Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Epidemiology

Tissue composition of mammographically dense and non-dense breast tissue

Authors: Karthik Ghosh, Kathleen R. Brandt, Carol Reynolds, Christopher G. Scott, V. S. Pankratz, Darren L. Riehle, Wilma L. Lingle, Tonye Odogwu, Derek C. Radisky, Daniel W. Visscher, James N. Ingle, Lynn C. Hartmann, Celine M. Vachon

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer but its underlying biology in healthy women is not well-defined. Using a novel collection of core biopsies from mammographically dense versus non-dense regions of the breasts of healthy women, we examined histologic and molecular differences between these two tissue types. Eligible participants were 40 + years, had a screening mammogram and no prior breast cancer or current endocrine therapy. Mammograms were used to identify dense and non-dense regions and ultrasound-guided core biopsies were performed to obtain tissue from these regions. Quantitative assessment of epithelium, stroma, and fat was performed on dense and non-dense cores. Molecular markers including Ki-67, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) were also assessed for participants who had >0% epithelial area in both dense and non-dense tissue. Signed rank test was used to assess within woman differences in epithelium, stroma and fat between dense and non-dense tissue. Differences in molecular markers (Ki-67, ER, and PR) were analyzed using generalized linear models, adjusting for total epithelial area. Fifty-nine women, mean age 51 years (range: 40–82), were eligible for analyses. Dense tissue was comprised of greater mean areas of epithelium and stroma (1.1 and 9.2 mm2 more, respectively) but less fat (6.0 mm2 less) than non-dense tissue. There were no statistically significant differences in relative expression of Ki-67 (P = 0.82), ER (P = 0.09), or PR (P = 0.96) between dense and non-dense tissue. Consistent with prior reports, we found that mammographically dense areas of the breast differ histologically from non-dense areas, reflected in greater proportions of epithelium and stroma and lesser proportions of fat in the dense compared to non-dense breast tissue. Studies of both epithelial and stromal components are important in understanding the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Tice JA, Bauer S, Browner WS, Cuzick J, Ziv E, Vogel V, Shepherd J, Vachon C, Smith-Bindman R et al (2009) Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:384–398PubMedCrossRef Cummings SR, Tice JA, Bauer S, Browner WS, Cuzick J, Ziv E, Vogel V, Shepherd J, Vachon C, Smith-Bindman R et al (2009) Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:384–398PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K, Scott CG, Maloney SD, Carston MJ, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA (2007) Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:43–49PubMedCrossRef Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K, Scott CG, Maloney SD, Carston MJ, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA (2007) Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:43–49PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S (2010) Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1224–1237 Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S (2010) Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:1224–1237
4.
go back to reference McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6:1159–1169 McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6:1159–1169
5.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL, Lockwood GA, Miller AB (2000) Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Eur J Cancer Prev 1:15–24 Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL, Lockwood GA, Miller AB (2000) Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Eur J Cancer Prev 1:15–24
6.
go back to reference Li T, Sun L, Miller N, Nicklee T, Woo J, Hulse-Smith L, Tsao MS, Khokha R, Martin L, Boyd N (2005) The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:343–349PubMedCrossRef Li T, Sun L, Miller N, Nicklee T, Woo J, Hulse-Smith L, Tsao MS, Khokha R, Martin L, Boyd N (2005) The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:343–349PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hawes D, Downey S, Pearce CL, Bartow S, Wan P, Pike MC, Wu AH (2006) Dense breast stromal tissue shows greatly increased concentration of breast epithelium but no increase in its proliferative activity. Breast Cancer Res 8:R24PubMedCrossRef Hawes D, Downey S, Pearce CL, Bartow S, Wan P, Pike MC, Wu AH (2006) Dense breast stromal tissue shows greatly increased concentration of breast epithelium but no increase in its proliferative activity. Breast Cancer Res 8:R24PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stomper PC, Penetrante RB, Edge SB, Arredondo MA, Blumenson LE, Stewart CC (1996) Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage. Breast Cancer Res Treat 37:229–236PubMedCrossRef Stomper PC, Penetrante RB, Edge SB, Arredondo MA, Blumenson LE, Stewart CC (1996) Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage. Breast Cancer Res Treat 37:229–236PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Alowami S, Troup S, Al-Haddad S, Kirkpatrick I, Watson PH (2003) Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression. Breast Cancer Res 5:R129–R135PubMedCrossRef Alowami S, Troup S, Al-Haddad S, Kirkpatrick I, Watson PH (2003) Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression. Breast Cancer Res 5:R129–R135PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bartow SA, Pathak DR, Mettler FA, Key CR, Pike MC (1995) Breast mammographic pattern: a concatenation of confounding and breast cancer risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 142:813–819PubMed Bartow SA, Pathak DR, Mettler FA, Key CR, Pike MC (1995) Breast mammographic pattern: a concatenation of confounding and breast cancer risk factors. Am J Epidemiol 142:813–819PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lin SJ, Cawson J, Hill P, Haviv I, Jenkins M, Hopper JL, Southey MC, Campbell IG, Thompson EW (2011) Image-guided sampling reveals increased stroma and lower glandular complexity in mammographically dense breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128:505–516PubMedCrossRef Lin SJ, Cawson J, Hill P, Haviv I, Jenkins M, Hopper JL, Southey MC, Campbell IG, Thompson EW (2011) Image-guided sampling reveals increased stroma and lower glandular complexity in mammographically dense breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128:505–516PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian national breast screening study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bright RA, Morrison AS, Brisson J, Burstein NA, Sadowsky NS, Kopans DB, Meyer JE (1988) Relationship between mammographic and histologic features of breast tissue in women with benign biopsies. Cancer 61:266–271PubMedCrossRef Bright RA, Morrison AS, Brisson J, Burstein NA, Sadowsky NS, Kopans DB, Meyer JE (1988) Relationship between mammographic and histologic features of breast tissue in women with benign biopsies. Cancer 61:266–271PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fisher ER, Palekar A, Kim WS, Redmond C (1978) The histopathology of mammographic patterns. Am J Clin Pathol 69:421–426PubMed Fisher ER, Palekar A, Kim WS, Redmond C (1978) The histopathology of mammographic patterns. Am J Clin Pathol 69:421–426PubMed
15.
go back to reference Verheus M, Maskarinec G, Erber E, Steude JS, Killeen J, Hernandez BY, Cline JM (2009) Mammographic density and epithelial histopathologic markers. BMC Cancer 9:182PubMedCrossRef Verheus M, Maskarinec G, Erber E, Steude JS, Killeen J, Hernandez BY, Cline JM (2009) Mammographic density and epithelial histopathologic markers. BMC Cancer 9:182PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Harvey JA, Santen RJ, Petroni GR, Bovbjerg VE, Smolkin ME, Sheriff FS, Russo J (2008) Histologic changes in the breast with menopausal hormone therapy use: correlation with breast density, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and proliferation indices. Menopause 15:67–73PubMed Harvey JA, Santen RJ, Petroni GR, Bovbjerg VE, Smolkin ME, Sheriff FS, Russo J (2008) Histologic changes in the breast with menopausal hormone therapy use: correlation with breast density, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and proliferation indices. Menopause 15:67–73PubMed
17.
go back to reference Khan QJ, Kimler BF, O’Dea AP, Zalles CM, Sharma P, Fabian CJ (2007) Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 9:R35PubMedCrossRef Khan QJ, Kimler BF, O’Dea AP, Zalles CM, Sharma P, Fabian CJ (2007) Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 9:R35PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Cook AJ, Buist DS, Cummings SR, Vachon C, Vacek P, Miglioretti DL (2010) Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use. J Clin Oncol 28:3830–3837PubMedCrossRef Kerlikowske K, Cook AJ, Buist DS, Cummings SR, Vachon C, Vacek P, Miglioretti DL (2010) Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use. J Clin Oncol 28:3830–3837PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vachon CM, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Wu FF, Brandt KR (2002) Case-control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1382–1388PubMed Vachon CM, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Wu FF, Brandt KR (2002) Case-control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1382–1388PubMed
20.
go back to reference Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Slone S, Wasilauskas C, Pike MC, Ursin G (2003) Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:30–37PubMedCrossRef Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Slone S, Wasilauskas C, Pike MC, Ursin G (2003) Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:30–37PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cuzick J, Forbes JF, Sestak I, Cawthorn S, Hamed H, Holli K, Howell A (2007) Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer—96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:272–282PubMedCrossRef Cuzick J, Forbes JF, Sestak I, Cawthorn S, Hamed H, Holli K, Howell A (2007) Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer—96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:272–282PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Russo J (2004) Molecular basis of breast cancer prevention and treatment. Chapter 2. In: Russo J, Russo IH (eds) The breast as a developing organ. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 11–46 Russo J (2004) Molecular basis of breast cancer prevention and treatment. Chapter 2. In: Russo J, Russo IH (eds) The breast as a developing organ. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 11–46
23.
go back to reference Garrity MM, Burgart LJ, Riehle DL, Hill EM, Sebo TJ, Witzig T (2003) Identifying and quantifying apoptosis: navigating technical pitfalls. Mod Pathol 16:389–394PubMedCrossRef Garrity MM, Burgart LJ, Riehle DL, Hill EM, Sebo TJ, Witzig T (2003) Identifying and quantifying apoptosis: navigating technical pitfalls. Mod Pathol 16:389–394PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Milanese TR, Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Vierkant RA, Maloney SD, Pankratz VS, Degnim AC, Vachon CM, Reynolds CA et al (2006) Age-related lobular involution and reduced risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1600–1607 Milanese TR, Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Vierkant RA, Maloney SD, Pankratz VS, Degnim AC, Vachon CM, Reynolds CA et al (2006) Age-related lobular involution and reduced risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1600–1607
25.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lin LI (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268PubMedCrossRef Lin LI (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lin L (2000) A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 56:324–325CrossRef Lin L (2000) A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 56:324–325CrossRef
28.
go back to reference King TS, Chinchilli VM (2001) A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data. Stat Med 20:2131–2147PubMedCrossRef King TS, Chinchilli VM (2001) A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data. Stat Med 20:2131–2147PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312:146–151PubMedCrossRef Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312:146–151PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Lingle WL, Degnim AC, Ghosh K, Vierkant RA, Maloney SD, Pankratz VS, Hillman DW et al (2005) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:229–237PubMedCrossRef Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, Lingle WL, Degnim AC, Ghosh K, Vierkant RA, Maloney SD, Pankratz VS, Hillman DW et al (2005) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:229–237PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Moe RH, Uhlig T, Kjeken I, Hagen KB, Kvien TK, Grotle M (2010) Multidisciplinary and multifaceted outpatient management of patients with osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:253PubMedCrossRef Moe RH, Uhlig T, Kjeken I, Hagen KB, Kvien TK, Grotle M (2010) Multidisciplinary and multifaceted outpatient management of patients with osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:253PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Chanques G, Viel E, Constantin JM, Jung B, de Lattre S, Carr J, Cisse M, Lefrant JY, Jaber S (2010) The measurement of pain in intensive care unit: comparison of 5 self-report intensity scales. Pain 151:711–721PubMedCrossRef Chanques G, Viel E, Constantin JM, Jung B, de Lattre S, Carr J, Cisse M, Lefrant JY, Jaber S (2010) The measurement of pain in intensive care unit: comparison of 5 self-report intensity scales. Pain 151:711–721PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VW (2005) The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain 117:412–420PubMedCrossRef Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VW (2005) The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain 117:412–420PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Rosen S, Svensson M, Nilsson U (2008) Calm or not calm: the question of anxiety in the perianesthesia patient. J Perianesth Nurs 23:237–246PubMedCrossRef Rosen S, Svensson M, Nilsson U (2008) Calm or not calm: the question of anxiety in the perianesthesia patient. J Perianesth Nurs 23:237–246PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J et al (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371–1388 Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J et al (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371–1388
36.
go back to reference Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886PubMedCrossRef Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CPC, New York McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CPC, New York
38.
go back to reference Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS (1988) Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44:1049–1060PubMedCrossRef Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS (1988) Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44:1049–1060PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL (1992) Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1170–1179PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL (1992) Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1170–1179PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Bland KI, Kuhns JG, Buchanan JB, Dwyer PA, Heuser LF, O’Connor CA, Gray LA Sr, Polk HC Jr (1982) A clinicopathologic correlation of mammographic parenchymal patterns and associated risk factors for human mammary carcinoma. Ann Surg 195:582–594PubMedCrossRef Bland KI, Kuhns JG, Buchanan JB, Dwyer PA, Heuser LF, O’Connor CA, Gray LA Sr, Polk HC Jr (1982) A clinicopathologic correlation of mammographic parenchymal patterns and associated risk factors for human mammary carcinoma. Ann Surg 195:582–594PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Urbanski S, Jensen HM, Cooke G, McFarlane D, Shannon P, Kruikov V, Boyd NF (1988) The association of histological and radiological indicators of breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 58:474–479PubMedCrossRef Urbanski S, Jensen HM, Cooke G, McFarlane D, Shannon P, Kruikov V, Boyd NF (1988) The association of histological and radiological indicators of breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 58:474–479PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Moskowitz M, Gartside P, McLaughlin C (1980) Mammographic patterns as markers for high-risk benign breast disease and incident cancers. Radiology 134:293–295PubMed Moskowitz M, Gartside P, McLaughlin C (1980) Mammographic patterns as markers for high-risk benign breast disease and incident cancers. Radiology 134:293–295PubMed
43.
go back to reference Arthur JE, Ellis IO, Flowers C, Roebuck E, Elston CW, Blamey RW (1990) The relationship of ‘‘high risk’’ mammographic patterns to histological risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast. Br J Radiol 63:845–849PubMedCrossRef Arthur JE, Ellis IO, Flowers C, Roebuck E, Elston CW, Blamey RW (1990) The relationship of ‘‘high risk’’ mammographic patterns to histological risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast. Br J Radiol 63:845–849PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Bartow SA, Pathak DR, Mettler FA (1990) Radiographic microcalcification and parenchymal patterns as indicators of histologic “high-risk” benign breast disease. Cancer 66:1721–1725PubMedCrossRef Bartow SA, Pathak DR, Mettler FA (1990) Radiographic microcalcification and parenchymal patterns as indicators of histologic “high-risk” benign breast disease. Cancer 66:1721–1725PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Ghosh K, Hartmann LC, Reynolds C, Visscher DW, Brandt KR, Vierkant RA, Scott CG, Radisky DC, Sellers TA, Pankratz VS et al (2010) Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast. J Clin Oncol 28:2207–2212 Ghosh K, Hartmann LC, Reynolds C, Visscher DW, Brandt KR, Vierkant RA, Scott CG, Radisky DC, Sellers TA, Pankratz VS et al (2010) Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast. J Clin Oncol 28:2207–2212
46.
go back to reference Vierkant RA, Hartmann LC, Pankratz VS, Anderson SS, Radisky D, Frost MH, Vachon CM, Ghosh K, Distad TJ, Degnim AC et al (2009) Lobular involution: localized phenomenon or field effect? Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:193–196PubMedCrossRef Vierkant RA, Hartmann LC, Pankratz VS, Anderson SS, Radisky D, Frost MH, Vachon CM, Ghosh K, Distad TJ, Degnim AC et al (2009) Lobular involution: localized phenomenon or field effect? Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:193–196PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Tissue composition of mammographically dense and non-dense breast tissue
Authors
Karthik Ghosh
Kathleen R. Brandt
Carol Reynolds
Christopher G. Scott
V. S. Pankratz
Darren L. Riehle
Wilma L. Lingle
Tonye Odogwu
Derek C. Radisky
Daniel W. Visscher
James N. Ingle
Lynn C. Hartmann
Celine M. Vachon
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1727-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine