Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Computed Tomography | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

A two-portal technique using a flexible reamer system is a safe and effective method for transportal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Authors: Kyoung Ho Yoon, Jae Ho Kim, Yoo Beom Kwon, Eung Ju Kim, Sang Hyeon Lee, Sang-Gyun Kim

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

A flexible reamer system (FRS) for transportal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been developed to overcome the technical challenges of a rigid reamer system. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the two-portal technique using an FRS by evaluating femoral tunnel geometry.

Methods

This study included 30 patients (mean age 30 ± 12.1) who underwent transportal single-bundle ACLR. Operations were performed with the two-portal technique using an FRS. Three-dimensional computed tomography was performed for all patients 2 days after the operation. The femoral tunnel position, femoral graft bending angle, femoral tunnel length, and posterior wall breakage were evaluated. These radiologic outcomes were compared to previous literature-reported outcomes.

Results

The mean distances (measured as a percentage) from the posterior wall and the intercondylar notch roof to the femoral tunnel center were 29.6 ± 5.5% and 20.1 ± 6.7%, respectively. The femoral graft bending angle (108.4° ± 6.9°) was similar to that associated with the traditional transportal technique using a rigid reamer system, but it was less acute than that associated with the three-portal technique using an FRS. The femoral tunnel length (32.8 ± 4.5 mm) was also similar to the results of the traditional transportal technique using a rigid reamer system, but it was shorter than that of three-portal technique using an FRS. The prevalence of posterior wall breakage was as low as the reported outcomes of the outside-in technique (2 cases, 6.6%).

Conclusions

The two-portal technique for transportal ACLR using an FRS can achieve comparable femoral graft bending angle and femoral tunnel length compared with the conventional three-portal technique using the rigid reamer system and had a low risk of posterior wall breakage. Therefore, the two-portal technique using the FRS can be considered a safe and effective method for transportal ACLR.

Level of evidence

Retrospective case series; level of evidence, 4
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahn JH, Lee YS, Jeong HJ, Park JH, Cho Y, Kim K-J, Ko TS (2017) Comparison of transtibial and retrograde outside-in techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of graft nature and clinical outcomes: a case control study using 3T MRI. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):357–365CrossRef Ahn JH, Lee YS, Jeong HJ, Park JH, Cho Y, Kim K-J, Ko TS (2017) Comparison of transtibial and retrograde outside-in techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of graft nature and clinical outcomes: a case control study using 3T MRI. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):357–365CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Parkinson B, Gogna R, Robb C, Thompson P, Spalding T (2017) Anatomic ACL reconstruction: the normal central tibial footprint position and a standardised technique for measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(5):1568–1575CrossRef Parkinson B, Gogna R, Robb C, Thompson P, Spalding T (2017) Anatomic ACL reconstruction: the normal central tibial footprint position and a standardised technique for measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(5):1568–1575CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zhu M, Li S, Su Z, Zhou X, Peng P, Li J, Wang J, Lin L (2018) Tibial tunnel placement in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison study of outcomes between patient-specific drill template versus conventional arthroscopic techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(4):515–525CrossRef Zhu M, Li S, Su Z, Zhou X, Peng P, Li J, Wang J, Lin L (2018) Tibial tunnel placement in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison study of outcomes between patient-specific drill template versus conventional arthroscopic techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(4):515–525CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tashiro Y, Irarrázaval S, Osaki K, Iwamoto Y, Fu FH (2017) Comparison of graft bending angle during knee motion after outside-in, trans-portal and trans-tibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(1):129–137CrossRef Tashiro Y, Irarrázaval S, Osaki K, Iwamoto Y, Fu FH (2017) Comparison of graft bending angle during knee motion after outside-in, trans-portal and trans-tibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(1):129–137CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim JG, Chang MH, Lim HC, Bae JH, Lee SY, Ahn JH, Wang JH (2015) An in vivo 3D computed tomographic analysis of femoral tunnel geometry and aperture morphology between rigid and flexible systems in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transportal technique. Arthroscopy 31(7):1318–1329CrossRef Kim JG, Chang MH, Lim HC, Bae JH, Lee SY, Ahn JH, Wang JH (2015) An in vivo 3D computed tomographic analysis of femoral tunnel geometry and aperture morphology between rigid and flexible systems in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transportal technique. Arthroscopy 31(7):1318–1329CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Park JS, Park JH, Wang JH, Oh CH, Hwang MH, Lee SH, Kim JG (2015) Comparison of femoral tunnel geometry, using in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography, during transportal and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopy 31(1):83–91CrossRef Park JS, Park JH, Wang JH, Oh CH, Hwang MH, Lee SH, Kim JG (2015) Comparison of femoral tunnel geometry, using in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography, during transportal and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopy 31(1):83–91CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Nakamura T, Horie M, Katagiri H, Otabe K, Nakagawa Y, Amemiya M, Sekiya I, Muneta T, Koga H (2019) Anatomic femoral tunnel placement is difficult by the transtibial technique: comparison of three different femoral tunnel drilling techniques in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05740-8 CrossRefPubMed Nakamura K, Nakamura T, Horie M, Katagiri H, Otabe K, Nakagawa Y, Amemiya M, Sekiya I, Muneta T, Koga H (2019) Anatomic femoral tunnel placement is difficult by the transtibial technique: comparison of three different femoral tunnel drilling techniques in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00167-019-05740-8 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dhawan A, Gallo RA, Lynch SA (2016) Anatomic tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24(7):443–454CrossRef Dhawan A, Gallo RA, Lynch SA (2016) Anatomic tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24(7):443–454CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Silver AG, Kaar SG, Grisell MK, Reagan JM, Farrow LD (2010) Comparison between rigid and flexible systems for drilling the femoral tunnel through an anteromedial portal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26(6):790–795CrossRef Silver AG, Kaar SG, Grisell MK, Reagan JM, Farrow LD (2010) Comparison between rigid and flexible systems for drilling the femoral tunnel through an anteromedial portal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26(6):790–795CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Steiner ME, Smart LR (2012) Flexible instruments outperform rigid instruments to place anatomic anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnels without hyperflexion. Arthroscopy 28(6):835–843CrossRef Steiner ME, Smart LR (2012) Flexible instruments outperform rigid instruments to place anatomic anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnels without hyperflexion. Arthroscopy 28(6):835–843CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Larson AI, Bullock DP, Pevny T (2012) Comparison of 4 femoral tunnel drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 28(7):972–979CrossRef Larson AI, Bullock DP, Pevny T (2012) Comparison of 4 femoral tunnel drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 28(7):972–979CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kosy JD, Walmsley K, Anaspure R, Schranz PJ, Mandalia VI (2019) Flexible reamers create comparable anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction femoral tunnels without the hyperflexion required with rigid reamers: 3D-CT analysis of tunnel morphology in a randomised clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05709-7 CrossRefPubMed Kosy JD, Walmsley K, Anaspure R, Schranz PJ, Mandalia VI (2019) Flexible reamers create comparable anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction femoral tunnels without the hyperflexion required with rigid reamers: 3D-CT analysis of tunnel morphology in a randomised clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00167-019-05709-7 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kim JG, Wang JH, Lim HC, Ahn JH (2012) Femoral graft bending angle and femoral tunnel geometry of transportal and outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis. Arthroscopy 28(11):1682–1694CrossRef Kim JG, Wang JH, Lim HC, Ahn JH (2012) Femoral graft bending angle and femoral tunnel geometry of transportal and outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis. Arthroscopy 28(11):1682–1694CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rasmussen JF, Lavery KP, Dhawan A (2013) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a flexible reamer system and 70 degrees arthroscope. Arthrosc Tech 2(4):e319–322CrossRef Rasmussen JF, Lavery KP, Dhawan A (2013) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a flexible reamer system and 70 degrees arthroscope. Arthrosc Tech 2(4):e319–322CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sinha A, Monga P (2016) Is there a significant blind spot created by 70 degree scope as compared with 30 degree?: a comparative study. In: Orthopaedic proceedings, vol Supp_13. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, p 5 Sinha A, Monga P (2016) Is there a significant blind spot created by 70 degree scope as compared with 30 degree?: a comparative study. In: Orthopaedic proceedings, vol Supp_13. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, p 5
18.
go back to reference Fitzgerald J, Saluan P, Richter DL, Huff N, Schenck RC (2015) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a flexible reamer system: technique and pitfalls. Orthop J Sports Med 3(7):2325967115592875CrossRef Fitzgerald J, Saluan P, Richter DL, Huff N, Schenck RC (2015) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a flexible reamer system: technique and pitfalls. Orthop J Sports Med 3(7):2325967115592875CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10(1):14–21PubMed Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10(1):14–21PubMed
20.
go back to reference Piefer JW, Pflugner TR, Hwang MD, Lubowitz JH (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 28(6):872–881CrossRef Piefer JW, Pflugner TR, Hwang MD, Lubowitz JH (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 28(6):872–881CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Greis PE, Burks RT, Bachus K, Luker MG (2001) The influence of tendon length and fit on the strength of a tendon-bone tunnel complex: a biomechanical and histologic study in the dog. Am J Sport Med 29(4):493–497CrossRef Greis PE, Burks RT, Bachus K, Luker MG (2001) The influence of tendon length and fit on the strength of a tendon-bone tunnel complex: a biomechanical and histologic study in the dog. Am J Sport Med 29(4):493–497CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zantop T, Ferretti M, Bell KM, Brucker PU, Gilbertson L, Fu FH (2008) Effect of tunnel-graft length on the biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: intra-articular study in a goat model. Am J Sport Med 36(11):2158–2166CrossRef Zantop T, Ferretti M, Bell KM, Brucker PU, Gilbertson L, Fu FH (2008) Effect of tunnel-graft length on the biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: intra-articular study in a goat model. Am J Sport Med 36(11):2158–2166CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jeon YS, Choi SW, Park JH, Yoon JS, Shin JS, Kim MK (2017) Mid-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Relat Res 29(1):19–25CrossRef Jeon YS, Choi SW, Park JH, Yoon JS, Shin JS, Kim MK (2017) Mid-term outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Relat Res 29(1):19–25CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kim K-I, Lee SH, Bae C, Bae SH (2017) Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography evaluation of the tunnel location and angle in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques. Knee Surg Relat Res 29(1):11–18CrossRef Kim K-I, Lee SH, Bae C, Bae SH (2017) Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography evaluation of the tunnel location and angle in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques. Knee Surg Relat Res 29(1):11–18CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Erdem M, Gulabi D, Asil K, Erdem AC (2015) Farmedial versus anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a computed tomography analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(4):539–547CrossRef Erdem M, Gulabi D, Asil K, Erdem AC (2015) Farmedial versus anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a computed tomography analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(4):539–547CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A two-portal technique using a flexible reamer system is a safe and effective method for transportal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Authors
Kyoung Ho Yoon
Jae Ho Kim
Yoo Beom Kwon
Eung Ju Kim
Sang Hyeon Lee
Sang-Gyun Kim
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03343-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2020 Go to the issue