Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 5/2018

Open Access 01-05-2018 | Original Article

Lowered dose full-spine radiography in pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis

Authors: Caroline Ernst, Nico Buls, Armand Laumen, Gert Van Gompel, Filip Verhelle, Johan de Mey

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To optimize our standard full-spine radiography with respect to diagnostic quality and dose.

Methods

A phantom study was performed to establish an optimal posterior–anterior view (PA) full spine protocol having the lowest dose with non-inferior quality compared to standard. We then applied this protocol in 40 pediatric patients (group B). The radiographs were scored on six criteria by a pediatric radiologist and orthopedist and compared to the scores of 40 PA full spine radiographs performed in 2013 with standard protocol (group A). Radiation dose was assessed by dose area product (DAP) and effective dose (E). Statistical analysis included independent samples t test, Mann–Whitney U test and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

An optimized protocol was defined (0.2 mm Cu filter, 0.87 relative exposure, with grid). Mean age was 13.3 ± 1.6 years for group A and 13.4 ± 1.7 years for group B. For group B, the mean DAP was 47.0 µGy m2 with an E of 0.13 mSv. For group A, the mean DAP was 85.3 µGy m2 with an E of 0.24 mSv. This represents a dose reduction of 45%. Mean image quality scores for group A (27.9 ± 2.4) and group B (28.1 ± 2.3) were similar (p = 0.612). Interobserver agreement was observed to be excellent (ICC 0.92).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that a low-dose full-spine radiograph can be performed in patients with idiopathic scoliosis without loss of image quality.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stirling AJ, Howel D, Millner PA et al (1996) Late-onset idiopathic scoliosis in children six to fourteen years old. A cross-sectional prevalence study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(9):1330–1336CrossRefPubMed Stirling AJ, Howel D, Millner PA et al (1996) Late-onset idiopathic scoliosis in children six to fourteen years old. A cross-sectional prevalence study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(9):1330–1336CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Presciutti SM, Karukanda T, Lee M (2014) Management decisions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis significantly affect patient radiation exposure. Spine J 14(9):1984–1990CrossRefPubMed Presciutti SM, Karukanda T, Lee M (2014) Management decisions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis significantly affect patient radiation exposure. Spine J 14(9):1984–1990CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mgaadi M, Ben Omrane L, Hammou A (2012) Effective dose for scoliosis patients undergoing full spine radiography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 149(3):297–303CrossRef Mgaadi M, Ben Omrane L, Hammou A (2012) Effective dose for scoliosis patients undergoing full spine radiography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 149(3):297–303CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pace N, Leonardo R, Negrini S (2013) A comparison approach to explain risks related to X-ray imaging for scoliosis, 2012 SOSORT award. Scoliosis 8(1):11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pace N, Leonardo R, Negrini S (2013) A comparison approach to explain risks related to X-ray imaging for scoliosis, 2012 SOSORT award. Scoliosis 8(1):11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Amzallag-Bellenger E, Uyttenhove E, Nectoux E et al (2014) Idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents: assessment with a biplanar X-ray device. Insights into imaging [serial online] 5:571–583CrossRef Amzallag-Bellenger E, Uyttenhove E, Nectoux E et al (2014) Idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents: assessment with a biplanar X-ray device. Insights into imaging [serial online] 5:571–583CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Frush DP, Donelly LF, Rosen NS (2011) Radiation risk from medical imaging: a special need to focus on children. In: Evidence-based imaging. Improving the quality of imaging in patient care. Springer, New York, pp 27–41 Frush DP, Donelly LF, Rosen NS (2011) Radiation risk from medical imaging: a special need to focus on children. In: Evidence-based imaging. Improving the quality of imaging in patient care. Springer, New York, pp 27–41
7.
go back to reference Law M, Ma WK, Lau D et al (2016) Cumulative radiation exposure and associated cancer risk estimates for scoliosis patients: impact of repetitive full spine radiography. Eur J Radiol 85:625–628CrossRefPubMed Law M, Ma WK, Lau D et al (2016) Cumulative radiation exposure and associated cancer risk estimates for scoliosis patients: impact of repetitive full spine radiography. Eur J Radiol 85:625–628CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hohenforst-Schmidt W, Banckwitz R, Zarogoulidis P et al (2014) Radiation exposure of patients by cone beam CT during endobronchial navigation : a phantom study. J Cancer 5(3):192–202CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hohenforst-Schmidt W, Banckwitz R, Zarogoulidis P et al (2014) Radiation exposure of patients by cone beam CT during endobronchial navigation : a phantom study. J Cancer 5(3):192–202CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Båth M (2010) Evaluating imaging systems: practical applications. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139:26–36CrossRefPubMed Båth M (2010) Evaluating imaging systems: practical applications. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139:26–36CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yvert M, Diallo A, Bessou P et al (2015) Radiography of scoliosis: comparative dose levels and image quality between a dynamic flat-panel detector and a slot-scanning device (EOS system). Diagn Interv Imaging 96(11):1177–1188CrossRefPubMed Yvert M, Diallo A, Bessou P et al (2015) Radiography of scoliosis: comparative dose levels and image quality between a dynamic flat-panel detector and a slot-scanning device (EOS system). Diagn Interv Imaging 96(11):1177–1188CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference ICRP (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4) ICRP (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4)
12.
go back to reference Hansen J, Jurik AG, Fiirgaard B et al (2003) Optimisation of scoliosis examinations in children. Pediatr Radiol 33(11):752–765CrossRefPubMed Hansen J, Jurik AG, Fiirgaard B et al (2003) Optimisation of scoliosis examinations in children. Pediatr Radiol 33(11):752–765CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Andersen P Jr, Andersen P, van der Kooy P (1982) Dose reduction in radiography of the spine in scoliosis. Acta Radiol Diagn 23:251–253CrossRef Andersen P Jr, Andersen P, van der Kooy P (1982) Dose reduction in radiography of the spine in scoliosis. Acta Radiol Diagn 23:251–253CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Geijer H, Verdonck B, Beckman KW et al (2003) Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization. Eur Radiol 13(3):543–551PubMed Geijer H, Verdonck B, Beckman KW et al (2003) Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization. Eur Radiol 13(3):543–551PubMed
15.
go back to reference Commission of the European Communities (1996) European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in pediatrics. Office for official publications of the European Communities, EUR 16261 Commission of the European Communities (1996) European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in pediatrics. Office for official publications of the European Communities, EUR 16261
16.
go back to reference Geijer H, Beckman KW, Jonsson B et al (2001) Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation. Radiol 218:402–410CrossRef Geijer H, Beckman KW, Jonsson B et al (2001) Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation. Radiol 218:402–410CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hallen S, Martling K, Mattsson S (1992) Dosimetry at X ray examinations of scoliosis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 43:49–54CrossRef Hallen S, Martling K, Mattsson S (1992) Dosimetry at X ray examinations of scoliosis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 43:49–54CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Almen AJ, Mattsson S (1996) Dose distribution at radiographic examination of the spine in pediatric radiology. Spine 21:750–756CrossRefPubMed Almen AJ, Mattsson S (1996) Dose distribution at radiographic examination of the spine in pediatric radiology. Spine 21:750–756CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Chamberlain C, Huda W, Hojnowski L et al (2000) Radiation doses to patients undergoing scoliosis radiography. Br J Radiography 73:847–853CrossRef Chamberlain C, Huda W, Hojnowski L et al (2000) Radiation doses to patients undergoing scoliosis radiography. Br J Radiography 73:847–853CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Deschênes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G et al (2010) diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine 35(9):989–994CrossRefPubMed Deschênes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G et al (2010) diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine 35(9):989–994CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hui S, Pialasse JP, Wong J et al (2016) Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose X-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scolios: 2016 SOSORT_IRSSD “John Sevastic Award” winner in imaging research. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:46CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hui S, Pialasse JP, Wong J et al (2016) Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose X-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scolios: 2016 SOSORT_IRSSD “John Sevastic Award” winner in imaging research. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:46CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Ilharreborde B, Ferrero C, Alison M et al (2016) EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent Idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25:526–531CrossRefPubMed Ilharreborde B, Ferrero C, Alison M et al (2016) EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent Idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25:526–531CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference McKenna C, Wade R, Faria R et al (2012) EOS 2D/3D X-ray system: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 16(14):1CrossRefPubMedCentral McKenna C, Wade R, Faria R et al (2012) EOS 2D/3D X-ray system: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 16(14):1CrossRefPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Lowered dose full-spine radiography in pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis
Authors
Caroline Ernst
Nico Buls
Armand Laumen
Gert Van Gompel
Filip Verhelle
Johan de Mey
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5561-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

European Spine Journal 5/2018 Go to the issue