Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of vaginal treatment options for persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection after excisional treatment of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of different vaginal administration on cervical persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection after excisional treatment for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL).

Six databases (PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane Central, China Knowledge Network database, China Biomedical Literature Service, and WanFang database) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of various types of vaginal administration compared to no treatment on persistent HR-HPV infection after HSIL excisional treatment, and comprehensive analysis of the clearance of different drugs on HR-HPV was performed using Bayesian reticulation meta-analysis.

The study analyzed the efficacy of eight interventions, including Interferon, Baofukang, Paiteling, Bletilla striata Sanhuang Powder, Lactobacilli vaginal capsules, Fuanning + Interferon, Interferon + Lactobacilli vaginal capsules, and Interferon + Baofukang, on the clearance of HR-HPV after excisional treatment through pooling and analyzing data from 52 RCTs. The results of the study demonstrated that Interferon + Lactobacilli vaginal capsules [OR 16.0 (95% CIs 8.1–32.0)], Interferon + Fuanning [OR 16.0 (95% CIs 1.1–52.0)], and Interferon + Baofukang [OR 14.0 (95% CIs 6.8–28.0)] were all found to significantly improve postoperative HR-HPV clearance rates when compared to no treatment. Furthermore, when studies with high-risk bias were excluded, Interferon + Lactobacilli vaginal capsules [OR 8.6 (95% CIs 4.7–19.0)] and Interferon + Baofukang [OR 22.0 (95% CIs 8.7–59.0)] were still found to be positively associated with increased postoperative HR-HPV clearance rate. Additionally, the study´s results also indicate that Interferon + Baofukang was effective in enhancing the postoperative HR-HPV clearance rates, mainly when the studies were restricted to a follow-up period of at least 12 months [OR 9.6 (95% CIs 2.9–34.0)]. However, it is important to note that the majority of the trials (29 out of 52, 51.6%) were rated as moderate to high risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence was moderate to very low.

The application of various forms of vaginal administration, except for individual use of Lactobacilli vaginal capsules, is more efficacious than no treatment in patients with cervical persistent HR-HPV infection after excisional treatment. However, all of the estimates of the effect size for change in the efficiency of HR-HPV clearance are uncertain. Our confidence in effect estimates and ranking of treatments is low, which needs larger, more rigorous, and longer follow-up RCTs to resolve.