Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 3/2012

01-06-2012 | Pictorial Essay

The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: a CT imaging guide for radiologists

Authors: Y. Sheu, A. Furlan, O. Almusa, G. Papachristou, K. T. Bae

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis and description of the various findings in acute pancreatitis is important for treatment. The original Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis sought to create a uniform system for classifying the severity of acute pancreatitis as well as common language to describe the various events that can occur in acute pancreatitis. The goal was to allow accurate communication between physicians using standardized language so correct treatment options could be used. Since that time, advances in the understanding of acute pancreatitis as well as improvements in both interventions and imaging have led to criticisms of the system and its abandonment by physicians. A 2007 revision of the Atlanta classifications sought to address many of these issues. This article will explain the changes to the Atlanta classification system and provide pictorial examples of the findings in acute pancreatitis as described by the Atlanta classification system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Besselink MG et al (2006) Describing computed tomography findings in acute necrotizing pancreatitis with the Atlanta classification: an interobserver agreement study. Pancreas 33(4):331–335PubMedCrossRef Besselink MG et al (2006) Describing computed tomography findings in acute necrotizing pancreatitis with the Atlanta classification: an interobserver agreement study. Pancreas 33(4):331–335PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bollen TL et al (2007) Toward an update of the atlanta classification on acute pancreatitis: review of new and abandoned terms. Pancreas 35(2):107–113PubMedCrossRef Bollen TL et al (2007) Toward an update of the atlanta classification on acute pancreatitis: review of new and abandoned terms. Pancreas 35(2):107–113PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group, Revision of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis. 2007 Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group, Revision of the Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis. 2007
4.
5.
go back to reference Morgan DE (2008) Imaging of acute pancreatitis and its complications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(10):1077–1085PubMedCrossRef Morgan DE (2008) Imaging of acute pancreatitis and its complications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(10):1077–1085PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ et al (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174(2):331–336PubMed Balthazar EJ et al (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174(2):331–336PubMed
7.
go back to reference De Waele JJ et al (2007) Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas 34(2):185–190PubMedCrossRef De Waele JJ et al (2007) Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas 34(2):185–190PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hill MC et al (1982) Acute pancreatitis: clinical vs. CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 139(2):263–269PubMed Hill MC et al (1982) Acute pancreatitis: clinical vs. CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 139(2):263–269PubMed
9.
go back to reference Knoepfli AS et al (2007) Prospective study of 310 patients: can early CT predict the severity of acute pancreatitis? Abdom Imaging 32(1):111–115PubMedCrossRef Knoepfli AS et al (2007) Prospective study of 310 patients: can early CT predict the severity of acute pancreatitis? Abdom Imaging 32(1):111–115PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Thomas S. et al. Diffusion MRI of acute pancreatitis and comparison with normal individuals using ADC values. Emerg Radiol Thomas S. et al. Diffusion MRI of acute pancreatitis and comparison with normal individuals using ADC values. Emerg Radiol
11.
go back to reference Werner J et al (2005) Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 54(3):426–436PubMedCrossRef Werner J et al (2005) Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 54(3):426–436PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Valek V, Kala Z, Dite P (2010) Role of imaging methods in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis 28(2):317–323PubMedCrossRef Valek V, Kala Z, Dite P (2010) Role of imaging methods in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis 28(2):317–323PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sakorafas GH, Tsiotos GG, Sarr MG (1999) Extrapancreatic necrotizing pancreatitis with viable pancreas: a previously under-appreciated entity. J Am Coll Surg 188(6):643–648PubMedCrossRef Sakorafas GH, Tsiotos GG, Sarr MG (1999) Extrapancreatic necrotizing pancreatitis with viable pancreas: a previously under-appreciated entity. J Am Coll Surg 188(6):643–648PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harrison S et al (2010) Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing debridement of pancreatic necrosis. J Gastrointest Surg 14(2):245–251PubMedCrossRef Harrison S et al (2010) Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing debridement of pancreatic necrosis. J Gastrointest Surg 14(2):245–251PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Trout AT et al (2010) Imaging of acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of computed tomographic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34(4):485–495PubMedCrossRef Trout AT et al (2010) Imaging of acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of computed tomographic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34(4):485–495PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Morgan DE et al (1997) Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 203(3):773–778PubMed Morgan DE et al (1997) Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 203(3):773–778PubMed
17.
go back to reference Lenhart DK, Balthazar EJ (2008) MDCT of acute mild (nonnecrotizing) pancreatitis: abdominal complications and fate of fluid collections. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(3):643–649PubMedCrossRef Lenhart DK, Balthazar EJ (2008) MDCT of acute mild (nonnecrotizing) pancreatitis: abdominal complications and fate of fluid collections. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(3):643–649PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mortele KJ et al (2001) Splenic and perisplenic involvement in acute pancreatitis: determination of prevalence and morphologic helical CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(1):50–54PubMedCrossRef Mortele KJ et al (2001) Splenic and perisplenic involvement in acute pancreatitis: determination of prevalence and morphologic helical CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(1):50–54PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bollen TL et al (2007) Intense adrenal enhancement in patients with acute pancreatitis and early organ failure. Emerg Radiol 14(5):317–322PubMedCrossRef Bollen TL et al (2007) Intense adrenal enhancement in patients with acute pancreatitis and early organ failure. Emerg Radiol 14(5):317–322PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: a CT imaging guide for radiologists
Authors
Y. Sheu
A. Furlan
O. Almusa
G. Papachristou
K. T. Bae
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-011-1001-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Emergency Radiology 3/2012 Go to the issue