Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Gastrointestinal

Diagnostic prediction of complicated appendicitis by combined clinical and radiological appendicitis severity index (APSI)

Authors: Maxim Avanesov, Nis Jesper Wiese, Murat Karul, Helena Guerreiro, Sarah Keller, Philip Busch, Frank Jacobsen, Gerhard Adam, Jin Yamamura

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To develop a routinely applicable severity index for the management of acute appendicitis in adults using combined clinical and radiological parameters and retroperitoneal space planes (RSP).

Methods

Two hundred consecutive patients with histologically proven acute appendicitis and available presurgical CT scans were analysed retrospectively. Two radiologists assessed all CT scans for morphologic sings of appendicitis and six RSP. Clinical parameters were age, body temperature, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count, and duration of symptoms. Radiological parameters were appendix diameter and wall thickness, periappendiceal fat stranding and fluid, intraluminal and extraluminal air, thinning of appendiceal wall, caecal wall thickening, appendicolith and abscess formation.

Results

One hundred and three patients (51%) had histologically proven complicated appendicitis. Based on three clinical (age ≥52 years, body temperature ≥37.5°C, duration of symptoms ≥48 h) and four computed tomography (CT) findings (appendix diameter ≥14 mm, presence of periappendiceal fluid, extraluminal air, perityphlitic abscess), the APSI was developed using regression coefficients of multivariate logistic regression analyses with a maximum of 10 points. A score of ≥4 points predicted complicated appendicitis with a positive predictive value of 92% and a negative predictive value of 83%. Substantial to excellent interobserver agreement was found for the four radiological parameters of the APSI [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), 0.78-0.83]. The RSP evaluation presented no added value for the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis.

Conclusions

Using APSI, an accurate and simple prediction of complicated appendicitis in adults was possible. The RSP count was not useful for the diagnosis of complicated appendicitis.

Key points

• Appendicitis severity score provides an accurate and simple prediction of complicated appendicitis
• Appendicitis severity score ≥4 accurately predicted complicated appendicitis (PPV 92%;NPV 83%)
• Evaluation of retroperitoneal space planes was not useful in diagnosing complicated appendicitis
Literature
2.
go back to reference Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EAM (2015) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 15:48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EAM (2015) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 15:48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Hobeika C, Hor T, Chereau N et al (2017) Day surgery for acute appendicitis in adults: a prospective series of 102 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 27:158–162CrossRefPubMed Hobeika C, Hor T, Chereau N et al (2017) Day surgery for acute appendicitis in adults: a prospective series of 102 patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 27:158–162CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2012) Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 344:e2156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2012) Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 344:e2156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Rollins KE, Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2016) Antibiotics versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg 40:2305–2318CrossRefPubMed Rollins KE, Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2016) Antibiotics versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg 40:2305–2318CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hansson J, Körner U, Ludwigs K et al (2012) Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice. World J Surg 36:2028–2036CrossRefPubMed Hansson J, Körner U, Ludwigs K et al (2012) Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice. World J Surg 36:2028–2036CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sallinen V, Akl EA, You JJ et al (2016) Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 103:656–667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sallinen V, Akl EA, You JJ et al (2016) Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 103:656–667CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T et al (2015) Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 313:2340–2348CrossRefPubMed Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T et al (2015) Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 313:2340–2348CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Van RA, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2008) Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression us related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 249:97–106CrossRef Van RA, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2008) Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression us related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 249:97–106CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hansen AJ, Young SW, De Petris G, Tessier DJ, Hernandez JL, Johnson DJ (2004) Histologic severity of appendicitis can be predicted by computed tomography. ArchSurg 139:1304–1308 Hansen AJ, Young SW, De Petris G, Tessier DJ, Hernandez JL, Johnson DJ (2004) Histologic severity of appendicitis can be predicted by computed tomography. ArchSurg 139:1304–1308
11.
go back to reference Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theyson JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC (2006) Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology 241:780–786CrossRefPubMed Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theyson JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC (2006) Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology 241:780–786CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kim MS, Park HW, Park JY et al (2014) Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome. Abdominal Imaging 39:459–466CrossRefPubMed Kim MS, Park HW, Park JY et al (2014) Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome. Abdominal Imaging 39:459–466CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Antonopoulos P, Konstantinidis F, Dalamarinis K et al (2006) Acute gangrenous appendicitis-diagnosis by spiral CT. Ann Gastroenterol 19:72–76 Antonopoulos P, Konstantinidis F, Dalamarinis K et al (2006) Acute gangrenous appendicitis-diagnosis by spiral CT. Ann Gastroenterol 19:72–76
14.
go back to reference Foley TA, Earnest F IV, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL (2005) Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis : accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay 1. Radiology 235:89–96CrossRefPubMed Foley TA, Earnest F IV, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL (2005) Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis : accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay 1. Radiology 235:89–96CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lietzén E, Mällinen J, Grönroos MJ et al (2016) Is preoperative distinction between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis feasible without imaging ? Surgery 160:789–795CrossRefPubMed Lietzén E, Mällinen J, Grönroos MJ et al (2016) Is preoperative distinction between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis feasible without imaging ? Surgery 160:789–795CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 100:322–329CrossRefPubMed Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 100:322–329CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Imaoka Y, Itamoto T, Takakura Y, Suzuki T, Ikeda S, Urushihara T (2016) Validity of predictive factors of acute complicated appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 11:48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Imaoka Y, Itamoto T, Takakura Y, Suzuki T, Ikeda S, Urushihara T (2016) Validity of predictive factors of acute complicated appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 11:48CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Kitaoka K, Saito K, Tokuuye K (2014) Important CT findings for prediction of severe appendicitis: involvement of retroperitoneal space. World J Emerg Surg 9:62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kitaoka K, Saito K, Tokuuye K (2014) Important CT findings for prediction of severe appendicitis: involvement of retroperitoneal space. World J Emerg Surg 9:62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Jeon HG, Ju HU, Kim GY et al (2014) Bacteriology and changes in antibiotic susceptibility in adults with community-acquired perforated appendicitis. PLoS One 9:e111144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeon HG, Ju HU, Kim GY et al (2014) Bacteriology and changes in antibiotic susceptibility in adults with community-acquired perforated appendicitis. PLoS One 9:e111144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174:331–336CrossRefPubMed Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174:331–336CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L et al (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1261–1265CrossRefPubMed Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L et al (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1261–1265CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference De Waele JJ, Delrue L, Hoste EA, De Vos M, Duyck P, Colardyn FA (2007) Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas 34:185–190CrossRefPubMed De Waele JJ, Delrue L, Hoste EA, De Vos M, Duyck P, Colardyn FA (2007) Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas 34:185–190CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Atema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2015) Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 102:979–990CrossRefPubMed Atema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA (2015) Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 102:979–990CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Andersson REB (2004) Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg 91:28–37CrossRefPubMed Andersson REB (2004) Meta-analysis of the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg 91:28–37CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bröker MEE, Van Lieshout EMM, van der Elst M et al (2012) Discriminating between simple and perforated appendicitis. J Surg Res 83:79–83CrossRef Bröker MEE, Van Lieshout EMM, van der Elst M et al (2012) Discriminating between simple and perforated appendicitis. J Surg Res 83:79–83CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Augustin T, Cagir B, Vandermeer TJ (2011) Characteristics of perforated appendicitis: effect of delay is confounded by age and gender. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1223–1231CrossRefPubMed Augustin T, Cagir B, Vandermeer TJ (2011) Characteristics of perforated appendicitis: effect of delay is confounded by age and gender. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1223–1231CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference van Vught LA, Endeman H, Meijvis SC et al (2014) The effect of age on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:1183–1188CrossRefPubMed van Vught LA, Endeman H, Meijvis SC et al (2014) The effect of age on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:1183–1188CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Miki T, Ogata S, Uto M et al (2005) Enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its severity. Radiat Med 23:242–255PubMed Miki T, Ogata S, Uto M et al (2005) Enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its severity. Radiat Med 23:242–255PubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic prediction of complicated appendicitis by combined clinical and radiological appendicitis severity index (APSI)
Authors
Maxim Avanesov
Nis Jesper Wiese
Murat Karul
Helena Guerreiro
Sarah Keller
Philip Busch
Frank Jacobsen
Gerhard Adam
Jin Yamamura
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5339-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

European Radiology 9/2018 Go to the issue