Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2020

01-02-2020 | Computed Tomography | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: The Possibility of a New Prognostic Biomarker of Pericardial Fat Volumes in Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Authors: Shuichi Shinohara, MD, Kenichi Kobayashi, MD, Makoto Nakagawa, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Visceral fat volume is considered an important biomarker for overall survival (OS) in cancer. For patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer, visceral fat in the abdomen is a favorable prognostic factor.1 However, the prognostic significance of visceral fatty tissue remains controversial. Pericardial fat (PF) is visceral fat in the chest, which thoracic surgeons use to seal alveolar air leaks and wrap the bronchial stumps. The calculation of PF volume using computed tomography (CT) is well established, but the prognostic impact of PF volume on thoracic cancer is unclear.2 Only one study has reported the relationship between cancer incidence and PF volume.3 Furthermore, the association between PF volume and OS in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been studied. The current study aimed to elucidate whether PF volume calculated using CT scan is associated with OS in operable NSCLC. The authors hypothesized that high PF volume is a more favorable prognostic predictor for OS than body mass index (BMI). …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Harada K, Baba Y, Ishimoto T, et al. Low visceral fat content is associated with poor prognosis in a database of 507 upper gastrointestinal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3946–53.CrossRef Harada K, Baba Y, Ishimoto T, et al. Low visceral fat content is associated with poor prognosis in a database of 507 upper gastrointestinal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3946–53.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bertaso AG, Bertol D, Duncan BB, Foppa M. Epicardial fat: definition, measurements, and systematic review of main outcomes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;101:e18–28.PubMedPubMedCentral Bertaso AG, Bertol D, Duncan BB, Foppa M. Epicardial fat: definition, measurements, and systematic review of main outcomes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;101:e18–28.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Britton KA, Massaro JM, Murabito JM, Kreger BE, Hoffmann U, Fox CS. Body fat distribution, incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:921–25.CrossRef Britton KA, Massaro JM, Murabito JM, Kreger BE, Hoffmann U, Fox CS. Body fat distribution, incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:921–25.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shinohara S, Sugaya M, Onitsuka T, Machida K, Matsuo M, Tanaka F. Impact of postoperative pneumonia developing after discharge on long-term follow-up for resected lung cancer. World J Surg. 2018;42:3979–87.CrossRef Shinohara S, Sugaya M, Onitsuka T, Machida K, Matsuo M, Tanaka F. Impact of postoperative pneumonia developing after discharge on long-term follow-up for resected lung cancer. World J Surg. 2018;42:3979–87.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: The Possibility of a New Prognostic Biomarker of Pericardial Fat Volumes in Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Authors
Shuichi Shinohara, MD
Kenichi Kobayashi, MD
Makoto Nakagawa, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08004-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2020 Go to the issue