Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013

01-01-2013 | Guidelines

SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer

Authors: Marc Zerey, Lisa Martin Hawver, Ziad Awad, Dimitrios Stefanidis, William Richardson, Robert D. Fanelli, Members of the SAGES Guidelines Committee

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

The following recommendations regarding the safe performance of laparoscopic resection for curable colon and rectal cancer are intended for surgeons experienced in both minimally invasive surgery and the surgical treatment of patients with colon and rectal cancer. This document does not address the endoscopic screening or surveillance for colorectal cancer. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) previously published a joint statement regarding the credentialing process [1]. SAGES also has published guidelines that specifically address credentialing surgeons for laparoscopic procedures in general [2]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (1994) Approved statement on laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:8–12 The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (1994) Approved statement on laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:8–12
4.
5.
go back to reference Tseng LN et al (1998) Port-site metastases. Impact of local tissue trauma and gas leakage. Surg Endosc 12(12):1377–1380PubMedCrossRef Tseng LN et al (1998) Port-site metastases. Impact of local tissue trauma and gas leakage. Surg Endosc 12(12):1377–1380PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Guyatt GH et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926PubMedCrossRef Guyatt GH et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Simmang CL et al (1999) Practice parameters for detection of colorectal neoplasms. The Standards Committee, The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 42(9):1123–1129PubMedCrossRef Simmang CL et al (1999) Practice parameters for detection of colorectal neoplasms. The Standards Committee, The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 42(9):1123–1129PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Winawer S et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124(2):544–560PubMedCrossRef Winawer S et al (2003) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124(2):544–560PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Cho YB et al (2007) Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg 31(7):1491–1495PubMedCrossRef Cho YB et al (2007) Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg 31(7):1491–1495PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Larach SW et al (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40(5):592–596PubMedCrossRef Larach SW et al (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40(5):592–596PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wexner SD et al (1995) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery—are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum 38(7):723–727PubMedCrossRef Wexner SD et al (1995) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery—are we being honest with our patients? Dis Colon Rectum 38(7):723–727PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T (2005) Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140(10):932–935PubMedCrossRef Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T (2005) Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140(10):932–935PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vaziri K, Choxi SC, Orkin BA (2010) Accuracy of colonoscopic localization. Surg Endosc 24(10):2502–2505PubMedCrossRef Vaziri K, Choxi SC, Orkin BA (2010) Accuracy of colonoscopic localization. Surg Endosc 24(10):2502–2505PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Feingold DL et al (2004) Safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 8(5):543–546PubMedCrossRef Feingold DL et al (2004) Safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 8(5):543–546PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Arteaga-Gonzalez I et al (2006) The use of preoperative endoscopic tattooing in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery for endoscopically advanced tumors: a prospective comparative clinical study. World J Surg 30(4):605–611PubMedCrossRef Arteaga-Gonzalez I et al (2006) The use of preoperative endoscopic tattooing in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery for endoscopically advanced tumors: a prospective comparative clinical study. World J Surg 30(4):605–611PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Park JW et al (2008) The usefulness of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing using a saline test injection method with prepackaged sterile India ink for localization in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):501–505PubMedCrossRef Park JW et al (2008) The usefulness of preoperative colonoscopic tattooing using a saline test injection method with prepackaged sterile India ink for localization in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):501–505PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Johnson CD et al (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359(12):1207–1217PubMedCrossRef Johnson CD et al (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359(12):1207–1217PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yeung JM, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Acheson AG (2009) Colonic tattooing in laparoscopic surgery—making the mark? Colorectal Dis 11(5):527–530PubMedCrossRef Yeung JM, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Acheson AG (2009) Colonic tattooing in laparoscopic surgery—making the mark? Colorectal Dis 11(5):527–530PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ward J et al (1999) Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 210(2):459–466PubMed Ward J et al (1999) Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 210(2):459–466PubMed
21.
go back to reference Frazee RC et al (1992) Prospective, randomized trial of inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 35(3):223–226PubMedCrossRef Frazee RC et al (1992) Prospective, randomized trial of inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 35(3):223–226PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lee EC et al (1996) Inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 39(4):369–373PubMedCrossRef Lee EC et al (1996) Inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 39(4):369–373PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Monson JR et al (2012) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum (in press) Monson JR et al (2012) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum (in press)
24.
go back to reference Baum ML et al (1981) A survey of clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery: evidence against further use of no-treatment controls. N Engl J Med 305(14):795–799PubMedCrossRef Baum ML et al (1981) A survey of clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery: evidence against further use of no-treatment controls. N Engl J Med 305(14):795–799PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Chung M, Steinmetz OK, Gordon PH (1993) Perioperative blood transfusion and outcome after resection for colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 80(4):427–432PubMedCrossRef Chung M, Steinmetz OK, Gordon PH (1993) Perioperative blood transfusion and outcome after resection for colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 80(4):427–432PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Busch OR et al (1993) Blood transfusions and prognosis in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 328(19):1372–1376PubMedCrossRef Busch OR et al (1993) Blood transfusions and prognosis in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 328(19):1372–1376PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stahl TJ et al (2006) Practice parameters for the prevention of venous thrombosis. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1477–1483PubMedCrossRef Stahl TJ et al (2006) Practice parameters for the prevention of venous thrombosis. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10):1477–1483PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Slim K et al (2009) Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 249(2):203–209PubMedCrossRef Slim K et al (2009) Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 249(2):203–209PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Zhu QD et al (2010) Efficacy of mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in prevention of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(2):267–275PubMedCrossRef Zhu QD et al (2010) Efficacy of mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in prevention of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(2):267–275PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Brownson P, Jenkins SA, Nott D et al (1992) Mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery: results of a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 79:461–462 Brownson P, Jenkins SA, Nott D et al (1992) Mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery: results of a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 79:461–462
31.
go back to reference Contant CM et al (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 370(9605):2112–2117PubMedCrossRef Contant CM et al (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 370(9605):2112–2117PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Fa-Si-Oen P et al (2005) Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(8):1509–1516PubMedCrossRef Fa-Si-Oen P et al (2005) Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(8):1509–1516PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Miettinen RP et al (2000) Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):669–675; discussion 675–677PubMedCrossRef Miettinen RP et al (2000) Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):669–675; discussion 675–677PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lanthaler M et al (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for anastomosis assessment in laparoscopically assisted left-sided colon resection: is it worthwhile? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(1):27–31PubMedCrossRef Lanthaler M et al (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for anastomosis assessment in laparoscopically assisted left-sided colon resection: is it worthwhile? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(1):27–31PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Li VK et al (2009) Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure? Surg Endosc 23(11):2459–2465PubMedCrossRef Li VK et al (2009) Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure? Surg Endosc 23(11):2459–2465PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ishihara S, Watanabe T, Nagawa H (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Surg Today 38(11):1063–1065PubMedCrossRef Ishihara S, Watanabe T, Nagawa H (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Surg Today 38(11):1063–1065PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Nelson H et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(8):583–596PubMedCrossRef Nelson H et al (2001) Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(8):583–596PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Lacy AM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Hewett PJ et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248(5):728–738PubMedCrossRef Hewett PJ et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248(5):728–738PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Guillou PJ et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Veldkamp R et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Kawamura YJ et al (2000) Effect of high ligation on the long-term result of patients with operable colon cancer, particularly those with limited nodal involvement. Eur J Surg 166(10):803–807PubMedCrossRef Kawamura YJ et al (2000) Effect of high ligation on the long-term result of patients with operable colon cancer, particularly those with limited nodal involvement. Eur J Surg 166(10):803–807PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Wiggers T et al (1988) No-touch isolation technique in colon cancer: a controlled prospective trial. Br J Surg 75(5):409–415PubMedCrossRef Wiggers T et al (1988) No-touch isolation technique in colon cancer: a controlled prospective trial. Br J Surg 75(5):409–415PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Rouffet F et al (1994) Curative resection for left colonic carcinoma: hemicolectomy vs. segmental colectomy. A prospective, controlled, multicenter trial. French Association for Surgical Research. Dis Colon Rectum 37(7):651–659PubMedCrossRef Rouffet F et al (1994) Curative resection for left colonic carcinoma: hemicolectomy vs. segmental colectomy. A prospective, controlled, multicenter trial. French Association for Surgical Research. Dis Colon Rectum 37(7):651–659PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Poon JT et al (2009) Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. World J Surg 33(10):2177–2182PubMedCrossRef Poon JT et al (2009) Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. World J Surg 33(10):2177–2182PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Liang JT et al (2003) Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: randomized controlled clinical trial. World J Surg 27(2):190–196PubMedCrossRef Liang JT et al (2003) Comparison of medial-to-lateral versus traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic dissection sequences for resection of rectosigmoid cancers: randomized controlled clinical trial. World J Surg 27(2):190–196PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Senagore AJ et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):503–509PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):503–509PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Slanetz CA Jr (1984) The effect of inadvertent intraoperative perforation on survival and recurrence in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 27(12):792–797PubMedCrossRef Slanetz CA Jr (1984) The effect of inadvertent intraoperative perforation on survival and recurrence in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 27(12):792–797PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Kwok SP et al (1996) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer. Ann Surg 223(2):170–176PubMedCrossRef Kwok SP et al (1996) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer. Ann Surg 223(2):170–176PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Chang GJ et al (2012) Practice parameters for the management of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55(8):831–843 Chang GJ et al (2012) Practice parameters for the management of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55(8):831–843
52.
go back to reference Beck DE et al (2011) The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Beck DE et al (2011) The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ et al (2005) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48(3):411–423PubMedCrossRef Tjandra JJ et al (2005) Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48(3):411–423PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Morino M et al (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237(3):335–342PubMed Morino M et al (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237(3):335–342PubMed
55.
go back to reference Cheung HY et al (2009) Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without neoadjuvant chemo-irradiation: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 23(1):147–152PubMedCrossRef Cheung HY et al (2009) Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without neoadjuvant chemo-irradiation: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 23(1):147–152PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Hasegawa H et al (2007) Short- and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic surgery compared for 131 patients with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer. Surg Endosc 21(6):920–924PubMedCrossRef Hasegawa H et al (2007) Short- and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic surgery compared for 131 patients with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer. Surg Endosc 21(6):920–924PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Miyajima N et al (2009) Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(1):113–118PubMedCrossRef Miyajima N et al (2009) Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(1):113–118PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Ng KH et al (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann Surg 249(1):82–86PubMedCrossRef Ng KH et al (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann Surg 249(1):82–86PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Jayne DG et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Jayne DG et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASSIC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG et al (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASSIC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645PubMedCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Jayne DG et al (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92(9):1124–1132PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG et al (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92(9):1124–1132PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Kang SB et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645PubMedCrossRef Kang SB et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11(7):637–645PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Buunen M et al (2009) COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 56(2):89–91PubMed Buunen M et al (2009) COLOR II. A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer. Dan Med Bull 56(2):89–91PubMed
64.
go back to reference Kitano S et al (2005) Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35(8):475–477PubMedCrossRef Kitano S et al (2005) Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35(8):475–477PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Nandakumar G, Fleshman JW (2010) Laparoscopy for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19(4):793–802PubMedCrossRef Nandakumar G, Fleshman JW (2010) Laparoscopy for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19(4):793–802PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Lim SB et al (2008) Optimal surgery time after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers. Ann Surg 248(2):243–251PubMedCrossRef Lim SB et al (2008) Optimal surgery time after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers. Ann Surg 248(2):243–251PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Francois Y et al (1999) Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: the Lyon R90–01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 17(8):2396PubMed Francois Y et al (1999) Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: the Lyon R90–01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 17(8):2396PubMed
68.
go back to reference Horn A, Morild I, Dahl O (1990) Tumour shrinkage and down staging after preoperative radiation of rectal adenocarcinomas. Radiother Oncol 18(1):19–28PubMedCrossRef Horn A, Morild I, Dahl O (1990) Tumour shrinkage and down staging after preoperative radiation of rectal adenocarcinomas. Radiother Oncol 18(1):19–28PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Sugarbaker PH, Corlew S (1982) Influence of surgical techniques on survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 25(6):545–557PubMedCrossRef Sugarbaker PH, Corlew S (1982) Influence of surgical techniques on survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 25(6):545–557PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Bonfanti G et al (1982) Results of extended surgery for cancer of the rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 69(6):305–307PubMedCrossRef Bonfanti G et al (1982) Results of extended surgery for cancer of the rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 69(6):305–307PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Curley SA et al (1992) Extended resection for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 163(6):553–559PubMedCrossRef Curley SA et al (1992) Extended resection for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 163(6):553–559PubMedCrossRef
72.
go back to reference Veldkamp R et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18(8):1163–1185PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18(8):1163–1185PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Smithers BM et al (1986) Emergency right hemicolectomy in colon carcinoma: a prospective study. Aust N Z J Surg 56(10):749–752PubMedCrossRef Smithers BM et al (1986) Emergency right hemicolectomy in colon carcinoma: a prospective study. Aust N Z J Surg 56(10):749–752PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Runkel NS et al (1998) Improved outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine. Br J Surg 85(9):1260–1265PubMedCrossRef Runkel NS et al (1998) Improved outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine. Br J Surg 85(9):1260–1265PubMedCrossRef
75.
go back to reference Ng SS et al (2008) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes. World J Surg 32(3):454–458PubMedCrossRef Ng SS et al (2008) Emergency laparoscopic-assisted versus open right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colonic carcinoma: a comparative study of short-term clinical outcomes. World J Surg 32(3):454–458PubMedCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Ng SS et al (2006) Emergency laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colon carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(4):350–354PubMedCrossRef Ng SS et al (2006) Emergency laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colon carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(4):350–354PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Lopez-Kostner F, Hool GR, Lavery IC (1997) Management and causes of acute large-bowel obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 77(6):1265–1290PubMedCrossRef Lopez-Kostner F, Hool GR, Lavery IC (1997) Management and causes of acute large-bowel obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 77(6):1265–1290PubMedCrossRef
78.
go back to reference The SCOTIA Study Group (1995) Single-stage treatment for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing subtotal colectomy with segmental resection following intraoperative irrigation. The SCOTIA Study Group. Subtotal Colectomy versus On-table Irrigation and Anastomosis. Br J Surg 82(12):1622–1627 The SCOTIA Study Group (1995) Single-stage treatment for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing subtotal colectomy with segmental resection following intraoperative irrigation. The SCOTIA Study Group. Subtotal Colectomy versus On-table Irrigation and Anastomosis. Br J Surg 82(12):1622–1627
79.
go back to reference Cheung HY et al (2009) Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144(12):1127–1132PubMedCrossRef Cheung HY et al (2009) Endolaparoscopic approach vs conventional open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144(12):1127–1132PubMedCrossRef
80.
go back to reference Johnstone PA et al (1996) Port site recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignancy. J Clin Oncol 14(6):1950–1956PubMed Johnstone PA et al (1996) Port site recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignancy. J Clin Oncol 14(6):1950–1956PubMed
81.
go back to reference Kirman I et al (2004) Depletion of circulating insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 after open surgery is associated with high interleukin-6 levels. Dis Colon Rectum 47(6):11–17; discussion 917–918CrossRef Kirman I et al (2004) Depletion of circulating insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 after open surgery is associated with high interleukin-6 levels. Dis Colon Rectum 47(6):11–17; discussion 917–918CrossRef
82.
go back to reference Lee SW et al (2003) Peritoneal macrophage and blood monocyte functions after open and laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy in rats. Surg Endosc 17(12):1996–2002PubMedCrossRef Lee SW et al (2003) Peritoneal macrophage and blood monocyte functions after open and laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy in rats. Surg Endosc 17(12):1996–2002PubMedCrossRef
83.
go back to reference Carter JJ et al (2003) Laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy is associated with decreased formation of postoperative pulmonary metastases compared with open cecectomy in a murine model. Surgery 134(3):432–436PubMedCrossRef Carter JJ et al (2003) Laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy is associated with decreased formation of postoperative pulmonary metastases compared with open cecectomy in a murine model. Surgery 134(3):432–436PubMedCrossRef
84.
go back to reference Whelan RL et al (2003) Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17(6):972–978PubMedCrossRef Whelan RL et al (2003) Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17(6):972–978PubMedCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Lee SW et al (2002) Higher colon cancer tumor proliferative index and lower tumor cell death rate in mice undergoing laparotomy versus insufflation. Surg Endosc 16(1):36–39PubMedCrossRef Lee SW et al (2002) Higher colon cancer tumor proliferative index and lower tumor cell death rate in mice undergoing laparotomy versus insufflation. Surg Endosc 16(1):36–39PubMedCrossRef
86.
go back to reference Carter JJ et al (2006) Perioperative immunomodulation with Flt3 kinase ligand or a whole tumor cell vaccine is associated with a reduction in lung metastasis formation after laparotomy in mice. Surg Innov 13(1):41–47PubMedCrossRef Carter JJ et al (2006) Perioperative immunomodulation with Flt3 kinase ligand or a whole tumor cell vaccine is associated with a reduction in lung metastasis formation after laparotomy in mice. Surg Innov 13(1):41–47PubMedCrossRef
87.
go back to reference Carter JJ et al (2005) Significant reduction of laparotomy-associated lung metastases and subcutaneous tumors after perioperative immunomodulation with flt3 ligand in mice. Surg Innov 12(4):319–325PubMedCrossRef Carter JJ et al (2005) Significant reduction of laparotomy-associated lung metastases and subcutaneous tumors after perioperative immunomodulation with flt3 ligand in mice. Surg Innov 12(4):319–325PubMedCrossRef
88.
go back to reference Kirman I et al (2002) Combined whole tumor cell and monophosphoryl lipid A vaccine improved by encapsulation in murine colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 16(4):654–658PubMedCrossRef Kirman I et al (2002) Combined whole tumor cell and monophosphoryl lipid A vaccine improved by encapsulation in murine colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 16(4):654–658PubMedCrossRef
89.
go back to reference Carter JJ, Whelan RL (2001) The immunologic consequences of laparoscopy in oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 10(3):655–677PubMed Carter JJ, Whelan RL (2001) The immunologic consequences of laparoscopy in oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 10(3):655–677PubMed
90.
go back to reference Allendorf JD et al (1999) Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic surgery in mice may be related to differences in postoperative T-cell function. Surg Endosc 13(3):233–235PubMedCrossRef Allendorf JD et al (1999) Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic surgery in mice may be related to differences in postoperative T-cell function. Surg Endosc 13(3):233–235PubMedCrossRef
91.
go back to reference Wittich P et al (2000) Port-site metastases after CO(2) laparoscopy. Is aerosolization of tumor cells a pivotal factor? Surg Endosc 14(2):189–192PubMedCrossRef Wittich P et al (2000) Port-site metastases after CO(2) laparoscopy. Is aerosolization of tumor cells a pivotal factor? Surg Endosc 14(2):189–192PubMedCrossRef
92.
go back to reference Stocchi L, Nelson H (1998) Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update. J Surg Oncol 68(4):255–267PubMedCrossRef Stocchi L, Nelson H (1998) Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: trial update. J Surg Oncol 68(4):255–267PubMedCrossRef
93.
go back to reference Fleshman J et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662; discussion 662–664PubMedCrossRef Fleshman J et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662; discussion 662–664PubMedCrossRef
94.
go back to reference Lacy AM et al (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM et al (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(1):1–7PubMedCrossRef
95.
go back to reference Reilly WT et al (1996) Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. A rare but perhaps underestimated problem. Dis Colon Rectum 39(2):200–207PubMedCrossRef Reilly WT et al (1996) Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. A rare but perhaps underestimated problem. Dis Colon Rectum 39(2):200–207PubMedCrossRef
96.
go back to reference Braumann C et al (2000) Influence of intraperitoneal and systemic application of taurolidine and taurolidine/heparin during laparoscopy on intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumour growth in rats. Clin Exp Metastasis 18(7):547–552PubMedCrossRef Braumann C et al (2000) Influence of intraperitoneal and systemic application of taurolidine and taurolidine/heparin during laparoscopy on intraperitoneal and subcutaneous tumour growth in rats. Clin Exp Metastasis 18(7):547–552PubMedCrossRef
97.
go back to reference Iwanaka T, Arya G, Ziegler MM (1998) Mechanism and prevention of port-site tumor recurrence after laparoscopy in a murine model. J Pediatr Surg 33(3):457–461PubMedCrossRef Iwanaka T, Arya G, Ziegler MM (1998) Mechanism and prevention of port-site tumor recurrence after laparoscopy in a murine model. J Pediatr Surg 33(3):457–461PubMedCrossRef
98.
go back to reference Jacobi CA et al (1999) Influence of different gases and intraperitoneal instillation of antiadherent or cytotoxic agents on peritoneal tumor cell growth and implantation with laparoscopic surgery in a rat model. Surg Endosc 13(10):1021–1025PubMedCrossRef Jacobi CA et al (1999) Influence of different gases and intraperitoneal instillation of antiadherent or cytotoxic agents on peritoneal tumor cell growth and implantation with laparoscopic surgery in a rat model. Surg Endosc 13(10):1021–1025PubMedCrossRef
99.
go back to reference Neuhaus SJ et al (1999) Influence of cytotoxic agents on intraperitoneal tumor implantation after laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 42(1):10–15PubMedCrossRef Neuhaus SJ et al (1999) Influence of cytotoxic agents on intraperitoneal tumor implantation after laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 42(1):10–15PubMedCrossRef
100.
go back to reference Neuhaus SJ et al (1999) Experimental study of the effect of intraperitoneal heparin on tumour implantation following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 86(3):400–404PubMedCrossRef Neuhaus SJ et al (1999) Experimental study of the effect of intraperitoneal heparin on tumour implantation following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 86(3):400–404PubMedCrossRef
101.
go back to reference Lee SW et al (1999) Peritoneal irrigation with povidone-iodine solution after laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy significantly decreases port-tumor recurrence in a murine model. Dis Colon Rectum 42(3):319–326PubMedCrossRef Lee SW et al (1999) Peritoneal irrigation with povidone-iodine solution after laparoscopic-assisted splenectomy significantly decreases port-tumor recurrence in a murine model. Dis Colon Rectum 42(3):319–326PubMedCrossRef
102.
go back to reference Pigazzi A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620PubMedCrossRef Pigazzi A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620PubMedCrossRef
103.
go back to reference Koh, Tsang CB, Kim SH (2011) A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci(R) surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc 25(6):1945–1952PubMedCrossRef Koh, Tsang CB, Kim SH (2011) A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci(R) surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc 25(6):1945–1952PubMedCrossRef
104.
go back to reference DeNoto G, Rubach, Ravikumar TS (2006) A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(6):551–556PubMedCrossRef DeNoto G, Rubach, Ravikumar TS (2006) A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(6):551–556PubMedCrossRef
105.
go back to reference D’Annibale A et al (2010) Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol 17(11):2856–2862PubMedCrossRef D’Annibale A et al (2010) Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol 17(11):2856–2862PubMedCrossRef
106.
go back to reference deSouza AL et al (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1000–1006PubMedCrossRef deSouza AL et al (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1000–1006PubMedCrossRef
107.
go back to reference Zimmern A et al (2010) Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg 34(8):1954–1958PubMedCrossRef Zimmern A et al (2010) Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg 34(8):1954–1958PubMedCrossRef
108.
go back to reference Ceccarelli G et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis for colon carcinoma located in the splenic flexure. Surg Endosc 24(7):1784–1788PubMedCrossRef Ceccarelli G et al (2010) Laparoscopic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis for colon carcinoma located in the splenic flexure. Surg Endosc 24(7):1784–1788PubMedCrossRef
109.
go back to reference Patriti A et al (2009) Laparoscopic and robot-assisted one-stage resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a pilot study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16(4):450–457PubMedCrossRef Patriti A et al (2009) Laparoscopic and robot-assisted one-stage resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a pilot study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16(4):450–457PubMedCrossRef
110.
go back to reference Luca F et al (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1274–1278PubMedCrossRef Luca F et al (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1274–1278PubMedCrossRef
111.
go back to reference Spinoglio G et al (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632PubMedCrossRef Spinoglio G et al (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632PubMedCrossRef
112.
113.
go back to reference Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20(11):1713–1718PubMedCrossRef Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20(11):1713–1718PubMedCrossRef
114.
go back to reference Kang J et al (2012) Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Ann Surg Oncol 19(1):154–155PubMedCrossRef Kang J et al (2012) Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Ann Surg Oncol 19(1):154–155PubMedCrossRef
115.
go back to reference Luca F et al (2011) Surgical and pathological outcomes after right hemicolectomy: case-matched study comparing robotic and open surgery. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.398 PubMed Luca F et al (2011) Surgical and pathological outcomes after right hemicolectomy: case-matched study comparing robotic and open surgery. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​398 PubMed
116.
go back to reference Park IJ et al (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23(4):839–846PubMedCrossRef Park IJ et al (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 23(4):839–846PubMedCrossRef
117.
go back to reference Li JC et al (2009) The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit. Surg Endosc 23(7):1603–1608PubMedCrossRef Li JC et al (2009) The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit. Surg Endosc 23(7):1603–1608PubMedCrossRef
118.
go back to reference Akiyoshi T et al (2011) Learning curve for standardized laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer under supervision: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 25(5):1409–1414PubMedCrossRef Akiyoshi T et al (2011) Learning curve for standardized laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer under supervision: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 25(5):1409–1414PubMedCrossRef
119.
go back to reference Miskovic D et al (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252(6):943–951PubMedCrossRef Miskovic D et al (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252(6):943–951PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer
Authors
Marc Zerey
Lisa Martin Hawver
Ziad Awad
Dimitrios Stefanidis
William Richardson
Robert D. Fanelli
Members of the SAGES Guidelines Committee
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2592-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013 Go to the issue