Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology
Published in: European Radiology 6/2013

01-06-2013 | Computed Tomography

Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: Technical principles

Authors: Martin J. Willemink, Pim A. de Jong, Tim Leiner, Linda M. de Heer, Rutger A. J. Nievelstein, Ricardo P. J. Budde, Arnold M. R. Schilham

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To explain the technical principles of and differences between commercially available iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms for computed tomography (CT) in non-mathematical terms for radiologists and clinicians.

Methods

Technical details of the different proprietary IR techniques were distilled from available scientific articles and manufacturers' white papers and were verified by the manufacturers. Clinical results were obtained from a literature search spanning January 2006 to January 2012, including only original research papers concerning IR for CT.

Results

IR for CT iteratively reduces noise and artefacts in either image space or raw data, or both. Reported dose reductions ranged from 23 % to 76 % compared to locally used default filtered back-projection (FBP) settings, with similar noise, artefacts, subjective, and objective image quality.

Conclusion

IR has the potential to allow reducing the radiation dose while preserving image quality. Disadvantages of IR include blotchy image appearance and longer computational time. Future studies need to address differences between IR algorithms for clinical low-dose CT.

Key Points

• Iterative reconstruction technology for CT is presented in non-mathematical terms.
• IR reduces noise and artefacts compared to filtered back-projection.
• IR can improve image quality in routine-dose CT and lower the radiation dose.
• IR's disadvantages include longer computation and blotchy appearance of some images.
Literature
1.
Xu J, Mahesh M, Tsui BM (2009) Is iterative reconstruction ready for MDCT? J Am Coll Radiol 6:274–276PubMedCrossRef
2.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
5.
Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E et al (2012) Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA 307:2400–2409PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
Lee TY, Chhem RK (2010) Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur J Radiol 76:28–35PubMedCrossRef
8.
Hentel KD, Sharma R, Wladyka C, Min RJ (2011) Appropriate use of CT in the emergency department. Emerg Med 1:6–13
9.
Macias CG, Sahouria JJ (2011) The appropriate use of CT: quality improvement and clinical decision-making in pediatric emergency medicine. Pediatr Radiol 41(Suppl 2):498–504PubMedCrossRef
10.
Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 122:e525-e555PubMedCrossRef
11.
Kerl JM, Bauer RW, Maurer TB et al (2011) Dose levels at coronary CT angiography—a comparison of dual energy, dual source and 16-slice CT. Eur Radiol 21:530–537PubMedCrossRef
12.
Fleischmann D, Boas FE (2011) Computed tomography—old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 21:510–517PubMedCrossRef
13.
Pan X, Sidky EY, Vannier M (2009) Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? Inverse Probl 25:1230009PubMedCrossRef
14.
Nelson RC, Feuerlein S, Boll DT (2011) New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:286–292PubMedCrossRef
15.
Funama Y, Taguchi K, Utsunomiya D et al (2011) Combination of a low-tube-voltage technique with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm at coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:480–485PubMedCrossRef
16.
Gervaise A, Osemont B, Lecocq S et al (2012) CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT. Eur Radiol 22:295–301PubMedCrossRef
17.
Korn A, Fenchel M, Bender B et al (2011) Iterative reconstruction in head CT: image quality of routine and low-dose protocols in comparison with standard filtered back-projection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:218–224PubMedCrossRef
18.
Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR et al (2010) Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:40–45PubMedCrossRef
19.
Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G et al (2011) Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol 21:2521–2526PubMedCrossRef
20.
Sato J, Akahane M, Inano S et al (2011) Effect of radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 30:146–153PubMedCrossRef
21.
Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 21:2130–2138PubMedCrossRef
22.
Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD et al (2011) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 259:565–573PubMedCrossRef
23.
Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J et al (2011) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 21:636–643PubMedCrossRef
24.
Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:655–660PubMedCrossRef
25.
Yanagawa M, Honda O, Kikuyama A et al (2012) Pulmonary nodules: Effect of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) technique on performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system-Comparison of performance between different-dose CT scans. Eur J Radiol 81:2877–2886PubMedCrossRef
26.
Leipsic J, Heilbron BG, Hague C (2012) Iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: finding its way. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:613–620PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
29.
30.
Noel PB, Fingerle AA, Renger B, Munzel D, Rummeny EJ, Dobritz M (2011) Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1404–1409PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:764–771PubMedCrossRef
33.
Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544PubMedCrossRef
34.
Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199PubMedCrossRef
35.
Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:713–719PubMedCrossRef
36.
37.
38.
Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Schlett CL et al (2011) Coronary artery plaques: cardiac CT with model-based and adaptive-statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur J Radiol 81:e363–e369PubMedCrossRef
39.
Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M et al (2011) Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1081–1087PubMedCrossRef
40.
Bulla S, Blanke P, Hassepass F et al (2012) Reducing the radiation dose for low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction: feasibility and image quality. Eur J Radiol 81:2246–2250PubMedCrossRef
41.
Ghetti C, Ortenzia O, Serreli G (2011) CT iterative reconstruction in image space: a phantom study. Phys Med 28:161–165PubMedCrossRef
42.
Hu XH, Ding XF, Wu RZ, Zhang MM (2011) Radiation dose of non-enhanced chest CT can be reduced 40 % by using iterative reconstruction in image space. Clin Radiol 66:1023–1029PubMedCrossRef
43.
Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim AY et al (2011) A prospective comparison of standard-dose CT enterography and 50 % reduced-dose CT enterography with and without noise reduction for evaluating Crohn disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:50–57PubMedCrossRef
44.
May MS, Wust W, Brand M et al (2011) Dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of image quality of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source computed tomography. Invest Radiol 46:465–470PubMedCrossRef
45.
Park EA, Lee W, Kim KW et al (2012) Iterative reconstruction of dual-source coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:1775–1786PubMedCrossRef
46.
Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T et al (2011) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 21:627–635PubMedCrossRef
47.
Renker M, Ramachandra A, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Iterative image reconstruction techniques: applications for cardiac CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:225–230PubMedCrossRef
48.
Renker M, Nance JW Jr, Schoepf UJ et al (2011) Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. Radiology 260:390–399PubMedCrossRef
49.
Schindera ST, Diedrichsen L, Muller HC et al (2011) Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study. Radiology 260:454–462PubMedCrossRef
50.
European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography (1999) Report EUR 16262. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission
51.
Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL (2003) Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 228:15–21PubMedCrossRef
52.
Cornfeld D, Israel G, Detroy E, Bokhari J, Mojibian H (2011) Impact of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W336–W340PubMedCrossRef
53.
Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, Wu Q, Peter MB, Johnson CD (2010) Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:126–131PubMedCrossRef
54.
Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P et al (2010) A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart 96:922–926PubMedCrossRef
55.
Honda O, Yanagawa M, Inoue A et al (2011) Image quality of multiplanar reconstruction of pulmonary CT scans using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Br J Radiol 84:335–341PubMedCrossRef
56.
Kambadakone AR, Chaudhary NA, Desai GS, Nguyen DD, Kulkarni NM, Sahani DV (2011) Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W743–W752PubMedCrossRef
57.
Kilic K, Erbas G, Guryildirim M, Arac M, Ilgit E, Coskun B (2011) Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1578–1582PubMedCrossRef
58.
Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654PubMedCrossRef
59.
Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR (2010) A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1095–1099PubMedCrossRef
60.
Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST et al (2010) Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience. Radiology 254:145–153PubMedCrossRef
61.
Martinsen AC, Saether HK, Hol PK, Olsen DR, Skaane P (2011) Iterative reconstruction reduces abdominal CT dose. Eur J Radiol 81:1483–1487PubMedCrossRef
62.
Matsuda I, Hanaoka S, Akahane M et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for volume-rendered computed tomography portovenography: improvement of image quality. Jpn J Radiol 28:700–706PubMedCrossRef
63.
Mieville FA, Gudinchet F, Rizzo E et al (2011) Paediatric cardiac CT examinations: impact of the iterative reconstruction method ASIR on image quality—preliminary findings. Pediatr Radiol 41:1154–1164PubMedCrossRef
64.
Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M, Gallagher S, Weinsaft JW (2009) High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:246–251PubMedCrossRef
65.
Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, Kolokythas O, Koprowicz KM (2012) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 22:138–143PubMedCrossRef
66.
Mueck FG, Korner M, Scherr MK et al (2011) Upgrade to Iterative Image Reconstruction (IR) in abdominal MDCT imaging: a clinical study for detailed parameter optimization beyond vendor recommendations using the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Environment (ASIR). Rofo 184:229–238PubMed
67.
Prakash P, Kalra MK, Ackman JB et al (2010) Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Radiology 256:261–269PubMedCrossRef
68.
Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK et al (2010) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 45:202–210PubMedCrossRef
69.
Rapalino O, Kamalian S, Payabvash S et al (2012) Cranial CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: improved image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:609–615PubMedCrossRef
70.
Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J et al (2010) Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 257:373–383PubMedCrossRef
71.
Vorona GA, Ceschin RC, Clayton BL, Sutcavage T, Tadros SS, Panigrahy A (2011) Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique in children: a feasibility study. Pediatr Radiol 41:1174–1182PubMedCrossRef
72.
Yanagawa M, Honda O, Yoshida S et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard- and reduced-dose CT. Acad Radiol 17:1259–1266PubMedCrossRef
73.
Habets J, Symersky P, de Mol BA, Mali WP, Leiner T, Budde RP (2012) A novel iterative reconstruction algorithm allows reduced dose multidetector-row CT imaging of mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:1567–1575PubMedCrossRef
74.
Utsunomiya D, Weigold WG, Weissman G, Taylor AJ (2012) Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT. Eur Radiol 22:1287–1294PubMedCrossRef
75.
Beister M, Kolditz D, Kalender WA (2012) Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. Phys Med 28:94–108PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: Technical principles
Authors
Martin J. Willemink
Pim A. de Jong
Tim Leiner
Linda M. de Heer
Rutger A. J. Nievelstein
Ricardo P. J. Budde
Arnold M. R. Schilham
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2765-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

European Radiology 6/2013 Go to the issue

Cardiac

Precision of pulmonary vein diameter measurements assessed by CE-MRA and steady-state-free precession imaging

Head and Neck

Impact of organ-specific dose reduction on the image quality of head and neck CT angiography

Neuro

Calcium at the carotid siphon as an indicator of internal carotid artery stenosis

Urogenital

MR imaging of renal cortical tumours: qualitative and quantitative chemical shift imaging parameters

Computed Tomography

Radiation dose and image quality of X-ray volume imaging systems: cone-beam computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography and digital fluoroscopy

Neuro

Immediate post-operative MRI suggestive of the site and timing of glioblastoma recurrence after gross total resection: a retrospective longitudinal preliminary study