Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation | Research

A CT-based technique to predict optimal projection for self-expanding TAVI in patients with different aortic valve anatomies

Authors: Xi Wang, Fei Chen, Tian-Yuan Xiong, Yi-Jian Li, Yuan-Weixiang Ou, Qiao Li, Yong Peng, Jia-Fu Wei, Sen He, Mao Chen, Yuan Feng

Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Optimal projection is essential for valve deployment during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this study was to propose an approach to predict optimal projection in TAVI candidates with different aortic valve anatomies.

Methods

331 patients undergoing self-expanding TAVI were included and the so-called non-coronary cusp (NCC)-parallel technique was utilized, which generated the predicted projection by connecting NCC commissures on the transverse plane on the pre-procedural computed tomography images.

Results

37.8% of the study cohort were bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients. Around 80% of both NCC-parallel views and final views were in the right anterior oblique (RAO) and caudal (CAU) quadrant. There was less than 5° change required from the NCC-parallel view to the final implanted view in 79% of tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients but only in 27% (13/48) of type 0 BAV patients with coronary arteries originated from the different cusps. After excluding the above mentioned BAV patients, 62.3% (48/77) of BAV patients needed less than 5° change to achieve optimal projection and only in 8 patients, the angular change was larger than 10° in either left/right anterior oblique or cranial/caudal direction.

Conclusions

The NCC-parallel technique provides reliable prediction for optimal projection in self-expanding TAVI in all TAV and most BAV patients, with a vast majority of views in the RAO and CAU quadrant.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sammour Y, Banerjee K, Kumar A, Lak H, Chawla S, Incognito C, et al. Systematic approach to high implantation of SAPIEN-3 valve achieves a lower rate of conduction abnormalities including pacemaker implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:e009407.CrossRef Sammour Y, Banerjee K, Kumar A, Lak H, Chawla S, Incognito C, et al. Systematic approach to high implantation of SAPIEN-3 valve achieves a lower rate of conduction abnormalities including pacemaker implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:e009407.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Blanke P, Weir-McCall JR, Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Jilaihawi H, et al. Computed tomography imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019;13:1–20.CrossRef Blanke P, Weir-McCall JR, Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Jilaihawi H, et al. Computed tomography imaging in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019;13:1–20.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gurvitch R, Wood DA, Leipsic J, Tay E, Johnson M, Ye J, et al. Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:1157–65.CrossRef Gurvitch R, Wood DA, Leipsic J, Tay E, Johnson M, Ye J, et al. Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:1157–65.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Arnold M, Achenbach S, Pfeiffer I, Ensminger S, Marwan M, Einhaus F, et al. A method to determine suitable fluoroscopic projections for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6:422–8.CrossRef Arnold M, Achenbach S, Pfeiffer I, Ensminger S, Marwan M, Einhaus F, et al. A method to determine suitable fluoroscopic projections for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6:422–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hell MM, Biburger L, Marwan M, Schuhbaeck A, Achenbach S, Lell M, et al. Prediction of fluoroscopic angulations for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by CT angiography: influence on procedural parameters. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:906–14. Hell MM, Biburger L, Marwan M, Schuhbaeck A, Achenbach S, Lell M, et al. Prediction of fluoroscopic angulations for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by CT angiography: influence on procedural parameters. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:906–14.
6.
go back to reference Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Desai MY, Svensson LG. Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2079–86.CrossRef Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Desai MY, Svensson LG. Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2079–86.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tang GHL, Zaid S, Michev I, Ahmad H, Kaple R, Undemir C, et al. “Cusp-Overlap” view simplifies fluoroscopy-guided implantation of self-expanding valve in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:1663–5.CrossRef Tang GHL, Zaid S, Michev I, Ahmad H, Kaple R, Undemir C, et al. “Cusp-Overlap” view simplifies fluoroscopy-guided implantation of self-expanding valve in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:1663–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wong I, Bieliauskas G, De Backer O, Søndergaard L. Technical considerations for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with ACURATE neo2. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:224–6.CrossRef Wong I, Bieliauskas G, De Backer O, Søndergaard L. Technical considerations for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with ACURATE neo2. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:224–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ben-Shoshan J, Alosaimi H, Lauzier PT, Pighi M, Talmor-Barkan Y, Overtchouk P, et al. Double S-curve versus cusp-overlap technique: defining the optimal fluoroscopic projection for TAVR with a self-expanding device. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:185–94.CrossRef Ben-Shoshan J, Alosaimi H, Lauzier PT, Pighi M, Talmor-Barkan Y, Overtchouk P, et al. Double S-curve versus cusp-overlap technique: defining the optimal fluoroscopic projection for TAVR with a self-expanding device. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:185–94.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vincent F, Ternacle J, Denimal T, Shen M, Redfors B, Delhaye C, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Circulation. 2021;143:1043–61.CrossRef Vincent F, Ternacle J, Denimal T, Shen M, Redfors B, Delhaye C, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. Circulation. 2021;143:1043–61.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document (VARC-2). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S45-60.CrossRef Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document (VARC-2). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S45-60.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sievers H-H, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1226–33.CrossRef Sievers H-H, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1226–33.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kapadia SR, Schoenhagen P, Stewart W, Tuzcu EM. Imaging for transcatheter valve procedures. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010;35:228–76.CrossRef Kapadia SR, Schoenhagen P, Stewart W, Tuzcu EM. Imaging for transcatheter valve procedures. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010;35:228–76.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hamdan A, Guetta V, Klempfner R, Konen E, Raanani E, Glikson M, et al. Inverse relationship between membranous septal length and the risk of atrioventricular block in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1218–28.CrossRef Hamdan A, Guetta V, Klempfner R, Konen E, Raanani E, Glikson M, et al. Inverse relationship between membranous septal length and the risk of atrioventricular block in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1218–28.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jilaihawi H, Zhao Z, Du R, Staniloae C, Saric M, Neuburger PJ, et al. Minimizing permanent pacemaker following repositionable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1796–807.CrossRef Jilaihawi H, Zhao Z, Du R, Staniloae C, Saric M, Neuburger PJ, et al. Minimizing permanent pacemaker following repositionable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1796–807.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kapadia SR, Wazni O, Krishnaswamy A. Pacemaker implantation after TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(10 Pt A):1148–50.CrossRef Kapadia SR, Wazni O, Krishnaswamy A. Pacemaker implantation after TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(10 Pt A):1148–50.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jilaihawi H, Chen M, Webb J, Himbert D, Ruiz CE, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. A bicuspid aortic valve imaging classification for the TAVR Era. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1145–58.CrossRef Jilaihawi H, Chen M, Webb J, Himbert D, Ruiz CE, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. A bicuspid aortic valve imaging classification for the TAVR Era. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1145–58.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference de Oliveira DMC, Abdullah N, Green NC, Espino DM. Biomechanical assessment of bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: a fluid–structure interaction modelling approach. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2020;11:431–47.CrossRef de Oliveira DMC, Abdullah N, Green NC, Espino DM. Biomechanical assessment of bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: a fluid–structure interaction modelling approach. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2020;11:431–47.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference van Rosendael PJ, Delgado V, Bax JJ. Pacemaker implantation rate after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with early and new-generation devices: a systematic review. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2003–13.CrossRef van Rosendael PJ, Delgado V, Bax JJ. Pacemaker implantation rate after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with early and new-generation devices: a systematic review. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2003–13.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O’Hair D, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1706–15.CrossRef Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O’Hair D, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1706–15.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kalogeras K, Ruparelia N, Kabir T, Jabbour R, Naganuma T, Vavuranakis M, et al. Comparison of the self-expanding Evolut-PRO transcatheter aortic valve to its predecessor Evolut-R in the real world multicenter ATLAS registry. Int J Cardiol. 2020;310:120–5.CrossRef Kalogeras K, Ruparelia N, Kabir T, Jabbour R, Naganuma T, Vavuranakis M, et al. Comparison of the self-expanding Evolut-PRO transcatheter aortic valve to its predecessor Evolut-R in the real world multicenter ATLAS registry. Int J Cardiol. 2020;310:120–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A CT-based technique to predict optimal projection for self-expanding TAVI in patients with different aortic valve anatomies
Authors
Xi Wang
Fei Chen
Tian-Yuan Xiong
Yi-Jian Li
Yuan-Weixiang Ou
Qiao Li
Yong Peng
Jia-Fu Wei
Sen He
Mao Chen
Yuan Feng
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2261
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02387-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 1/2021 Go to the issue