Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2010

01-08-2010

Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Series of 131 Cases

Authors: Andrea Zimmern, Leela Prasad, Ashwin deSouza, Slawomir Marecik, John Park, Herand Abcarian

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has become a mainstay in the treatment of benign and malignant colorectal diseases. There are inherent limitations to conventional laparoscopy which can be overcome by the robot. Here we present our experience with 131 cases of robotic and robot-assisted colon and rectal resections.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. From August 2005 through June 2009, we performed a total of 131 totally robotic and robot-assisted colorectal resections. These included 42 right colectomies (RC), 16 anterior resections (AR) for benign disease, 8 AR with rectopexy for prolapse, 7 total proctocolectomies (TPC), 47 low and ultralow anterior resections (LAR) for rectal cancer, and 11 abdominal perineal resections (APR). All LARs were done as a hybrid procedure (laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization followed by robotic rectal dissection), and all APR specimens were extracted through the perineal incision. All coloanal anastomoses were diverted with a loop ileostomy.

Results

There were no intraoperative complications in this series. Postoperative complications included 10 patients with ileus or small bowel obstruction (SBO), 2 patients with anastomotic leaks, 1 patient with an abscess, and 3 patients with temporary peripheral neuropathy that resolved spontaneously. Five patients required reoperation and there were a total of 4 conversions (3.7%) across all case types.

Conclusions

Robotic colon and rectal resections are safe and feasible options for the treatment of both benign and malignant disease processes. Further studies comparing oncologic and perioperative outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open techniques are needed to determine the utility and efficacy of this technology in the field of colorectal surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW et al (2010) Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol 101:116–121PubMed Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW et al (2010) Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol 101:116–121PubMed
2.
go back to reference Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ et al (2009) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int 104:1428–1435CrossRefPubMed Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ et al (2009) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int 104:1428–1435CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M et al (2009) Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 73:119–123CrossRefPubMed Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M et al (2009) Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology 73:119–123CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G et al (2007) A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J Urol 178:478–482CrossRefPubMed Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G et al (2007) A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J Urol 178:478–482CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA et al (2009) A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 113:191–194CrossRefPubMed Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA et al (2009) A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 113:191–194CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M et al (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1274–1278CrossRefPubMed Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M et al (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1274–1278CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Balch GC (2009) Emerging role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for rectal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1451–1453CrossRefPubMed Balch GC (2009) Emerging role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for rectal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1451–1453CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trial): multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trial): multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Spinoglio G, Summa M, Prioria F et al (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1627–1632CrossRefPubMed Spinoglio G, Summa M, Prioria F et al (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1627–1632CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V et al (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2162–2168CrossRefPubMed D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V et al (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2162–2168CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM et al (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:1601–1608CrossRefPubMed Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM et al (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:1601–1608CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Soravia C, Schwieger I, Witzig JA et al (2008) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience. J Robotic Surg 1:291–295CrossRef Soravia C, Schwieger I, Witzig JA et al (2008) Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience. J Robotic Surg 1:291–295CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23:447–451CrossRefPubMed Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23:447–451CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Blumetti J, deSouza AL, Prasad LM (2009) Hybrid laparoscopic-robotic low anterior resection. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 20:181–184CrossRef Blumetti J, deSouza AL, Prasad LM (2009) Hybrid laparoscopic-robotic low anterior resection. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 20:181–184CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Series of 131 Cases
Authors
Andrea Zimmern
Leela Prasad
Ashwin deSouza
Slawomir Marecik
John Park
Herand Abcarian
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0591-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

World Journal of Surgery 8/2010 Go to the issue