Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Editorial

An application of meta-analysis based on DerSimonian and Laird method

Authors: Brandon J. George, PhD, Inmaculada B. Aban, PhD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

In this issue, Elgendy et al discuss their findings from a meta-analysis of 22 studies that examined the clinical use of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in situations not covered by the appropriate use criteria (AUC) put forth by the American College of Cardiology (ACC). In particular, the authors were interested in whether the inappropriate use of MPI resulted in different detection rates of cardiac ischemia or other abnormal findings compared to MPI used according to AUC.1
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elgendy IY, Mahmoud A, Shuster JJ, Doukky R, Winchester DE. Outcomes after inappropriate nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015. doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0240-2. Elgendy IY, Mahmoud A, Shuster JJ, Doukky R, Winchester DE. Outcomes after inappropriate nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging: A meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015. doi:10.​1007/​s12350-015-0240-2.
2.
go back to reference Sutton A. Publication bias. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 435-52. Sutton A. Publication bias. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 435-52.
4.
go back to reference Shadish WR, Haddock CK. Combining estimates of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 257-77. Shadish WR, Haddock CK. Combining estimates of effect size. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 257-77.
5.
6.
go back to reference Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] Version 5.3. (2014) Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] Version 5.3. (2014) Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration
7.
go back to reference Jackson D, Bowden J, Baker R. How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare to its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts? J Stat Plan Inference 2010;140:961-70.CrossRef Jackson D, Bowden J, Baker R. How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare to its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts? J Stat Plan Inference 2010;140:961-70.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hamza TH, van Houwelingen HC, Stijnen T. The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:41-51.CrossRefPubMed Hamza TH, van Houwelingen HC, Stijnen T. The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:41-51.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference IntHout J, Ionnidis JPA, Borm GF. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral IntHout J, Ionnidis JPA, Borm GF. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;28:105-14.CrossRefPubMed DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;28:105-14.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
An application of meta-analysis based on DerSimonian and Laird method
Authors
Brandon J. George, PhD
Inmaculada B. Aban, PhD
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0249-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2016 Go to the issue