Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Medical Research 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Computed Tomography | Research

Can radiologic parameters used to detect cervical spinal instability be used in patients with ankylosing spondylitis?

Authors: Henrik Teuber, Sascha Halvachizadeh, Melvin Muthirakalayil, Luxu Yin, Harry Eisenkrein, Frank Hildebrand, Philipp Kobbe, Kai Sprengel, Ladislav Mica, Hatem Alkadhi, Hans-Christoph Pape, Roman Pfeifer

Published in: European Journal of Medical Research | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Cervical spinal instability can be difficult to detect in the shock room setting even with the utilization of computed tomography (CT) scans. This may be especially true in patients with cervical degenerative disease, such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence AS has on various radiologic parameters used to detect traumatic and degenerative instability of the cervical spine, to assess if CT imaging in the shock room is diagnostically appropriate in this patient population.

Methods

A matched, case–control retrospective analysis of patients with AS and controls without AS admitted at two level-1 trauma centers was performed. All patients were admitted via shock room and received a polytrauma CT. Twenty-four CT parameters of atlanto-occipital dislocation/instability, traumatic and degenerative spondylolisthesis, basilar invagination, and prevertebral soft tissue swelling were assessed. Since the study was assessing normal values, study patients were included if they had no injury to the cervical spine. Study patients were matched by age and sex.

Results

A total of 78 patients were included (AS group, n = 39; control group, n = 39). The evaluated cervical radiologic parameters were largely within normal limits and showed no significant clinical or morphologic differences between the two groups.

Conclusion

In this analysis, CT measurements pertaining to various cervical pathologies were not different between patients with and without AS. Parameters to assess for atlanto-occipital dislocation/instability, spondylolisthesis, or basilar invagination in the trauma setting may reliably be used in patients with AS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Crim JR, et al. Clearance of the cervical spine in multitrauma patients: the role of advanced imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2001;22(4):283–305.CrossRef Crim JR, et al. Clearance of the cervical spine in multitrauma patients: the role of advanced imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2001;22(4):283–305.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lee JY, et al. Cervical spine involvement in longstanding ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(3):331–8.PubMed Lee JY, et al. Cervical spine involvement in longstanding ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(3):331–8.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Robinson Y, Sanden B, Olerud C. Increased occurrence of spinal fractures related to ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective 22-year cohort study in 17,764 patients from a national registry in Sweden. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Robinson Y, Sanden B, Olerud C. Increased occurrence of spinal fractures related to ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective 22-year cohort study in 17,764 patients from a national registry in Sweden. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Jang JH, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis: patterns of radiographic involvement—a re-examination of accepted principles in a cohort of 769 patients. Radiology. 2011;258(1):192–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jang JH, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis: patterns of radiographic involvement—a re-examination of accepted principles in a cohort of 769 patients. Radiology. 2011;258(1):192–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Brophy S, et al. The natural history of ankylosing spondylitis as defined by radiological progression. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(6):1236–43.PubMed Brophy S, et al. The natural history of ankylosing spondylitis as defined by radiological progression. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(6):1236–43.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hoh DJ, Khoueir P, Wang MY. Management of cervical deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;24(1):E9.CrossRefPubMed Hoh DJ, Khoueir P, Wang MY. Management of cervical deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;24(1):E9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lazennec JY, d’Astorg H, Rousseau MA. Cervical spine surgery in ankylosing spondylitis: review and current concept. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(4):507–13.CrossRefPubMed Lazennec JY, d’Astorg H, Rousseau MA. Cervical spine surgery in ankylosing spondylitis: review and current concept. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(4):507–13.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference van Tubergen A, et al. Are syndesmophytes most prevalent in the lumbar or in the cervical spine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and do they develop in a specific direction? Rheumatology. 2012;51(8):1432–9.CrossRefPubMed van Tubergen A, et al. Are syndesmophytes most prevalent in the lumbar or in the cervical spine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and do they develop in a specific direction? Rheumatology. 2012;51(8):1432–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Anwar F, et al. Delayed presentation and diagnosis of cervical spine injuries in long-standing ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(3):403–7.CrossRefPubMed Anwar F, et al. Delayed presentation and diagnosis of cervical spine injuries in long-standing ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(3):403–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wintermark M, et al. Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2003;227(3):681–9.CrossRefPubMed Wintermark M, et al. Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2003;227(3):681–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gale SC, et al. The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma. 2005;59(5):1121–5.CrossRefPubMed Gale SC, et al. The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma. J Trauma. 2005;59(5):1121–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R. Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2005;58(5):902–5.CrossRefPubMed Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R. Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2005;58(5):902–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Blackmore CC, et al. Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology. 1999;212(1):117–25.CrossRefPubMed Blackmore CC, et al. Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology. 1999;212(1):117–25.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bailitz J, et al. CT should replace three-view radiographs as the initial screening test in patients at high, moderate, and low risk for blunt cervical spine injury: a prospective comparison. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2009;66(6):1605–9.CrossRef Bailitz J, et al. CT should replace three-view radiographs as the initial screening test in patients at high, moderate, and low risk for blunt cervical spine injury: a prospective comparison. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2009;66(6):1605–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Harris JH Jr, Carson GC, Wagner LK. Radiologic diagnosis of traumatic occipitovertebral dissociation: 1. Normal occipitovertebral relationships on lateral radiographs of supine subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(4):881–6.CrossRefPubMed Harris JH Jr, Carson GC, Wagner LK. Radiologic diagnosis of traumatic occipitovertebral dissociation: 1. Normal occipitovertebral relationships on lateral radiographs of supine subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(4):881–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gonzalez LF, et al. Vertical atlantoaxial distraction injuries: radiological criteria and clinical implications. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(3):273–80.CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez LF, et al. Vertical atlantoaxial distraction injuries: radiological criteria and clinical implications. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(3):273–80.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Slobodin G, et al. Craniocervical junction involvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(12):2986–90.CrossRefPubMed Slobodin G, et al. Craniocervical junction involvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(12):2986–90.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tam LS, Gu J, Yu D. Pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(7):399–405.CrossRefPubMed Tam LS, Gu J, Yu D. Pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6(7):399–405.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rajak R, et al. Odontoid pannus formation in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis causing atlanto-axial instability. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:bcr1120115178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rajak R, et al. Odontoid pannus formation in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis causing atlanto-axial instability. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:bcr1120115178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Levine AM, Edwards CC. The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(2):217–26.CrossRefPubMed Levine AM, Edwards CC. The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(2):217–26.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Park JH, Kim SH, Cho KH. Clinical outcomes of posterior C2–C3 fixation for unstable Hangman’s fracture compared with posterior C1–C3 fusion. Korean J Spine. 2014;11(2):33–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park JH, Kim SH, Cho KH. Clinical outcomes of posterior C2–C3 fixation for unstable Hangman’s fracture compared with posterior C1–C3 fusion. Korean J Spine. 2014;11(2):33–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Scheer JK, et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(2):141–59.CrossRefPubMed Scheer JK, et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(2):141–59.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bono CM, et al. Measurement techniques for upper cervical spine injuries: consensus statement of the Spine Trauma Study Group. Spine. 2007;32(5):593–600.CrossRefPubMed Bono CM, et al. Measurement techniques for upper cervical spine injuries: consensus statement of the Spine Trauma Study Group. Spine. 2007;32(5):593–600.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hermann KG, et al. Spinal changes in patients with spondyloarthritis: comparison of MR imaging and radiologic appearances. Radiographics. 2005;25(3):559–69 (discussion 569-70).CrossRefPubMed Hermann KG, et al. Spinal changes in patients with spondyloarthritis: comparison of MR imaging and radiologic appearances. Radiographics. 2005;25(3):559–69 (discussion 569-70).CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Pang D, Thompson DN. Embryology and bony malformations of the craniovertebral junction. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2011;27(4):523–64.CrossRef Pang D, Thompson DN. Embryology and bony malformations of the craniovertebral junction. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2011;27(4):523–64.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Can radiologic parameters used to detect cervical spinal instability be used in patients with ankylosing spondylitis?
Authors
Henrik Teuber
Sascha Halvachizadeh
Melvin Muthirakalayil
Luxu Yin
Harry Eisenkrein
Frank Hildebrand
Philipp Kobbe
Kai Sprengel
Ladislav Mica
Hatem Alkadhi
Hans-Christoph Pape
Roman Pfeifer
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 2047-783X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01052-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

European Journal of Medical Research 1/2023 Go to the issue