Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Dentists’ knowledge and preference regarding gingival displacement methods

Authors: Islam Abd Alraheam, Susan Hattar, Aya Al-Asmar, Abeer Alhadidi, Saif Abu Hamour, Amira Aldroubi, Faleh A. Sawair

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

An accurate impression is an essential procedure for fabricating indirect fixed restorations. To achieve a precise final impression, the management of gingival tissue is without doubt a crucial.

Aim

To evaluate the use of different gingival displacement techniques among dental clinicians and to assess their associated knowledge and technique preferences.

Methods

A self-designed survey was created electronically and sent to a list of dentists. The survey was composed of multiple sections. Participants who stated that they do not use GD methods were asked to answer the survey questions based on their knowledge. Descriptive statistics were generated, andChi-square test was used to examine the association between the different variables.

Results

A total of 188 dentists participated in this study. The majority 144 (76.6%) use GD in their practice. When asked which technique yields a more accurate impression with lower incidence of repeating the impression, 93 (64.6%) reported retraction cord technique with a hemostatic agent results in a higher impression accuracy, while only 14 (9.7%) declared the retraction paste technique as being more accurate.

Conclusion

The cordless GD technique is believed to be easier, faster, and less traumatic to the gingival tissues, nevertheless, the outcome of dental impressions is believed to be more predictable with the use of conventional retraction cords and hemostatic medicaments.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wang Y, Fan F, Li X, et al. Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int. 2019;50:234–44.PubMed Wang Y, Fan F, Li X, et al. Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int. 2019;50:234–44.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Donovan TE, Chee WW. Current concepts in gingival displacement. Dental Clinics. 2004;48:433–44. Donovan TE, Chee WW. Current concepts in gingival displacement. Dental Clinics. 2004;48:433–44.
3.
go back to reference Al Hamad KQ, Azar WZ, Alwaeli HA, et al. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:1053–8.CrossRefPubMed Al Hamad KQ, Azar WZ, Alwaeli HA, et al. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:1053–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Martins FV, Santana RB, Fonseca EM. Efficacy of conventional cord versus cordless techniques for gingival displacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021;125:46–55.CrossRef Martins FV, Santana RB, Fonseca EM. Efficacy of conventional cord versus cordless techniques for gingival displacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021;125:46–55.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Donovan TE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dental Clinics. 2004;48:445–70. Donovan TE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dental Clinics. 2004;48:445–70.
6.
go back to reference Shivasakthy M, Ali SA. Comparative study on the efficacy of gingival retraction using polyvinyl acetate strips and conventional retraction cord–An in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2368.PubMedPubMedCentral Shivasakthy M, Ali SA. Comparative study on the efficacy of gingival retraction using polyvinyl acetate strips and conventional retraction cord–An in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2368.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Sillness J. Periodontal conditions in patients treated with dental bridges. 2. The influence of full and partial crowns on plaque accumulation, development of gingivitis and pocket formation. J Periodontal Res. 1970;5:219–24.CrossRef Sillness J. Periodontal conditions in patients treated with dental bridges. 2. The influence of full and partial crowns on plaque accumulation, development of gingivitis and pocket formation. J Periodontal Res. 1970;5:219–24.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Valderhaug J, Ellingsen J, Jokstad A. Oral hygiene, periodontal conditions and carious lesions in patients treated with dental bridges: a 15-year clinical and radiographic follow-up study. J Clin Periodontol. 1993;20:482–9.CrossRefPubMed Valderhaug J, Ellingsen J, Jokstad A. Oral hygiene, periodontal conditions and carious lesions in patients treated with dental bridges: a 15-year clinical and radiographic follow-up study. J Clin Periodontol. 1993;20:482–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ferro KJ, Morgano SM, Driscoll CF, et al. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. 2017. Ferro KJ, Morgano SM, Driscoll CF, et al. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. 2017.
10.
go back to reference Laufer B-Z, Baharav H, Ganor Y, et al. The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 1996;76:466–71.CrossRef Laufer B-Z, Baharav H, Ganor Y, et al. The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 1996;76:466–71.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Veitz-Keenan A, Keenan JR. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question. Evid Based Dent. 2017;18:21–2.CrossRefPubMed Veitz-Keenan A, Keenan JR. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question. Evid Based Dent. 2017;18:21–2.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tabassum S, Adnan S, Khan FR. Gingival retraction methods: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:637–43.CrossRefPubMed Tabassum S, Adnan S, Khan FR. Gingival retraction methods: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:637–43.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hansen PA, Tira DE, Barlow J. Current methods of finish-line exposure by practicing prosthodontists. J Prosthodont. 1999;8:163–70.CrossRefPubMed Hansen PA, Tira DE, Barlow J. Current methods of finish-line exposure by practicing prosthodontists. J Prosthodont. 1999;8:163–70.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ercoli C, Tarnow D, Poggio CE, et al. The relationships between tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses and Restorations and the Periodontium. J Prosthodont. 2021;30:305–17.CrossRefPubMed Ercoli C, Tarnow D, Poggio CE, et al. The relationships between tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses and Restorations and the Periodontium. J Prosthodont. 2021;30:305–17.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Huang C, Somar M, Li K, et al. Efficiency of cordless versus cord techniques of gingival retraction: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:177–85.CrossRefPubMed Huang C, Somar M, Li K, et al. Efficiency of cordless versus cord techniques of gingival retraction: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:177–85.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gupta A, Prithviraj DR, Gupta D, et al. Clinical evaluation of three new gingival retraction systems: a research report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13:36–42.CrossRefPubMed Gupta A, Prithviraj DR, Gupta D, et al. Clinical evaluation of three new gingival retraction systems: a research report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13:36–42.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Donovan T, Gandara B, Nemetz H. Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 1985;53:525–31.CrossRef Donovan T, Gandara B, Nemetz H. Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. J Prosthetic Dentistry. 1985;53:525–31.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Jekki R, et al. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2014;58:45–68.CrossRefPubMed Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Jekki R, et al. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2014;58:45–68.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Burke FT, Crisp RJ. Evaluation of a novel compule-based gingival retraction system in UK general dental practices. Dent Update. 2014;41:432–8.CrossRefPubMed Burke FT, Crisp RJ. Evaluation of a novel compule-based gingival retraction system in UK general dental practices. Dent Update. 2014;41:432–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rathod A, Jacob SS, Ali MA, et al. Efficacy of different gingival displacement materials in the management of gingival sulcus width: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22:703–6.CrossRefPubMed Rathod A, Jacob SS, Ali MA, et al. Efficacy of different gingival displacement materials in the management of gingival sulcus width: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22:703–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dentists’ knowledge and preference regarding gingival displacement methods
Authors
Islam Abd Alraheam
Susan Hattar
Aya Al-Asmar
Abeer Alhadidi
Saif Abu Hamour
Amira Aldroubi
Faleh A. Sawair
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03218-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue