Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 11/2008

01-11-2008 | Original Contribution

Robotic Colorectal Surgery: First 50 Cases Experience

Authors: Giuseppe Spinoglio, M.D., Massimo Summa, M.D., Fabio Priora, M.D., Raoul Quarati, M.D., Silvio Testa, M.D.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 11/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is believed to be technically and oncologically feasible. However, some limitation of traditional laparoscopic surgery may cause difficulties. Robotic-assisted surgery may overcome these pitfalls.

Methods

From December 2005 to July 2007, 50 patients were selected for robotic-assisted colorectal resection mainly for cancer.

Results

Of the 50 patients enrolled, 32 (64 percent) were men and 18 (36 percent) were women. Their mean age was 66.7 (range, 37–92) years. The American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) class distribution was 13 (26 percent) ASA I, 24 (48 percent) ASA II, 12 (24 percent) ASA III, and 1 (2 percent) ASA IV. Forty-four patients suffered from cancer and six patients from benign disease. Amongst the cancer patients, 3 percent were at UICC (International Union Against Cancer) Stage 0, 36 percent at UICC Stage I, 24 percent at Stage II, 28 percent at Stage III, and 9 percent at Stage IV. The global conversion rate was 4 percent. The mean operative time was 338.8 minutes. It decreased as the experience increased (419 minutes in the first 20 cases vs. 346 minutes in the last 30 cases; P = 0.036). As a gross comparison, the results of a coeval standard laparoscopy group of patients were shown.

Conclusions

Robotic laparoscopic colon surgery is feasible and safe. A longer operating time is needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2002;287:321–8.PubMedCrossRef Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2002;287:321–8.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 2001;25:1467–77.PubMed Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 2001;25:1467–77.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003;138:777–84.PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003;138:777–84.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Abbou C, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165:1964–6.PubMedCrossRef Abbou C, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165:1964–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Billatos ES, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology 2006;68:1275–9.PubMedCrossRef Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Billatos ES, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology 2006;68:1275–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mohr F, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:842–53.PubMedCrossRef Mohr F, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:842–53.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS 2006;10:317–20.PubMed Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS 2006;10:317–20.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1689–94.PubMedCrossRef Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1689–94.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Woeste G, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C. Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;20:253–7.PubMedCrossRef Woeste G, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C. Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Int J Colorectal Dis 2005;20:253–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:2162–8.PubMedCrossRef D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:2162–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rockall TA, Darzi A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1463–8.PubMedCrossRef Rockall TA, Darzi A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1463–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Marecick SJ, Chaudhry V, Jan A, et al. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg 2007;193:349–55.CrossRef Marecick SJ, Chaudhry V, Jan A, et al. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg 2007;193:349–55.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Baik SH, Kang CM, Kim NK, et al. Robotic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. J Robotic Surg 2007;1:99–102.CrossRef Baik SH, Kang CM, Kim NK, et al. Robotic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. J Robotic Surg 2007;1:99–102.CrossRef
16.
Metadata
Title
Robotic Colorectal Surgery: First 50 Cases Experience
Authors
Giuseppe Spinoglio, M.D.
Massimo Summa, M.D.
Fabio Priora, M.D.
Raoul Quarati, M.D.
Silvio Testa, M.D.
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 11/2008
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9334-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2008

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 11/2008 Go to the issue