Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Original Research

Worklife and Wellness in Academic General Internal Medicine: Results from a National Survey

Authors: Mark Linzer, MD, Sara Poplau, BA, Stewart Babbott, MD, Tracie Collins, MD, MPH, Laura Guzman-Corrales, MPH, Jeremiah Menk, MS, Mary Lou Murphy, MS, RN, Kay Ovington, BA

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

General internal medicine (GIM) careers are increasingly viewed as challenging and unsustainable.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess academic GIM worklife and determine remediable predictors of stress and burnout.

DESIGN

We conducted an email survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in 15 GIM divisions participated.

MAIN MEASURES

A ten-item survey queried stress, burnout, and work conditions such as electronic medical record (EMR) challenges. An open-ended question assessed stressors and solutions. Results were categorized into burnout, high stress, high control, chaos, good teamwork, high values alignment, documentation time pressure, and excessive home EMR use. Frequencies were determined for national data, Veterans Affairs (VA) versus civilian populations, and hospitalist versus ambulatory roles. A General Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) evaluated associations with burnout. A formal content analysis was performed for open-ended question responses.

KEY RESULTS

Of 1235 clinicians sampled, 579 responded (47 %). High stress was present in 67 %, with 38 % burned out (burnout range 10–56 % by division). Half of respondents had low work control, 60 % reported high documentation time pressure, half described too much home EMR time, and most reported very busy or chaotic workplaces. Two-thirds felt aligned with departmental leaders’ values, and three-quarters were satisfied with teamwork. Burnout was associated with high stress, low work control, and low values alignment with leaders (all p < 0.001). The 45 VA faculty had less burnout than civilian counterparts (17 % vs. 40 %, p < 0.05). Hospitalists described better teamwork than ambulatory clinicians and fewer hospitalists noted documentation time pressure (both p < 0.001). Key themes from the qualitative analysis were short visits, insufficient support staff, a Relative Value Unit mentality, documentation time pressure, and undervaluing education.

CONCLUSIONS

While GIM divisions overall demonstrate high stress and burnout, division rates vary widely. Sustainability efforts within GIM could focus on visit length, staff support, schedule control, clinic chaos, and EMR stress.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Linzer M, Manwell LB, Williams ES, et al. Working conditions in primary care: Physician reactions and care quality. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(1):28–36. W6-W9.CrossRefPubMed Linzer M, Manwell LB, Williams ES, et al. Working conditions in primary care: Physician reactions and care quality. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(1):28–36. W6-W9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wetterneck TB, Linzer M, McMurray JE, et al. Worklife and satisfaction of general internists. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(6):649–656.CrossRefPubMed Wetterneck TB, Linzer M, McMurray JE, et al. Worklife and satisfaction of general internists. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(6):649–656.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rohland BM, Kruse GR, Rohrer JE. Validation of a single-item measure of burnout against the Maslach Burnout Inventory among physicians. Stress Health. 2004;20(2):75–79. doi:10.1002/smi.1002.CrossRef Rohland BM, Kruse GR, Rohrer JE. Validation of a single-item measure of burnout against the Maslach Burnout Inventory among physicians. Stress Health. 2004;20(2):75–79. doi:10.​1002/​smi.​1002.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17(8):873–890.CrossRefPubMed Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17(8):873–890.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6(2):65–70. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6(2):65–70.
13.
go back to reference Saint S, Zemencuk JK, Hayward RA, et al. What effect does increasing inpatient time have on outpatient-oriented internist satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):725–729.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saint S, Zemencuk JK, Hayward RA, et al. What effect does increasing inpatient time have on outpatient-oriented internist satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):725–729.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Bank AJ, Obetz C, Konrardy A, et al. Impact of scribes on patient interaction, productivity, and revenue in a cardiology clinic: A prospective study. Clin Outcomes Res CEOR. 2013;5:399–406. doi:10.2147/CEOR.S49010.CrossRef Bank AJ, Obetz C, Konrardy A, et al. Impact of scribes on patient interaction, productivity, and revenue in a cardiology clinic: A prospective study. Clin Outcomes Res CEOR. 2013;5:399–406. doi:10.​2147/​CEOR.​S49010.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Linzer M, Warde C, Alexander RW, et al. Part-time careers in academic internal medicine: A report from the Association of Specialty Professors Part-Time Careers Task Force on behalf of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. Acad Med. 2009;84(10):1395–1400. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6bf8c.CrossRefPubMed Linzer M, Warde C, Alexander RW, et al. Part-time careers in academic internal medicine: A report from the Association of Specialty Professors Part-Time Careers Task Force on behalf of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. Acad Med. 2009;84(10):1395–1400. doi:10.​1097/​ACM.​0b013e3181b6bf8c​.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(10):1129–1136.CrossRefPubMed Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(10):1129–1136.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(1):61–67.CrossRefPubMed Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(1):61–67.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Worklife and Wellness in Academic General Internal Medicine: Results from a National Survey
Authors
Mark Linzer, MD
Sara Poplau, BA
Stewart Babbott, MD
Tracie Collins, MD, MPH
Laura Guzman-Corrales, MPH
Jeremiah Menk, MS
Mary Lou Murphy, MS, RN
Kay Ovington, BA
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3720-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2016 Go to the issue

Clinical Practice: Exercises in Clinical Reasoning

Look No Further: An Exercise in Clinical Reasoning

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.