Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2010

01-02-2010 | Clinical Trial

Women’s decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid

Authors: Angela Fagerlin, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, Dylan M. Smith, Vijayan Nair, Holly A. Derry, Jennifer B. McClure, Sarah Greene, Azadeh Stark, Sharon Hensley Alford, Paula Lantz, Daniel F. Hayes, Cheryl Wiese, Sarah Claud Zweig, Rosemarie Pitsch, Aleksandra Jankovic, Peter A. Ubel

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Tamoxifen reduces primary breast cancer incidence, yet causes serious side effects. To date, few women with increased breast cancer risk have elected to use tamoxifen for chemoprevention. The objective of the study was to determine women’s knowledge of and attitudes toward tamoxifen following exposure to a tailored decision aid (DA). A total of 632 women with a 5-year risk of breast cancer ≥1.66% (Mean = 2.56, range = 1.7–17.3) were recruited from two healthcare organizations. Participants viewed an online DA that informed them about their 5-year risk of breast cancer and presented individually tailored content depicting the risks/benefits of tamoxifen prophylaxis. Outcome measures included behavioral intentions (to seek additional information about tamoxifen, to talk to a physician about tamoxifen, and to take tamoxifen); knowledge; and perceived risks and benefits of tamoxifen. After viewing the DA, 29% of participants said they intended to seek more information or talk to their doctor about tamoxifen, and only 6% believed they would take tamoxifen. Knowledge was considerable, with 63% of women answering at least 5 of 6 knowledge questions correctly. Participants were concerned about the risks of tamoxifen, and many believed that the benefits of tamoxifen did not outweigh the risks. This study is the largest to date to test women’s preferences for taking tamoxifen and one of the largest to have tested the impact of a tailored DA. After viewing the DA, women demonstrated good understanding of tamoxifen’s risks and benefits, but most were not interested in taking tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Freedman AN, Graubard BI, Rao SR, McCaskill-Stevens W, Ballard-Barbash R, Gail MH (2003) Estimates of the number of U.S. women who could benefit from tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(7):526–532PubMedCrossRef Freedman AN, Graubard BI, Rao SR, McCaskill-Stevens W, Ballard-Barbash R, Gail MH (2003) Estimates of the number of U.S. women who could benefit from tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(7):526–532PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rush Port E, Montgomery LL, Heerdt AS, Borgen PI (2001) Patient reluctance toward tamoxifen use for breast cancer primary prevention. Ann Surg Oncol 8(7):580–585CrossRef Rush Port E, Montgomery LL, Heerdt AS, Borgen PI (2001) Patient reluctance toward tamoxifen use for breast cancer primary prevention. Ann Surg Oncol 8(7):580–585CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stacey D, O’Connor AM, De Grasse C, Verma S (2003) Development and evaluation of a breast cancer prevention decision aid for higher-risk women. Health Expect 6:3–18CrossRefPubMed Stacey D, O’Connor AM, De Grasse C, Verma S (2003) Development and evaluation of a breast cancer prevention decision aid for higher-risk women. Health Expect 6:3–18CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Melnikow J, Paterniti D, Azari R et al. (2005) Preferences of women evaluating risks of tamoxifen (POWER) study of preferences for tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction. Cancer 103(10):1996–2005 Melnikow J, Paterniti D, Azari R et al. (2005) Preferences of women evaluating risks of tamoxifen (POWER) study of preferences for tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction. Cancer 103(10):1996–2005
5.
go back to reference Bober SL, Hoke LA, Duda RB, Regan MM, Tung NM (2004) Decision-making about tamoxifen in women at high risk for breast cancer: clinical and psychological factors. J Clin Oncol 22(24):4951–4957CrossRefPubMed Bober SL, Hoke LA, Duda RB, Regan MM, Tung NM (2004) Decision-making about tamoxifen in women at high risk for breast cancer: clinical and psychological factors. J Clin Oncol 22(24):4951–4957CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Salant T, Ganschow PS, Olopade OI, Lauderdale DS (2006) “Why take it if you don’t have anything?” Breast cancer risk perceptions and prevention choices at a public hospital. J Gen Intern Med 21:779–785CrossRefPubMed Salant T, Ganschow PS, Olopade OI, Lauderdale DS (2006) “Why take it if you don’t have anything?” Breast cancer risk perceptions and prevention choices at a public hospital. J Gen Intern Med 21:779–785CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Snyder C, Seidel J, Hanna D, Lynch HT, Narod S (2005) The use of preventative measures among healthy women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Familial Cancer 4:97–103CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe KA, Snyder C, Seidel J, Hanna D, Lynch HT, Narod S (2005) The use of preventative measures among healthy women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Familial Cancer 4:97–103CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(24):1879–1886CrossRefPubMed Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(24):1879–1886CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(18):1371–1388CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(18):1371–1388CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Smith DM et al (2008) Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Educ Couns 73(2):209–214 Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Smith DM et al (2008) Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: the debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Educ Couns 73(2):209–214
11.
go back to reference Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (2006) Effects of tamoxifen vs. raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes. J Am Med Assoc 295(23):2727–2741CrossRef Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al (2006) Effects of tamoxifen vs. raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes. J Am Med Assoc 295(23):2727–2741CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wennberg JE (2002) Promoting Disease Management in Medicare. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health of the House Committee on Ways and Means, vol 2002 Wennberg JE (2002) Promoting Disease Management in Medicare. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health of the House Committee on Ways and Means, vol 2002
13.
go back to reference Couper M, Miller P (2008) Web survey methods. Public Opin Q 72(5):831–835CrossRef Couper M, Miller P (2008) Web survey methods. Public Opin Q 72(5):831–835CrossRef
14.
go back to reference O’Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V et al (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J 319(7212):731–734 O’Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V et al (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J 319(7212):731–734
Metadata
Title
Women’s decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid
Authors
Angela Fagerlin
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
Dylan M. Smith
Vijayan Nair
Holly A. Derry
Jennifer B. McClure
Sarah Greene
Azadeh Stark
Sharon Hensley Alford
Paula Lantz
Daniel F. Hayes
Cheryl Wiese
Sarah Claud Zweig
Rosemarie Pitsch
Aleksandra Jankovic
Peter A. Ubel
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0618-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine