Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hepatology International 2/2022

01-04-2022 | Hepatitis B | Original Article

Sequential HBV treatment with tenofovir alafenamide for patients with chronic hepatitis B: week 96 results from a real-world, multicenter cohort study

Authors: Eiichi Ogawa, Makoto Nakamuta, Toshimasa Koyanagi, Aritsune Ooho, Norihiro Furusyo, Eiji Kajiwara, Kazufumi Dohmen, Akira Kawano, Takeaki Satoh, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Koichi Azuma, Nobuyuki Yamashita, Naoki Yamashita, Rie Sugimoto, Hiromasa Amagase, Masami Kuniyoshi, Yasunori Ichiki, Chie Morita, Masaki Kato, Shinji Shimoda, Hideyuki Nomura, Jun Hayashi, The Kyushu University Liver Disease Study (KULDS) Group

Published in: Hepatology International | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and aims

Outcome data of sequential hepatitis B virus treatment with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and renal safety of TAF in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who were previously treated with entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or a nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 458 consecutive CHB patients who switched to TAF monotherapy after at least 2 years of treatment with another NA. The longitudinal virological/laboratory responses were evaluated up to 96 weeks after switchover. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Results

The proportions of complete viral suppression (CVS) (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) at week 96 were 99.0%, 98.5%, and 98.4% in the prior ETV (n = 198), TDF (n = 137), and NA combination (n = 123) groups, respectively. Almost all patients with HBV DNA of 20–2000 IU/mL at baseline achieved CVS at week 96. On multivariable generalized estimated equation analysis, a low quantitative hepatitis surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at baseline was associated with a lower follow-up qHBsAg level (coefficient 0.81, p < 0.001). The eGFR showed greater improvement in patients with CKD compared to those without (coefficient 21.7, p < 0.001). However, the increase of eGFR reached a peak between weeks 24 and 48.

Conclusions

Based on this longitudinal data analysis up to 96 weeks, sequential NA therapy with a switch to TAF is a good option to achieve high viral suppression and renal safety.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–2128CrossRefPubMed Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–2128CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Krause G, Ott JJ. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:1546–1555CrossRefPubMed Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Krause G, Ott JJ. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:1546–1555CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018;67:1560–1599CrossRefPubMed Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology. 2018;67:1560–1599CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67:370–398CrossRef European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67:370–398CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, Abbas Z, Chan HL, Chen CJ, et al. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:1–98CrossRefPubMed Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, Abbas Z, Chan HL, Chen CJ, et al. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:1–98CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lok AS, Zoulim F, Dusheiko G, Ghany MG. Hepatitis B cure: from discovery to regulatory approval. J Hepatol. 2017;67:847–861CrossRefPubMed Lok AS, Zoulim F, Dusheiko G, Ghany MG. Hepatitis B cure: from discovery to regulatory approval. J Hepatol. 2017;67:847–861CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cornberg M, Lok AS, Terrault NA, Zoulim F. EASL-AASLD HBV treatment endpoints conference faculty. Guidance for design and endpoints of clinical trials in chronic hepatitis B—report from the 2019 EASL-AASLD HBV treatment endpoints conference‡. J Hepatol. 2019;2020(72):539–557 Cornberg M, Lok AS, Terrault NA, Zoulim F. EASL-AASLD HBV treatment endpoints conference faculty. Guidance for design and endpoints of clinical trials in chronic hepatitis B—report from the 2019 EASL-AASLD HBV treatment endpoints conference. J Hepatol. 2019;2020(72):539–557
8.
go back to reference Ogawa E, Furusyo N, Nguyen MH. Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: design, development, and place in therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:3197–3204CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ogawa E, Furusyo N, Nguyen MH. Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: design, development, and place in therapy. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11:3197–3204CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Lok AS, McMahon BJ, Brown RS Jr, Wong JB, Ahmed AT, Farah W, et al. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B viral infection in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2016;63:284–306CrossRefPubMed Lok AS, McMahon BJ, Brown RS Jr, Wong JB, Ahmed AT, Farah W, et al. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B viral infection in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2016;63:284–306CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Woo G, Tomlinson G, Nishikawa Y, Kowgier M, Sherman M, Wong DK, et al. Tenofovir and entecavir are the most effective antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analyses. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1218–1229CrossRefPubMed Woo G, Tomlinson G, Nishikawa Y, Kowgier M, Sherman M, Wong DK, et al. Tenofovir and entecavir are the most effective antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analyses. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1218–1229CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tang LSY, Covert E, Wilson E, Kottilil S. Chronic hepatitis B infection: a review. JAMA. 2018;319:1802–1813CrossRefPubMed Tang LSY, Covert E, Wilson E, Kottilil S. Chronic hepatitis B infection: a review. JAMA. 2018;319:1802–1813CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Casado JL. Renal and bone toxicity with the use of tenofovir: understanding at the end. AIDS Rev. 2016;18:59–68PubMed Casado JL. Renal and bone toxicity with the use of tenofovir: understanding at the end. AIDS Rev. 2016;18:59–68PubMed
13.
go back to reference Buti M, Tsai N, Petersen J, Flisiak R, Gurel S, Krastev Z, et al. Seven-year efficacy and safety of treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:1457–1464CrossRefPubMed Buti M, Tsai N, Petersen J, Flisiak R, Gurel S, Krastev Z, et al. Seven-year efficacy and safety of treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:1457–1464CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chan HL, Fung S, Seto WK, Chuang WL, Chen CY, Kim HJ, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:185–195CrossRefPubMed Chan HL, Fung S, Seto WK, Chuang WL, Chen CY, Kim HJ, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:185–195CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Buti M, Gane E, Seto WK, Chan HL, Chuang WL, Stepanova T, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:196–206CrossRefPubMed Buti M, Gane E, Seto WK, Chan HL, Chuang WL, Stepanova T, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1:196–206CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Agarwal K, Brunetto M, Seto WK, Lim YS, Fung S, Marcellin P, et al. 96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2018;68:672–681CrossRefPubMed Agarwal K, Brunetto M, Seto WK, Lim YS, Fung S, Marcellin P, et al. 96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2018;68:672–681CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ogawa E, Nomura H, Nakamuta M, Furusyo N, Koyanagi T, Dohmen K, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide after switching from entecavir or nucleos(t)ide combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int. 2020;40:1578–1589CrossRefPubMed Ogawa E, Nomura H, Nakamuta M, Furusyo N, Koyanagi T, Dohmen K, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide after switching from entecavir or nucleos(t)ide combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int. 2020;40:1578–1589CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–992CrossRefPubMed Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–992CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ogawa E, Furusyo N, Murata M, Ohnishi H, Toyoda K, Taniai H, et al. Longitudinal assessment of liver stiffness by transient elastography for chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleoside analog. Hepatol Res. 2011;41:1178–1188CrossRefPubMed Ogawa E, Furusyo N, Murata M, Ohnishi H, Toyoda K, Taniai H, et al. Longitudinal assessment of liver stiffness by transient elastography for chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleoside analog. Hepatol Res. 2011;41:1178–1188CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Uchida Y, Nakao M, Tsuji S, Uemura H, Kouyama JI, Naiki K, et al. Significance of switching of the nucleos(t)ide analog used to treat Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate. J Med Virol. 2020;92:329–338CrossRefPubMed Uchida Y, Nakao M, Tsuji S, Uemura H, Kouyama JI, Naiki K, et al. Significance of switching of the nucleos(t)ide analog used to treat Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate. J Med Virol. 2020;92:329–338CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Li ZB, Li L, Niu XX, Chen SH, Fu YM, Wang CY, et al. Switching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide for chronic hepatitis B patients with low-level viraemia. Liver Int. 2021;41:1254–1264CrossRefPubMed Li ZB, Li L, Niu XX, Chen SH, Fu YM, Wang CY, et al. Switching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide for chronic hepatitis B patients with low-level viraemia. Liver Int. 2021;41:1254–1264CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nguyen MH, Atsukawa M, Ishikawa T, Yasuda S, Yokohama K, Trinh HN, et al. Outcomes of sequential therapy with tenofovir alafenamide after long-term entecavir. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:1264–1273CrossRefPubMed Nguyen MH, Atsukawa M, Ishikawa T, Yasuda S, Yokohama K, Trinh HN, et al. Outcomes of sequential therapy with tenofovir alafenamide after long-term entecavir. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:1264–1273CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Fong TL, Lee BT, Tien A, Chang M, Lim C, Ahn A, et al. Improvement of bone mineral density and markers of proximal renal tubular function in chronic hepatitis B patients switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide. J Viral Hepat. 2019;26:561–567CrossRefPubMed Fong TL, Lee BT, Tien A, Chang M, Lim C, Ahn A, et al. Improvement of bone mineral density and markers of proximal renal tubular function in chronic hepatitis B patients switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide. J Viral Hepat. 2019;26:561–567CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lampertico P, Buti M, Fung S, Ahn SH, Chuang WL, Tak WY, et al. Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, multicentre non-inferiority study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:441–453CrossRefPubMed Lampertico P, Buti M, Fung S, Ahn SH, Chuang WL, Tak WY, et al. Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, multicentre non-inferiority study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:441–453CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wong GL, Chan HL, Mak CW, Lee SK, Ip ZM, Lam AT, et al. Entecavir treatment reduces hepatic events and deaths in chronic hepatitis B patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2013;58:1537–1547CrossRefPubMed Wong GL, Chan HL, Mak CW, Lee SK, Ip ZM, Lam AT, et al. Entecavir treatment reduces hepatic events and deaths in chronic hepatitis B patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2013;58:1537–1547CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tseng TC, Liu CJ, Yang HC, Su TH, Wang CC, Chen CL, et al. High levels of hepatitis B surface antigen increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with low HBV load. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1140–1149CrossRefPubMed Tseng TC, Liu CJ, Yang HC, Su TH, Wang CC, Chen CL, et al. High levels of hepatitis B surface antigen increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with low HBV load. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1140–1149CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Yip TC, Wong GL, Chan HL, Tse YK, Lam KL, Lui GC, et al. HBsAg seroclearance further reduces hepatocellular carcinoma risk after complete viral suppression with nucleos(t)ide analogues. J Hepatol. 2019;70:361–370CrossRefPubMed Yip TC, Wong GL, Chan HL, Tse YK, Lam KL, Lui GC, et al. HBsAg seroclearance further reduces hepatocellular carcinoma risk after complete viral suppression with nucleos(t)ide analogues. J Hepatol. 2019;70:361–370CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Razek AA, Abdalla A, Omran E, Fathy A, Zalata K. Diagnosis and quantification of hepatic fibrosis in children with diffusion weighted MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:129–134CrossRefPubMed Razek AA, Abdalla A, Omran E, Fathy A, Zalata K. Diagnosis and quantification of hepatic fibrosis in children with diffusion weighted MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:129–134CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Razek AAKA, Khashaba M, Abdalla A, Bayomy M, Barakat T. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in children with chronic hepatitis. Radiol Med. 2014;119:903–909CrossRefPubMed Razek AAKA, Khashaba M, Abdalla A, Bayomy M, Barakat T. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in children with chronic hepatitis. Radiol Med. 2014;119:903–909CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Razek AA, Massoud SM, Azziz MR, El-Bendary MM, Zalata K, Motawea EM. Prediction of esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients with apparent diffusion coefficient of the spleen. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:1465–1469CrossRefPubMed Razek AA, Massoud SM, Azziz MR, El-Bendary MM, Zalata K, Motawea EM. Prediction of esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients with apparent diffusion coefficient of the spleen. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:1465–1469CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Besheer T, Elalfy H, Abd El-Maksoud M, Abd El-Razek A, Taman S, Zalata K, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and micro-RNA in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:1366–1377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Besheer T, Elalfy H, Abd El-Maksoud M, Abd El-Razek A, Taman S, Zalata K, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and micro-RNA in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:1366–1377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
35.
go back to reference Chan HLY, Buti M, Agarwal K, et al. Maintenance of high levels of viral suppression and improved safety profile of tenofovir alafenamide relative to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in chronic hepatitis B patients treated for 5 years in 2 ongoing phase 3 studies. Hepatology. 2020;72:490A Chan HLY, Buti M, Agarwal K, et al. Maintenance of high levels of viral suppression and improved safety profile of tenofovir alafenamide relative to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in chronic hepatitis B patients treated for 5 years in 2 ongoing phase 3 studies. Hepatology. 2020;72:490A
36.
go back to reference Fontana RJ. Side effects of long-term oral antiviral therapy for hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2009;49:S185–S195CrossRefPubMed Fontana RJ. Side effects of long-term oral antiviral therapy for hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2009;49:S185–S195CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Gish RG, Clark MD, Kane SD, Shaw RE, Mangahas MF, Baqai S. Similar risk of renal events among patients treated with tenofovir or entecavir for chronic hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:941–946CrossRefPubMed Gish RG, Clark MD, Kane SD, Shaw RE, Mangahas MF, Baqai S. Similar risk of renal events among patients treated with tenofovir or entecavir for chronic hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:941–946CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Lindeman RD, Tobin J, Shock NW. Longitudinal studies on the rate of decline in renal function with age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:278–285CrossRefPubMed Lindeman RD, Tobin J, Shock NW. Longitudinal studies on the rate of decline in renal function with age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:278–285CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Tamaki N, Kurosaki M, Nakanishi H, Itakura J, Inada K, Kirino S, et al. Comparison of medication adherence and satisfaction between entecavir and tenofovir alafenamide therapy in chronic hepatitis B. J Med Virol. 2020;92:1355–1358CrossRefPubMed Tamaki N, Kurosaki M, Nakanishi H, Itakura J, Inada K, Kirino S, et al. Comparison of medication adherence and satisfaction between entecavir and tenofovir alafenamide therapy in chronic hepatitis B. J Med Virol. 2020;92:1355–1358CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Sequential HBV treatment with tenofovir alafenamide for patients with chronic hepatitis B: week 96 results from a real-world, multicenter cohort study
Authors
Eiichi Ogawa
Makoto Nakamuta
Toshimasa Koyanagi
Aritsune Ooho
Norihiro Furusyo
Eiji Kajiwara
Kazufumi Dohmen
Akira Kawano
Takeaki Satoh
Kazuhiro Takahashi
Koichi Azuma
Nobuyuki Yamashita
Naoki Yamashita
Rie Sugimoto
Hiromasa Amagase
Masami Kuniyoshi
Yasunori Ichiki
Chie Morita
Masaki Kato
Shinji Shimoda
Hideyuki Nomura
Jun Hayashi
The Kyushu University Liver Disease Study (KULDS) Group
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Hepatology International / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1936-0533
Electronic ISSN: 1936-0541
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-021-10295-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Hepatology International 2/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.