Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 1/2024

Open Access 19-10-2023 | Migraine | Original Research

One-Year Consistent Safety, Utilization, and Efficacy Assessment of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for Migraine Treatment

Authors: Andrea Synowiec, Alit Stark-Inbar, Maya Weinstein, Alon Ironi, Alexander Mauskop

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder causing severe pain and disability in more than a billion people worldwide. Ideal treatment should provide long-term efficacy with minimal side effects. Previous studies indicate that remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is an efficacious and safe treatment option for the acute treatment of migraine in clinical practice. This study examined long-term safety, utilization, and efficacy of REN during 12 consecutive usage months.

Methods

Data from patients with migraine across the USA using REN to treat their migraine attacks were electronically collected from the Nerivio® device. All patients who used REN during 12 consecutive months were included, and data were compared across months. Safety was assessed by the number and type of adverse events. Utilization was measured by the number of monthly treatments. Efficacy was evaluated as consistent change in headache pain intensity, functional disability, and disappearance of associated symptoms from baseline to 2 h post treatment.

Results

Data were analyzed from 409 people living with migraine who treated with REN for 12 consecutive months, performing a total of 39,531 treatments. The incidence of device-related adverse events (dAEs) was 1.96% (8/409), including two negligible (0.49%), five mild (1.22%), one moderate (0.24%), and no severe events. All patients continued treatment with REN despite dAEs. One-year average monthly utilization was 8.05 treatments (SD 1.15). Month-to-month utilization did not change during 12 months of consecutive use [F(4.895, 1997.204) = 2.014, p = 0.075, repeated-measures ANOVA]. One-year average efficacy showed 74.1% of users reported consistent 2-h pain relief, and 26.0% reported consistent pain freedom. Month-to-month pain relief and pain freedom did not change during 12 months of consecutive use [F(11, 1069) = 0.55, p = 0.873 and F(11, 1295) = 0.69, p = 0.750 respectively; generalized linear mixed model analysis].

Conclusion

REN is a safe and well-tolerated acute migraine treatment, with stable efficacy and utilization over 1 year, making it an advantageous non-drug option for the long-term management of this chronic disease.

Trial Registration Number

NCT05760638.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1–211. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1–211.
2.
go back to reference Munjal S, Singh P, Reed ML, et al. Most bothersome symptom in persons with migraine: results from the Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) Study. Headache. 2020;60:416–29. Munjal S, Singh P, Reed ML, et al. Most bothersome symptom in persons with migraine: results from the Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) Study. Headache. 2020;60:416–29.
3.
go back to reference Burch R, Rizzoli P, Loder E. The prevalence and impact of migraine and severe headache in the United States: updated age, sex, and socioeconomic-specific estimates from government health surveys. Headache. 2021;61:60–8.PubMedCrossRef Burch R, Rizzoli P, Loder E. The prevalence and impact of migraine and severe headache in the United States: updated age, sex, and socioeconomic-specific estimates from government health surveys. Headache. 2021;61:60–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Law H-Z, Chung MH, Nissan G, Janis JE, Amirlak B. Hospital burden of migraine in United States adults: a 15-year national inpatient sample analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e2790.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Law H-Z, Chung MH, Nissan G, Janis JE, Amirlak B. Hospital burden of migraine in United States adults: a 15-year national inpatient sample analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e2790.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Burch RC, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Migraine: epidemiology, burden, and comorbidity. Neurol Clin. 2019;37:631–49.PubMedCrossRef Burch RC, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Migraine: epidemiology, burden, and comorbidity. Neurol Clin. 2019;37:631–49.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goadsby PJ, Sprenger T. Current practice and future directions in the prevention and acute management of migraine. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:285–98.PubMedCrossRef Goadsby PJ, Sprenger T. Current practice and future directions in the prevention and acute management of migraine. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:285–98.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Diener HC, Limmroth V. Medication-overuse headache: a worldwide problem. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:475–83.PubMedCrossRef Diener HC, Limmroth V. Medication-overuse headache: a worldwide problem. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:475–83.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Overuse of acute migraine medications and migraine chronification. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009;13:301–7. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Overuse of acute migraine medications and migraine chronification. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2009;13:301–7.
9.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Cady R, Buse DC. Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine is associated with new-onset chronic migraine. Neurology. 2015;84:688–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Cady R, Buse DC. Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine is associated with new-onset chronic migraine. Neurology. 2015;84:688–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68:343–9.PubMedCrossRef Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68:343–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ailani J, Rabany L, Tamir S, Ironi A, Starling A. Real-world analysis of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for the acute treatment of migraine. Front Pain Res. 2022;2: 753736.CrossRef Ailani J, Rabany L, Tamir S, Ironi A, Starling A. Real-world analysis of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for the acute treatment of migraine. Front Pain Res. 2022;2: 753736.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leroux E, Buchanan A, Lombard L, et al. Evaluation of patients with insufficient efficacy and/or tolerability to triptans for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic literature review. Adv Ther. 2020;37:4765–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Leroux E, Buchanan A, Lombard L, et al. Evaluation of patients with insufficient efficacy and/or tolerability to triptans for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic literature review. Adv Ther. 2020;37:4765–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS, Board of Directors of the American Headache Society. The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2022;62(1):111–12. Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS, Board of Directors of the American Headache Society. The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2022;62(1):111–12.
14.
go back to reference Alam A, Munjal S, Reed M, et al. Triptan use and discontinuation in a representative sample of persons with migraine: results from Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) Study (P4.10-019). Neurology. 2019;92:P4.10-019. Alam A, Munjal S, Reed M, et al. Triptan use and discontinuation in a representative sample of persons with migraine: results from Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) Study (P4.10-019). Neurology. 2019;92:P4.10-019.
15.
go back to reference Tepper DE. Migraine in children. Headache. 2017;57:1021–2. Tepper DE. Migraine in children. Headache. 2017;57:1021–2.
16.
go back to reference Ferrari A, Baraldi C, Sternieri E. Medication overuse and chronic migraine: a critical review according to clinical pharmacology. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015;11:1127–44.PubMedCrossRef Ferrari A, Baraldi C, Sternieri E. Medication overuse and chronic migraine: a critical review according to clinical pharmacology. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015;11:1127–44.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tepper SJ. Medication-overuse headache. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2012;18:807–22. Tepper SJ. Medication-overuse headache. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2012;18:807–22.
18.
go back to reference Vandenbussche N, Laterza D, Lisicki M, et al. Medication-overuse headache: a widely recognized entity amidst ongoing debate. J Headache Pain. 2018;19:50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Vandenbussche N, Laterza D, Lisicki M, et al. Medication-overuse headache: a widely recognized entity amidst ongoing debate. J Headache Pain. 2018;19:50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mohajer A, Harris L, Keller K, et al. Migraine patients exhibit risk of medication overuse headache with sustained triptan treatment—results from a large-scale real-world claims analysis (2408). Neurology. 2021;96:2408.CrossRef Mohajer A, Harris L, Keller K, et al. Migraine patients exhibit risk of medication overuse headache with sustained triptan treatment—results from a large-scale real-world claims analysis (2408). Neurology. 2021;96:2408.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Oskoui M, Pringsheim T, Holler-Managan Y, et al. Practice guideline update summary: acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society. Headache. 2019;59:1158–73. Oskoui M, Pringsheim T, Holler-Managan Y, et al. Practice guideline update summary: acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society. Headache. 2019;59:1158–73.
22.
go back to reference Esparham A, Stark-Inbar A, Jekel L, et al. Acute treatment of migraine in adolescents: real-world analysis of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN). Pediatr Neurol. 2023;142:51–5.PubMedCrossRef Esparham A, Stark-Inbar A, Jekel L, et al. Acute treatment of migraine in adolescents: real-world analysis of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN). Pediatr Neurol. 2023;142:51–5.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Peretz A, Stark-Inbar A, Harris D, et al. Safety of remote electrical neuromodulation for acute migraine treatment in pregnant women: a retrospective controlled survey-study. Headache. 2023;63(7):968–70. Peretz A, Stark-Inbar A, Harris D, et al. Safety of remote electrical neuromodulation for acute migraine treatment in pregnant women: a retrospective controlled survey-study. Headache. 2023;63(7):968–70.
24.
go back to reference Messali AJ, Yang M, Gillard P, et al. Treatment persistence and switching in triptan users: a systematic literature review. Headache. 2014;54:1120–30. Messali AJ, Yang M, Gillard P, et al. Treatment persistence and switching in triptan users: a systematic literature review. Headache. 2014;54:1120–30.
25.
go back to reference Katić BJ, Krause SJ, Tepper SJ, Hu HX, Bigal ME. Adherence to acute migraine medication: what does it mean, why does it matter? Headache. 2010;50:117–29. Katić BJ, Krause SJ, Tepper SJ, Hu HX, Bigal ME. Adherence to acute migraine medication: what does it mean, why does it matter? Headache. 2010;50:117–29.
26.
go back to reference Babaei M, Rapoport AM. Device profile of Nerivio for the acute and preventive treatment of episodic or chronic migraine in patients 12 years and older. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023;20:433–47.PubMedCrossRef Babaei M, Rapoport AM. Device profile of Nerivio for the acute and preventive treatment of episodic or chronic migraine in patients 12 years and older. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023;20:433–47.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yarnitsky D, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bouhassira D, et al. Recommendations on terminology and practice of psychophysical DNIC testing. Eur J Pain. 2010;14:339–339.PubMedCrossRef Yarnitsky D, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bouhassira D, et al. Recommendations on terminology and practice of psychophysical DNIC testing. Eur J Pain. 2010;14:339–339.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yarnitsky D, Dodick DW, Grosberg BM, et al. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) relieves acute migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Headache. 2019;59:1240–52. Yarnitsky D, Dodick DW, Grosberg BM, et al. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) relieves acute migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Headache. 2019;59:1240–52.
29.
go back to reference Grosberg B, Rabany L, Lin T, et al. Safety and efficacy of remote electrical neuromodulation for the acute treatment of chronic migraine: an open-label study. Pain Rep. 2021;6:e966.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Grosberg B, Rabany L, Lin T, et al. Safety and efficacy of remote electrical neuromodulation for the acute treatment of chronic migraine: an open-label study. Pain Rep. 2021;6:e966.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Nierenburg H, Vieira JR, Lev N, et al. Remote electrical neuromodulation for the acute treatment of migraine in patients with chronic migraine: an open-label pilot study. Pain Ther. 2020;9(2):531–43. Nierenburg H, Vieira JR, Lev N, et al. Remote electrical neuromodulation for the acute treatment of migraine in patients with chronic migraine: an open-label pilot study. Pain Ther. 2020;9(2):531–43.
31.
go back to reference Hershey AD, Lin T, Gruper Y, et al. Remote electrical neuromodulation for acute treatment of migraine in adolescents. Headache. 2021;61(2):310–17. Hershey AD, Lin T, Gruper Y, et al. Remote electrical neuromodulation for acute treatment of migraine in adolescents. Headache. 2021;61(2):310–17.
33.
go back to reference Cowan R, Stark-Inbar A, Rabany L, et al. Clinical benefits and economic cost-savings of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention. J Med Econ. 2023;26:656–64.PubMedCrossRef Cowan R, Stark-Inbar A, Rabany L, et al. Clinical benefits and economic cost-savings of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) for migraine prevention. J Med Econ. 2023;26:656–64.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Tepper SJ, Lin T, Montal T, Ironi A, Dougherty C. Real-world experience with remote electrical neuromodulation in the acute treatment of migraine. Pain Med. 2020;21:3522–9.PubMedCrossRef Tepper SJ, Lin T, Montal T, Ironi A, Dougherty C. Real-world experience with remote electrical neuromodulation in the acute treatment of migraine. Pain Med. 2020;21:3522–9.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Solomon GD, Skobieranda FG, Gragg LA. Quality of life and well-being of headache patients: measurement by the medical outcomes study instrument. Headache. 1993;33:351–8.PubMedCrossRef Solomon GD, Skobieranda FG, Gragg LA. Quality of life and well-being of headache patients: measurement by the medical outcomes study instrument. Headache. 1993;33:351–8.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Hutchinson S, Ailani J, et al. Discontinuation of acute prescription medication for migraine: results from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache. 2019;59:1762–72. Lipton RB, Hutchinson S, Ailani J, et al. Discontinuation of acute prescription medication for migraine: results from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache. 2019;59:1762–72.
38.
go back to reference Dodick D, Martin V. Triptans and CNS side-effects: pharmacokinetic and metabolic mechanisms. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:417–24.PubMedCrossRef Dodick D, Martin V. Triptans and CNS side-effects: pharmacokinetic and metabolic mechanisms. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:417–24.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Whyte CA, Tepper SJ. Adverse effects of medications commonly used in the treatment of migraine. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9:1379–91.PubMedCrossRef Whyte CA, Tepper SJ. Adverse effects of medications commonly used in the treatment of migraine. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9:1379–91.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kim J, Lee J, Shin CM, Lee DH, Park B-J. Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular events due to NSAIDs in the diabetic elderly population. BMJ Open Diab Res Care. 2015;3:e000133.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kim J, Lee J, Shin CM, Lee DH, Park B-J. Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular events due to NSAIDs in the diabetic elderly population. BMJ Open Diab Res Care. 2015;3:e000133.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Tepper SJ. Opioids should not be used in migraine. Headache. 2012;52:30–4. Tepper SJ. Opioids should not be used in migraine. Headache. 2012;52:30–4.
42.
go back to reference Brandes JL, Klise S, Krege JH, et al. Interim results of a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of the long-term safety and efficacy of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine (the GLADIATOR study). Cephalalgia. 2019;39:1343–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Brandes JL, Klise S, Krege JH, et al. Interim results of a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of the long-term safety and efficacy of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine (the GLADIATOR study). Cephalalgia. 2019;39:1343–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Ailani J, Kudrow D, Smith TR, et al. Effects of rimegepant 75 mg on monthly migraine days: a 52-week, open-label extension study [abstract no. P-162]. Headache. 2022;62:139–140. Ailani J, Kudrow D, Smith TR, et al. Effects of rimegepant 75 mg on monthly migraine days: a 52-week, open-label extension study [abstract no. P-162]. Headache. 2022;62:139–140.
44.
go back to reference DeJulio PA, Perese JK, Schuster NM, Oswald JC. Lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine. Pain Manag. 2021;11:437–49.PubMedCrossRef DeJulio PA, Perese JK, Schuster NM, Oswald JC. Lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine. Pain Manag. 2021;11:437–49.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Goadsby PJ, Wietecha LA, Dennehy EB, et al. Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine. Brain. 2019;142:1894–904.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Goadsby PJ, Wietecha LA, Dennehy EB, et al. Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine. Brain. 2019;142:1894–904.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Tassorelli C, Bragg S, Krege JH, et al. Safety findings from CENTURION, a phase 3 consistency study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine. J Headache Pain. 2021;22:132.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tassorelli C, Bragg S, Krege JH, et al. Safety findings from CENTURION, a phase 3 consistency study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine. J Headache Pain. 2021;22:132.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, et al. Once-daily oral atogepant for the long-term preventive treatment of migraine: findings from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial. Headache. 2023;63:79–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ashina M, Tepper SJ, Reuter U, et al. Once-daily oral atogepant for the long-term preventive treatment of migraine: findings from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial. Headache. 2023;63:79–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Kudrow D, Smith TR, et al. Safety and tolerability of rimegepant every other day for preventive treatment of migraine plus as-needed for acute treatment of migraine: results from a 52-week, open-label extension study [abstract no. IOR-09]. Headache. 2022;62(Suppl 1):99. Lipton RB, Kudrow D, Smith TR, et al. Safety and tolerability of rimegepant every other day for preventive treatment of migraine plus as-needed for acute treatment of migraine: results from a 52-week, open-label extension study [abstract no. IOR-09]. Headache. 2022;62(Suppl 1):99.
49.
go back to reference Evers S, Wald S. Effluvium and alopecia associated with monoclonal calcitonin gene-related peptide antibody use. Headache. 2023;63:165–7.PubMedCrossRef Evers S, Wald S. Effluvium and alopecia associated with monoclonal calcitonin gene-related peptide antibody use. Headache. 2023;63:165–7.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Ruiz M, Cocores A, Tosti A, Goadsby PJ, Monteith TS. Alopecia as an emerging adverse event to CGRP monoclonal antibodies: cases series, evaluation of FAERS, and literature review. Cephalalgia. 2023;43:3331024221143538.PubMedCrossRef Ruiz M, Cocores A, Tosti A, Goadsby PJ, Monteith TS. Alopecia as an emerging adverse event to CGRP monoclonal antibodies: cases series, evaluation of FAERS, and literature review. Cephalalgia. 2023;43:3331024221143538.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Woods RH. Alopecia signals associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors in the treatment or prophylaxis of migraine: a pharmacovigilance study. Pharmacotherapy. 2022;42:758–67.PubMedCrossRef Woods RH. Alopecia signals associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors in the treatment or prophylaxis of migraine: a pharmacovigilance study. Pharmacotherapy. 2022;42:758–67.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
One-Year Consistent Safety, Utilization, and Efficacy Assessment of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for Migraine Treatment
Authors
Andrea Synowiec
Alit Stark-Inbar
Maya Weinstein
Alon Ironi
Alexander Mauskop
Publication date
19-10-2023
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02697-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Advances in Therapy 1/2024 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.