Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2020

01-02-2020 | Esophagus Resection | Gastrointestinal Oncology

For Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers, Does an “Esophageal” or “Gastric” Surgical Approach Offer Better Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes?

Authors: Jennifer Tseng, MD, Mitchell C. Posner, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The optimal surgical approach to the resection of gastoesophageal junction cancer is unknown. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to further compare the esophageal and gastric approaches to gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature from January 1990 to May 2018 was performed to determine whether an esophageal or gastric surgical approach offers better perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

Results

A total of 179 abstracts were identified and after excluding publications for non-English language, primary focus on neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment, lack of comparison of surgical approaches or not addressing morbidity, mortality, or survival-related outcomes, a total of 14 nonrandomized, comparative studies were reviewed in detail.

Conclusions

The proximal and distant extent of the tumor based on Siewert type classification greatly influences choice of operation. Overall survival rates and surgical outcomes are comparable, and surgical approach should be dictated by patient factors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an eighth edition staging primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1): 36–42.CrossRef Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, et al. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an eighth edition staging primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1): 36–42.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg. 1946; 34(133):18–31.CrossRef Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg. 1946; 34(133):18–31.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification of 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2000; 232:353–61.CrossRef Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification of 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2000; 232:353–61.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ulrich B, Zahedi A. Technical aspects and results of the transhiatal resection in adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14(2):115–9.CrossRef Ulrich B, Zahedi A. Technical aspects and results of the transhiatal resection in adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14(2):115–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kauppila JH, Wahlin K, Lagergren J. Gastrectomy compared to oesophagectomy for Siewert II and III gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer in relation to resection margins, lymphadenectomy and survival. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17783.CrossRef Kauppila JH, Wahlin K, Lagergren J. Gastrectomy compared to oesophagectomy for Siewert II and III gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer in relation to resection margins, lymphadenectomy and survival. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17783.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Blank S, Schmidt T, Heger P, et al. Surgical strategies in true adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG II): thoracoabdominal or abdominal approach? Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(2):303–314.CrossRef Blank S, Schmidt T, Heger P, et al. Surgical strategies in true adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG II): thoracoabdominal or abdominal approach? Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(2):303–314.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Spector NM, Hicks FD, Pickleman J. Quality of life and symptoms after surgery for gastroesophageal cancer: a pilot study. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2002;25(3):120–5.CrossRef Spector NM, Hicks FD, Pickleman J. Quality of life and symptoms after surgery for gastroesophageal cancer: a pilot study. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2002;25(3):120–5.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kauppila JH, Ringborg C, Johar A, et al. Health-related quality of life after gastrectomy, esophagectomy, and combined esophagogastrectomy for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 2018; 21(3):533–541.CrossRef Kauppila JH, Ringborg C, Johar A, et al. Health-related quality of life after gastrectomy, esophagectomy, and combined esophagogastrectomy for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 2018; 21(3):533–541.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al. Japan clinical oncology group (JCOG9502). Left thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(8):644–51.CrossRef Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al. Japan clinical oncology group (JCOG9502). Left thoracoabdominal approach versus abdominal-transhiatal approach for gastric cancer of the cardia or subcardia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(8):644–51.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Haveramp L, Ruurda JP, van Leeuwen MS, et al. Systematic review of the surgical strategies of adenocaricnomas of the gastroesophageal junction. Surg Oncol. 2014;23(4):22–8. Haveramp L, Ruurda JP, van Leeuwen MS, et al. Systematic review of the surgical strategies of adenocaricnomas of the gastroesophageal junction. Surg Oncol. 2014;23(4):22–8.
28.
go back to reference Ellis FH, Jr. Treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus or cardia. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989;64(8):945–55.CrossRef Ellis FH, Jr. Treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus or cardia. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989;64(8):945–55.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Chu KM, Law SY, Fok M, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1997;174(3):320–4.CrossRef Chu KM, Law SY, Fok M, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1997;174(3):320–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
For Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers, Does an “Esophageal” or “Gastric” Surgical Approach Offer Better Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes?
Authors
Jennifer Tseng, MD
Mitchell C. Posner, MD
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07732-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2020 Go to the issue