Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

The Visual Analog Scale as a Comprehensible Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) in Septorhinoplasty

Authors: Christoph Spiekermann, Susanne Amler, Claudia Rudack, Markus Stenner

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The patient’s satisfaction with the esthetic result is a major criterion of success in septorhinoplasty. However, the idea of esthetic perfection varies greatly and primarily depends on subjective perception. Hence, patient-reported instruments are important and necessary to assess the outcome in septorhinoplasty. To analyze the potential of the visual analog scale (VAS) as a patient-reported outcome measure in septorhinoplasty, the perception of the nasal appearance was assessed by a VAS pre- and postoperatively in 213 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. Furthermore, in this prospective study, the patients’ satisfaction concerning the procedure’s result was analyzed using a five-point Likert scale. Females had lower preoperative VAS scores but a higher increase compared to males. Patients with lower initial VAS scores showed a higher improvement in the VAS score postoperatively compared to patients with higher initial VAS scores. Satisfaction with the result depends on the increase in the VAS score value. The VAS scale is a short and comprehensible tool to assess patients’ perception of nasal appearance preoperatively and represents an appropriate instrument to assess the esthetic patient-reported outcome in septorhinoplasty.
Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Society of Plastic Surgeons. National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics (2016) Report of the 2015 Statistics. Department of Public Relations, Arlington Heights American Society of Plastic Surgeons. National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics (2016) Report of the 2015 Statistics. Department of Public Relations, Arlington Heights
2.
go back to reference Claes G, Claes J, Wuyts FL (2009) Outcome of septorhinoplasty: a comparison of patient and surgeon views. B-ENT 5:203–211PubMed Claes G, Claes J, Wuyts FL (2009) Outcome of septorhinoplasty: a comparison of patient and surgeon views. B-ENT 5:203–211PubMed
3.
go back to reference Mohammadshahi M, Pourreza A, Orojlo PH, Mahmoodi M, Akbari F (2014) Rhinoplasty as a medicalized phenomenon: a 25-center survey on quality of life before and after cosmetic rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38:615–619CrossRefPubMed Mohammadshahi M, Pourreza A, Orojlo PH, Mahmoodi M, Akbari F (2014) Rhinoplasty as a medicalized phenomenon: a 25-center survey on quality of life before and after cosmetic rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 38:615–619CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Castle DJ, Honigman RJ, Phillips KA (2002) Does cosmetic surgery improve psychosocial wellbeing? Med J Aust 176:601–604PubMedPubMedCentral Castle DJ, Honigman RJ, Phillips KA (2002) Does cosmetic surgery improve psychosocial wellbeing? Med J Aust 176:601–604PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Herruer JM, Prins JB, van Heerbeek N, Verhage-Damen GW, Ingels KJ (2015) Negative predictors for satisfaction in patients seeking facial cosmetic surgery: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1596–1605CrossRefPubMed Herruer JM, Prins JB, van Heerbeek N, Verhage-Damen GW, Ingels KJ (2015) Negative predictors for satisfaction in patients seeking facial cosmetic surgery: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1596–1605CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Goin MK, Rees TD (1991) A prospective study of patients’ psychological reactions to rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 27:210–215CrossRefPubMed Goin MK, Rees TD (1991) A prospective study of patients’ psychological reactions to rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 27:210–215CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM (2003) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:469–482CrossRefPubMed Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM (2003) Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:469–482CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lohuis PJ, Hakim S, Duivesteijn W, Knobbe A, Tasman AJ (2013) Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:913e–923eCrossRefPubMed Lohuis PJ, Hakim S, Duivesteijn W, Knobbe A, Tasman AJ (2013) Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:913e–923eCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Frederick DA, Lever J, Peplau LA (2007) Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: views of men and women across the lifespan. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1407–1415CrossRefPubMed Frederick DA, Lever J, Peplau LA (2007) Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: views of men and women across the lifespan. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1407–1415CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ästhetisch-Plastische Chirurgie. Zahlen, Fakten und Trends in der Plastischen Chirurgie 2015. DGÄPC-Magazin (2016) Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ästhetisch-Plastische Chirurgie. Zahlen, Fakten und Trends in der Plastischen Chirurgie 2015. DGÄPC-Magazin (2016)
11.
go back to reference Chauhan N, Warner J, Adamson PA (2010) Adolescent rhinoplasty: challenges and psychosocial and clinical outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:510–516CrossRefPubMed Chauhan N, Warner J, Adamson PA (2010) Adolescent rhinoplasty: challenges and psychosocial and clinical outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:510–516CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference McGrath MH, Mukerji S (2000) Plastic surgery and the teenage patient. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 13:105–118CrossRefPubMed McGrath MH, Mukerji S (2000) Plastic surgery and the teenage patient. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 13:105–118CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Arima LM, Velasco LC, Tiago RS (2012) Influence of age on rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation: a preliminary study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:248–253CrossRefPubMed Arima LM, Velasco LC, Tiago RS (2012) Influence of age on rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation: a preliminary study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:248–253CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wright MR, Wright WK (1975) A psychological study of patients undergoing cosmetic surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 101:145–151CrossRefPubMed Wright MR, Wright WK (1975) A psychological study of patients undergoing cosmetic surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 101:145–151CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Montemurro P, Porcnik A, Heden P, Otte M (2015) The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39:270–277CrossRefPubMed Montemurro P, Porcnik A, Heden P, Otte M (2015) The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39:270–277CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Denadai R, Araujo KM, Samartine Junior H, Denadai R, Raposo-Amaral CE (2015) Aesthetic surgery reality television shows: do they influence public perception of the scope of plastic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 39:1000–1009CrossRefPubMed Denadai R, Araujo KM, Samartine Junior H, Denadai R, Raposo-Amaral CE (2015) Aesthetic surgery reality television shows: do they influence public perception of the scope of plastic surgery? Aesthetic Plast Surg 39:1000–1009CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Cingi C, Songu M, Bal C (2011) Outcomes research in rhinoplasty: body image and quality of life. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25:263–267CrossRefPubMed Cingi C, Songu M, Bal C (2011) Outcomes research in rhinoplasty: body image and quality of life. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25:263–267CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Visual Analog Scale as a Comprehensible Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) in Septorhinoplasty
Authors
Christoph Spiekermann
Susanne Amler
Claudia Rudack
Markus Stenner
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1113-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue