Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Acetabular Fracture | Trauma Surgery

Analysis of computed tomography-based infra-acetabular morphometry to assess the feasibility of infra-acetabular screws

Authors: Shozo Kanezaki, Masashi Miyazaki, Naoki Notani, Toshinobu Ishihara, Tomonori Sakamoto, Tetsutaro Abe, Masashi Kataoka, Hiroshi Tsumura

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The number of pelvic fractures based on osteoporosis has been increasing. The infra-acetabular screw (IAS), which connected both osseous columns, is a safe method of screw placement going through the infra-acetabular corridor (IAC). However, the specifics of the anatomy of IAC have been far from completely understood, especially in the Asian population. The purpose of our study was to reveal the details of the IAC using computed tomography (CT) data.

Materials and methods

Traumatized in-patients having pelvic CT scans from 2014 to 2016 were enrolled. Pediatric and adult patients with pelvic fractures and hip prostheses were excluded. The male/female ratio and distribution of patients' age were equalized manually; 40 male and 40 female patients were included. The IAC was measured on the plane of the inlet view (25° caudal) in multi-planar reconstructed CT images. Measurements: infra-acetabular diameter (IAD), anterior–posterior length of the IAC (APL), length from the starting point of the IAC to the medial edge of the pelvis (LME), length from the starting point of the IAC to the top of the pubic symphysis (LPS), and tilting on inlet plate (TIP).

Results

Age was 59 ± 22 (mean ± SD). Height was 159 ± 11 cm, and body mass index (BMI) was 22.9 ± 4.1. IAD, APL, LME, LPS, and TIP was 4.0 ± 1.3 mm, 89.5 ± 7.1 mm, 8.7 ± 3.6 mm, 57.8 ± 4.8 mm, and 4.7 ± 5.2°, respectively. Over 20% of corridors (35 of 160) were not feasible for IAS placement, because of inadequate width (less than 3.0 mm). Nine corridors (5.6%) had curvature in IAC, which meant technically demanding to insert IAS. There was no difference in IAD between male and female patients, while APL, LME, LPS, and TIP had sex-related differences.

Conclusions

Surgeons should pay attention to the fact that over 20% of IACs are not feasible for infra-acetabular screw placement even with the perfect reduction of fragments when treating acetabular fractures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Matta MJ (2006) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Jt Surg 76:1632–1645 Matta MJ (2006) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Jt Surg 76:1632–1645
2.
go back to reference Kuma A, Shar NA, Kershaw SA, Clayson AD (2005) Operative management of acetabular fractures: a review of 73 fractures. Injury 36:605–612CrossRef Kuma A, Shar NA, Kershaw SA, Clayson AD (2005) Operative management of acetabular fractures: a review of 73 fractures. Injury 36:605–612CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Daurka JS, Pastides PS, Lewis A, Rickman M, Bircher MD (2014) Acetabular fractures in patients aged >  55 years: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg 96:157–163CrossRef Daurka JS, Pastides PS, Lewis A, Rickman M, Bircher MD (2014) Acetabular fractures in patients aged >  55 years: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg 96:157–163CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rinne PP, Laitinen MK, Huttunen T, Kannus P, Mattila VM (2017) The incidence and trauma mechanism of acetabular fractures: a nationwide study in Finland between 1997 and 2014. Injury 48:2157–2161CrossRef Rinne PP, Laitinen MK, Huttunen T, Kannus P, Mattila VM (2017) The incidence and trauma mechanism of acetabular fractures: a nationwide study in Finland between 1997 and 2014. Injury 48:2157–2161CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Miller AN, Prasarn ML, Lorich DG, Helfet DL (2010) The radiological evaluation of acetabular fractures in the elderly. J Bone Jt Surg 92:560–564CrossRef Miller AN, Prasarn ML, Lorich DG, Helfet DL (2010) The radiological evaluation of acetabular fractures in the elderly. J Bone Jt Surg 92:560–564CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Laflamme GY, Hevert-Davies J, Rouleau D, Benoit B, Leduc S (2011) Internal fixation of osteopenic acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate. Injury 42:1130–1134CrossRef Laflamme GY, Hevert-Davies J, Rouleau D, Benoit B, Leduc S (2011) Internal fixation of osteopenic acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate. Injury 42:1130–1134CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Letournel E, Judet R (1993) Fractures of the acetabulum. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Letournel E, Judet R (1993) Fractures of the acetabulum. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Culemann U, Marintschev I, Gras F, Pohlemann T (2011) Infra-acetabular corridor—technical tip for an additional screw placement to increase the fixation strength of acetabular fractures. J Trauma 70:244–246CrossRef Culemann U, Marintschev I, Gras F, Pohlemann T (2011) Infra-acetabular corridor—technical tip for an additional screw placement to increase the fixation strength of acetabular fractures. J Trauma 70:244–246CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Marintschev I, Gras F, Schwarz CE, Pohlemann T, Hofmann GO, Culemann U (2012) Biomechanical comparison of different acetabular plate systems and constructs: the role of infra-acetabular screw placement and use of locking plates. Injury 43:470–474CrossRef Marintschev I, Gras F, Schwarz CE, Pohlemann T, Hofmann GO, Culemann U (2012) Biomechanical comparison of different acetabular plate systems and constructs: the role of infra-acetabular screw placement and use of locking plates. Injury 43:470–474CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gras F, Gottschling H, Schröder M, Marintschev I, Reimers N, Burgkart R (2015) Sex-specific differences of the infraacetabular corridor: a biomorphometric CT-based analysis on a database of 523 pelves. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:361–369CrossRef Gras F, Gottschling H, Schröder M, Marintschev I, Reimers N, Burgkart R (2015) Sex-specific differences of the infraacetabular corridor: a biomorphometric CT-based analysis on a database of 523 pelves. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:361–369CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Baumann F, Schmitz P, Mahr D, Kerschbaum M, Gänsslen A, Nerlich M et al (2018) A guideline for placement of an infra-acetabular screw based on anatomic landmarks via an intra-pelvic approach. J Orthop Surg Res 13:77CrossRef Baumann F, Schmitz P, Mahr D, Kerschbaum M, Gänsslen A, Nerlich M et al (2018) A guideline for placement of an infra-acetabular screw based on anatomic landmarks via an intra-pelvic approach. J Orthop Surg Res 13:77CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Uehara T, Noda T, Yoshimura M, Ozaki T, Yamakawa Y, Kinami Y (2016) Safe zone of posterior column screws and infraacetabular screws for acetabular fractures. Kossetsu (Japanese) 38:811–815 Uehara T, Noda T, Yoshimura M, Ozaki T, Yamakawa Y, Kinami Y (2016) Safe zone of posterior column screws and infraacetabular screws for acetabular fractures. Kossetsu (Japanese) 38:811–815
Metadata
Title
Analysis of computed tomography-based infra-acetabular morphometry to assess the feasibility of infra-acetabular screws
Authors
Shozo Kanezaki
Masashi Miyazaki
Naoki Notani
Toshinobu Ishihara
Tomonori Sakamoto
Tetsutaro Abe
Masashi Kataoka
Hiroshi Tsumura
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03280-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2020 Go to the issue