Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Article

The Influence of Social Media and Easily Accessible Online Information on the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Practice: Literature Review and Our Own Experience

Authors: Paolo Montemurro, Ales Porcnik, Per Hedén, Maximilian Otte

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Patients interested in aesthetic plastic surgery procedures increasingly seek advice on social media and rely on easily accessible online information. The investigatory goal was to determine the impact of this phenomenon on the everyday aesthetic plastic surgery practice.

Methods and Patients

Five hundred consecutive patients completed a questionnaire prior to their consultation with a plastic surgeon at our clinic. A questionnaire was also completed by 128 plastic surgeons practising in 19 different countries. A literature review was performed.

Results

Almost all patients (95 %) used the internet to collect information prior to consultation, for 68 % of them it being their first search method. Social media were used by 46 % of patients and 40 % of these were strongly influenced when choosing a specific doctor. The majority of plastic surgeons (85 %) thought the information found on social media could lead to unrealistic expectations. However, 45 % of plastic surgeons believed that their consultations became easier after the advent of social media, 29 % found them more difficult. A literature review showed a high percentage of poor quality internet websites regarding plastic surgery and an increase in use of social media among plastic surgeons.

Conclusion

The internet and social media play an important and growing role in plastic surgery. This results in more informed patients but may create unrealistic expectations. Even if the internet provides ample information, it cannot replace the face-to-face consultation, which always should remain a detailed process, covering both risks and limitations of alternative procedures. Available literature on how social media influences the medical practice is still scarce and further research is needed.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Jejurikar SS, Rovak JM, Kuzon WM, Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Cederna PS (2002) Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the internet. Ann Plast Surg 49:460–465CrossRefPubMed Jejurikar SS, Rovak JM, Kuzon WM, Chung KC, Kotsis SV, Cederna PS (2002) Evaluation of plastic surgery information on the internet. Ann Plast Surg 49:460–465CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gordon JB, Barot LR, Fahey AL, Matthews MS (2001) The Internet as a source of information on breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:171–176CrossRefPubMed Gordon JB, Barot LR, Fahey AL, Matthews MS (2001) The Internet as a source of information on breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:171–176CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Domanski MC, Cavale N (2012) Self-reported “worth it” rating of aesthetic surgery in social media. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:1292–1295CrossRef Domanski MC, Cavale N (2012) Self-reported “worth it” rating of aesthetic surgery in social media. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:1292–1295CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Szychta P, Zielinski T, Rykala J, Witmanowski H, Kruk-Jeromin J (2012) Role of the internet in communication between patient and surgeon before rhinoplasty. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 46:248–251CrossRefPubMed Szychta P, Zielinski T, Rykala J, Witmanowski H, Kruk-Jeromin J (2012) Role of the internet in communication between patient and surgeon before rhinoplasty. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 46:248–251CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Zaidi FH, Jones CA (2009) Informing patients: oculoplastic surgery and the internet. Eye 23:2090–2093CrossRefPubMed Zaidi FH, Jones CA (2009) Informing patients: oculoplastic surgery and the internet. Eye 23:2090–2093CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Parikh AR, Kok K, Redfern B, Clarke A, Withey S, Butler PE (2006) A portal to validated websites on cosmetic surgery: the design of an archetype. Ann Plast Surg 57:350–352CrossRefPubMed Parikh AR, Kok K, Redfern B, Clarke A, Withey S, Butler PE (2006) A portal to validated websites on cosmetic surgery: the design of an archetype. Ann Plast Surg 57:350–352CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Smarrito S, Mitrofanoff M, Haddad R, Pavy B (2003) Do we need a chart of quality for websites related to cosmetic surgery? Ann Chir Plast Esthet 48:222–227CrossRefPubMed Smarrito S, Mitrofanoff M, Haddad R, Pavy B (2003) Do we need a chart of quality for websites related to cosmetic surgery? Ann Chir Plast Esthet 48:222–227CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nassab R, Hamnett N, Nelson K, Kaur S, Greensill B, Dhital S, Juma A (2010) Cosmetic tourism: public opinion and analysis of information and content available on the internet. Aesthet Surg J 30:465–469CrossRefPubMed Nassab R, Hamnett N, Nelson K, Kaur S, Greensill B, Dhital S, Juma A (2010) Cosmetic tourism: public opinion and analysis of information and content available on the internet. Aesthet Surg J 30:465–469CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Aliu O, Chung KC (2010) Readability of ASPS and ASAPS educational web sites: an analysis of consumer impact. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1271–1278PubMedCentralPubMed Aliu O, Chung KC (2010) Readability of ASPS and ASAPS educational web sites: an analysis of consumer impact. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1271–1278PubMedCentralPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hoppe IC, Ahuja NK, Ingargiola MJ, Granick MS (2013) A survey of patient comprehension of readily accessible online educational material regarding plastic surgery procedures. Aesthet Surg J 33:436–442CrossRefPubMed Hoppe IC, Ahuja NK, Ingargiola MJ, Granick MS (2013) A survey of patient comprehension of readily accessible online educational material regarding plastic surgery procedures. Aesthet Surg J 33:436–442CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Walden JL, Panagopoulous G, Shrader SW (2010) Contemporary decision making and perception in patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 30:395–403CrossRefPubMed Walden JL, Panagopoulous G, Shrader SW (2010) Contemporary decision making and perception in patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 30:395–403CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wong WW, Camp MC, Camp JS, Gupta SC (2010) The quality of internet advertising in aesthetic surgery: an in-depth analysis. Aesthet Surg J 30:735–743CrossRefPubMed Wong WW, Camp MC, Camp JS, Gupta SC (2010) The quality of internet advertising in aesthetic surgery: an in-depth analysis. Aesthet Surg J 30:735–743CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Fansa H, Haller S (2011) Patients’ decision for aesthetic surgery. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 43:368–375CrossRefPubMed Fansa H, Haller S (2011) Patients’ decision for aesthetic surgery. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 43:368–375CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vardanian AJ, Kusnezov N, Im DD, Lee JC, Jarrahy R (2013) Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1184–1193CrossRefPubMed Vardanian AJ, Kusnezov N, Im DD, Lee JC, Jarrahy R (2013) Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1184–1193CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wong WW, Gupta SC (2011) Plastic surgery marketing in a generation of “tweeting”. Aesthet Surg J 31:972–976CrossRefPubMed Wong WW, Gupta SC (2011) Plastic surgery marketing in a generation of “tweeting”. Aesthet Surg J 31:972–976CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wheeler CK, Said H, Prucz R, Rodrich RJ, Mathes DW (2011) Social media in plastic surgery practices: emerging trends in North America. Aesthet Surg J 31:435–441CrossRefPubMed Wheeler CK, Said H, Prucz R, Rodrich RJ, Mathes DW (2011) Social media in plastic surgery practices: emerging trends in North America. Aesthet Surg J 31:435–441CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stevens RJG, Hamilton NM, O’Donoghue JM, Davies MP (2012) The use of the internet and social software by plastic surgeons. Eur J Plast Surg 35:747–755CrossRef Stevens RJG, Hamilton NM, O’Donoghue JM, Davies MP (2012) The use of the internet and social software by plastic surgeons. Eur J Plast Surg 35:747–755CrossRef
22.
23.
24.
go back to reference Camp SM, Mills DC (2012) The marriage of plastic surgery and social media: a relationship to last a lifetime. Aesthet Surg J 32:349–351CrossRefPubMed Camp SM, Mills DC (2012) The marriage of plastic surgery and social media: a relationship to last a lifetime. Aesthet Surg J 32:349–351CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Influence of Social Media and Easily Accessible Online Information on the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Practice: Literature Review and Our Own Experience
Authors
Paolo Montemurro
Ales Porcnik
Per Hedén
Maximilian Otte
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2/2015 Go to the issue