Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2023

16-01-2023 | Ulcerative Colitis | Original Article

Vedolizumab and Adalimumab in Biologic-Naïve Ulcerative Colitis: Comparison of Patient-Level Clinical Trial Data and VARSITY for Week 6 Clinical Remission

Authors: Neeraj Narula, Emily C. L. Wong, Parambir S. Dulai, John K. Marshall, Vipul Jairath, Walter Reinisch

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 6/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Indirect treatment comparisons using patient-level data are increasing in popularity within inflammatory bowel disease research. We compared the efficacy of adalimumab and vedolizumab for biologic-naïve moderate–severe ulcerative colitis (UC) using indirect comparisons of phase 3 clinical trials and compared the results to the RCT VARSITY.

Design

Pooled analysis of patient-level data from 518 biologic-naïve patients with UC was performed using GEMINI-1 and ULTRA-1. Proportions of patients achieving week 6 clinical remission and clinical response were compared, and propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression were used to account for potential confounders. These results were compared to those derived from VARSITY.

Results

A numerically greater proportion of vedolizumab-treated patients from GEMINI-1 achieved week 6 clinical remission compared to those treated with adalimumab [136/388 (35.1%) vs. 38/130 (29.2%)]. Similar findings were observed among the propensity score matched cohort [33/110 (30.0%) vs. 25/110 (22.7%), adjusted OR (aOR) 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–3.02), p = 0.187]. A similar magnitude for absolute difference in the proportions of patients achieving week 6 clinical remission was observed from VARSITY in vedolizumab compared to adalimumab [131/305 (43.0%) vs. 114/307 (37.1%), OR 1.27 (95% CI 0.92–1.76), p = 0.142].

Conclusions

In this post hoc analysis, a similar magnitude in the absolute difference of efficacy at week 6 among biologic-naïve patients was observed using indirect comparisons of phase 3 clinical trial data as was observed in VARSITY. Indirect comparisons using patient-level clinical trial data could be used to inform drug choices for future head-to-head trials and guide positioning of drugs in the absence of head-to-head trials.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG et al. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2462–2476.CrossRefPubMed Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG et al. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2462–2476.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sandborn WJ, van Assche G, Reinisch W et al. Adalimumab induces and maintains clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(2):257-65.e1–257-65.e3. Sandborn WJ, van Assche G, Reinisch W et al. Adalimumab induces and maintains clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(2):257-65.e1–257-65.e3.
3.
go back to reference Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Sands BE et al. Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2013;369(8):699–710.CrossRefPubMed Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Sands BE et al. Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2013;369(8):699–710.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2019;381(13):1201–1214.CrossRefPubMed Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2019;381(13):1201–1214.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sandborn WJ, Su C, Sands BE et al. Tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1723–1736.CrossRefPubMed Sandborn WJ, Su C, Sands BE et al. Tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1723–1736.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Marano C et al. Subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response and remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(1):85–95; quiz e14–5. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Marano C et al. Subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response and remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(1):85–95; quiz e14–5.
7.
go back to reference Sands BE, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Loftus EV Jr et al. Vedolizumab versus adalimumab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2019;381(13):1215–1226.CrossRefPubMed Sands BE, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Loftus EV Jr et al. Vedolizumab versus adalimumab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. New Engl J Med. 2019;381(13):1215–1226.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Narula N, Wong ECL, Dulai PS et al. Comparative efficacy and rapidity of action for infliximab vs ustekinumab in biologic naïve Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;20(7):1579–1587.e2 Narula N, Wong ECL, Dulai PS et al. Comparative efficacy and rapidity of action for infliximab vs ustekinumab in biologic naïve Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;20(7):1579–1587.e2
9.
go back to reference Narula N, Wong ECL, Marshall JK, Colombel JF, Dulai PS, Reinisch W. Comparative efficacy for infliximab vs vedolizumab in biologic naive ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;20(7):1588–1597.e3. Narula N, Wong ECL, Marshall JK, Colombel JF, Dulai PS, Reinisch W. Comparative efficacy for infliximab vs vedolizumab in biologic naive ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;20(7):1588–1597.e3.
10.
go back to reference Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Sands BE et al. Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(8):699–710.CrossRefPubMed Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Sands BE et al. Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(8):699–710.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Reinisch W, Sandborn WJ, Hommes DW et al. Adalimumab for induction of clinical remission in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results of a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2011;60(6):780–787.CrossRefPubMed Reinisch W, Sandborn WJ, Hommes DW et al. Adalimumab for induction of clinical remission in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results of a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2011;60(6):780–787.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Speich B, von Niederhäusern B, Schur N et al. Systematic review on costs and resource use of randomized clinical trials shows a lack of transparent and comprehensive data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;96:1–11.CrossRefPubMed Speich B, von Niederhäusern B, Schur N et al. Systematic review on costs and resource use of randomized clinical trials shows a lack of transparent and comprehensive data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;96:1–11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Singh S, Fumery M, Sandborn WJ, Murad MH. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: first- and second-line pharmacotherapy for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Therap. 2018;47(2):162–175.CrossRef Singh S, Fumery M, Sandborn WJ, Murad MH. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: first- and second-line pharmacotherapy for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Therap. 2018;47(2):162–175.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ananthakrishnan AN, Cagan A, Cai T et al. Comparative effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(4):880–885.CrossRefPubMed Ananthakrishnan AN, Cagan A, Cai T et al. Comparative effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22(4):880–885.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Osterman MT, Haynes K, Delzell E et al. Comparative effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab for Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(5):811–7.e3.CrossRefPubMed Osterman MT, Haynes K, Delzell E et al. Comparative effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab for Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(5):811–7.e3.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Narula N, Kainz S, Petritsch W et al. The efficacy and safety of either infliximab or adalimumab in 362 patients with anti-TNF-α naïve Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Therap. 2016;44(2):170–180.CrossRef Narula N, Kainz S, Petritsch W et al. The efficacy and safety of either infliximab or adalimumab in 362 patients with anti-TNF-α naïve Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Therap. 2016;44(2):170–180.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Reinisch W, Bressler B, Curtis R et al. Fecal calprotectin responses following induction therapy with vedolizumab in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: a post hoc analysis of GEMINI 1. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25(4):803–810.CrossRefPubMed Reinisch W, Bressler B, Curtis R et al. Fecal calprotectin responses following induction therapy with vedolizumab in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: a post hoc analysis of GEMINI 1. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25(4):803–810.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Vedolizumab and Adalimumab in Biologic-Naïve Ulcerative Colitis: Comparison of Patient-Level Clinical Trial Data and VARSITY for Week 6 Clinical Remission
Authors
Neeraj Narula
Emily C. L. Wong
Parambir S. Dulai
John K. Marshall
Vipul Jairath
Walter Reinisch
Publication date
16-01-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 6/2023
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-07825-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2023

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.