Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2020

Open Access 01-08-2020 | Wound Infection | Original Article

A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study

Authors: Tomoya Takami, Tomoyuki Yamaguchi, Hiroyuki Yoshitake, Kotaro Hatano, Naoki Kataoka, Masafumi Tomita, Shinichiro Makimoto

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Appendectomy is one of the most common operations. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is considered first-line treatment, but the use of LA for treatment of complicated appendicitis remains controversial. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with LA and those who underwent open appendectomy (OA).

Methods

Data for 179 patients who underwent an operation for the treatment of complicated appendicitis at our hospital between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The selection included 89 patients who underwent a conventional appendectomy and 90 patients who were treated laparoscopically. Outcome measures such as mean operative time, blood loss, time until oral intake duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the concurrent effects of the examined factors on the rate of postoperative complications.

Results

The mean ages of patients in the OA and LA groups were 50.17 ± 22.77 and 50.13 ± 25.84 year. Mean operative times were longer in the LA group than OA (10.2.56 ± 44.4 versus 85.4 ± 43.11 min; p = 0.009). The duration of hospital stay was shorter for the LA group (9.61 ± 5.57 versus 12.19 ± 8.4; p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in return to consumption of oral intake between the LA and OA groups (2.03 ± 1.66 versus 2.48 ± 2.17; p = 0.123). Multivariable analysis found that the rate of postoperative complications was significantly reduced for the LA group, in comparison with the postoperative-complication rate of the OA group (16.7% versus 27%; odds ratio 0.376; 95% CI 0.153–0.923; p = 0.0327).

Conclusions

These results suggest that LA is a safe and efficient operative procedure that provides clinically beneficial advantages in comparison with OA. Thus, when possible, appendectomy for complicated appendicitis should be attempted using a laparoscopic approach.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910–25.CrossRef Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910–25.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference McBurney C.The incision made in the abdominal wall in case of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20:38–43.CrossRef McBurney C.The incision made in the abdominal wall in case of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20:38–43.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:545–53.CrossRef Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:545–53.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177:250–6.CrossRef Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177:250–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1999;9:17–26.CrossRef Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1999;9:17–26.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lin HF, Lai HS, Lai IR. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:14338–47.CrossRef Lin HF, Lai HS, Lai IR. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:14338–47.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Thereaux J, Veyrie N, Corigliano N, Servajean S, Czernichow S, Bouillot J. Is laparoscopy a safe approach for diffuse appendicular peritonitis? Feasibility and determination of risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1908–13.CrossRef Thereaux J, Veyrie N, Corigliano N, Servajean S, Czernichow S, Bouillot J. Is laparoscopy a safe approach for diffuse appendicular peritonitis? Feasibility and determination of risk factors for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1908–13.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yeom S, Kim MS, Park S, Son T, Jung YY, Lee SA et al. Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open approaches in the treatment of periapendiceal abscess diagnosed by radiologic investigation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24:762–9.CrossRef Yeom S, Kim MS, Park S, Son T, Jung YY, Lee SA et al. Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open approaches in the treatment of periapendiceal abscess diagnosed by radiologic investigation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24:762–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.CrossRef Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4909–14.CrossRef Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4909–14.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fritts LL, Orlando R. Laparoscopic appendectomy. A safety and cost analysis. Arch Surg. 1993;128:521–5.CrossRef Fritts LL, Orlando R. Laparoscopic appendectomy. A safety and cost analysis. Arch Surg. 1993;128:521–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nowzaradan Y, Westmoreland J, McCarver CT, Harris RJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indication and current use. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1:247–57.CrossRef Nowzaradan Y, Westmoreland J, McCarver CT, Harris RJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indication and current use. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991;1:247–57.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Taguchi Y, Komatsu S, Sakamoto E, Norimizu S, Shingu Y, Hasegawa H. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2016;5:1705–12.CrossRef Taguchi Y, Komatsu S, Sakamoto E, Norimizu S, Shingu Y, Hasegawa H. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2016;5:1705–12.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Li P, Han Y, Yang Y, Guo H, Hao F, Tang Y,et al.Retrospective review of laparscopic versus open surgery in the treatment of appendiceal abscess in pediatric patients:Laparoscopic versus open surgey for appendiceal abscess. Medicine. 2017;96(30):e7514.CrossRef Li P, Han Y, Yang Y, Guo H, Hao F, Tang Y,et al.Retrospective review of laparscopic versus open surgery in the treatment of appendiceal abscess in pediatric patients:Laparoscopic versus open surgey for appendiceal abscess. Medicine. 2017;96(30):e7514.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Athanasiou C, Lockwood S, Markides GA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: an update of the literature. World J Surg. 2017;41(12):3083–99.CrossRef Athanasiou C, Lockwood S, Markides GA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: an update of the literature. World J Surg. 2017;41(12):3083–99.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zhang S, Du T, Jiang X, Song C. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(4):262–6.CrossRef Zhang S, Du T, Jiang X, Song C. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(4):262–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bonanni F, Reed J, Hartzell G, Trostle D, Boorse R, Gittleman M, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;179:273–8.PubMed Bonanni F, Reed J, Hartzell G, Trostle D, Boorse R, Gittleman M, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;179:273–8.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Frazee RC, Bohannon WT. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg. 1996;131:509–11.CrossRef Frazee RC, Bohannon WT. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg. 1996;131:509–11.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dai L, Shuai J.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. UEG J. 2017;5(4):542–553. Dai L, Shuai J.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. UEG J. 2017;5(4):542–553.
22.
go back to reference Kim SY, Hong SG, Roh HR, Park SB, Kim YH, Chae GB. Learning curve for a laparoscopic appendectomy by a surgical trainee. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26:324–8.CrossRef Kim SY, Hong SG, Roh HR, Park SB, Kim YH, Chae GB. Learning curve for a laparoscopic appendectomy by a surgical trainee. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26:324–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, Cheah WK, Lomanto D, Goh P, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg. 2002;26:1485–8.CrossRef So JB, Chiong EC, Chiong E, Cheah WK, Lomanto D, Goh P, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg. 2002;26:1485–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shimoda M, Maruyama T, Nishida K, Suzuki K, Tago T, Shimazaki J, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, single center experience.2018;4(5):e00635. Shimoda M, Maruyama T, Nishida K, Suzuki K, Tago T, Shimazaki J, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, single center experience.2018;4(5):e00635.
25.
go back to reference Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S,et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43–52.CrossRef Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S,et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43–52.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lim SG, Ahn EJ, Kim SY, Chung IY, Park JM, Park SH,et al. A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:293–7.CrossRef Lim SG, Ahn EJ, Kim SY, Chung IY, Park JM, Park SH,et al. A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27:293–7.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2010;34:2026–40.CrossRef Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2010;34:2026–40.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW. Mitchell P.Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:969–73.CrossRef Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW. Mitchell P.Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:969–73.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kazemier G, in’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1473–6.CrossRef Kazemier G, in’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1473–6.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sahm M, Kube R, Schmidt S, Ritter C, Pross M, Lippert H. Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:124–9.CrossRef Sahm M, Kube R, Schmidt S, Ritter C, Pross M, Lippert H. Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:124–9.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R. Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:660–2.CrossRef Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R. Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:660–2.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik P,et al. Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:456–9.CrossRef Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik P,et al. Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:456–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study
Authors
Tomoya Takami
Tomoyuki Yamaguchi
Hiroyuki Yoshitake
Kotaro Hatano
Naoki Kataoka
Masafumi Tomita
Shinichiro Makimoto
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue