Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2014

01-08-2014 | Original Article

Rhinoplasty as a Medicalized Phenomenon: A 25-Center Survey on Quality of Life Before and After Cosmetic Rhinoplasty

Authors: Marita Mohammadshahi, Abolghasem Pourreza, Parvaneh Heidari Orojlo, Mahmood Mahmoodi, Feizallah Akbari

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cosmetic surgery, including rhinoplasty, has been dramatically increasing in Iran through the last two decades. It is performed mainly on the youth for the purpose of beauty, an area not directly related to medicine but strongly medicalized. This study aimed to explore the effects of rhinoplasty on the quality of life experienced by individuals who have undergone the surgery.

Methods

From all the plastic surgery clinics in Teheran, 25 were selected randomly as sites for the study. In the next step, 110 patients who had undergone rhinoplasty were selected randomly from these clinics. Only patients whose surgery had been performed 3 to 18 months before the interview were included in the statistical population. Data were collected through a Likert-type questionnaire that queries three major quality-of-life dimensions: general benefit, social support, and physical health. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS.

Results

The mean scores for quality of life before and after surgery were 66.54 and 61.11, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.008), showing a decline in quality of life after rhinoplasty. Whereas the mean score for social support and physical health decreased, the score for general benefit increased after the surgery. The main motivating factors for surgery were external factors (e.g., friends, family). In addition, the date of the surgery and the time of the interview were positively correlated. In other words, the longer the time since surgery, the greater was the increase in the patients’ satisfaction and quality of life.

Conclusions

The overall quality of life among the statistical population decreased. This could be attributed to unnecessary surgeries, medical errors, and performance of rhinoplasty because of its recognized popularity. The reduction in social support may have resulted from unacceptable consequences of rhinoplasty, particularly in terms of appearance, and reactions of family and peer group. The physical health of the respondents was negatively affected by rhinoplasty. Malfunction of the upper respiratory system after rhinoplasty is a known main reason for the negative effect of rhinoplasty on the quality of life. Correlations between the times of the surgery and the interview suggest a long-term rather than an immediate assessment of effects that such surgeries have on the quality of life.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://​www.​springer.​com/​00266.​
Footnotes
1
Glassco Benefit List
 
2
Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation
 
3
Dairfford Appearance Scale 59
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Conrad P, Mackie T, Mehrotra A (2010) Estimating the costs of medicalization. Soc Sci Med 70:1943–1947PubMedCrossRef Conrad P, Mackie T, Mehrotra A (2010) Estimating the costs of medicalization. Soc Sci Med 70:1943–1947PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Conrad P (1992) Medicalization and social control. Ann Rev Sociol 18:209–232CrossRef Conrad P (1992) Medicalization and social control. Ann Rev Sociol 18:209–232CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Conrad P (2007) The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions Into Treatable Disorders. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Conrad P (2007) The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions Into Treatable Disorders. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
5.
go back to reference Hafezi F, Nohi H (2002) Rhinoplasty in burned noses. Sci Inform Database 10:845–850 Hafezi F, Nohi H (2002) Rhinoplasty in burned noses. Sci Inform Database 10:845–850
6.
go back to reference Donohue JM, Cevasco M, Rosenthal MB (2007) A decade of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. N Engl J Med 357:673–681PubMedCrossRef Donohue JM, Cevasco M, Rosenthal MB (2007) A decade of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. N Engl J Med 357:673–681PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Conrad P, Leiter V (2004) Medicalization, markets, and consumers. J Health Soc Behav 45:158–176PubMed Conrad P, Leiter V (2004) Medicalization, markets, and consumers. J Health Soc Behav 45:158–176PubMed
8.
go back to reference Islamic Republic of Iran News Network (IRINN) (2013) Disturbing Statistics in Rhinoplasty. News Network, Tehran, Iran Islamic Republic of Iran News Network (IRINN) (2013) Disturbing Statistics in Rhinoplasty. News Network, Tehran, Iran
9.
go back to reference Arndt EM et al (1986) Beauty and the eye of the beholder: social consequences and personal adjustments for facial patients. Br J Plast Surg 39:81–84PubMedCrossRef Arndt EM et al (1986) Beauty and the eye of the beholder: social consequences and personal adjustments for facial patients. Br J Plast Surg 39:81–84PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cash TF, Horton CE (1983) Aesthetic surgery: effects of rhinoplasty on the social perception of patients by others. Plast Reconstr Surg 72:543–548PubMedCrossRef Cash TF, Horton CE (1983) Aesthetic surgery: effects of rhinoplasty on the social perception of patients by others. Plast Reconstr Surg 72:543–548PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reich J (1975) Factors influencing patient satisfaction with the results of aesthetic plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:5–13PubMedCrossRef Reich J (1975) Factors influencing patient satisfaction with the results of aesthetic plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:5–13PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Harris DL, Carr AT (2001) The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg 54:216–222PubMedCrossRef Harris DL, Carr AT (2001) The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg 54:216–222PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cano S, Browne J, Lamping D (2004) Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: current approaches and future directions. Br J Plast Surg 57:1–11PubMedCrossRef Cano S, Browne J, Lamping D (2004) Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: current approaches and future directions. Br J Plast Surg 57:1–11PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chauhan N, Warner J, Adamson PA (2010) Adolescent rhinoplasty: challenges and psychosocial and clinical outcomes. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:510–516CrossRef Chauhan N, Warner J, Adamson PA (2010) Adolescent rhinoplasty: challenges and psychosocial and clinical outcomes. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:510–516CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Alsarraf R et al (2001) Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:198–201PubMedCrossRef Alsarraf R et al (2001) Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:198–201PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr (2001) Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:7PubMedCrossRef Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr (2001) Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:7PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Johnson CM Jr (2001) Cost outcomes of facial plastic surgery: regional and temporal trends. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:44–47PubMedCrossRef Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Johnson CM Jr (2001) Cost outcomes of facial plastic surgery: regional and temporal trends. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:44–47PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kramer MF, Rasp G, Kastenbauer E (2003) Health-related quality of life in rhino surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 24:97–105PubMedCrossRef Kramer MF, Rasp G, Kastenbauer E (2003) Health-related quality of life in rhino surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 24:97–105PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Papadopulos N et al (2007) Quality of life following aesthetic plastic surgery: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:915–921PubMedCrossRef Papadopulos N et al (2007) Quality of life following aesthetic plastic surgery: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:915–921PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Alsarraf R (2000) Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:192–197CrossRef Alsarraf R (2000) Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:192–197CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hormozi AK, Toosi AB (2008) Rhinometry: an important clinical index for evaluation of the nose before and after rhinoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:286–293CrossRef Hormozi AK, Toosi AB (2008) Rhinometry: an important clinical index for evaluation of the nose before and after rhinoplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 32:286–293CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cole RP et al (1994) Measuring outcome in low-priority plastic surgery patients using quality of life indices. Br J Plast Surg 47:117–121PubMedCrossRef Cole RP et al (1994) Measuring outcome in low-priority plastic surgery patients using quality of life indices. Br J Plast Surg 47:117–121PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Litner J et al (2008) Impact of cosmetic facial surgery on satisfaction with appearance and quality of life. Arch Facial Plast Surg 10:79–83PubMedCrossRef Litner J et al (2008) Impact of cosmetic facial surgery on satisfaction with appearance and quality of life. Arch Facial Plast Surg 10:79–83PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Klassen A et al (1998) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic surgery patients with a condition-specific instrument: the Derriford Scale. Br J Plast Surg 51:380–384PubMedCrossRef Klassen A et al (1998) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic surgery patients with a condition-specific instrument: the Derriford Scale. Br J Plast Surg 51:380–384PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sajadi H (2000) Quality of Life, Book of Abstracts. Report for Social Situation in Iran. Tehran, Iran Sajadi H (2000) Quality of Life, Book of Abstracts. Report for Social Situation in Iran. Tehran, Iran
26.
go back to reference Ercolani M et al (1999) Short-term outcome of rhinoplasty for medical or cosmetic indication. J Psychosom Res 47:277–281PubMedCrossRef Ercolani M et al (1999) Short-term outcome of rhinoplasty for medical or cosmetic indication. J Psychosom Res 47:277–281PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
go back to reference Sarwer DB et al (2008) Two-year results of a prospective, multisite investigation of patient satisfaction and psychosocial status following cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 28:245–250PubMedCrossRef Sarwer DB et al (2008) Two-year results of a prospective, multisite investigation of patient satisfaction and psychosocial status following cosmetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 28:245–250PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rhinoplasty as a Medicalized Phenomenon: A 25-Center Survey on Quality of Life Before and After Cosmetic Rhinoplasty
Authors
Marita Mohammadshahi
Abolghasem Pourreza
Parvaneh Heidari Orojlo
Mahmood Mahmoodi
Feizallah Akbari
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0323-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2014 Go to the issue