Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Hypertension | Study protocol

Study protocol for the randomized controlled EVA (early vascular adjustments) trial: tailored treatment of mild hypertension in pregnancy to prevent severe hypertension and preeclampsia

Authors: Eva Mulder, Chahinda Ghossein-Doha, Evine Appelman, Sander van Kuijk, Luc Smits, Rogier van der Zanden, Joris van Drongelen, Marc Spaanderman

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In contrast to severe gestational hypertension, it is questioned whether antihypertensive medication for mild to moderate gestational hypertension prevents adverse maternal and offspring outcomes. Hypertensive drugs halve the risk of severe hypertension, but do not seem to prevent progression to preeclampsia or reduce the risk of complications in offspring. In fact, beta-blockers, a first line therapy option, are suspected to impair foetal growth. Disappointing effects of antihypertensive medication can be anticipated when the pharmacological mode of action does not match the underlying haemodynamic imbalance. Hypertension may result from 1) high cardiac output, low vascular resistance state, in which beta blockade is expected to be most effective, or 2) low cardiac output, high vascular resistance state where dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers or central-acting alpha agonists might be the best corrective medication. In the latter, beta-blockade might be maternally ineffective and even contribute to impaired foetal growth by keeping cardiac output low. We propose a randomized controlled trial to determine whether correcting the haemodynamic imbalance in women with mild to moderate hypertension reduces the development of severe hypertension and/or preeclampsia more than non-pharmacological treatment does, without alleged negative effects on foetal growth.

Methods

Women diagnosed with mild to moderate hypertension without proteinuria or signs of other organ damage before 37 weeks of pregnancy are invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial. Women randomized to the intervention group will be prescribed tailored antihypertensive medication, using a simple diagnostic and treatment algorithm based on the mean arterial pressure/heart rate ratio, which serves as an easy-to-determine proxy for maternal circulatory state. Women randomized to the control group will receive non-pharmacological standard care according to national and international guidelines. In total, 208 women will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is progression to severe hypertension and preeclampsia and the secondary outcomes are adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Discussion

This trial will provide evidence of whether tailoring treatment of mild to moderate gestational hypertension to the individual haemodynamic profile prevents maternal disease progression.

Trial registration

NCT02531490, registered on 24 August 2015.
Literature
5.
go back to reference von Dadelszen P, Magee LA. Fall in mean arterial pressure and fetal growth restriction in pregnancy hypertension: an updated metaregression analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;24:941–5. von Dadelszen P, Magee LA. Fall in mean arterial pressure and fetal growth restriction in pregnancy hypertension: an updated metaregression analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;24:941–5.
7.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Hypertension in pregnancy: the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy NICE clinical guideline 107, 2010. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Hypertension in pregnancy: the management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy NICE clinical guideline 107, 2010.
11.
go back to reference Chrysant SG, Frohlich ED, Adamopoulos PN, et al. Pathophysiologic significance of "stress" or relative polycythemia in essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37:1069–72 1976/06/01.CrossRefPubMed Chrysant SG, Frohlich ED, Adamopoulos PN, et al. Pathophysiologic significance of "stress" or relative polycythemia in essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37:1069–72 1976/06/01.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Safar ME, London GM, Levenson JA, et al. Effect of alpha-methyldopa on cardiac output in hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979;25:266–72 1979/03/01.CrossRefPubMed Safar ME, London GM, Levenson JA, et al. Effect of alpha-methyldopa on cardiac output in hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979;25:266–72 1979/03/01.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Grossman E, Messerli FH. Effect of calcium antagonists on plasma norepinephrine levels, heart rate, and blood pressure. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1453–8 1997/12/17.CrossRefPubMed Grossman E, Messerli FH. Effect of calcium antagonists on plasma norepinephrine levels, heart rate, and blood pressure. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1453–8 1997/12/17.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Vetrovec GW. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of first- and second-generation calcium antagonists. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:34A–8A 1994/01/27.CrossRefPubMed Vetrovec GW. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of first- and second-generation calcium antagonists. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:34A–8A 1994/01/27.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Borow KM, Neumann A, Lang RM, et al. Noninvasive assessment of the direct action of oral nifedipine and nicardipine on left ventricular contractile state in patients with systemic hypertension: importance of reflex sympathetic responses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:939–49 1993/03/15.CrossRefPubMed Borow KM, Neumann A, Lang RM, et al. Noninvasive assessment of the direct action of oral nifedipine and nicardipine on left ventricular contractile state in patients with systemic hypertension: importance of reflex sympathetic responses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:939–49 1993/03/15.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bosio PM, McKenna PJ, Conroy R, et al. Maternal central hemodynamics in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:978–84.PubMed Bosio PM, McKenna PJ, Conroy R, et al. Maternal central hemodynamics in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:978–84.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Taler SJ, Textor SC, Augustine JE. Resistant hypertension: comparing hemodynamic management to specialist care. Hypertension. 2002;39:982–8.CrossRefPubMed Taler SJ, Textor SC, Augustine JE. Resistant hypertension: comparing hemodynamic management to specialist care. Hypertension. 2002;39:982–8.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. 2009;374:979–Lancet, 988, 2009/08/07. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60736-4. Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. 2009;374:979–Lancet, 988, 2009/08/07. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(09)60736-4.
32.
go back to reference Saudan P, Brown MA, Buddle ML, et al. Does gestational hypertension become pre-eclampsia? Bri J Obstetr Gynaecol. 1998;105:1177–84.CrossRef Saudan P, Brown MA, Buddle ML, et al. Does gestational hypertension become pre-eclampsia? Bri J Obstetr Gynaecol. 1998;105:1177–84.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Study protocol for the randomized controlled EVA (early vascular adjustments) trial: tailored treatment of mild hypertension in pregnancy to prevent severe hypertension and preeclampsia
Authors
Eva Mulder
Chahinda Ghossein-Doha
Evine Appelman
Sander van Kuijk
Luc Smits
Rogier van der Zanden
Joris van Drongelen
Marc Spaanderman
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03475-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue