Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2004

01-06-2004 | Original article

Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors

Authors: C. G. Ball, J. B. Kortbeek, A. W. Kirkpatrick, P. Mitchell

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is controversial. Outcomes were compared between patients who had complicated appendicitis and those who had uncomplicated appendicitis

Methods

Consecutive patients (n = 304) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were studied. Patients undergoing open appendectomies also were compared ad hoc. Analgesia use, length of hospital stay, return to activity, and complication rates for the complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis subgroups were analyzed.

Results

Complete data were available for 243 patients (80%). There were no statistical differences in characteristics between the two groups. The operating times, lengths of hospital stay, return to activity times, complication rates, and analgesia requirements, both in the hospital and after discharge, were equivalent. A greater number of complicated cases required open conversion. Considering those with complicated appendicitis, the open group had a significantly longer mean hospital stay and a higher complication rate than those treated with laparoscopic appendectomy.

Conclusions

The minimally invasive laparoscopic technique is safe and efficacious. It should be the initial procedure of choice for most cases of complicated appendicitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Al-Omran, M, Mamdani, MM, McLeod, RS 2003Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada.Can J Surg46263268PubMedPubMedCentral Al-Omran, M, Mamdani, MM, McLeod, RS 2003Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada.Can J Surg46263268PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Chung, RS, Rowland, DY, Li, P, Diaz, J 1999A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.Am J Surg177250253CrossRef Chung, RS, Rowland, DY, Li, P, Diaz, J 1999A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.Am J Surg177250253CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Frazee, RC, Bohannon, WT 1996Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.Arch Surg131509512CrossRef Frazee, RC, Bohannon, WT 1996Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.Arch Surg131509512CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Garbutt, JM, Soper, NJ, Shannon, WD, Botero, A, Littenberg, B 1999Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc91726CrossRef Garbutt, JM, Soper, NJ, Shannon, WD, Botero, A, Littenberg, B 1999Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc91726CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Golub, R, Siddiqui, F, Pohl, D 1998Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a meta-analysis.J Am Coll Surg186543553CrossRef Golub, R, Siddiqui, F, Pohl, D 1998Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a meta-analysis.J Am Coll Surg186543553CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Johnson, AB, Peetz, ME 1998Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis.Surg Endosc12940943CrossRef Johnson, AB, Peetz, ME 1998Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis.Surg Endosc12940943CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Khalili, TM, Hiatt, JR, Savar, A, Lau, C, Margulies, DR 1999Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy.Am Surg65965967PubMed Khalili, TM, Hiatt, JR, Savar, A, Lau, C, Margulies, DR 1999Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy.Am Surg65965967PubMed
9.
go back to reference Klingler, A, Henle, KP, Beller, S, Rechner, J, Zerz, A, Wetscher, G, Szinicz, G 1998Laparscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications.Am J Surg175232235CrossRef Klingler, A, Henle, KP, Beller, S, Rechner, J, Zerz, A, Wetscher, G, Szinicz, G 1998Laparscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications.Am J Surg175232235CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Long, KH, Bannon, MP, Zeitlow, SP, Helgeson, ER, Harmsen, WS, Smith, CD, Ilstrup, DM, Baerga-Varela, Y, Sarr, MG 2001A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses.Surgery129390400CrossRef Long, KH, Bannon, MP, Zeitlow, SP, Helgeson, ER, Harmsen, WS, Smith, CD, Ilstrup, DM, Baerga-Varela, Y, Sarr, MG 2001A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses.Surgery129390400CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Martin, LC, Puente, JL, Sosa, JL, Bassin, A, Breslaw, R, McKenney, MG 1995Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.Ann Surg222256262CrossRef Martin, LC, Puente, JL, Sosa, JL, Bassin, A, Breslaw, R, McKenney, MG 1995Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.Ann Surg222256262CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Piskun, G, Kozik, D, Rajpal, S, Shaftan, G, Fogler, R 2001Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.Surg Endosc15660662CrossRef Piskun, G, Kozik, D, Rajpal, S, Shaftan, G, Fogler, R 2001Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.Surg Endosc15660662CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Senapathi, PS, Bhattacharya, D, Ammori, BJ 2002Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass.Surg Endosc1617831785CrossRef Senapathi, PS, Bhattacharya, D, Ammori, BJ 2002Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass.Surg Endosc1617831785CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Slim, K, Pezet, D, Chipponi, J 1998Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials.Dis Colon Rectum41398403CrossRef Slim, K, Pezet, D, Chipponi, J 1998Laparoscopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials.Dis Colon Rectum41398403CrossRef
15.
go back to reference So, JB, Chiong, EC, Chiong, E, Cheah, WK, Lomanto, D, Goh, P, Kum, CK 2002Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.World J Surg2614851488CrossRef So, JB, Chiong, EC, Chiong, E, Cheah, WK, Lomanto, D, Goh, P, Kum, CK 2002Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.World J Surg2614851488CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stoltzing, H, Thon, K 2000Perforated appendicitis: Is laparoscopic operation advisable?Dig Surg17610616CrossRef Stoltzing, H, Thon, K 2000Perforated appendicitis: Is laparoscopic operation advisable?Dig Surg17610616CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Surland, S, Lafering, R, Holthausen, U, Neugebauer, EA 1998Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.Langenbecks Arch Surg383289295CrossRef Surland, S, Lafering, R, Holthausen, U, Neugebauer, EA 1998Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.Langenbecks Arch Surg383289295CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Temple, LK, Litwin, DE, McLeod, RS 1999A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.Can J Surg42377383PubMedPubMedCentral Temple, LK, Litwin, DE, McLeod, RS 1999A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.Can J Surg42377383PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Wullstein, C, Barkhausen, S, Gross, E 2001Results of laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis.Dis Colon Rectum4417001705CrossRef Wullstein, C, Barkhausen, S, Gross, E 2001Results of laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis.Dis Colon Rectum4417001705CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yao, CC, Lin, CS, Yang, CC 1999Laparoscopic appendectomy for ruptured appendicitis.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech9271273PubMed Yao, CC, Lin, CS, Yang, CC 1999Laparoscopic appendectomy for ruptured appendicitis.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech9271273PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors
Authors
C. G. Ball
J. B. Kortbeek
A. W. Kirkpatrick
P. Mitchell
Publication date
01-06-2004
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2004
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2004

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2004 Go to the issue

Editorial Notes

News and notices