Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 2/2003

01-06-2003 | Original Research Article

Uniparental Disomy and Robertsonian Translocations

Risk Estimation and Prenatal Testing

Authors: Dr Thomas Eggermann, Klaus Zerres

Published in: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy | Issue 2/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Uniparental disomy (UPD) is defined by the inheritance of both homologous chromosomes from only one parent, resulting in an imbalance of the expression of imprinted genes. With the recent identification of several diseases associated with UPD, the diagnostic significance of this molecular finding is a focus of interest. Acrocentric chromosomes involved in Robertsonian translocations (RTs) are particularly prone to being affected by mis-segregation events, possibly resulting in UPD. While UPDs of chromosomes 13, 21, and 22 have no clinical consequences, and therefore have no diagnostic impact despite of homozygosity of recessive alleles, prenatal testing for UPDs 14 or 15 is becoming increasingly asked for.
Methods: Thirty-one fetuses with nonhomologous balanced RTs involving chromosome 14 were tested for UPD14 by microsatellite typing.
Results: No cases of maternal UPD14 were detected among the 31 fetuses analyzed.
Conclusions: Based on our own data from molecular testing in 31 prenatal RT cases and findings in the published literature, we delineated a risk of 0.3% for a UPD with clinical consequences for prenatally detected carriers of a nonhomologous RT. Prenatal UPD testing is not associated with any additional risk to the pregnancy once invasive prenatal testing has been carried out. However, the possibly conflicting consequences in the case of a prenatal UPD identification should be discussed in advance. Furthermore, risk figures in specific clinical cohorts, such as couples prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection, as well as questions of prenatal diagnostic management, will be discussed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Engel E. A new genetic concept: uniparental disomy and its potential effect, isodisomy. Am J Med Genet 1980; 6: 137–43PubMedCrossRef Engel E. A new genetic concept: uniparental disomy and its potential effect, isodisomy. Am J Med Genet 1980; 6: 137–43PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kotzot D. Abnormal phenotypes in uniparental disomy (UPD): fundamental aspects and a critical review with bibliography of UPD other than 15. Am J Med Genet 1999; 82: 265–74PubMedCrossRef Kotzot D. Abnormal phenotypes in uniparental disomy (UPD): fundamental aspects and a critical review with bibliography of UPD other than 15. Am J Med Genet 1999; 82: 265–74PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Spence JF, Perciaccante RG, Greig GM, et al. Uniparental disomy as a mechanism for human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet 1988; 42: 217–26PubMed Spence JF, Perciaccante RG, Greig GM, et al. Uniparental disomy as a mechanism for human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet 1988; 42: 217–26PubMed
4.
go back to reference Shaffer LG, McCaskill C, Adkins K, et al. Systematic search for uniparental disomy in early fetal losses: the results and a review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 1998; 79: 366–72PubMedCrossRef Shaffer LG, McCaskill C, Adkins K, et al. Systematic search for uniparental disomy in early fetal losses: the results and a review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 1998; 79: 366–72PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Martin RN, Rademaker AW, Hildebrand K, et al. Variation in the frequency and type of sperm chromosomal abnormalities among normal men. Hum Genet 1987; 77: 108–14PubMedCrossRef Martin RN, Rademaker AW, Hildebrand K, et al. Variation in the frequency and type of sperm chromosomal abnormalities among normal men. Hum Genet 1987; 77: 108–14PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Engel E, de Lozier-Blanchet CD. Uniparental disomy, isodisomy, and imprinting: probable effects in man and strategies for their detection. Am J Med Genet 1991; 40: 432–9PubMedCrossRef Engel E, de Lozier-Blanchet CD. Uniparental disomy, isodisomy, and imprinting: probable effects in man and strategies for their detection. Am J Med Genet 1991; 40: 432–9PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Eggermann T, Wolf M, Spaich C, et al. Search for uniparental disomy 14 in balanced Robertsonian translocation carriers. Clin Genet 1999; 56: 464–6PubMedCrossRef Eggermann T, Wolf M, Spaich C, et al. Search for uniparental disomy 14 in balanced Robertsonian translocation carriers. Clin Genet 1999; 56: 464–6PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Martin RA, Sabol DW, Rogan PK. Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14 confined to an interstitial segment (14q32-14q24.2). J Med Genet 1999; 36: 633–6PubMed Martin RA, Sabol DW, Rogan PK. Maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14 confined to an interstitial segment (14q32-14q24.2). J Med Genet 1999; 36: 633–6PubMed
9.
go back to reference Eggermann T, Mergenthaler S, Eggermann K, et al. Identification of interstitial maternal uniparental disomy (UPD)(14) and complete maternal UPD(20) in a cohort of growth retarded patients. J Med Genet 2001; 38: 86–9PubMedCrossRef Eggermann T, Mergenthaler S, Eggermann K, et al. Identification of interstitial maternal uniparental disomy (UPD)(14) and complete maternal UPD(20) in a cohort of growth retarded patients. J Med Genet 2001; 38: 86–9PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lindor NM, Karnes PS, Michels VV, et al. Uniparental disomy in congenital disorders: a prospective study. Am J Med Genet 1995; 58: 143–6PubMedCrossRef Lindor NM, Karnes PS, Michels VV, et al. Uniparental disomy in congenital disorders: a prospective study. Am J Med Genet 1995; 58: 143–6PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gualandi F, Sensi A, Trabanelli C, et al. Prenatal UPD testing survey in Robertsonian translocations. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 465–8PubMedCrossRef Gualandi F, Sensi A, Trabanelli C, et al. Prenatal UPD testing survey in Robertsonian translocations. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 465–8PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Berend SA, Horwitz J, McCaskill C, et al. Identification of uniparental disomy following prenatal detection of Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1787–93PubMedCrossRef Berend SA, Horwitz J, McCaskill C, et al. Identification of uniparental disomy following prenatal detection of Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1787–93PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jay MA, Roberts E, Davies T, et al. Prenatal testing for uniparental disomy (UPD). Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 512–3CrossRef Jay MA, Roberts E, Davies T, et al. Prenatal testing for uniparental disomy (UPD). Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 512–3CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Silverstein S, Lerer I, Sagi M, et al. Uniparental disomy in fetuses diagnosed with balanced Robertsonian translocations: risk estimate. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 649–51PubMedCrossRef Silverstein S, Lerer I, Sagi M, et al. Uniparental disomy in fetuses diagnosed with balanced Robertsonian translocations: risk estimate. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 649–51PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Warburton D. De-novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49: 995–1013PubMed Warburton D. De-novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49: 995–1013PubMed
16.
go back to reference Christian SL, Smith ACM, Macha M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of uniparental disomy 15 following trisomy 15 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 1996; 16: 323–32PubMedCrossRef Christian SL, Smith ACM, Macha M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of uniparental disomy 15 following trisomy 15 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 1996; 16: 323–32PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Robinson WP, Langlois S, Schuffenhauer S, et al. Cytogenetic and age-dependent risk factors associated with uniparental disomy 15. Prenat Diagn 1996; 16: 837–44PubMedCrossRef Robinson WP, Langlois S, Schuffenhauer S, et al. Cytogenetic and age-dependent risk factors associated with uniparental disomy 15. Prenat Diagn 1996; 16: 837–44PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference EUCROMIC. Trisomy 15 CPM: probable origins, pregnancy outcome and risk for fetal UPD: European Collaborative Research on Mosaicism in CVS. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19: 29–35CrossRef EUCROMIC. Trisomy 15 CPM: probable origins, pregnancy outcome and risk for fetal UPD: European Collaborative Research on Mosaicism in CVS. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19: 29–35CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Therman E, Susman M. Human chromosomes: structures, behaviour and effects. New York: Springer, 1993: 273–87 Therman E, Susman M. Human chromosomes: structures, behaviour and effects. New York: Springer, 1993: 273–87
20.
go back to reference Meschede D, Lemcke B, Exeler JR, et al. Chromosome abnormalities in 447 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection: prevalences, types, sex distribution and reproductive relevance. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 575–82CrossRef Meschede D, Lemcke B, Exeler JR, et al. Chromosome abnormalities in 447 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection: prevalences, types, sex distribution and reproductive relevance. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 575–82CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Peschka B, Leygraaf J, van der Veen K, et al. Type and frequency of chromosome aberrations in 781 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2257–63PubMedCrossRef Peschka B, Leygraaf J, van der Veen K, et al. Type and frequency of chromosome aberrations in 781 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2257–63PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cox GF, Bürger J, Lip V, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71: 162–4PubMedCrossRef Cox GF, Bürger J, Lip V, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71: 162–4PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Orstavik KH, Eiklid K, van der Hagen CB, et al. Another case of imprinting defect in a girl with Angelman syndrome conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72: 218–9PubMedCrossRef Orstavik KH, Eiklid K, van der Hagen CB, et al. Another case of imprinting defect in a girl with Angelman syndrome conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72: 218–9PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Manning M, Lissens W, Bonduelle M, et al. Study of DNA methylation patterns at chromosome 15q11-q13 in children born after ICSI reveals no imprinting defects. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6: 1049–53PubMedCrossRef Manning M, Lissens W, Bonduelle M, et al. Study of DNA methylation patterns at chromosome 15q11-q13 in children born after ICSI reveals no imprinting defects. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6: 1049–53PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kalousek D. Mosaicism confined to chorionic tissue in human gestations. In: Fraccaro M, Simoni G, Brambati G, editors. First trimester fetal diagnosis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 130–6CrossRef Kalousek D. Mosaicism confined to chorionic tissue in human gestations. In: Fraccaro M, Simoni G, Brambati G, editors. First trimester fetal diagnosis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 130–6CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shaffer LG, Agan N, Goldberg JD, et al. American College of medical genetics statement on diagnostic testing for uniparental disomy. Genet Med 2001; 3: 206–11PubMedCrossRef Shaffer LG, Agan N, Goldberg JD, et al. American College of medical genetics statement on diagnostic testing for uniparental disomy. Genet Med 2001; 3: 206–11PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Uniparental Disomy and Robertsonian Translocations
Risk Estimation and Prenatal Testing
Authors
Dr Thomas Eggermann
Klaus Zerres
Publication date
01-06-2003
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy / Issue 2/2003
Print ISSN: 1177-1062
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2000
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03260026

Other articles of this Issue 2/2003

Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 2/2003 Go to the issue

Original Research Article

Hyperekplexia (Startle Disease)

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.