Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012

01-12-2012 | Review

The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions

Authors: Suzanne B. Coopey, Emanuele Mazzola, Julliette M. Buckley, John Sharko, Ahmet K. Belli, Elizabeth M. H. Kim, Fernanda Polubriaginof, Giovanni Parmigiani, Judy E. Garber, Barbara L. Smith, Michele A. Gadd, Michelle C. Specht, Anthony J. Guidi, Constance A. Roche, Kevin S. Hughes

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Women with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), and severe ADH are at increased risk of breast cancer, but a systematic quantification of this risk and the efficacy of chemoprevention in the clinical setting is still lacking. The objective of this study is to evaluate a woman’s risk of breast cancer based on atypia type and to determine the effect of chemoprevention in decreasing this risk. Review of 76,333 breast pathology reports from three institutions within Partners Healthcare System, Boston, from 1987 to 2010 using natural language processing was carried out. This approach identified 2,938 women diagnosed with atypical breast lesions. The main outcome of this study is breast cancer occurrence. Of the 2,938 patients with atypical breast lesions, 1,658 were documented to have received no chemoprevention, and 184/1,658 (11.1 %) developed breast cancer at a mean follow-up of 68 months. Estimated 10-year cancer risks were 17.3 % with ADH, 20.7 % with ALH, 23.7 % with LCIS, and 26.0 % with severe ADH. In a subset of patients treated from 1999 on (the chemoprevention era), those who received no chemoprevention had an estimated 10-year breast cancer risk of 21.3 %, whereas those treated with chemoprevention had a 10-year risk of 7.5 % (p < 0.001). Chemoprevention use significantly reduced breast cancer risk for all atypia types (p < 0.05). The risk of breast cancer with atypical breast lesions is substantial. Physicians should counsel patients with ADH, ALH, LCIS, and severe ADH about the benefit of chemoprevention in decreasing their breast cancer risk.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312(3):146–151PubMedCrossRef Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312(3):146–151PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH et al (2005) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(3):229–237PubMedCrossRef Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH et al (2005) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(3):229–237PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Degnim AC, Visscher DW, Berman HK et al (2007) Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 25(19):2671–2677PubMedCrossRef Degnim AC, Visscher DW, Berman HK et al (2007) Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 25(19):2671–2677PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast: a long-term follow-up study. Cancer 55(11):2698–2708PubMedCrossRef Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast: a long-term follow-up study. Cancer 55(11):2698–2708PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Collins LC, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM, Connolly JL, Colditz GA, Schnitt SJ (2007) Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia. Results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer 109(2):180–187PubMedCrossRef Collins LC, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM, Connolly JL, Colditz GA, Schnitt SJ (2007) Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia. Results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer 109(2):180–187PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marshall LM, Hunter DJ, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ, Byrne C, London SJ, Colditz GA (1997) Risk of breast cancer associated with atypical hyperplasia of lobular and ductal types. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6:297–301PubMed Marshall LM, Hunter DJ, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ, Byrne C, London SJ, Colditz GA (1997) Risk of breast cancer associated with atypical hyperplasia of lobular and ductal types. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6:297–301PubMed
7.
go back to reference Zhou WB, Xue DQ, Liu XA, Ding Q, Wang S (2011) The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137(7):1053–1060PubMedCrossRef Zhou WB, Xue DQ, Liu XA, Ding Q, Wang S (2011) The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137(7):1053–1060PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rosen PP, Lieberman PH, Braun DW, Kosloff C, Adair F (1978) Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Detailed analysis of 99 patients with average follow-up of 24 years. Am J Surg Pathol 2(3):225–251PubMedCrossRef Rosen PP, Lieberman PH, Braun DW, Kosloff C, Adair F (1978) Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Detailed analysis of 99 patients with average follow-up of 24 years. Am J Surg Pathol 2(3):225–251PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haagensen CD, Lane N, Lattes R, Bodian C (1978) Lobular neoplasia (so-called lobular carcinoma in situ) of the breast. Cancer 42:737–769PubMedCrossRef Haagensen CD, Lane N, Lattes R, Bodian C (1978) Lobular neoplasia (so-called lobular carcinoma in situ) of the breast. Cancer 42:737–769PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Page DL, Kidd TE Jr, Dupont WD, Simpson JF, Rogers LW (1991) Lobular neoplasia of the breast: higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease. Hum Pathol 22(12):1232–1239PubMedCrossRef Page DL, Kidd TE Jr, Dupont WD, Simpson JF, Rogers LW (1991) Lobular neoplasia of the breast: higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease. Hum Pathol 22(12):1232–1239PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zurrida S, Bartoli C, Galimberti V, Raselli R, Barletta L (1996) Interpretation of the risk associated with the unexpected finding of lobular carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 3(1):57–61PubMedCrossRef Zurrida S, Bartoli C, Galimberti V, Raselli R, Barletta L (1996) Interpretation of the risk associated with the unexpected finding of lobular carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 3(1):57–61PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bodian CA, Perzin KH, Lattes R (1996) Lobular neoplasia: long term risk of breast cancer and relation to other factors. Cancer 78(5):1024–1034PubMedCrossRef Bodian CA, Perzin KH, Lattes R (1996) Lobular neoplasia: long term risk of breast cancer and relation to other factors. Cancer 78(5):1024–1034PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Habel LA, Moe RE, Daling JR, Holte S, Rossing MA, Weiss NS (1997) Risk of contralateral breast cancer among women with carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg 225(1):69–75PubMedCrossRef Habel LA, Moe RE, Daling JR, Holte S, Rossing MA, Weiss NS (1997) Risk of contralateral breast cancer among women with carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg 225(1):69–75PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wärnberg F, Yuen J, Holmberg L (2000) Risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer after breast carcinoma in situ. Lancet 355:724–725PubMedCrossRef Wärnberg F, Yuen J, Holmberg L (2000) Risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer after breast carcinoma in situ. Lancet 355:724–725PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Franceschi S, Levi F, LaVecchia C, Randimbison L, Te VC (1998) Second cancers following in situ carcinoma of the breast. Int J Cancer 77:392–395PubMedCrossRef Franceschi S, Levi F, LaVecchia C, Randimbison L, Te VC (1998) Second cancers following in situ carcinoma of the breast. Int J Cancer 77:392–395PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (1998) Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371–1388PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (1998) Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371–1388PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Eckert S, Krueger KA et al (1999) The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Results from the MORE randomized trial. JAMA 281(23):2189–2197PubMedCrossRef Cummings SR, Eckert S, Krueger KA et al (1999) The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Results from the MORE randomized trial. JAMA 281(23):2189–2197PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (2010) Update of the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial: preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res 3(6):696–706CrossRef Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (2010) Update of the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial: preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res 3(6):696–706CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE et al (2011) Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 364(25):2381–2391PubMedCrossRef Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE et al (2011) Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 364(25):2381–2391PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ropka ME, Keim J, Philbrick JT (2010) Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 28(18):3090–3095PubMedCrossRef Ropka ME, Keim J, Philbrick JT (2010) Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 28(18):3090–3095PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Buckley JM, Coopey SB, Mazzola E et al (2012) The feasibility of using natural language processing to extract clinical information from 76,000 breast pathology reports. J Pathol Inform 3:23–29PubMedCrossRef Buckley JM, Coopey SB, Mazzola E et al (2012) The feasibility of using natural language processing to extract clinical information from 76,000 breast pathology reports. J Pathol Inform 3:23–29PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Page DL, Anderson TJ (1987) Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 137–184 Page DL, Anderson TJ (1987) Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 137–184
23.
go back to reference Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55CrossRef Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127:757–763PubMed Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127:757–763PubMed
25.
go back to reference Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5(3):299–314 Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5(3):299–314
26.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Hartmann LC, Anderson SS et al (2010) Evaluation of the Tyrer–Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol 28(22):3591–3596PubMedCrossRef Boughey JC, Hartmann LC, Anderson SS et al (2010) Evaluation of the Tyrer–Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol 28(22):3591–3596PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference McLaren BK, Schuyler PA, Sanders ME et al (2006) Excellent survival, cancer type, and Nottingham grade after atypical lobular hyperplasia on initial breast biopsy. Cancer 107(6):1227–1233PubMedCrossRef McLaren BK, Schuyler PA, Sanders ME et al (2006) Excellent survival, cancer type, and Nottingham grade after atypical lobular hyperplasia on initial breast biopsy. Cancer 107(6):1227–1233PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chuba PJ, Hamre MR, Yap J et al (2005) Bilateral risk for subsequent breast cancer after lobular carcinoma-in situ: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data. J Clin Oncol 23(24):5534–5541PubMedCrossRef Chuba PJ, Hamre MR, Yap J et al (2005) Bilateral risk for subsequent breast cancer after lobular carcinoma-in situ: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data. J Clin Oncol 23(24):5534–5541PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cuzick J, DeCensi A, Arun B et al (2011) Preventive therapy for breast cancer: a consensus statement. Lancet Oncol 12:496–503PubMedCrossRef Cuzick J, DeCensi A, Arun B et al (2011) Preventive therapy for breast cancer: a consensus statement. Lancet Oncol 12:496–503PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM et al (2010) Women’s decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:613–620PubMedCrossRef Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM et al (2010) Women’s decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:613–620PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Pankratz VS, Hartmann LC, Degnim AC et al (2008) Assessment of the accuracy of the gail model in women with atypical hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol 26(33):5374–5379PubMedCrossRef Pankratz VS, Hartmann LC, Degnim AC et al (2008) Assessment of the accuracy of the gail model in women with atypical hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol 26(33):5374–5379PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions
Authors
Suzanne B. Coopey
Emanuele Mazzola
Julliette M. Buckley
John Sharko
Ahmet K. Belli
Elizabeth M. H. Kim
Fernanda Polubriaginof
Giovanni Parmigiani
Judy E. Garber
Barbara L. Smith
Michele A. Gadd
Michelle C. Specht
Anthony J. Guidi
Constance A. Roche
Kevin S. Hughes
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2318-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine