Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013

01-01-2013

Does the surgeon’s experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?

Authors: Astrid Herrero, Claire Philippe, Françoise Guillon, Bertrand Millat, Frédéric Borie

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess laparoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis with respect to the surgeon’s experience.

Methods

From January 1994 to December 2006, 130 patients underwent laparoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones found with intraoperative cholangiography. Two types of surgeons were defined: junior surgeons with fewer than ten laparoscopic common bile duct explorations performed and experienced surgeons with more than ten. The two patient populations (n = 65 in each group) were similar in regard to demographic data, clinical presentations (complicated or not), and ASA score.

Results

Results show that junior surgeons had significantly more patients with a common bile duct (CBD) diameter <7 mm compared to experienced surgeons (66 % vs. 38 %; p = 0.002). Primary closure of choledochotomy was performed by senior rather than junior surgeons significantly more often (87.5 % vs. 69 %; p = 0.05). Mean operating time was found to be longer for junior operators than for experienced surgeons (220 ± 71 min vs. 169 ± 71 min; p = 0.0006). There was no difference between group 1 (juniors) and group 2 (experienced surgeons) in regard to laparotomy conversion rate (9 % vs. 1.5 %; p = 0.1), complete common bile duct clearance (98 % vs. 100 %, p = ns), postoperative complications (two bile leaks in group 1 and one in group 2), and hospital stay (9 days vs. 7.5 days). In multivariate analysis, the transcystic approach was not influenced by the surgeon’s experience. Experienced surgeons performed choledochotomy with primary closure more easily [RR = 3 (range = 1.1–8); p = 0.04]. Complicated presentations [RR = 2 (0.7–3); p = 0.08] and CBD diameter [RR = 2.5 (0.96–7); p = 0.06] influenced the choice of type of closure of choledochotomy without any significant value.

Conclusion

Surgeon’s experience influenced operating time and type of choledochotomy closure performed but had no influence on postoperative results of the laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kharbutli B, Velanovich V (2008) Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):1973–1980CrossRefPubMed Kharbutli B, Velanovich V (2008) Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12(11):1973–1980CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33CrossRefPubMed Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K (1997) Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 12:16–22CrossRef Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K (1997) Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 12:16–22CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Millat B, Atger J, Deleuze A, Briandet H, Fingerhut A, Guillon F, Marrel E, De Seguin C, Soulier P (1997) Laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective evaluation in 247 consecutive unselected patients. Hepatogastroenterology 44(13):28–34PubMed Millat B, Atger J, Deleuze A, Briandet H, Fingerhut A, Guillon F, Marrel E, De Seguin C, Soulier P (1997) Laparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective evaluation in 247 consecutive unselected patients. Hepatogastroenterology 44(13):28–34PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA, Nassar AH (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24(7):1552–1556CrossRefPubMed Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA, Nassar AH (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24(7):1552–1556CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Leida Z, Ping B, Shuguang W, Yu H (2008) A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 22(7):1595–1600CrossRefPubMed Leida Z, Ping B, Shuguang W, Yu H (2008) A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 22(7):1595–1600CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24(1):CD005641 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24(1):CD005641
9.
go back to reference Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube-free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29–34CrossRefPubMed Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube-free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29–34CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Voitk AJ, Tsao SG, Ignatius S (2001) The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 182:250–253CrossRefPubMed Voitk AJ, Tsao SG, Ignatius S (2001) The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 182:250–253CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ludwig K, Lorenz D, Köckerling F (2002) Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones. ANZ J Surg 72:547–552CrossRefPubMed Ludwig K, Lorenz D, Köckerling F (2002) Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones. ANZ J Surg 72:547–552CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tutton MG, Pawa N, Arulampalam TH, Motson RW (2010) Training higher surgical trainees in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. World J Surg 34(3):569–573CrossRefPubMed Tutton MG, Pawa N, Arulampalam TH, Motson RW (2010) Training higher surgical trainees in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. World J Surg 34(3):569–573CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bresadola V, Intini S, Terrosu G (2001) Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency in general surgery. Surg Endosc 15:812–815CrossRefPubMed Bresadola V, Intini S, Terrosu G (2001) Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency in general surgery. Surg Endosc 15:812–815CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2005) Current status of laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones. Dig Dis 23(2):119–126CrossRefPubMed Shamiyeh A, Wayand W (2005) Current status of laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones. Dig Dis 23(2):119–126CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ebner S, Rechner J, Beller S, Erhart K, Riegler FM, Szinicz G (2004) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 18:762–765CrossRefPubMed Ebner S, Rechner J, Beller S, Erhart K, Riegler FM, Szinicz G (2004) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 18:762–765CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference [No authors listed] (1998) Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S). Surg Endosc 12(6):856–864 [No authors listed] (1998) Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S). Surg Endosc 12(6):856–864
17.
go back to reference Lyass S, Phillips EH (2006) Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 20(Suppl 2):S441–S445CrossRefPubMed Lyass S, Phillips EH (2006) Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 20(Suppl 2):S441–S445CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tokumura H, Umezawa A, Cao H, Sakamoto N, Imaoka Y, Ouchi A, Yamamoto K (2002) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9(2):206–212CrossRefPubMed Tokumura H, Umezawa A, Cao H, Sakamoto N, Imaoka Y, Ouchi A, Yamamoto K (2002) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9(2):206–212CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93(10):1185–1191CrossRefPubMed Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93(10):1185–1191CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19:003327 Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19:003327
Metadata
Title
Does the surgeon’s experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?
Authors
Astrid Herrero
Claire Philippe
Françoise Guillon
Bertrand Millat
Frédéric Borie
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2416-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2013 Go to the issue