1 diabetes in an at-home randomized crossover study: Results of the PROLOG Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(10):2155–61.PubMedCrossRef Forlenza GP, Li Z, Buckingham BA, Pinsker JE, Cengiz E, Wadwa RP, et al. Predictive low-glucose suspend reduces hypoglycemia in adults, adolescents, and children with type 1 diabetes in an at-home randomized crossover study: Results of the PROLOG Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(10):2155–61.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Choudhary P, Olsen BS, Conget I, Welsh JB, Vorrink L, Shin JJ. Hypoglycemia prevention and user acceptance of an insulin pump system with predictive low glucose management. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(5):288–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Choudhary P, Olsen BS, Conget I, Welsh JB, Vorrink L, Shin JJ. Hypoglycemia prevention and user acceptance of an insulin pump system with predictive low glucose management. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(5):288–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Weisman A, Bai JW, Cardinez M, Kramer CK, Perkins BA. Effect of artificial pancreas systems on glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(7):501–12.PubMedCrossRef Weisman A, Bai JW, Cardinez M, Kramer CK, Perkins BA. Effect of artificial pancreas systems on glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(7):501–12.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bergenstal RM, Garg S, Weinzimer SA, Buckingham BA, Bode BW, Tamborlane WV, et al. Safety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1407–8.PubMedCrossRef Bergenstal RM, Garg S, Weinzimer SA, Buckingham BA, Bode BW, Tamborlane WV, et al. Safety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA. 2016;316(13):1407–8.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Garg SK, Weinzimer SA, Tamborlane WV, Buckingham BA, Bode BW, Bailey TS, et al. Glucose outcomes with the in-home use of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19(3):155–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Garg SK, Weinzimer SA, Tamborlane WV, Buckingham BA, Bode BW, Bailey TS, et al. Glucose outcomes with the in-home use of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19(3):155–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Bekiari E, Kitsios K, Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Athanasiadou E, Karagiannis T, et al. Artificial pancreas treatment for outpatients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;361:k1310.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bekiari E, Kitsios K, Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Athanasiadou E, Karagiannis T, et al. Artificial pancreas treatment for outpatients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;361:k1310.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Reznik Y, Cohen O, Aronson R, Conget I, Runzis S, Castaneda J, et al. Insulin pump treatment compared with multiple daily injections for treatment of type 2 diabetes (OpT2mise): a randomised open-label controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9950):1265–72.PubMedCrossRef Reznik Y, Cohen O, Aronson R, Conget I, Runzis S, Castaneda J, et al. Insulin pump treatment compared with multiple daily injections for treatment of type 2 diabetes (OpT2mise): a randomised open-label controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9950):1265–72.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Briganti EM, Summers JC, Fitzgerald ZA, Lambers LNJ, Cohen ND. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion can be used effectively and safely in older patients with type 1 diabetes: long-term follow-up. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(11):783–6.PubMedCrossRef Briganti EM, Summers JC, Fitzgerald ZA, Lambers LNJ, Cohen ND. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion can be used effectively and safely in older patients with type 1 diabetes: long-term follow-up. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(11):783–6.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Herman WH, Ilag LL, Johnson SL, Martin CL, Sinding J, Al Harthi A, et al. A clinical trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(7):1568–73.PubMedCrossRef Herman WH, Ilag LL, Johnson SL, Martin CL, Sinding J, Al Harthi A, et al. A clinical trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(7):1568–73.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Johnson SL, McEwen LN, Newton CA, Martin CL, Raskin P, Halter JB, et al. The impact of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections of insulin on glucose variability in older adults with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2011;25(4):211–5.CrossRef Johnson SL, McEwen LN, Newton CA, Martin CL, Raskin P, Halter JB, et al. The impact of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections of insulin on glucose variability in older adults with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2011;25(4):211–5.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Matejko B, Cyganek K, Katra B, Galicka-Latala D, Grzanka M, Malecki MT, et al. Insulin pump therapy is equally effective and safe in elderly and young type 1 diabetes patients. Rev Diabet Stud. 2011;8(2):254–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Matejko B, Cyganek K, Katra B, Galicka-Latala D, Grzanka M, Malecki MT, et al. Insulin pump therapy is equally effective and safe in elderly and young type 1 diabetes patients. Rev Diabet Stud. 2011;8(2):254–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Argento NB, Liu J, Hughes AS, McAuliffe-Fogarty AH. Impact of medicare continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion policies in patients with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020;14(2):257–61.PubMedCrossRef Argento NB, Liu J, Hughes AS, McAuliffe-Fogarty AH. Impact of medicare continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion policies in patients with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020;14(2):257–61.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Stephens EA, Heffner J. Evaluating older patients with diabetes for insulin pump therapy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12(Suppl 1):S91–7.PubMedCrossRef Stephens EA, Heffner J. Evaluating older patients with diabetes for insulin pump therapy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12(Suppl 1):S91–7.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Munshi MN, Slyne C, Greenberg JM, Greaves T, Lee A, Carl S, et al. Nonadherence to insulin therapy detected by bluetooth-enabled pen cap is associated with poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(6):1129–31.PubMedCrossRef Munshi MN, Slyne C, Greenberg JM, Greaves T, Lee A, Carl S, et al. Nonadherence to insulin therapy detected by bluetooth-enabled pen cap is associated with poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(6):1129–31.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Peyrot M, Barnett AH, Meneghini LF, Schumm-Draeger PM. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational global attitudes of patients and physicians in insulin therapy study. Diabet Med. 2012;29(5):682–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Peyrot M, Barnett AH, Meneghini LF, Schumm-Draeger PM. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational global attitudes of patients and physicians in insulin therapy study. Diabet Med. 2012;29(5):682–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Tauschmann M, Hovorka R. Insulin pump therapy in youth with type 1 diabetes: toward closed-loop systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11(6):943–55.PubMedCrossRef Tauschmann M, Hovorka R. Insulin pump therapy in youth with type 1 diabetes: toward closed-loop systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11(6):943–55.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Vigersky R, Shrivastav M. Role of continuous glucose monitoring for type 2 in diabetes management and research. J Diabetes Complicat. 2017;31(1):280–7.CrossRef Vigersky R, Shrivastav M. Role of continuous glucose monitoring for type 2 in diabetes management and research. J Diabetes Complicat. 2017;31(1):280–7.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Klonoff DC, Buckingham B, Christiansen JS, Montori VM, Tamborlane WV, Vigersky RA, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(10):2968–79.PubMedCrossRef Klonoff DC, Buckingham B, Christiansen JS, Montori VM, Tamborlane WV, Vigersky RA, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(10):2968–79.PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(4):371–8.PubMedCrossRef Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(4):371–8.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Ruedy KJ, Parkin CG, Riddlesworth TD, Graham C. Continuous glucose monitoring in older adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using multiple daily injections of insulin: results from the DIAMOND trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(6):1138–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ruedy KJ, Parkin CG, Riddlesworth TD, Graham C. Continuous glucose monitoring in older adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using multiple daily injections of insulin: results from the DIAMOND trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(6):1138–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Mattishent K, Loke YK. Detection of asymptomatic drug-induced hypoglycemia using continuous glucose monitoring in older people—systematic review. J Diabetes Complicat. 2018;32(8):805–12.CrossRef Mattishent K, Loke YK. Detection of asymptomatic drug-induced hypoglycemia using continuous glucose monitoring in older people—systematic review. J Diabetes Complicat. 2018;32(8):805–12.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Polonsky WH, Peters AL, Hessler D. The impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients 65 years and older. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10(4):892–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Polonsky WH, Peters AL, Hessler D. The impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients 65 years and older. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10(4):892–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Litchman ML, Allen NA. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring facilitates feelings of safety in older adults with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(5):988–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Litchman ML, Allen NA. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring facilitates feelings of safety in older adults with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(5):988–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Argento NB, Nakamura K. Personal real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients 65 years and older. Endocr Pract. 2014;20(12):1297–302.PubMedCrossRef Argento NB, Nakamura K. Personal real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients 65 years and older. Endocr Pract. 2014;20(12):1297–302.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Toschi E, Munshi MN. Benefits and challenges of diabetes technology use in older adults. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2020;49(1):57–67.CrossRef Toschi E, Munshi MN. Benefits and challenges of diabetes technology use in older adults. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2020;49(1):57–67.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Pratley RE, Kanapka LG, Rickels MR, Ahmann A, Aleppo G, Beck R, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(23):2397–406.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pratley RE, Kanapka LG, Rickels MR, Ahmann A, Aleppo G, Beck R, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(23):2397–406.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Fiallo-Scharer R, Cheng J, Beck RW, Buckingham BA, Chase HP, Kollman C, et al. Factors predictive of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: analysis from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized control trial dataset. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(3):586–90.PubMedCrossRef Fiallo-Scharer R, Cheng J, Beck RW, Buckingham BA, Chase HP, Kollman C, et al. Factors predictive of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: analysis from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized control trial dataset. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(3):586–90.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Laiteerapong N, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Moffet HH, Sudore R, Schillinger D, et al. Correlates of quality of life in older adults with diabetes: the diabetes & aging study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(8):1749–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Laiteerapong N, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Moffet HH, Sudore R, Schillinger D, et al. Correlates of quality of life in older adults with diabetes: the diabetes & aging study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(8):1749–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Lee PG, Cigolle C, Blaum C. The co-occurrence of chronic diseases and geriatric syndromes: the health and retirement study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(3):511–6.PubMedCrossRef Lee PG, Cigolle C, Blaum C. The co-occurrence of chronic diseases and geriatric syndromes: the health and retirement study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(3):511–6.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Valencia WM, Botros D, Vera-Nunez M, Dang S. Diabetes Treatment in the Elderly: Incorporating Geriatrics, Technology, and Functional Medicine. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(10):95.PubMedCrossRef Valencia WM, Botros D, Vera-Nunez M, Dang S. Diabetes Treatment in the Elderly: Incorporating Geriatrics, Technology, and Functional Medicine. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(10):95.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical Considerations for Insulin Therapy in Older Adults with Type 1 Diabetes
Authors
Gunjan Y. Gandhi
Arshag D. Mooradian
Publication date
01-01-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs & Aging / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1170-229X
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1969
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-021-00900-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Drugs & Aging 1/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.