Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Appendicitis | Original Article

Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings

Authors: Rathachai Kaewlai, Sasima Tongsai, Wanwarang Teerasamit, Dhanawin Wongsaengchan, Napakadol Noppakunsomboon, Pramuk Khamman, Anchisa Chatkaewpaisal, Piyaporn Apisarnthanarak

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The study aimed to evaluate scoring systems for predicting complicated appendicitis in adults diagnosed with acute appendicitis on computed tomography.

Methods

Three hundred twenty-five consecutive adult patients (mean age 51.9 ± 19.6 years, 212 women) diagnosed with acute appendicitis on computed tomography were retrospectively included. Clinical and imaging findings were compared between patients with and without complicated appendicitis, and independent associations were identified. As C-reactive protein was not available for most patients, 5 out of 8 scoring systems were modified. They, and a newly proposed system, were compared via area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC), Additionally, the latter was internally validated. Pairwise comparison was performed, and diagnostic performance of these scoring systems was obtained.

Results

One hundred twenty-seven patients (36.8%) had complicated appendicitis. Significant independent associations were found between complicated appendicitis and duration of symptoms > 12 h, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, periappendiceal fluid, and extraluminal air (p values < 0.001 to 0.037; AUCs of 0.824–0.829). AUCs of 9 scoring systems ranged from 0.692 to 0.831. Of these, modified Atema, Kim HY, and proposed scores had similarly high and non-significantly different AUCs (0.793–0.831) on pairwise comparison. Their sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were 73.0–90.6%, 48.5–70.6%, and 64.3–72.3%, respectively. Internal validity test demonstrated high AUCs (0.826–0.844) with one of the proposed scores using odds ratio having 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value.

Conclusions

Few scoring systems, including proposed ones, had high AUCs, sensitivity, and reasonable specificities, which could potentially aid in safely selecting adult patients with acute appendicitis for nonoperative management.

Critical relevance statement

The study suggests few scoring systems for predicting complicated appendicitis with high AUCs and reasonable sensitivities, potentially aiding in selecting patients for nonoperative management.

Key points

• The study evaluated existing and proposed new scoring systems to predict complicated appendicitis in adults with acute appendicitis on computed tomography.
• Several factors were found to be significantly associated with complicated appendicitis, including duration of symptoms, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, periappendiceal fluid, and extraluminal air.
• The modified Atema, Kim HY, and newly proposed scoring systems performed well, potentially aiding in nonoperative management selection.

Graphical Abstract

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B et al (2020) Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 15:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B et al (2020) Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 15:27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Moris D, Paulson EK, Pappas TN (2021) Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults: a review. JAMA 326(22):2299–2311CrossRefPubMed Moris D, Paulson EK, Pappas TN (2021) Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults: a review. JAMA 326(22):2299–2311CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bom WJ, Scheijmans JCG, Salminen P, Boermeester MA (2021) Diagnosis of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in adults. Scand J Surg 110(2):170–179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bom WJ, Scheijmans JCG, Salminen P, Boermeester MA (2021) Diagnosis of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in adults. Scand J Surg 110(2):170–179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Song H, Lee S, Park JH et al (2021) Can patient triaging with clinical scoring systems reduce CT use in adolescents and young adults suspected of having appendicitis? Radiology 300(2):350–358CrossRefPubMed Song H, Lee S, Park JH et al (2021) Can patient triaging with clinical scoring systems reduce CT use in adolescents and young adults suspected of having appendicitis? Radiology 300(2):350–358CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Atema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2015) Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 102(8):979–990CrossRefPubMed Atema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2015) Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 102(8):979–990CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kim TH, Cho BS, Jung JH, Lee MS, Jang JH, Kim CN (2015) Predictive factors to distinguish between patients with noncomplicated appendicitis and those with complicated appendicitis. Ann Coloproctol 31(5):192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim TH, Cho BS, Jung JH, Lee MS, Jang JH, Kim CN (2015) Predictive factors to distinguish between patients with noncomplicated appendicitis and those with complicated appendicitis. Ann Coloproctol 31(5):192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Imaoka Y, Itamoto T, Takakura Y, Suzuki T, Ikeda S, Urushihara T (2016) Validity of predictive factors of acute complicated appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 11(1):48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Imaoka Y, Itamoto T, Takakura Y, Suzuki T, Ikeda S, Urushihara T (2016) Validity of predictive factors of acute complicated appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 11(1):48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Avanesov M, Wiese NJ, Karul M et al (2018) Diagnostic prediction of complicated appendicitis by combined clinical and radiological appendicitis severity index (APSI). Eur Radiol 28(9):3601–3610CrossRefPubMed Avanesov M, Wiese NJ, Karul M et al (2018) Diagnostic prediction of complicated appendicitis by combined clinical and radiological appendicitis severity index (APSI). Eur Radiol 28(9):3601–3610CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Khan MS, Siddiqui MTH, Shahzad N, Haider A, Chaudhry MBH, Alvi R (2019) Factors associated with complicated appendicitis: view from a low-middle income country. Cureus 11(5):e4765PubMedPubMedCentral Khan MS, Siddiqui MTH, Shahzad N, Haider A, Chaudhry MBH, Alvi R (2019) Factors associated with complicated appendicitis: view from a low-middle income country. Cureus 11(5):e4765PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Lin HA, Tsai HW, Chao CC, Lin SF (2021) Periappendiceal fat-stranding models for discriminating between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a diagnostic and validation study. World J Emerg Surg 16(1):52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin HA, Tsai HW, Chao CC, Lin SF (2021) Periappendiceal fat-stranding models for discriminating between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a diagnostic and validation study. World J Emerg Surg 16(1):52CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Kim HY, Park JH, Lee SS, Jeon JJ, Yoon CJ, Lee KH (2021) Differentiation between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: diagnostic model development and validation study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46(3):948–959CrossRefPubMed Kim HY, Park JH, Lee SS, Jeon JJ, Yoon CJ, Lee KH (2021) Differentiation between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: diagnostic model development and validation study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46(3):948–959CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Geerdink TH, Augustinus S, Atema JJ, Jensch S, Vrouenraets BC, de Castro SMM (2021) Validation of a scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated appendicitis. J Surg Res 258:231–238CrossRefPubMed Geerdink TH, Augustinus S, Atema JJ, Jensch S, Vrouenraets BC, de Castro SMM (2021) Validation of a scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated appendicitis. J Surg Res 258:231–238CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fujiwara K, Abe A, Masatsugu T, Hirano T, Hiraka K, Sada M (2021) Usefulness of several factors and clinical scoring models in preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis. PLoS One 16(7):e0255253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fujiwara K, Abe A, Masatsugu T, Hirano T, Hiraka K, Sada M (2021) Usefulness of several factors and clinical scoring models in preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis. PLoS One 16(7):e0255253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Iamwat J, Teerasamit W, Apisarnthanarak P, Noppakunsomboon N, Kaewlai R (2021) Predictive ability of CT findings in the differentiation of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: a retrospective investigation of 201 patients undergone appendectomy at initial admission. Insights Imaging 12(1):143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iamwat J, Teerasamit W, Apisarnthanarak P, Noppakunsomboon N, Kaewlai R (2021) Predictive ability of CT findings in the differentiation of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: a retrospective investigation of 201 patients undergone appendectomy at initial admission. Insights Imaging 12(1):143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Bröker MEE, van Lieshout EMM, van der Elst M, Stassen LPS, Schepers T (2012) Discriminating between simple and perforated appendicitis. J Surg Res 176(1):79–83CrossRefPubMed Bröker MEE, van Lieshout EMM, van der Elst M, Stassen LPS, Schepers T (2012) Discriminating between simple and perforated appendicitis. J Surg Res 176(1):79–83CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chambers AC, Bismohun SL, Davies H, White P, Patil AV (2015) Predictive value of abnormally raised serum bilirubin in acute appendicitis: a cohort study. Int J Surg 13:207–210CrossRefPubMed Chambers AC, Bismohun SL, Davies H, White P, Patil AV (2015) Predictive value of abnormally raised serum bilirubin in acute appendicitis: a cohort study. Int J Surg 13:207–210CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Eddama MMR, Fragkos KC, Renshaw S et al (2019) Logistic regression model to predict acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 101:107–118CrossRef Eddama MMR, Fragkos KC, Renshaw S et al (2019) Logistic regression model to predict acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 101:107–118CrossRef
18.
go back to reference García-Amador C, Arteaga Peralta V, de la Plaza LR, Torralba M, Medina Velasco A, Ramia JM (2021) Evaluation of preoperative clinical and serological determinantions in complicated acute appendicitis: a score for predicting complicated appendicitis. Cir Esp (Engl Ed) 99(4):282–288CrossRefPubMed García-Amador C, Arteaga Peralta V, de la Plaza LR, Torralba M, Medina Velasco A, Ramia JM (2021) Evaluation of preoperative clinical and serological determinantions in complicated acute appendicitis: a score for predicting complicated appendicitis. Cir Esp (Engl Ed) 99(4):282–288CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mahankali SK, Ahamed SA, Gupta GSP, Razek AAKA (2021) CT based acute appendicitis severity index for acute appendicitis and validate its effectiveness in predicting complicated appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 28(5):921–927CrossRefPubMed Mahankali SK, Ahamed SA, Gupta GSP, Razek AAKA (2021) CT based acute appendicitis severity index for acute appendicitis and validate its effectiveness in predicting complicated appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 28(5):921–927CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lin HA, Lin LT, Lin SF (2023) Application of artificial neural network models to differentiate between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis. J Med Sys 47(1):38CrossRef Lin HA, Lin LT, Lin SF (2023) Application of artificial neural network models to differentiate between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis. J Med Sys 47(1):38CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Podda M, Andersson R, Boermeester M et al (2021) Do young patients with high clinical suspicion of appendicitis really need cross-sectional imaging? Proceedings from a highly controversial debate among the experts’ panel of 2020 WSES Jerusalem guidelines. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 90(5):e101–e107CrossRefPubMed Podda M, Andersson R, Boermeester M et al (2021) Do young patients with high clinical suspicion of appendicitis really need cross-sectional imaging? Proceedings from a highly controversial debate among the experts’ panel of 2020 WSES Jerusalem guidelines. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 90(5):e101–e107CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Liang D, Fan Y, Zeng Y et al (2023) Development and validation of a deep learning and radiomics combined model for differentiating complicated from uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Available from: https://ssm.com/abstract=4297061. [Cited 2023 May 12] Liang D, Fan Y, Zeng Y et al (2023) Development and validation of a deep learning and radiomics combined model for differentiating complicated from uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Available from: https://​ssm.​com/​abstract=​4297061. [Cited 2023 May 12]
23.
go back to reference Bom WJ, Scheijmans JCG, Ubels S et al (2022) Optimising diagnostics to discriminate complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis: a prospective cohort study protocol. BMJ Open 12(4):e054304CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bom WJ, Scheijmans JCG, Ubels S et al (2022) Optimising diagnostics to discriminate complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis: a prospective cohort study protocol. BMJ Open 12(4):e054304CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Validation of scoring systems for the prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults using clinical and computed tomographic findings
Authors
Rathachai Kaewlai
Sasima Tongsai
Wanwarang Teerasamit
Dhanawin Wongsaengchan
Napakadol Noppakunsomboon
Pramuk Khamman
Anchisa Chatkaewpaisal
Piyaporn Apisarnthanarak
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01540-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Insights into Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue