Artificial intelligence in cardiac radiology

1.

Turing A (2009) Computing machinery and intelligence amplification. “Parsing the Turing Test.”. Comput Intell Expert Speak. https://doi.org/10.1109/9780470544297.ch3CrossRef

2.

McCarthy J (1990) Artificial intelligence, logic and formalizing common sense. Philos Log Artif Intell 1990:161–190

3.

Singh G, Al’Aref SJ, Van Assen M et al (2018) Machine learning in cardiac CT: basic concepts and contemporary data. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2018.04.010CrossRef

4.

Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ (2016) Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 375(13):1216–1219. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1606181.PredictingCrossRef

5.

Mukherjee S (2017) A.I. vs M.D. What happens when diagnosis is automated. New Yorker, New York

6.

Frost & Sullivan (2015) Cognitive computing and artificial intelligence systems in healthcare. Ramping up a $6 billion dollar market opportunity. Frost & Sullivan, New York

7.

Cabitza F, Rasoini R, Gensini GF (2017) Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7797CrossRef

8.

Hecht HS, Shaw L, Chandrashekhar YS, Bax JJ, Narula J (2019) Should NICE guidelines be universally accepted for the evaluation of stable coronary disease? A debate. Eur Heart J 40(18):1440–1453. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz024CrossRef

9.

Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S et al (2016) 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 37(29):2315–2381. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106CrossRef

10.

Sousa-Uva M, Neumann FJ, Ahlsson A et al (2019) 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 55(1):4–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy289CrossRef

11.

Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F et al (2018) 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 00:1–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394CrossRef

12.

Knuuti J, Wijns W, Chairperson I et al (2019) ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2019:1–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425CrossRef

13.

Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S et al (2018) 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 39(2):119–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393CrossRef

14.

Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA et al (2019) 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 74(10):1376–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.009CrossRef

15.

Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL (2018) Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer 18(8):500–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5CrossRef

16.

McDonald RJ, Schwartz KM, Eckel LJ et al (2015) The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload. Acad Radiol 22(9):1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.05.007CrossRef

17.

Coppola F, Faggioni L, Regge D et al (2020) Artificial intelligence: radiologists’ expectations and opinions gleaned from a nationwide online survey. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01205-yCrossRef

18.

Hernandez D, Amodei D, Girish S, Clark J, Brockman G, Ilya S (2019) OpenAI.org. AI and Compute. https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-compute/#addendum. Accessed 3 Nov 2020

19.

Summers RM, Handwerker LR, Pickhardt PJ et al (2008) Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population. Am J Roentgenol 191(1):168–174. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3354CrossRef

20.

van Assen M, Lee SJ, De Cecco CN (2020) Artificial intelligence from A to Z: from neural network to legal framework. Eur J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109083CrossRef

21.

Wolterink JM, Leiner T, Viergever MA, Išgum I (2017) Generative adversarial networks for noise reduction in low-dose CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(12):2536–2545. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2708987CrossRef

22.

Shan H, Padole A, Homayounieh F et al (2019) Competitive performance of a modularized deep neural network compared to commercial algorithms for low-dose CT image reconstruction. Nat Mach Intell 1(6):269–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0057-9CrossRef

23.

Tao Q, Lelieveldt BPF, Van Der Geest RJ (2020) Deep learning for quantitative cardiac MRI. Am J Roentgenol 214:529–535CrossRef

24.

Qin C, Schlemper J, Caballero J, Price AN, Hajnal JV (2018) Convolutional recurrent neural networks for dynamic mr image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging PP(c):1. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2018.2863670CrossRef

25.

Tarroni G, Oktay O, Bai W et al (2018) Learning-based quality control for cardiac MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging PP:1. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2018.2878509CrossRef

26.

Chow BJW, Small G, Yam Y et al (2011) Incremental prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography in coronary artery disease using confirm coronary computed tomography angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964155CrossRef

27.

Foldyna B, Udelson JE, Karády J et al (2019) Pretest probability for patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease: re-evaluating Diamond-Forrester for the contemporary era and clinical implications: insights from the PROMISE trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey182CrossRef

28.

Papachristidis A, Vaughan GF, Denny SJ et al (2020) Comparison of NICE and ESC proposed strategies on new onset chest pain and the contemporary clinical utility of pretest probability risk score. Open Hear 7(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001081CrossRef

29.

Cury RC, Abbara S, Achenbach S et al (2016) Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) an expert consensus document of SCCT, Endorsed by the ACC. JACC-Cardiovasc Imaging 9(9):1099–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.05.005CrossRef

30.

Muscogiuri G, Chiesa M, Trotta M et al (2019) Performance of a deep learning algorithm for the evaluation of CAD-RADS classification with CCTA. Atherosclerosis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.12.001CrossRef

31.

Becker CR, Majeed A, Crispin A et al (2005) CT measurement of coronary calcium mass: impact on global cardiac risk assessment. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2528-5CrossRef

32.

Caruso D, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ et al (2016) Correction factors for CT coronary artery calcium scoring using advanced modeled iterative reconstruction instead of filtered back projection. Acad Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.07.015CrossRef

33.

Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH et al (2007) ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Cl. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(3):378–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.001CrossRef

34.

Greenland P, Blaha MJ, Budoff MJ, Erbel R, Watson KE (2018) Coronary calcium score and cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 72(4):434–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.027CrossRef

35.

ó Hartaigh B, Valenti V, Cho I, Schulman-Marcus J, Gransar H, Knapper J, Kelkar AA, Xie JX, Chang HJ, Shaw LJ, Callister TQ (2016) 15-Year prognostic utility of coronary artery calcium scoring for all-cause mortality in the elderly. Atherosclerosis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.01.039CrossRef

36.

Tesche C, Duguay TM, Schoepf UJ et al (2018) Current and future applications of CT coronary calcium assessment. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2018.1474347CrossRef

37.

Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-TCrossRef

38.

de Vos BD, Wolterink JM, Leiner T, de Jong PA, Lessmann N, Isgum I (2019) Direct automatic coronary calcium scoring in cardiac and chest CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38(9):2127–2138. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2899534CrossRef

39.

Sandstedt M, Henriksson L, Janzon M et al (2020) Evaluation of an AI-based, automatic coronary artery calcium scoring software. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06489-xCrossRef

40.

Zhang Y, van der Werf NR, Jiang B, van Hamersvelt R, Greuter MJW, Xie X (2020) Motion-corrected coronary calcium scores by a convolutional neural network: a robotic simulating study. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06447-7CrossRef

41.

Išgum I, Rutten A, Prokop M, Van Ginneken B (2007) Detection of coronary calcifications from computed tomography scans for automated risk assessment of coronary artery disease. Med Phys 34(4):1450–1461. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2710548CrossRef

42.

Głowacki J, Krysiński M, Czaja-Ziółkowska M, Wasilewski J (2019) Machine learning-based algorithm enables the exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease in the patients who underwent coronary artery calcium scoring. Acad Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.11.016CrossRef

43.

Takx RAP, De Jong PA, Leiner T et al (2014) Automated coronary artery calcification scoring in non-gated chest CT: agreement and reliability. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091239CrossRef

44.

Wolterink JM, Leiner T, de Vos BD, van Hamersvelt RW, Viergever MA, Išgum I (2016) Automatic coronary artery calcium scoring in cardiac CT angiography using paired convolutional neural networks. Med Image Anal 34:123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.04.004CrossRef

45.

van Velzen SGM, Lessmann N, Velthuis BK et al (2020) Deep learning for automatic calcium scoring in CT: validation using multiple cardiac CT and chest CT protocols. Radiology 295(1):66–79. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191621CrossRef

46.

Apfaltrer P, Schoepf UJ, Vliegenthart R et al (2011) Coronary computed tomography-present status and future directions. Int J Clin Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02784.xCrossRef

47.

Meinel FG, Bayer RR II, Zwerner PL, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ, Bamberg F (2015) Coronary computed tomographic angiography in clinical practice: state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am 53(2):287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2014.11.012CrossRef

48.

Newby D (2015) CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60291-4CrossRef

49.

Williams MC, Moss AJ, Dweck M et al (2019) Coronary artery plaque characteristics associated with adverse outcomes in the SCOT-HEART study. J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.066CrossRef

50.

Andrew M, John H (2015) The challenge of coronary calcium on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) scans: effect on interpretation and possible solutions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31(2):145–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0773-0CrossRef

51.

Zreik M, Van Hamersvelt RW, Wolterink JM, Leiner T, Viergever MA, Išgum I (2019) A recurrent CNN for automatic detection and classification of coronary artery plaque and stenosis in coronary CT angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2883807CrossRef

52.

Utsunomiya D, Nakaura T, Oda S (2016) Artificial intelligence for the interpretation of coronary computed tomography angiography: can machine learning improve diagnostic performance? J Clin Exp Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000473CrossRef

53.

Kang D, Dey D, Slomka PJ et al (2015) Structured learning algorithm for detection of nonobstructive and obstructive coronary plaque lesions from computed tomography angiography. J Med Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmi.2.1.014003CrossRef

54.

Yoneyama H, Nakajima K, Taki J et al (2019) Ability of artificial intelligence to diagnose coronary artery stenosis using hybrid images of coronary computed tomography angiography and myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-019-0052-8CrossRef

55.

Hell MM, Dey D, Marwan M, Achenbach S, Schmid J, Schuhbaeck A (2015) Non-invasive prediction of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses by contrast density difference in coronary CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.04.024CrossRef

56.

Dey D, Gaur S, Ovrehus KA et al (2018) Integrated prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia from quantitative coronary CT angiography using machine learning: a multicentre study. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5223-zCrossRef

57.

Van Hamersvelt RW (2018) Deep learning analysis of left ventricular myocardium in CT angiographic intermediate-degree coronary stenosis improves the diagnostic accuracy for identification of functionally significant stenosis. Eur Radiol 29(5):2350–2359CrossRef

58.

Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ et al (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 308(12):1237. https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.11274CrossRef

59.

Kruk M, Wardziak Ł, Demkow M et al (2016) Workstation-based calculation of CTA-based FFR for intermediate stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9(6):690–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.09.019CrossRef

60.

Kitabata H, Leipsic J, Patel MR et al (2018) Incidence and predictors of lesion-specific ischemia by FFRCT: learnings from the international ADVANCE registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12(2):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2018.01.008CrossRef

61.

Lu MT, Ferencik M, Roberts RS et al (2017) Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography: management and outcomes in the PROMISE trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10(11):1350–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.024CrossRef

62.

Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Caruso D et al (2016) Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(3):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2016.03.002CrossRef

63.

Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Baumann S et al (2018) Coronary CT angiography–derived fractional flow reserve: machine learning algorithm versus computational fluid dynamics modeling. Radiology 288:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018171291CrossRef

64.

Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Albrecht MH et al (2017) Coronary CT angiography—derived fractional flow reserve. Radiology 285(1):17–33. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162641CrossRef

65.

Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A et al (2015) Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician-operated computational fluid dynamics algorithm. Radiology 274(3):674–683. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140992CrossRef

66.

Coenen A, Kim Y-H, Kruk M et al (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of a machine-learning approach to coronary computed tomographic angiography-based fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 11(6):e007217. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007217CrossRef

67.

von Knebel Doeberitz PL, De Cecco CN, Schoepf UJ et al (2019) Coronary CT angiography—derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5834-zCrossRef

68.

Qiao HY, Tang CX, Schoepf UJ et al (2020) Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06964-wCrossRef

69.

Kurata A, Fukuyama N, Hirai K et al (2019) On-site computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve using a machine-learning algorithm: clinical effectiveness in a retrospective multicenter cohort. Circ J. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0163CrossRef

70.

Motwani M, Dey D, Berman DS et al (2017) Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis. Eur Heart J 38(7):500–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw188CrossRef

71.

van Rosendael AR, Maliakal G, Kolli KK et al (2018) Maximization of the usage of coronary CTA derived plaque information using a machine learning based algorithm to improve risk stratification; insights from the CONFIRM registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2018.04.011CrossRef

72.

Marwick TH (2018) Ejection fraction pros and cons: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 72(19):2360–2379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2162CrossRef

73.

Bluemke DA, Kronmal RA, Lima JAC et al (2008) The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events. The MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(25):2148–2155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.014CrossRef

74.

Moss MD, Bigger JT, Case R, Gillespie MD, Goldstein RE (2015) Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 309(6):331–336

75.

Di Cesare E, Cademartiri F, Carbone I et al (2013) Indicazioni cliniche per l’utilizzo della cardio RM. A cura del Gruppo di lavoro della Sezione di Cardio-Radiologia della SIRM. Radiol Med. 118(5):752–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-012-0899-2CrossRef

76.

Francone M, Carbone I, Agati L et al (2011) Utilità delle sequenze STIR T2 pesate in risonanza magnetica cardiaca: spettro di applicazioni cliniche in varie cardiopatie ischemiche e nonischemiche. Radiol Med 116(1):32–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-010-0594-0CrossRef

77.

Muscogiuri G, Suranyi P, Eid M et al (2019) Pediatric cardiac MR imaging: practical preoperative assessment. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2019.01.004CrossRef

78.

Fratz S, Chung T, Greil GF et al (2013) Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-51CrossRef

79.

Varga-Szemes A, Muscogiuri G, Schoepf UJ et al (2016) Clinical feasibility of a myocardial signal intensity threshold-based semi-automated cardiac magnetic resonance segmentation method. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3952-4CrossRef

80.

Petitjean C, Dacher JN (2011) A review of segmentation methods in short axis cardiac MR images. Med Image Anal 15(2):169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2010.12.004CrossRef

81.

Suinesiaputra A, Bluemke DA, Cowan BR et al (2015) Quantification of LV function and mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: multi-center variability and consensus contours. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0170-9CrossRef

82.

Avendi MR, Kheradvar A, Jafarkhani H (2016) A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. Med Image Anal 30:108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.01.005CrossRef

83.

Ngo TA, Lu Z, Carneiro G (2017) Combining deep learning and level set for the automated segmentation of the left ventricle of the heart from cardiac cine magnetic resonance. Med Image Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.05.009CrossRef

84.

Ma Y, Wang L, Ma Y, Dong M, Du S, Sun X (2016) An SPCNN-GVF-based approach for the automatic segmentation of left ventricle in cardiac cine MR images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1429-9CrossRef

85.

Tan LK, Liew YM, Lim E, McLaughlin RA (2017) Convolutional neural network regression for short-axis left ventricle segmentation in cardiac cine MR sequences. Med Image Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.04.002CrossRef

86.

Curiale AH, Colavecchia FD, Mato G (2019) Automatic quantification of the LV function and mass: a deep learning approach for cardiovascular MRI. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.12.002CrossRef

87.

Liao F, Chen X, Hu X, Song S (2017) Estimation of the volume of the left ventricle from MRI images using deep neural networks. IEEE Trans Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2017.2778799CrossRef

88.

Bernard O, Lalande A, Zotti C et al (2018) Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37(11):2514–2525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2837502CrossRef

89.

Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Full PM, Wolf I, Engelhardt S, Maier-Hein KH (2018) Automatic cardiac disease assessment on cine-MRI via time-series segmentation and domain specific features. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75541-0_13

90.

Bai W, Sinclair M, Tarroni G et al (2018) Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks 08 Information and Computing Sciences 0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 20(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0471-xCrossRef

91.

Tao Q, Yan W, Wang Y et al (2018) Deep learning-based method for fully automatic quantification of left ventricle function from cine MR images: a multivendor, multicenter study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180513CrossRef

92.

Muscogiuri G, Suranyi P, Schoepf UJ et al (2018) Cardiac magnetic resonance T1-mapping of the myocardium: technical background and clinical relevance. J Thorac Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000270CrossRef

93.

Kammerlander AA, Marzluf BA, Zotter-Tufaro C et al (2016) T1 mapping by CMR imaging from histological validation to clinical implication. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.002CrossRef

94.

White SK, Sado DM, Flett AS, Moon JC (2012) Characterising the myocardial interstitial space: the clinical relevance of non-invasive imaging. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301515CrossRef

95.

De Cecco CN, Muscogiuri G, Varga-Szemes A, Schoepf UJ (2017) Cutting edge clinical applications in cardiovascular magnetic resonance. World J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i1.1CrossRef

96.

Kellman P, Hansen MS (2014) T1-mapping in the heart: accuracy and precision. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-2CrossRef

97.

Ugander M, Oki AJ, Hsu LY et al (2012) Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and sub-clinical myocardial pathology. Eur Heart J 33(10):1268–1278. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr481CrossRef

98.

Yamada A, Ishida M, Kitagawa K, Sakuma H (2018) Assessment of myocardial ischemia using stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Cardiovasc Imaging Asia 2(2):65–75. https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2017.00178CrossRef

99.

Hamlin SA, Henry TS, Little BP, Lerakis S, Stillman AE (2014) Mapping the future of cardiac MR imaging: case-based review of T1 and T2 mapping techniques. Radiographics 34:1594–1611. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.346140030CrossRef

100.

Rastegar N, Te Riele ASJM, James CA et al (2016) Fibrofatty changes: incidence at cardiac MR imaging in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy1. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016150988CrossRef

101.

Buckley O, Madan R, Kwong R, Rybicki FJ, Hunsaker A (2011) Cardiac masses, part 1: imaging strategies and technical considerations. Am J Roentgenol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.5b00266.QuantitativeCrossRef

102.

Edwards NC, Routledge H, Steeds RP (2009) T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess myocardial oedema in ischaemic heart disease. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.169961CrossRef

103.

Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al (2000) The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200011163432003CrossRef

104.

Thomson LEJ, Kim RJ, Judd RM (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of myocardial viability. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20075CrossRef

105.

Satoh H (2014) Distribution of late gadolinium enhancement in various types of cardiomyopathies: significance in differential diagnosis, clinical features and prognosis. World J Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v6.i7.585CrossRef

106.

o h-Ici D, Jeuthe S, Al-Wakeel N et al (2014) T1 mapping in ischaemic heart disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 15(6):597–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu024CrossRef

107.

Florian A, Jurcut R, Ginghina C, Bogeart J (1997) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in ischemic heart disease a clinical review. J Med Life 4(4):330–345

108.

Muscogiuri G, Suranyi P, Schoepf UJ et al (2017) Cardiac magnetic resonance T1-mapping of the myocardium. J Thorac Imaging 00(00):1. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000270CrossRef

109.

Gannon MP, Schaub E, Grines CL, Saba SG (2019) State of the art: evaluation and prognostication of myocarditis using cardiac MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26611CrossRef

110.

Chan RH, Maron BJ, Olivotto I et al (2014) Prognostic value of quantitative contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the evaluation of sudden death risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007094CrossRef

111.

Baeßler B, Mannil M, Maintz D, Alkadhi H, Manka R (2018) Texture analysis and machine learning of non-contrast T1-weighted MR images in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy—preliminary results. Eur J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.03.013CrossRef

112.

Moccia S, Banali R, Martini C et al (2019) Development and testing of a deep learning-based strategy for scar segmentation on CMR-LGE images. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-018-0718-4CrossRef

113.

Yang F, Zhang Y, Lei P et al (2019) A deep learning segmentation approach in free-breathing real-time cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5636423CrossRef

114.

Zabihollahy F, Rajchl M, White JA, Ukwatta E (2020) Fully automated segmentation of left ventricular scar from 3D late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging using a cascaded multi-planar U-Net (CMPU-Net). Med Phys. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14022CrossRef

115.

Fahmy AS, Rausch J, Neisiusa U et al (2018) Fully automated quantification of cardiac MR LV mass and scar in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using deep learning. Circulation 138(Suppl_1):A15085

116.

Zabihollahy F, White JA, Ukwatta E (2019) Convolutional neural network-based approach for segmentation of left ventricle myocardial scar from 3D late gadolinium enhancement MR images. Med Phys. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13436CrossRef

117.

Zhang N, Yang G, Gao Z et al (2019) Deep learning for diagnosis of chronic myocardial infarction on nonenhanced cardiac cine MRI. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182304CrossRef

118.

Li L, Wu F, Yang G et al (2020) Atrial scar quantification via multi-scale CNN in the graph-cuts framework. Med Image Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.101595CrossRef

119.

Li L, Yang G, Wu F et al (2019) Atrial scar segmentation via potential learning in the graph-cut framework. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12029-0_17

120.

Vergara GR, Marrouche NF (2011) Tailored management of atrial fibrillation using a LGE-MRI based model: from the clinic to the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01941.xCrossRef

121.

Halliday BP, Baksi AJ, Gulati A et al (2019) Outcome in dilated cardiomyopathy related to the extent, location, and pattern of late gadolinium enhancement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.015CrossRef

122.

Halliday BP, Gulati A, Ali A et al (2017) Association between midwall late gadolinium enhancement and sudden cardiac death in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and mild and moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026910CrossRef

123.

Dawes TJW, De Marvao A, Shi W et al (2017) Machine learning of three-dimensional right ventricular motion enables outcome prediction in pulmonary hypertension: a cardiac MR imaging study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016161315CrossRef

124.

Chen R, Lu A, Wang J et al (2019) Using machine learning to predict one-year cardiovascular events in patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.06.004CrossRef

125.

Pocock SJ, Ariti CA, McMurray JJV et al (2013) Predicting survival in heart failure: a risk score based on 39,372 patients from 30 studies. Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs337CrossRef

126.

Guaricci AI, Masci PG, Lorenzoni V, Schwitter J, Pontone G (2018) CarDiac MagnEtic Resonance for Primary Prevention Implantable CardioVerter DebrillAtor ThErapy international registry: design and rationale of the DERIVATE study. Int J Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.043CrossRef

127.

Diller GP, Orwat S, Vahle J et al (2020) Prediction of prognosis in patients with tetralogy of Fallot based on deep learning imaging analysis. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315962CrossRef

128.

ACR-DSI (2019) FDA cleared AI algorithms. DSI-ACR. https://www.acrdsi.org/DSI-Services/FDA-Cleared-AI-Algorithms. Accessed 30 Jan 2020

129.

Zuckerman DM, Brown P, Nissen SE (2011) Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process. Arch Intern Med 171(11):1006–1011. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.30CrossRef

130.

European-Commission (2020) White paper on artificial intelligence

131.

Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC et al (2019) Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement. Can Assoc Radiol J 70(4):329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2019.08.010CrossRef

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Artificial intelligence in cardiac radiology

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Cardiac-CT and cardiac-MR cost-effectiveness: a literature review

The current landscape of imaging recommendations in cardiovascular clinical guidelines: toward an imaging-guided precision medicine

CMR in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease

Cardiac magnetic resonance in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies

Cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies

Prognostic value of cardiac CT