Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Review

Iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: finding its way

Authors: Jonathon Leipsic, Brett G. Heilbron, Cameron Hague

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Image reconstruction algorithms play a critical role in defining the quality and integrity of medical imaging using computed tomography. Since the advent of CT, image reconstruction has largely been performed by filtered back projection (FBP). This reconstruction technique has served CT well particularly at a time when there were significant limitations in computer processing capabilities. Iterative image reconstruction algorithms were, in fact available and were used to generate images with the very first commercial clinical computed tomographic (CT) scanner. This technique did not see significant adoption in clinical CT use owing to the ease of implementation and the faster image reconstruction of filtered back projection. Over the past decade, the need for finer resolution, greater volume coverage, faster scan times and the desire to lower radiation dose at the same time have pushed the performance of FBP reconstruction to its limits. Recently, there has been a re-introduction of iterative reconstruction for CT imaging with recently published studies in other organ systems showing that iterative reconstructions can produce higher-resolution images with greater robustness for the reduction of various imaging artifacts. There has been subsequent early adoption and experience with iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography (CCTA). We herein review the various iterative reconstruction platforms released for use for CCTA and the initial experiences implementing and integrating these reconstruction algorithms in clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shepp LA, Vardi Y (1982) Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1(2):113–122PubMedCrossRef Shepp LA, Vardi Y (1982) Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1(2):113–122PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lange K, Carson R (1984) EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8(2):306–316PubMed Lange K, Carson R (1984) EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8(2):306–316PubMed
3.
go back to reference Cormack AM (1963) Representation of a function by its line integrals with some radiological applications. J Appl Phys 34:2722–2727CrossRef Cormack AM (1963) Representation of a function by its line integrals with some radiological applications. J Appl Phys 34:2722–2727CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ekstrom M, Kak AC (1984) Image reconstruction from projections. In: Ekstrom M (ed) Digital image processing techniques. Academic Press, New York Ekstrom M, Kak AC (1984) Image reconstruction from projections. In: Ekstrom M (ed) Digital image processing techniques. Academic Press, New York
5.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 113:1305–1310PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732PubMedCrossRef Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324–2336PubMedCrossRef Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324–2336PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144PubMedCrossRef Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T et al (2009) Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(8):940–946PubMedCrossRef Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T et al (2009) Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(8):940–946PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1450–1455PubMedCrossRef Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T et al (2008) Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1450–1455PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753PubMedCrossRef Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al (2008) Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 29:191–197PubMedCrossRef Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al (2008) Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 29:191–197PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hosch W, Heye T, Schulz F et al (2010) Image quality and radiation dose in 256-slice cardiac computed tomography: comparison of prospective versus retrospective image acquisition protocols. Eur J Radiol Hosch W, Heye T, Schulz F et al (2010) Image quality and radiation dose in 256-slice cardiac computed tomography: comparison of prospective versus retrospective image acquisition protocols. Eur J Radiol
15.
go back to reference Hou Y, Yue Y, Guo W et al (2010) Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Hou Y, Yue Y, Guo W et al (2010) Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
16.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117–121PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117–121PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT et al (2008) Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 18:1809–1817PubMedCrossRef Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT et al (2008) Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 18:1809–1817PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Snyder DL, Miller MI, Thomas LJ et al (1987) Noise and edge artifacts in maximum-likelihood reconstructions for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 6:228–238PubMedCrossRef Snyder DL, Miller MI, Thomas LJ et al (1987) Noise and edge artifacts in maximum-likelihood reconstructions for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 6:228–238PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tiow JS, Strother SC (1991) Practical tradeoffs between noise, quantitation, and number of iterations for maximum likelihood-based reconstructions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 10(4):563–571CrossRef Tiow JS, Strother SC (1991) Practical tradeoffs between noise, quantitation, and number of iterations for maximum likelihood-based reconstructions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 10(4):563–571CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jiang M, Wang G (2003) Convergence of the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART). IEEE Trans Image Process 12(8):957–961PubMedCrossRef Jiang M, Wang G (2003) Convergence of the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART). IEEE Trans Image Process 12(8):957–961PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wang J, Li T et al (2006) Penalized weighted least-squares approach to sinogram noise reduction and image reconstruction for low-dose X-ray computed tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(10):1272–1283PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Li T et al (2006) Penalized weighted least-squares approach to sinogram noise reduction and image reconstruction for low-dose X-ray computed tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(10):1272–1283PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ziegler A, Köhler T, Proksa R (2007) Noise and resolution in images reconstructed with FBP and OSC algorithms for CT. Med Phys 34(2):585–598PubMedCrossRef Ziegler A, Köhler T, Proksa R (2007) Noise and resolution in images reconstructed with FBP and OSC algorithms for CT. Med Phys 34(2):585–598PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference De Man B, Nuyts J, Dupont P et al (2000) Reduction of metal streak artifacts in X-ray computed tomography using a transmission maximum a posteriori algorithm. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 47:977–981CrossRef De Man B, Nuyts J, Dupont P et al (2000) Reduction of metal streak artifacts in X-ray computed tomography using a transmission maximum a posteriori algorithm. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 47:977–981CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wang G, Vannier MW, Cheng PC (1999) Iterative X-ray cone-beam tomography for metal artifact reduction and local region reconstruction. Microsc Microanal 5(1):58–65PubMedCrossRef Wang G, Vannier MW, Cheng PC (1999) Iterative X-ray cone-beam tomography for metal artifact reduction and local region reconstruction. Microsc Microanal 5(1):58–65PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Robertson DD, Yuan J, Wang G et al (1997) Total hip prosthesis metal-artifact suppression using iterative deblurring reconstruction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21(2):293–298PubMedCrossRef Robertson DD, Yuan J, Wang G et al (1997) Total hip prosthesis metal-artifact suppression using iterative deblurring reconstruction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21(2):293–298PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Labounty T, Heilbron B et al (2010) Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. Am J Roentgenol 195:655–660CrossRef Leipsic J, Labounty T, Heilbron B et al (2010) Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. Am J Roentgenol 195:655–660CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Labounty T, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654CrossRef Leipsic J, Labounty T, Heilbron B et al (2010) Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 195:649–654CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M et al (2009) High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:246–251PubMedCrossRef Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M et al (2009) High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:246–251PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M et al (2010) Iterative Reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovac Imaging Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M et al (2010) Iterative Reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovac Imaging
30.
go back to reference Budovec et al (2008) Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Multi detector computed tomography decreases image noise and improves image quality. In: Proceedings of SCBT-MR conference Budovec et al (2008) Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Multi detector computed tomography decreases image noise and improves image quality. In: Proceedings of SCBT-MR conference
Metadata
Title
Iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: finding its way
Authors
Jonathon Leipsic
Brett G. Heilbron
Cameron Hague
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9832-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 3/2012 Go to the issue