Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Original article

Effect of radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography

Authors: Jiro Sato, Masaaki Akahane, Sachiko Inano, Mariko Terasaki, Hiroyuki Akai, Masaki Katsura, Izuru Matsuda, Akira Kunimatsu, Kuni Ohtomo

Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography (CT).

Materials and methods

Inflated and fixed porcine lungs were scanned with a 64-slice CT system at 10, 20, 40 and 400 mAs. Using automatic exposure control, 40 mAs was chosen as standard dose. Scan data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and ASIR. Image pairs were obtained by factorial combination of images at a selected level. Using a 21-point scale, three experienced radiologists independently rated differences in quality between adjacently displayed paired images for image noise, image sharpness and conspicuity of tiny nodules. A subjective quality score (SQS) for each image was computed based on Anderson’s functional measurement theory. The standard deviation was recorded as a quantitative noise measurement.

Results

At all doses examined, SQSs improved with ASIR for all evaluation items. No significant differences were noted between the SQSs for 40%-ASIR images obtained at 20 mAs and those for FBP images at 40 mAs.

Conclusion

Compared to the FBP algorithm, ASIR for lung CT can enable an approximately 50% dose reduction from the standard dose while preserving visualization of small structures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–31.PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–31.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363:345–51.PubMedCrossRef Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363:345–51.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kubo T, Lin PJ, Stiller W, Takahashi M, Kauczor HU, Ohno Y, et al. Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:335–43.PubMedCrossRef Kubo T, Lin PJ, Stiller W, Takahashi M, Kauczor HU, Ohno Y, et al. Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:335–43.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, Richard S, Youngblood RS, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2010;254:145–53.PubMedCrossRef Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, Richard S, Youngblood RS, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2010;254:145–53.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre JB, Hachulla AL, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:636–43.PubMedCrossRef Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre JB, Hachulla AL, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:636–43.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, Hsieh J, Pien H, Singh S, et al. Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34:40–5.PubMedCrossRef Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, Hsieh J, Pien H, Singh S, et al. Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34:40–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yanagawa M, Honda O, Yoshida S, Kikuyama A, Inoue A, Sumikawa H, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard- and reduced-dose CT. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1259–66.PubMedCrossRef Yanagawa M, Honda O, Yoshida S, Kikuyama A, Inoue A, Sumikawa H, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard- and reduced-dose CT. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1259–66.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:1095–9.PubMedCrossRef Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:1095–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:764–71.PubMedCrossRef Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:764–71.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference van Dijk AM, Martens JB. Subjective quality assessment of compressed images. Signal Process. 1997;58:235–52.CrossRef van Dijk AM, Martens JB. Subjective quality assessment of compressed images. Signal Process. 1997;58:235–52.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Miao J, Huo D, Wilson DL. Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models. Med Phys. 2008;35:2541–53.PubMedCrossRef Miao J, Huo D, Wilson DL. Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models. Med Phys. 2008;35:2541–53.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Escalante-Ramírez B, Martens J, de Ridder H. Multidimensional characterization of the perceptual quality of noise-reduced computed tomography images. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 1995;6:317–34.CrossRef Escalante-Ramírez B, Martens J, de Ridder H. Multidimensional characterization of the perceptual quality of noise-reduced computed tomography images. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 1995;6:317–34.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Markarian B, Dailey ET. Preparation of inflated lung specimens. In: Heizman ER, editor. The lung: radiologic-pathologic correlations. 2nd ed. Mosby: St. Louis; 1984. p. 4–12. Markarian B, Dailey ET. Preparation of inflated lung specimens. In: Heizman ER, editor. The lung: radiologic-pathologic correlations. 2nd ed. Mosby: St. Louis; 1984. p. 4–12.
14.
go back to reference Anderson NH. Algebraic models in perception. In: Carterette EC, Friedman MP, editors. Handbook of perception: volume 2, psychophysical judgment and measurement. 1st ed. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 215–98. Anderson NH. Algebraic models in perception. In: Carterette EC, Friedman MP, editors. Handbook of perception: volume 2, psychophysical judgment and measurement. 1st ed. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 215–98.
15.
go back to reference Slone RM, Foos DH, Whiting BR, Muka E, Rubin DA, Pilgram TK, et al. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation. Radiology. 2000;215:543–53.PubMed Slone RM, Foos DH, Whiting BR, Muka E, Rubin DA, Pilgram TK, et al. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation. Radiology. 2000;215:543–53.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Preston CC, Colman AM. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol. 2000;104:1–15.CrossRef Preston CC, Colman AM. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol. 2000;104:1–15.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, Hsieh J, Pien HH, Digumarthy SR, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology. 2011;259:565–73.PubMedCrossRef Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, Hsieh J, Pien HH, Digumarthy SR, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology. 2011;259:565–73.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography
Authors
Jiro Sato
Masaaki Akahane
Sachiko Inano
Mariko Terasaki
Hiroyuki Akai
Masaki Katsura
Izuru Matsuda
Akira Kunimatsu
Kuni Ohtomo
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Japanese Journal of Radiology / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1867-1071
Electronic ISSN: 1867-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-011-0026-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Japanese Journal of Radiology 2/2012 Go to the issue