Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | giant cell tumor | Original Article

Deep learning for differentiation of osteolytic osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor around the knee joint on radiographs: a multicenter study

Authors: Jingjing Shao, Hongxin Lin, Lei Ding, Bing Li, Danyang Xu, Yang Sun, Tianming Guan, Haiyang Dai, Ruihao Liu, Demao Deng, Bingsheng Huang, Shiting Feng, Xianfen Diao, Zhenhua Gao

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To develop a deep learning (DL) model for differentiating between osteolytic osteosarcoma (OS) and giant cell tumor (GCT) on radiographs.

Methods

Patients with osteolytic OS and GCT proven by postoperative pathology were retrospectively recruited from four centers (center A, training and internal testing; centers B, C, and D, external testing). Sixteen radiologists with different experiences in musculoskeletal imaging diagnosis were divided into three groups and participated with or without the DL model’s assistance. DL model was generated using EfficientNet-B6 architecture, and the clinical model was trained using clinical variables. The performance of various models was compared using McNemar’s test.

Results

Three hundred thirty-three patients were included (mean age, 27 years ± 12 [SD]; 186 men). Compared to the clinical model, the DL model achieved a higher area under the curve (AUC) in both the internal (0.97 vs. 0.77, p = 0.008) and external test set (0.97 vs. 0.64, p < 0.001). In the total test set (including the internal and external test sets), the DL model achieved higher accuracy than the junior expert committee (93.1% vs. 72.4%; p < 0.001) and was comparable to the intermediate and senior expert committee (93.1% vs. 88.8%, p = 0.25; 87.1%, p = 0.35). With DL model assistance, the accuracy of the junior expert committee was improved from 72.4% to 91.4% (p = 0.051).

Conclusion

The DL model accurately distinguished osteolytic OS and GCT with better performance than the junior radiologists, whose own diagnostic performances were significantly improved with the aid of the model, indicating the potential for the differential diagnosis of the two bone tumors on radiographs.

Critical relevance statement

The deep learning model can accurately distinguish osteolytic osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor on radiographs, which may help radiologists improve the diagnostic accuracy of two types of tumors.

Key points

• The DL model shows robust performance in distinguishing osteolytic osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor.
• The diagnosis performance of the DL model is better than junior radiologists’.
• The DL model shows potential for differentiating osteolytic osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor.

Graphical Abstract

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Choi JH, Ro JY (2021) The 2020 WHO classification of tumors of bone: an updated review. Adv Anat Pathol 28:119–138CrossRefPubMed Choi JH, Ro JY (2021) The 2020 WHO classification of tumors of bone: an updated review. Adv Anat Pathol 28:119–138CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Anderson WJ, Doyle LA (2021) Updates from the 2020 World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone tumours. Histopathology 78:644–657CrossRefPubMed Anderson WJ, Doyle LA (2021) Updates from the 2020 World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone tumours. Histopathology 78:644–657CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Do NT, Jung ST, Yang HJ, Kim SH (2021) Multi-level seg-unet model with global and patch-based X-ray images for knee bone tumor detection. Diagnostics (Basel) 11:691CrossRefPubMed Do NT, Jung ST, Yang HJ, Kim SH (2021) Multi-level seg-unet model with global and patch-based X-ray images for knee bone tumor detection. Diagnostics (Basel) 11:691CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bahamonde L, Catalan J (2006) Bone tumors around the knee: risks and benefits of arthroscopic procedures. Arthroscopy 22:558–564CrossRefPubMed Bahamonde L, Catalan J (2006) Bone tumors around the knee: risks and benefits of arthroscopic procedures. Arthroscopy 22:558–564CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Voskuil R, Evenski AJ, Montgomery C, Emory C (2019) Malignant bone tumors of the knee: how to identify and treat. J Knee Surg 32:305–314CrossRefPubMed Voskuil R, Evenski AJ, Montgomery C, Emory C (2019) Malignant bone tumors of the knee: how to identify and treat. J Knee Surg 32:305–314CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tepelenis K, Papathanakos G, Kitsouli A et al (2021) Osteochondromas: an updated review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, radiological features and treatment options. In Vivo 35:681–691CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tepelenis K, Papathanakos G, Kitsouli A et al (2021) Osteochondromas: an updated review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, radiological features and treatment options. In Vivo 35:681–691CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference BasuMallick A, Chawla SP (2021) Giant cell tumor of bone: an update. Curr Oncol Rep 23:51CrossRef BasuMallick A, Chawla SP (2021) Giant cell tumor of bone: an update. Curr Oncol Rep 23:51CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Garcia RA, Inwards CY, Unni KK (2011) Benign bone tumors–recent developments. Semin Diagn Pathol 28:73–85CrossRefPubMed Garcia RA, Inwards CY, Unni KK (2011) Benign bone tumors–recent developments. Semin Diagn Pathol 28:73–85CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ariga A, Kanda H, Ando Y, Gokita T (2020) Giant cell tumor with atypical imaging implying osteosarcoma. Clin Nucl Med 45:892–893CrossRefPubMed Ariga A, Kanda H, Ando Y, Gokita T (2020) Giant cell tumor with atypical imaging implying osteosarcoma. Clin Nucl Med 45:892–893CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference von Schacky CE, Wilhelm NJ, Schäfer VS et al (2021) Multitask deep learning for segmentation and classification of primary bone tumors on radiographs. Radiology 301:398–406CrossRef von Schacky CE, Wilhelm NJ, Schäfer VS et al (2021) Multitask deep learning for segmentation and classification of primary bone tumors on radiographs. Radiology 301:398–406CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Miller TT (2008) Bone tumors and tumorlike conditions: analysis with conventional radiography. Radiology 246:662–674CrossRefPubMed Miller TT (2008) Bone tumors and tumorlike conditions: analysis with conventional radiography. Radiology 246:662–674CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nguyen JC, Baghdadi S, Pogoriler J, Guariento A, Rajapakse CS, Arkader A (2022) Pediatric osteosarcoma: correlation of imaging findings with histopathologic features, treatment, and outcome. Radiographics 42:1196–1213CrossRefPubMed Nguyen JC, Baghdadi S, Pogoriler J, Guariento A, Rajapakse CS, Arkader A (2022) Pediatric osteosarcoma: correlation of imaging findings with histopathologic features, treatment, and outcome. Radiographics 42:1196–1213CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
17.
go back to reference Noguchi S, Nishio M, Sakamoto R et al (2022) Deep learning-based algorithm improved radiologists’ performance in bone metastases detection on CT. Eur Radiol 32:7976–7987CrossRefPubMed Noguchi S, Nishio M, Sakamoto R et al (2022) Deep learning-based algorithm improved radiologists’ performance in bone metastases detection on CT. Eur Radiol 32:7976–7987CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Murphey MD, Kransdorf MJ (2021) Staging and classification of primary musculoskeletal bone and soft-tissue tumors according to the 2020 WHO update, from the AJR Special Series on Cancer Staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 217:1038–1052CrossRefPubMed Murphey MD, Kransdorf MJ (2021) Staging and classification of primary musculoskeletal bone and soft-tissue tumors according to the 2020 WHO update, from the AJR Special Series on Cancer Staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 217:1038–1052CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Park CW, Oh SJ, Kim KS (2022) Artificial intelligence-based classification of bone tumors in the proximal femur on plain radiographs: system development and validation. PLoS One 17:e0264140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park CW, Oh SJ, Kim KS (2022) Artificial intelligence-based classification of bone tumors in the proximal femur on plain radiographs: system development and validation. PLoS One 17:e0264140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference von Schacky CE, Wilhelm NJ, Schäfer VS (2022) Development and evaluation of machine learning models based on X-ray radiomics for the classification and differentiation of malignant and benign bone tumors. Eur Radiol 32:6247–6257CrossRef von Schacky CE, Wilhelm NJ, Schäfer VS (2022) Development and evaluation of machine learning models based on X-ray radiomics for the classification and differentiation of malignant and benign bone tumors. Eur Radiol 32:6247–6257CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Breden S, Hinterwimmer F, Consalvo S et al (2023) Deep learning-based detection of bone tumors around the knee in X-rays of children. J Clin Med 12(18):5960CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Breden S, Hinterwimmer F, Consalvo S et al (2023) Deep learning-based detection of bone tumors around the knee in X-rays of children. J Clin Med 12(18):5960CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Obuchowski NA, Bullen J (2022) Multireader diagnostic accuracy imaging studies: fundamentals of design and analysis. Radiology 303(1):26–34CrossRefPubMed Obuchowski NA, Bullen J (2022) Multireader diagnostic accuracy imaging studies: fundamentals of design and analysis. Radiology 303(1):26–34CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Liu R, Pan D, Xu Y (2022) A deep learning-machine learning fusion approach for the classification of benign, malignant, and intermediate bone tumors. Eur Radiol 32:1371–1383CrossRefPubMed Liu R, Pan D, Xu Y (2022) A deep learning-machine learning fusion approach for the classification of benign, malignant, and intermediate bone tumors. Eur Radiol 32:1371–1383CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Tan M, Le Q (2019) Efficientnet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. Int Conf Mach Learn PMLR 2019:6105–6114ADS Tan M, Le Q (2019) Efficientnet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. Int Conf Mach Learn PMLR 2019:6105–6114ADS
26.
go back to reference Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D (2020) Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Int J Comput Vis 128:336–359CrossRef Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D (2020) Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Int J Comput Vis 128:336–359CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Van Der Maaten L, Hinton G (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 9:27 Van Der Maaten L, Hinton G (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 9:27
Metadata
Title
Deep learning for differentiation of osteolytic osteosarcoma and giant cell tumor around the knee joint on radiographs: a multicenter study
Authors
Jingjing Shao
Hongxin Lin
Lei Ding
Bing Li
Danyang Xu
Yang Sun
Tianming Guan
Haiyang Dai
Ruihao Liu
Demao Deng
Bingsheng Huang
Shiting Feng
Xianfen Diao
Zhenhua Gao
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01610-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Insights into Imaging 1/2024 Go to the issue