Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2007

01-02-2007

Prospective study of 310 patients: can early CT predict the severity of acute pancreatitis?

Authors: A. -S. Knoepfli, K. Kinkel, T. Berney, P. Morel, C. D. Becker, P. -A. Poletti

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to determine the most important early CT parameters predictive of acute pancreatitis severity.

Methods

Three hundred and seventy-one consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain and hyperamylasemia were enrolled. Three hundred and ten of the 371 patients met our inclusion criteria. Acute pancreatitis severity was evaluated using the 1992 Atlanta criteria. Different CT parameters were reported from the admission abdominal CT by two radiologists blinded from any clinical parameter, but the patients’ age and gender. These variables were fitted in a binary logistic regression model.

Results

Acute pancreatitis was mild in 80% cases, severe in 20% cases and lethal in 12.69% cases. The following CT parameters were significantly associated with the severity of acute pancreatitis: the objective size of the pancreas (P = 0.001), the peripancreatic fat abnormalities (P = 0.001) and the extent of necrosis (P = 0.007). Moreover, the age of the patient revealed itself a highly significant (P = 0.001) indicator of disease severity. The association of the four CT criteria eventually showed a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 81% to predict acute pancreatitis severity.

Conclusion

Although these criteria correlated with disease severity, our study identified that morphological CT criteria cannot be used to triage patients with severe and mild acute pancreatitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, et al. (2000) Early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis by urinary trypsinogen activation peptide: a multicentre study. Lancet 355(9219):1955–1960PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, et al. (2000) Early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis by urinary trypsinogen activation peptide: a multicentre study. Lancet 355(9219):1955–1960PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kylanpaa-Back ML, Kemppainen E, Puolakkainen P (2002) Trypsin-based laboratory methods and carboxypeptidase activation peptide in acute pancreatitis. Jop 3(2):34–48PubMed Kylanpaa-Back ML, Kemppainen E, Puolakkainen P (2002) Trypsin-based laboratory methods and carboxypeptidase activation peptide in acute pancreatitis. Jop 3(2):34–48PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bradley EL III (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590PubMed Bradley EL III (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590PubMed
4.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613PubMedCrossRef Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Anglade D, et al. (2000) Is it useful to maintain specific scores for the early determination of the severity of acute pancreatitis? Ann Chir 125(4):325–333PubMedCrossRef Anglade D, et al. (2000) Is it useful to maintain specific scores for the early determination of the severity of acute pancreatitis? Ann Chir 125(4):325–333PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW (1990) Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg 77(11):1260–1264PubMedCrossRef Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW (1990) Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg 77(11):1260–1264PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, et al. (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174(2):331–336PubMed Balthazar EJ, et al. (1990) Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology 174(2):331–336PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ranson JH, et al. (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139(1):69–81PubMed Ranson JH, et al. (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139(1):69–81PubMed
9.
go back to reference Blamey SL, et al. (1984) Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut 25(12):1340–1346PubMed Blamey SL, et al. (1984) Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut 25(12):1340–1346PubMed
10.
go back to reference Pezzilli R, Billi P, Morselli-Labate AM (1998) Severity of acute pancreatitis: relationship with etiology, sex and age. Hepatogastroenterology 45(23):1859–1864PubMed Pezzilli R, Billi P, Morselli-Labate AM (1998) Severity of acute pancreatitis: relationship with etiology, sex and age. Hepatogastroenterology 45(23):1859–1864PubMed
11.
go back to reference Halonen KI, et al. (2000) Severe acute pancreatitis: prognostic factors in 270 consecutive patients. Pancreas 21(3):266–271PubMedCrossRef Halonen KI, et al. (2000) Severe acute pancreatitis: prognostic factors in 270 consecutive patients. Pancreas 21(3):266–271PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Company L, et al. (2003) Factors predicting mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 3(2):144–148PubMedCrossRef Company L, et al. (2003) Factors predicting mortality in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 3(2):144–148PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference London NJ, et al. (1991) Rapid-bolus contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Br J Surg 78(12):1452–1456PubMedCrossRef London NJ, et al. (1991) Rapid-bolus contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Br J Surg 78(12):1452–1456PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Clavien PA, et al. (1988) Value of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in the early diagnosis and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. A prospective study of 202 patients. Am J Surg 155(3):457–466PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, et al. (1988) Value of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in the early diagnosis and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. A prospective study of 202 patients. Am J Surg 155(3):457–466PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vesentini S, et al. (1993) Prospective comparison of C-reactive protein level, Ranson score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the prediction of septic complications of acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 80(6):755–757PubMedCrossRef Vesentini S, et al. (1993) Prospective comparison of C-reactive protein level, Ranson score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the prediction of septic complications of acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 80(6):755–757PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lankisch PG, et al. (2002) The APACHE II score is unreliable to diagnose necrotizing pancreatitis on admission to hospital. Pancreas 24(3):217–222PubMedCrossRef Lankisch PG, et al. (2002) The APACHE II score is unreliable to diagnose necrotizing pancreatitis on admission to hospital. Pancreas 24(3):217–222PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E (1994) Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 193(2):297–306PubMed Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E (1994) Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 193(2):297–306PubMed
18.
go back to reference Hill MC, et al. (1982) Acute pancreatitis: clinical vs. CT findings. Am J Roentgenol 139(2):263–269 Hill MC, et al. (1982) Acute pancreatitis: clinical vs. CT findings. Am J Roentgenol 139(2):263–269
19.
go back to reference Kemppainen E, et al. (1996) Early localization of necrosis by contrast-enhanced computed tomography can predict outcome in severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 83(7):924–929PubMedCrossRef Kemppainen E, et al. (1996) Early localization of necrosis by contrast-enhanced computed tomography can predict outcome in severe acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 83(7):924–929PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ranson JH, et al. (1985) Computed tomography and the prediction of pancreatic abscess in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 201(5):656–665PubMedCrossRef Ranson JH, et al. (1985) Computed tomography and the prediction of pancreatic abscess in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 201(5):656–665PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Paulson EK, et al. (1999) Acute pancreatitis complicated by gland necrosis: spectrum of findings on contrast-enhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 172(3):609–613 Paulson EK, et al. (1999) Acute pancreatitis complicated by gland necrosis: spectrum of findings on contrast-enhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 172(3):609–613
22.
23.
24.
go back to reference Lankisch PG, et al. (2001) Do we need a computed tomography examination in all patients with acute pancreatitis within 72 h after admission to hospital for the detection of pancreatic necrosis? Scand J Gastroenterol 36(4):432–436PubMedCrossRef Lankisch PG, et al. (2001) Do we need a computed tomography examination in all patients with acute pancreatitis within 72 h after admission to hospital for the detection of pancreatic necrosis? Scand J Gastroenterol 36(4):432–436PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Block S, et al. (1986) Identification of pancreas necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis: imaging procedures versus clinical staging. Gut 27(9):1035–1042PubMed Block S, et al. (1986) Identification of pancreas necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis: imaging procedures versus clinical staging. Gut 27(9):1035–1042PubMed
26.
27.
28.
Metadata
Title
Prospective study of 310 patients: can early CT predict the severity of acute pancreatitis?
Authors
A. -S. Knoepfli
K. Kinkel
T. Berney
P. Morel
C. D. Becker
P. -A. Poletti
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9034-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Abdominal Radiology 1/2007 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.