Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research article

Total knee arthroplasty following lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matching study

Authors: Tianshun Xie, Astrid J. de Vries, Hugo C. van der Veen, Reinoud W. Brouwer

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The disparity in patient-reported outcomes between total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and primary TKA has yet to be fully comprehended. This study aims to compare the patient-reported outcomes, radiological parameters and complication rates between TKA following HTO and primary TKA.

Methods

Sixty-five patients who underwent TKA following lateral closing-wedge HTO were compared to a matched group of primary TKA at postoperative 6-months and 1-year. Between-group confounders of age, gender, smoking status, Body Mass index, preoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain in rest, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Shortform (KOOS-PS), EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) overall health score, and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were balanced by propensity score matching. Patient-reported outcome measures were NRS pain in rest, KOOS-PS, EQ-5D overall health score, and OKS. Radiological parameters were femorotibial angle, medial proximal tibial angle, anatomical lateral distal femoral angle, posterior tibial slope, and patellar height assessed by Insall-Salvati ratio. The complication rates of TKA were compared between the two groups. The HTO survival time, the choice of staple removal before or during TKA in patients who underwent TKA following HTO patients, and the rate of patellar resurfacing were assessed. The p value < 0.0125 indicates statistical significance after Bonferroni correction.

Results

After propensity score matching, no significant between-group differences in the patient-reported outcome measures, radiographical parameters and complication rates were found (p > 0.0125). In the TKA following HTO group, with an average HTO survival time of 8.7 years, staples were removed before TKA in 46 patients (71%) and during TKA in 19 patients, and 11 cases (17%) had patella resurfacing. In the primary TKA group, 15 cases (23%) had patella resurfacing.

Conclusion

The short-term assessment of TKA following HTO indicates outcomes similar to primary TKA. A previous HTO does not impact the early results of subsequent TKA, suggesting that the previous HTO has minimal influence on TKA outcomes.

Level of evidence

III, cohort study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ollivier B, et al. Good long-term survival and patient-reported outcomes after high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3569–84.PubMedCrossRef Ollivier B, et al. Good long-term survival and patient-reported outcomes after high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3569–84.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Virolainen P, Aro HT. High tibial osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a review of the literature and a meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(4):258–61.PubMedCrossRef Virolainen P, Aro HT. High tibial osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a review of the literature and a meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(4):258–61.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sun X, Wang J, Su Z. A meta-analysis of total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(4):527–35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sun X, Wang J, Su Z. A meta-analysis of total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(4):527–35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chen X, et al. Higher risk of revision in total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):153.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chen X, et al. Higher risk of revision in total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):153.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ramappa M, Anand S, Jennings A. Total knee replacement following high tibial osteotomy versus total knee replacement without high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(11):1587–93.PubMedCrossRef Ramappa M, Anand S, Jennings A. Total knee replacement following high tibial osteotomy versus total knee replacement without high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(11):1587–93.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Meding JB, Wing JT, Ritter MA. Does high tibial osteotomy affect the success or survival of a total knee replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(7):1991–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Meding JB, Wing JT, Ritter MA. Does high tibial osteotomy affect the success or survival of a total knee replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(7):1991–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Erak S, et al. Total knee arthroplasty following medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy: technical issues early clinical radiological results. Knee. 2011;18(6):499–504.PubMedCrossRef Erak S, et al. Total knee arthroplasty following medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy: technical issues early clinical radiological results. Knee. 2011;18(6):499–504.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bae DK, et al. Comparison of mid-term results between conversion total knee arthroplasties following closed wedge high tibial osteotomy and primary total knee arthroplasties: a matched pair study including patellar symptom and position. J Orthop Sci. 2017;22(3):495–500.PubMedCrossRef Bae DK, et al. Comparison of mid-term results between conversion total knee arthroplasties following closed wedge high tibial osteotomy and primary total knee arthroplasties: a matched pair study including patellar symptom and position. J Orthop Sci. 2017;22(3):495–500.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Saragaglia D, et al. Computer-assisted total knee replacement after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: medium-term results in a series of ninety cases. Int Orthop. 2016;40(1):35–40.PubMedCrossRef Saragaglia D, et al. Computer-assisted total knee replacement after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: medium-term results in a series of ninety cases. Int Orthop. 2016;40(1):35–40.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Amendola L, et al. Knee joint arthroplasty after tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop. 2010;34(2):289–95.PubMedCrossRef Amendola L, et al. Knee joint arthroplasty after tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop. 2010;34(2):289–95.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nizard RS, et al. Total knee replacement after failed tibial osteotomy: results of a matched-pair study. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(8):847–53.PubMedCrossRef Nizard RS, et al. Total knee replacement after failed tibial osteotomy: results of a matched-pair study. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(8):847–53.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cross MB, et al. Revising an HTO or UKA to TKA: is it more like a primary TKA or a revision TKA? J Arthroplast. 2014;29(9 Suppl):229–31.CrossRef Cross MB, et al. Revising an HTO or UKA to TKA: is it more like a primary TKA or a revision TKA? J Arthroplast. 2014;29(9 Suppl):229–31.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Bentley G. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a medium-term review. J Arthroplast. 2000;15(5):597–603.CrossRef Haddad FS, Bentley G. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a medium-term review. J Arthroplast. 2000;15(5):597–603.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kazakos KJ, et al. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(2):167–73.PubMedCrossRef Kazakos KJ, et al. Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(2):167–73.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Scuderi GR, et al. The new knee society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):3–19.PubMedCrossRef Scuderi GR, et al. The new knee society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):3–19.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Insall JN, et al. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(6):754–65.PubMedCrossRef Insall JN, et al. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(6):754–65.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Billig JI, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: understanding surgical efficacy and quality from the patient’s perspective. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(1):56–64.PubMedCrossRef Billig JI, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: understanding surgical efficacy and quality from the patient’s perspective. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(1):56–64.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Snyder CF, et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Med Care. 2013;51(8 Suppl 3):S73–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Snyder CF, et al. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Med Care. 2013;51(8 Suppl 3):S73–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Amis AA. Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):197–205.PubMedCrossRef Amis AA. Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):197–205.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference von Elm E, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573–7.CrossRef von Elm E, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract. 2003;3(4):310–6.PubMedCrossRef Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract. 2003;3(4):310–6.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Perruccio AV, et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarth Cartil. 2008;16(5):542–50.CrossRef Perruccio AV, et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarth Cartil. 2008;16(5):542–50.CrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Dawson J, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):63–9.PubMedCrossRef Dawson J, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):63–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D. Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy: the effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:248–64.CrossRef Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D. Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy: the effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:248–64.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sheth NP, Husain A, Nelson CL. Surgical techniques for total knee arthroplasty: measured resection, gap balancing, and hybrid. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(7):499–508.PubMedCrossRef Sheth NP, Husain A, Nelson CL. Surgical techniques for total knee arthroplasty: measured resection, gap balancing, and hybrid. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(7):499–508.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Verhulst FV, et al. Patellar height measurements: Insall-Salvati ratio is most reliable method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(3):869–75.PubMedCrossRef Verhulst FV, et al. Patellar height measurements: Insall-Salvati ratio is most reliable method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(3):869–75.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lee OS, et al. Effect of posterior tibial slope change on postoperative range of motion and clinical outcomes after posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2023;36(1):87–94.PubMedCrossRef Lee OS, et al. Effect of posterior tibial slope change on postoperative range of motion and clinical outcomes after posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2023;36(1):87–94.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Cherian JJ, et al. Mechanical, anatomical, and kinematic axis in TKA: concepts and practical applications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):89–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cherian JJ, et al. Mechanical, anatomical, and kinematic axis in TKA: concepts and practical applications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):89–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Xie T, et al. Clinical relevance of joint line obliquity after high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis remains controversial: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(10):4355–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xie T, et al. Clinical relevance of joint line obliquity after high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis remains controversial: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(10):4355–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Courtney PM, Boniello AJ, Berger RA. Complications following outpatient total joint arthroplasty: an analysis of a national database. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(5):1426–30.CrossRef Courtney PM, Boniello AJ, Berger RA. Complications following outpatient total joint arthroplasty: an analysis of a national database. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(5):1426–30.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Townsend LA, et al. Impact of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(6):580–4.PubMedCrossRef Townsend LA, et al. Impact of age on patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(6):580–4.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Whitlock KG, et al. Gender role in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of perioperative outcomes in US patients. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(12):2736–40.CrossRef Whitlock KG, et al. Gender role in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of perioperative outcomes in US patients. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(12):2736–40.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Matharu GS, et al. The effect of smoking on outcomes following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a population-based cohort study of 117,024 patients. Acta Orthop. 2019;90(6):559–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Matharu GS, et al. The effect of smoking on outcomes following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a population-based cohort study of 117,024 patients. Acta Orthop. 2019;90(6):559–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
42.
go back to reference Katakam A, et al. Development of machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of minimal clinically important difference for the KOOS-PS following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2022;40(4):808–15.PubMedCrossRef Katakam A, et al. Development of machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of minimal clinically important difference for the KOOS-PS following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2022;40(4):808–15.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Coretti S, Ruggeri M, McNamee P. The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(2):221–33.PubMedCrossRef Coretti S, Ruggeri M, McNamee P. The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(2):221–33.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Seo SS, et al. Survival of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(30):e16609.PubMedCrossRef Seo SS, et al. Survival of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(30):e16609.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Chen JY, et al. Cruciate retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after previous high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(12):3607–13.PubMedCrossRef Chen JY, et al. Cruciate retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after previous high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(12):3607–13.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Lisý P, et al. Comparison of short-time functional outcomes after TKA between Multigen Plus CR and Physica KR prostheses. Musculoskelet Surg. 2023;107(1):69–76.PubMedCrossRef Lisý P, et al. Comparison of short-time functional outcomes after TKA between Multigen Plus CR and Physica KR prostheses. Musculoskelet Surg. 2023;107(1):69–76.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Sheehy L, et al. Does measurement of the anatomic axis consistently predict hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) for knee alignment studies in osteoarthritis? Analysis of long limb radiographs from the multicenter osteoarthritis (MOST) study. Osteoarth Cartil. 2011;19(1):58–64.CrossRef Sheehy L, et al. Does measurement of the anatomic axis consistently predict hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) for knee alignment studies in osteoarthritis? Analysis of long limb radiographs from the multicenter osteoarthritis (MOST) study. Osteoarth Cartil. 2011;19(1):58–64.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Total knee arthroplasty following lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matching study
Authors
Tianshun Xie
Astrid J. de Vries
Hugo C. van der Veen
Reinoud W. Brouwer
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04760-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2024 Go to the issue