Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2006

01-09-2006

Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?

Authors: G. Kazemier, K. H. in’t Hof, S. Saad, H. J. Bonjer, S. Sauerland

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This metaanalysis aimed to compare endoscopic linear stapling and loop ligatures used to secure the base of the appendix.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials on appendix stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy were systematically searched and critically appraised. The results in terms of complication rates, operating time, and hospital stay were pooled by standard metaanalytic techniques.

Results

Data on 427 patients from four studies were included. The operative time was 9 min longer when loops were used (p = 0.04). Superficial wound infections (odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06–0.71; p = 0.01) and postoperative ileus (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14–0.89; p = 0.03) were significantly less frequent when the appendix stump was secured with staples instead of loops. Of 10 intraoperative ruptures of the appendix, 7 occurred in loop-treated patients (p = 0.46). Hospital stay and frequency of postoperative intraabdominal abscess also were comparable in loop-treated and staple-treated patients.

Conclusions

The clinical evidence on stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy favors the routine use of endoscopic staplers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference al Fallouji M (1993) Making loops in laparoscopic surgery: state of the art. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 477–481PubMed al Fallouji M (1993) Making loops in laparoscopic surgery: state of the art. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 477–481PubMed
2.
go back to reference Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501PubMed Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501PubMed
3.
go back to reference Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18: 749–750PubMedCrossRef Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18: 749–750PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cristalli BG, Izard V, Jacob D, Levardon M (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier. Surg Endosc 5: 176–178PubMed Cristalli BG, Izard V, Jacob D, Levardon M (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a clip applier. Surg Endosc 5: 176–178PubMed
5.
go back to reference Daniell JF, Gurley LD, Kurtz BR, Chambers JF (1991) The use of an automatic stapling device for laparoscopic appendectomy. Obstet Gynecol 78: 721–723PubMed Daniell JF, Gurley LD, Kurtz BR, Chambers JF (1991) The use of an automatic stapling device for laparoscopic appendectomy. Obstet Gynecol 78: 721–723PubMed
6.
go back to reference Guillem P, Mulliez E, Proye C, Pattou F (2004) Retained appendicolith after laparoscopic appendectomy: the need for systematic double ligature of the appendiceal base. Surg Endosc 18: 717–718CrossRef Guillem P, Mulliez E, Proye C, Pattou F (2004) Retained appendicolith after laparoscopic appendectomy: the need for systematic double ligature of the appendiceal base. Surg Endosc 18: 717–718CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12: 1204–1208PubMedCrossRef Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12: 1204–1208PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Houben F, Willmen HR (1998) Vereinfachte Appendektomie ohne Stumpfversenkung: Erfahrungen aus 20-jähriger konventioneller und 5-jähriger laparoskopischer Anwendung. Chirurg 69: 66–71PubMedCrossRef Houben F, Willmen HR (1998) Vereinfachte Appendektomie ohne Stumpfversenkung: Erfahrungen aus 20-jähriger konventioneller und 5-jähriger laparoskopischer Anwendung. Chirurg 69: 66–71PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17: 1–12PubMedCrossRef Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17: 1–12PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11: 336–340PubMedCrossRef Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11: 336–340PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Klaiber C, Wagner M, Metzger A (1994) Various stapling techniques in laparoscopic appendectomy: 40 consecutive cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 205–209PubMed Klaiber C, Wagner M, Metzger A (1994) Various stapling techniques in laparoscopic appendectomy: 40 consecutive cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 205–209PubMed
12.
go back to reference Klima S (1998) Bedeutung der Appendixstumpfversorgung bei der laparoskopischen Appendektomie. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4): 90–93PubMed Klima S (1998) Bedeutung der Appendixstumpfversorgung bei der laparoskopischen Appendektomie. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4): 90–93PubMed
13.
go back to reference Klima S, Schyra B (1996) Technik und Bedeutung der Stumpfversorgung für das Ergebnis der laparoskopischen Appendektomie. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 113: 556–558PubMed Klima S, Schyra B (1996) Technik und Bedeutung der Stumpfversorgung für das Ergebnis der laparoskopischen Appendektomie. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 113: 556–558PubMed
14.
go back to reference Lange J, Zünd MR, Nägeli J (1993) Prospektiv randomisierte Studie: Roederschlinge versus Endo-GIA bei der laparoskopischen Appendektomie [abstract]. Min Invas Chir 2(Suppl 1): 8 Lange J, Zünd MR, Nägeli J (1993) Prospektiv randomisierte Studie: Roederschlinge versus Endo-GIA bei der laparoskopischen Appendektomie [abstract]. Min Invas Chir 2(Suppl 1): 8
15.
go back to reference Lörken M, Marnitz U, Schumpelick V (1999) Freier intraperitonealer Clip als Ursache eines mechanischen Dünndarmileus. Chirurg 70: 1492–1493PubMedCrossRef Lörken M, Marnitz U, Schumpelick V (1999) Freier intraperitonealer Clip als Ursache eines mechanischen Dünndarmileus. Chirurg 70: 1492–1493PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nottingham JM (2002) Mechanical small bowel obstruction from a loose linear cutter staple after laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 289–290PubMedCrossRef Nottingham JM (2002) Mechanical small bowel obstruction from a loose linear cutter staple after laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 289–290PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B, Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213PubMedCrossRef Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B, Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr (1997) Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1: 188–193PubMedCrossRef Paik PS, Towson JA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW Jr (1997) Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastrointest Surg 1: 188–193PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88: 200–205PubMedCrossRef Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88: 200–205PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Petrocelli P, Corsale I, Giannessi S, Cerone M, Colugnat D, Matocci GC (2003) Complicanze da suture meccaniche in chirurgia laparoscopica: occlusione intestinale da clip: Segnalazione di un caso clinico e revisione della letteratura. Minerva Chir 58: 591–594PubMed Petrocelli P, Corsale I, Giannessi S, Cerone M, Colugnat D, Matocci GC (2003) Complicanze da suture meccaniche in chirurgia laparoscopica: occlusione intestinale da clip: Segnalazione di un caso clinico e revisione della letteratura. Minerva Chir 58: 591–594PubMed
21.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EAM (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 383: 289–295CrossRef Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neugebauer EAM (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 383: 289–295CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer E (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Collaboration (ed) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. IV/2004 (CD-ROM). Update Software, Oxford, UK Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer E (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Collaboration (ed) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. IV/2004 (CD-ROM). Update Software, Oxford, UK
23.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Seiler CM (2005) Role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in evidence-based medicine. World J Surg 29: 582–587PubMedCrossRef Sauerland S, Seiler CM (2005) Role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in evidence-based medicine. World J Surg 29: 582–587PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L, Frei E, Büchler MW (2000) Laparoscopic appendectomy in Switzerland: a prospective audit of 2,179 cases. Dig Surg 17: 497–502PubMedCrossRef Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L, Frei E, Büchler MW (2000) Laparoscopic appendectomy in Switzerland: a prospective audit of 2,179 cases. Dig Surg 17: 497–502PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shalaby R, Arnos A, Desoky A, Samaha AH (2001) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: evaluation of different techniques. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11: 22–27PubMedCrossRef Shalaby R, Arnos A, Desoky A, Samaha AH (2001) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: evaluation of different techniques. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11: 22–27PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shimi SM, Lirici M, Vander Velpen G, Cuschieri A (1994) Comparative study of the holding strength of slipknots using absorbable and nonabsorbable ligature materials. Surg Endosc 8: 1285–1291PubMedCrossRef Shimi SM, Lirici M, Vander Velpen G, Cuschieri A (1994) Comparative study of the holding strength of slipknots using absorbable and nonabsorbable ligature materials. Surg Endosc 8: 1285–1291PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42: 377–383PubMed Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42: 377–383PubMed
Metadata
Title
Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?
Authors
G. Kazemier
K. H. in’t Hof
S. Saad
H. J. Bonjer
S. Sauerland
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0525-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2006 Go to the issue