Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 8/2015

01-10-2015

MRI: first-line imaging modality for pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis

Authors: Joseph Konrad, David Grand, Ana Lourenco

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasound (US) as compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis for visualization of the appendix, accuracy at diagnosing acute appendicitis, the ability of each modality to identify alternate diagnoses of pain and whether gestational age (GA) has an association with appendix identification rates.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 140 pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis to determine the efficacy of US and MRI to identify the appendix, diagnose or exclude acute appendicitis, identify alternative etiologies for clinical presentation, and the affect of GA on identification of the appendix. Imaging results were correlated with surgical pathology in patients who underwent surgery. The electronic medical record was used to assess clinical outcomes in patients who did not undergo surgery.

Results

The appendix was visualized in 7% (8/117) of US exams and in 80% (91/114) of MRI exams. Alternate etiologies of pathology were determined in 3% (3/117) of US exams and 12% (14/114) of MRI exams. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for acute appendicitis were both 100% and 98%, respectively, as compared to 18% and 99%, respectively, with US. GA did not affect MRI or ultrasound visualization rates of the appendix.

Conclusion

Given the low likelihood of visualization of the appendix at US, the excellent accuracy of MRI and the ability of MRI to identify alternate diagnoses, we suggest that at certain institutions MRI may be considered a first-line imaging modality for pregnant patients of any GA with suspected appendicitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hee P, Viktrup L (1999) The diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcome after appendectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 65:129–135CrossRefPubMed Hee P, Viktrup L (1999) The diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcome after appendectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 65:129–135CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, et al. (2000) Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1027–1029CrossRefPubMed Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, et al. (2000) Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1027–1029CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bailey LE, Finley RK Jr, Miller SF, et al. (1986) Acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Am Surg 52:218–221PubMed Bailey LE, Finley RK Jr, Miller SF, et al. (1986) Acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Am Surg 52:218–221PubMed
4.
go back to reference Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, et al. (2007) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy–risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg 5:192–197CrossRefPubMed Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, et al. (2007) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy–risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg 5:192–197CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Firstenberg MS, Malangoni MA (1998) Gastrointestinal surgery during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 27:73–88CrossRefPubMed Firstenberg MS, Malangoni MA (1998) Gastrointestinal surgery during pregnancy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 27:73–88CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ueberrueck T, Koch A, Meyer L, et al. (2004) Ninety-four appendectomies or suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy. World J Surg 28:508–511CrossRefPubMed Ueberrueck T, Koch A, Meyer L, et al. (2004) Ninety-four appendectomies or suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy. World J Surg 28:508–511CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pastore PA, Loomis DM, Sauret J, et al. (2006) Appendicitis in pregnancy. J Am Board Fam Med 19:621–626CrossRefPubMed Pastore PA, Loomis DM, Sauret J, et al. (2006) Appendicitis in pregnancy. J Am Board Fam Med 19:621–626CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wallace CA, Petrov MS, Soybel DI, et al. (2008) Influence of imaging on the negative appendectomy rate in pregnancy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:46–50CrossRefPubMed Wallace CA, Petrov MS, Soybel DI, et al. (2008) Influence of imaging on the negative appendectomy rate in pregnancy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:46–50CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mazze RI, Kallen B (1991) Appendectomy during pregnancy: a Swedish registry study of 778 cases. Obstet Gynecol 77:835–840PubMed Mazze RI, Kallen B (1991) Appendectomy during pregnancy: a Swedish registry study of 778 cases. Obstet Gynecol 77:835–840PubMed
10.
go back to reference Oto A, Ernst R, Shah R, et al. (2005) Right-lower-quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis in pregnant women: evaluation with MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology 234:445–451CrossRefPubMed Oto A, Ernst R, Shah R, et al. (2005) Right-lower-quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis in pregnant women: evaluation with MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology 234:445–451CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande P, et al. (2009) Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 250:749–757CrossRefPubMed Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande P, et al. (2009) Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 250:749–757CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Birchard K, Brown M, Hyslop W, et al. (2005) MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 184:452–458CrossRefPubMed Birchard K, Brown M, Hyslop W, et al. (2005) MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 184:452–458CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh , et al. (2006) MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicits in pregnancy. Radiology 238(3):891–899CrossRefPubMed Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh , et al. (2006) MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicits in pregnancy. Radiology 238(3):891–899CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Oto A, Ernst RD, Ghulmiyyah LM, et al. (2009) MR imaging in the triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Abdom Imaging 34:243–250CrossRefPubMed Oto A, Ernst RD, Ghulmiyyah LM, et al. (2009) MR imaging in the triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Abdom Imaging 34:243–250CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lehnert B, Gross J, Linnae K, Moshiri M (2012) Utility of Ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 19:293–299CrossRefPubMed Lehnert B, Gross J, Linnae K, Moshiri M (2012) Utility of Ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 19:293–299CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Yabunaka K, Katsuda T, Sanada S, Fukutomi T (2007) Sonographic appearance of the normal appendix in adults. J Ultrasound Med 26:37–43PubMed Yabunaka K, Katsuda T, Sanada S, Fukutomi T (2007) Sonographic appearance of the normal appendix in adults. J Ultrasound Med 26:37–43PubMed
17.
go back to reference Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, et al. (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112:333–340CrossRefPubMed Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, et al. (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112:333–340CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS (1992) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJA Am J Roentgenol 159:539–542CrossRef Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS (1992) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJA Am J Roentgenol 159:539–542CrossRef
Metadata
Title
MRI: first-line imaging modality for pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis
Authors
Joseph Konrad
David Grand
Ana Lourenco
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0540-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Abdominal Radiology 8/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.