Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 3/2017

Open Access 01-03-2017 | Editorial Comment

The management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: early invasive strategy for all?

Authors: F. Arslan, M. Voskuil

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

It is unquestionable that early invasive reperfusion therapy in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has significantly reduced infarct-related mortality and morbidity [1]. Scientific and social dissemination campaigns have created a certain awareness both in the public domain and among physicians with slogans such as ‘the sooner the better’ and ‘time is muscle’, when faced with such acute situations. The early diagnosis of ischaemia plays an equally important role in improving outcome after myocardial infarction (MI). Cardiac troponins (cTn) play a central role in detecting myocardial damage and are regarded as a cornerstone in the diagnosis of an acute coronary event resulting from atherosclerotic plaque instability [2]. On intracoronary imaging studies and post-mortem observation, acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation (i. e. non-STEMI, NSTEMI-ACS) is often seen to be related to ‘milder’ forms of plaque instability such as erosion and ulceration-based instability [35]. The high-sensitive cTn assays have put the definition of MI into a new perspective [2]. Early detection is preferable in any type of injury or disease, but the question of whether earlier intervention will also result in favourable outcome at an acceptable cost remains. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boersma E. Primary coronary angioplasty vs. thrombolysis G. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(7):779–88.CrossRefPubMed Boersma E. Primary coronary angioplasty vs. thrombolysis G. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(7):779–88.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2551–67.CrossRefPubMed Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(20):2551–67.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kerensky RA, Wade M, Deedwania P, et al. Revisiting the culprit lesion in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results from the VANQWISH trial angiographic core laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(9):1456–63.CrossRefPubMed Kerensky RA, Wade M, Deedwania P, et al. Revisiting the culprit lesion in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results from the VANQWISH trial angiographic core laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(9):1456–63.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cheruvu PK, Finn AV, Gardner C, et al. Frequency and distribution of thin-cap fibroatheroma and ruptured plaques in human coronary arteries: a pathologic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(10):940–9.CrossRefPubMed Cheruvu PK, Finn AV, Gardner C, et al. Frequency and distribution of thin-cap fibroatheroma and ruptured plaques in human coronary arteries: a pathologic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(10):940–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Goldstein JA, Demetriou D, Grines CL, et al. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(13):915–22.CrossRefPubMed Goldstein JA, Demetriou D, Grines CL, et al. Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(13):915–22.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Damman P, van’t Hof AW, ten Berg JM, Jukema JW, Appelman Y, Liem AH, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: comments from the Dutch ACS working group. Neth Heart J. 2017;25 doi:10.1007/s12471-016-0939-y. Damman P, van’t Hof AW, ten Berg JM, Jukema JW, Appelman Y, Liem AH, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: comments from the Dutch ACS working group. Neth Heart J. 2017;25 doi:10.​1007/​s12471-016-0939-y.
7.
go back to reference Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(23):2999–3054.CrossRefPubMed Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(23):2999–3054.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Navarese EP, Gurbel PA, Andreotti F, et al. Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):261–70.CrossRefPubMed Navarese EP, Gurbel PA, Andreotti F, et al. Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):261–70.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Katritsis DG, Siontis GC, Kastrati A, et al. Optimal timing of coronary angiography and potential intervention in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(1):32–40.CrossRefPubMed Katritsis DG, Siontis GC, Kastrati A, et al. Optimal timing of coronary angiography and potential intervention in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(1):32–40.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(21):2165–75.CrossRefPubMed Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(21):2165–75.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Milosevic A, Vasiljevic-Pokrajcic Z, Milasinovic D, et al. Immediate versus delayed invasive intervention for non-STEMI patients: the RIDDLE-NSTEMI study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(6):541–9.CrossRefPubMed Milosevic A, Vasiljevic-Pokrajcic Z, Milasinovic D, et al. Immediate versus delayed invasive intervention for non-STEMI patients: the RIDDLE-NSTEMI study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(6):541–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Riezebos RK, Ronner E, Ter Bals E, et al. Immediate versus deferred coronary angioplasty in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Heart. 2009;95(10):807–12.CrossRefPubMed Riezebos RK, Ronner E, Ter Bals E, et al. Immediate versus deferred coronary angioplasty in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Heart. 2009;95(10):807–12.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Oosterwerff EF, Fagel ND, Slagboom T, et al. Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention timing on 5‑year outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. The ‘wait a day’ approach might be safer. Neth Heart J. 2016;24(3):173–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oosterwerff EF, Fagel ND, Slagboom T, et al. Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention timing on 5‑year outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. The ‘wait a day’ approach might be safer. Neth Heart J. 2016;24(3):173–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Badings EA, The SH, Dambrink JH, et al. Early or late intervention in high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: results of the ELISA-3 trial. EuroIntervention. 2013;9(1):54–61.CrossRefPubMed Badings EA, The SH, Dambrink JH, et al. Early or late intervention in high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: results of the ELISA-3 trial. EuroIntervention. 2013;9(1):54–61.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ishak M, Ali D, Fokkert MJ, et al. Fast assessment and management of chest pain without ST-elevation in the pre-hospital gateway: rationale and design. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4(2):129–36.CrossRefPubMed Ishak M, Ali D, Fokkert MJ, et al. Fast assessment and management of chest pain without ST-elevation in the pre-hospital gateway: rationale and design. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4(2):129–36.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: early invasive strategy for all?
Authors
F. Arslan
M. Voskuil
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0944-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Netherlands Heart Journal 3/2017 Go to the issue