Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2019

Open Access 01-11-2019 | Computed Tomography | Scientific Article

CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction

Authors: Ruud H. H. Wellenberg, Jochen A. C. van Osch, Henk J. Boelhouwers, Mireille A. Edens, Geert J. Streekstra, Harmen B. Ettema, Martijn F. Boomsma

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 11/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of radiation dose reduction on image quality in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) combined with orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR).

Materials and methods

Patients with metal-on-metal THAs received a pelvic CT with a full (FD) and a reduced radiation dose (RD) with −20%, −40%, −57%, or −80% CT radiation dose respectively, when assigned to group 1, 2, 3, or 4 respectively. FD acquisitions were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction, iDose4. RD acquisitions were additionally reconstructed with iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) levels 1–3 with different levels of noise suppression. CT numbers, noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were measured in muscle, fat and bladder. Subjective image quality was evaluated on seven aspects including artefacts, osseous structures, prosthetic components and soft tissues.

Results

Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. While reducing radiation dose by 20%, 40%, 57%, or 80% in combination with IMR, CT numbers remained constant. Compared with iDose4, the noise decreased (p < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratios increased (p < 0.001) with IMR. O-MAR improved CT number accuracy in the bladder and reduced noise in the bladder, muscle and fat (p < 0.01). Subjective image quality was rated lower on RD IMR images than FD iDose4 images on all seven aspects (p < 0.05) and was not related to the applied radiation dose reduction.

Conclusion

In RD IMR with O-MAR images, CT numbers remained constant, noise decreased and contrast-to-noise ratios between muscle and fat increased compared with FD iDose4 with O-MAR images in patients with metal-on-metal THAs. Subjective image quality reduced, regardless of the degree of radiation dose reduction.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Khawaja RDA, Singh S, Otrakji A, et al. Dose reduction in pediatric abdominal CT: use of iterative reconstruction techniques across different CT platforms. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(7):1046–55.CrossRef Khawaja RDA, Singh S, Otrakji A, et al. Dose reduction in pediatric abdominal CT: use of iterative reconstruction techniques across different CT platforms. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(7):1046–55.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mehta D, Thompson R, Morton T, Dhanantwari A, Shefer E. Iterative model reconstruction: simultaneously lowered computed tomography radiation dose and improved image quality. Med Phys Int J 2013;1:147-155. Mehta D, Thompson R, Morton T, Dhanantwari A, Shefer E. Iterative model reconstruction: simultaneously lowered computed tomography radiation dose and improved image quality. Med Phys Int J 2013;1:147-155.
4.
go back to reference Boudabbous S, Arditi D, Paulin E, Syrogiannopoulou A, Becker C, Montet X. Model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) for the reduction of metal artifacts on CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(2):380–5.CrossRef Boudabbous S, Arditi D, Paulin E, Syrogiannopoulou A, Becker C, Montet X. Model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) for the reduction of metal artifacts on CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(2):380–5.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kuya K, Shinohara Y, Kato A, Sakamoto M, Kurosaki M, Ogawa T. Reduction of metal artifacts due to dental hardware in computed tomography angiography: assessment of the utility of model-based iterative reconstruction. Neuroradiology. 2017;59(3):231–5.CrossRef Kuya K, Shinohara Y, Kato A, Sakamoto M, Kurosaki M, Ogawa T. Reduction of metal artifacts due to dental hardware in computed tomography angiography: assessment of the utility of model-based iterative reconstruction. Neuroradiology. 2017;59(3):231–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yasaka K, Katsura M, Akahane M, Sato J, Matsuda I, Ohtomo K. Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):209.CrossRef Yasaka K, Katsura M, Akahane M, Sato J, Matsuda I, Ohtomo K. Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):209.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Padole A, Singh S, Lira D, et al. Assessment of filtered back projection, adaptive statistical, and model-based iterative reconstruction for reduced dose abdominal computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39(4):462–7.CrossRef Padole A, Singh S, Lira D, et al. Assessment of filtered back projection, adaptive statistical, and model-based iterative reconstruction for reduced dose abdominal computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39(4):462–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Li H, Noel C, Chen H, et al. Clinical evaluation of a commercial orthopedic metal artifact reduction tool for CT simulations in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2012;39:7507–17.CrossRef Li H, Noel C, Chen H, et al. Clinical evaluation of a commercial orthopedic metal artifact reduction tool for CT simulations in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2012;39:7507–17.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wellenberg RHH, Boomsma MF, van Osch JAC, et al. Computed tomography imaging of a hip prosthesis using iterative model-based reconstruction and Orthopaedic metal artefact reduction: a quantitative analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016;40(6):971–8.CrossRef Wellenberg RHH, Boomsma MF, van Osch JAC, et al. Computed tomography imaging of a hip prosthesis using iterative model-based reconstruction and Orthopaedic metal artefact reduction: a quantitative analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016;40(6):971–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boomsma MF, Warringa N, Edens MA, et al. Quantitative analysis of orthopedic metal artefact reduction in 64-slice computed tomography scans in large head metal-on-metal total hip replacement, a phantom study. Springerplus. 2016;5:405-15.CrossRef Boomsma MF, Warringa N, Edens MA, et al. Quantitative analysis of orthopedic metal artefact reduction in 64-slice computed tomography scans in large head metal-on-metal total hip replacement, a phantom study. Springerplus. 2016;5:405-15.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shim E, Kang Y, Ahn JM, et al. Metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR): usefulness in CT evaluation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(4):860–6.CrossRef Shim E, Kang Y, Ahn JM, et al. Metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR): usefulness in CT evaluation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(4):860–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Andersson KM, Nowik P, Persliden J, Thunberg P, Norrman E. Metal artefact reduction in CT imaging of hip prostheses—an evaluation of commercial techniques provided by four vendors. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1052):20140473.CrossRef Andersson KM, Nowik P, Persliden J, Thunberg P, Norrman E. Metal artefact reduction in CT imaging of hip prostheses—an evaluation of commercial techniques provided by four vendors. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1052):20140473.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wellenberg RHH, Boomsma MF, van Osch JAC, et al. Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46(5):623–32.CrossRef Wellenberg RHH, Boomsma MF, van Osch JAC, et al. Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46(5):623–32.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gondim Teixeira P, Meyer J, Baumann C, et al. Total hip prosthesis CT with single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction: impact on the visualization of specific periprosthetic soft tissue structures. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(9):1237–46.CrossRef Gondim Teixeira P, Meyer J, Baumann C, et al. Total hip prosthesis CT with single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction: impact on the visualization of specific periprosthetic soft tissue structures. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(9):1237–46.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yasaka K, Maeda E, Hanaoka S, Katsura M, Sato J, Ohtomo K. Single-energy metal artifact reduction for helical computed tomography of the pelvis in patients with metal hip prostheses. Jpn J Radiol. 2016;34(9):625–32.CrossRef Yasaka K, Maeda E, Hanaoka S, Katsura M, Sato J, Ohtomo K. Single-energy metal artifact reduction for helical computed tomography of the pelvis in patients with metal hip prostheses. Jpn J Radiol. 2016;34(9):625–32.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sonoda A, Nitta N, Ushio N, et al. Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils. Jpn J Radiol. 2015;33(11):710–6.CrossRef Sonoda A, Nitta N, Ushio N, et al. Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils. Jpn J Radiol. 2015;33(11):710–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Subhas N, Primak AN, Obuchowski NA, et al. Iterative metal artifact reduction: evaluation and optimization of technique. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(12):1729–35.CrossRef Subhas N, Primak AN, Obuchowski NA, et al. Iterative metal artifact reduction: evaluation and optimization of technique. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(12):1729–35.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Han SC, Chung YE, Lee YH, Park KK, Kim MJ, Kim KW. Metal artifact reduction software used with abdominopelvic dual-energy CT of patients with metal hip prostheses: assessment of image quality and clinical feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(4):788–95.CrossRef Han SC, Chung YE, Lee YH, Park KK, Kim MJ, Kim KW. Metal artifact reduction software used with abdominopelvic dual-energy CT of patients with metal hip prostheses: assessment of image quality and clinical feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(4):788–95.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Reynoso E, Capunay C, Rasumoff A, et al. Periprosthetic artifact reduction using virtual monochromatic imaging derived from gemstone dual-energy computed tomography and dedicated software. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016;40(4):649–57.CrossRef Reynoso E, Capunay C, Rasumoff A, et al. Periprosthetic artifact reduction using virtual monochromatic imaging derived from gemstone dual-energy computed tomography and dedicated software. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016;40(4):649–57.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Huang J, Kerns J, Nute J, et al. An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(3):1047–67.CrossRef Huang J, Kerns J, Nute J, et al. An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(3):1047–67.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pessis E, Sverzut JM, Campagna R, Guerini H, Feydy A, Drapé J-L. Reduction of metal artifact with dual-energy CT: virtual monospectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching and metal artifact reduction software. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19(5):446–55.CrossRef Pessis E, Sverzut JM, Campagna R, Guerini H, Feydy A, Drapé J-L. Reduction of metal artifact with dual-energy CT: virtual monospectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching and metal artifact reduction software. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19(5):446–55.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bolstad K, Flatabø S, Aadnevik D, Dalehaug I, Vetti N. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants. Acta Radiol. 2018;59(9):111–1118.CrossRef Bolstad K, Flatabø S, Aadnevik D, Dalehaug I, Vetti N. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants. Acta Radiol. 2018;59(9):111–1118.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kataria B, Althén JN, Smedby Ö, Persson A, Sökjer H, Sandborg M. Assessment of image quality in abdominal CT: potential dose reduction with model-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 2018;28(6):2464–73.CrossRef Kataria B, Althén JN, Smedby Ö, Persson A, Sökjer H, Sandborg M. Assessment of image quality in abdominal CT: potential dose reduction with model-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 2018;28(6):2464–73.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Richard S, Husarik DB, Yadava G, Murphy SN, Samei E. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys. 2012;39(7):4115–22.CrossRef Richard S, Husarik DB, Yadava G, Murphy SN, Samei E. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys. 2012;39(7):4115–22.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Samei E, Richard S. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology. Med Phys 2015;42:314–23.CrossRef Samei E, Richard S. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology. Med Phys 2015;42:314–23.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Solomon J, Mileto A, Ramirez Giraldo JC, Samei E. Diagnostic performance of an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm for multidetector CT scanner: potential for radiation dose reduction in a multireader study 1. Radiology. 2015;275(3):735–45.CrossRef Solomon J, Mileto A, Ramirez Giraldo JC, Samei E. Diagnostic performance of an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm for multidetector CT scanner: potential for radiation dose reduction in a multireader study 1. Radiology. 2015;275(3):735–45.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Löve A, Olsson M-L, Siemund R, Stålhammar F, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Söderberg M. Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol. 2013;86(1031):1–11.CrossRef Löve A, Olsson M-L, Siemund R, Stålhammar F, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Söderberg M. Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol. 2013;86(1031):1–11.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Millon D, Vlassenbroek A, Van Maanen AG, Cambier SE, Coche EE. Low contrast detectability and spatial resolution with model-based iterative reconstructions of MDCT images: a phantom and cadaveric study. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(3):927–37.CrossRef Millon D, Vlassenbroek A, Van Maanen AG, Cambier SE, Coche EE. Low contrast detectability and spatial resolution with model-based iterative reconstructions of MDCT images: a phantom and cadaveric study. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(3):927–37.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X. Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(2):360–6.CrossRef Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X. Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(2):360–6.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pooler BD, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. Prospective evaluation of reduced dose computed tomography for the detection of low-contrast liver lesions: direct comparison with concurrent standard dose imaging. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):2055–66.CrossRef Pooler BD, Lubner MG, Kim DH, et al. Prospective evaluation of reduced dose computed tomography for the detection of low-contrast liver lesions: direct comparison with concurrent standard dose imaging. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):2055–66.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Vardhanabhuti V, Riordan RD, Mitchell GR, Hyde C, Roobottom CA. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(4):209–16.CrossRef Vardhanabhuti V, Riordan RD, Mitchell GR, Hyde C, Roobottom CA. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(4):209–16.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Subhas N, Pursyko CP, Polster JM, et al. Dose reduction with dedicated CT metal artifact reduction algorithm: CT phantom study. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(3):593–600.CrossRef Subhas N, Pursyko CP, Polster JM, et al. Dose reduction with dedicated CT metal artifact reduction algorithm: CT phantom study. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(3):593–600.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction
Authors
Ruud H. H. Wellenberg
Jochen A. C. van Osch
Henk J. Boelhouwers
Mireille A. Edens
Geert J. Streekstra
Harmen B. Ettema
Martijn F. Boomsma
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03206-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2019

Skeletal Radiology 11/2019 Go to the issue