Top

BMC Health Services Research

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

The health service perspective on determinants of success in allied health student research project collaborations: a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Authors: Rebecca L. Angus, H. Laetitia Hattingh, Kelly A. Weir

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Background

A research culture in health care organisations is associated with improved healthcare performance. Allied health (AH) students undertake research training as part of their professional degree qualifications. This may include participation in research projects, sometimes undertaken in association with health services. Co-supervision of these projects by health service staff provides research capacity building opportunities and staff-centred outcomes for the individuals involved, as well as improvements in clinical knowledge and practice within the local area. Also, publications from these projects contribute to the wider evidence base. Identification of barriers and facilitators to engagement in, and conduct of, these projects may optimise systems for improved health service outcomes.

Methods

This formative evaluation used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide analysis of qualitative data obtained from semi-structured interviews with health service-employed allied health professionals, including clinicians and research fellows, who had supervised students on clinical-related research placements within the previous five years.

Results

Eleven AH clinicians described 18 collaborative projects with 24 students from five AH disciplines across four universities. Three health service-employed AH research fellows described their involvement in these and other student research projects. Twenty key determinant constructs were identified and mapped across all five CFIR domains. Facilitators included health service cosmopolitanism, project adaptability and implementation climate (compatibility). Health service-employed research fellows provided readiness for implementation and a facilitator for project execution. The main barriers identified were cost to staff in workload and personal time and aspects related to project complexity. Differing student characteristics affected the relative advantage of collaborative projects in positive and negative manners.

Conclusions

This study describes the facilitators and barriers to the conduct of collaborative AH student research projects. Addressing these determinants when establishing each new project may enable health services to optimise communication, role delineation and project success, and thus ultimately, healthcare performance and patient care.

Available only for authorised users

Boaz A, Hanney S, Jones T, Soper B. Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009415-e.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J, Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41(1):45–53.CrossRefPubMed

Newington L, Wells M, Adonis A, Bolton L, Bolton Saghdaoui L, Coffey M, et al. A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Allied Health Professions Australia. Allied health. Melbourne: AHPA; 2022. Available from: https://ahpa.com.au/allied-health/.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health workforce. AIHW; 2022. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/workforce/health-workforce. Updated 07 July 2022.

Harris J, Grafton K, Cooke J. Developing a consolidated research framework for clinical allied health professionals practising in the UK. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):852.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Angus RL, Hattingh HL, Weir KA. Experiences of hospital allied health professionals in collaborative student research projects: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):729.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lacey C, Scodras S, Ardron J, Sellan R, Garbaczewska M, O’Brien KK, et al. Retrospective review of student research projects in a Canadian master of science in physical therapy programme and the perceived impact on advisors’ research capacity, education, clinical practice, knowledge translation, and health policy. Physiother Can. 2018;70(2):160–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Whelan K, Thomas JE, Madden AM. Student research projects: the experiences of student dietitians, university faculty members, and collaborators. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(9):1567–74.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Skolarus TA, Lehmann T, Tabak RG, Harris J, Lecy J, Sales AE. Assessing citation networks for dissemination and implementation research frameworks. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Queensland Industrial Relations Commission. Health Practitioners and Dental Officers (Queensland Health) Award – State 2015, 2018 State Wage Case Reprint. Brisbane: State of Queensland; 2018.

14.

D’Arrietta LM, Vangaveti VN, Crowe MJ, Malau-Aduli BS. Rethinking health professionals’ motivation to do research: a systematic review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:185–216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Matus J, Walker A, Mickan S. Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):716.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Slade SC, Philip K, Morris ME. Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Borkowski D, McKinstry C, Cotchett M, Williams C, Haines T. Research culture in allied health: a systematic review. Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22(4):294–303.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Harvey D, Plummer D, Nielsen I, Adams R, Pain T. Becoming a clinician researcher in allied health. Aust Health Rev. 2016;40(5):562–9.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Wenke R, Weir KA, Noble C, Mahoney J, Mickan S. Not enough time for research? Use of supported funding to promote allied health research activity. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:269–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Cordrey T, King E, Pilkington E, Gore K, Gustafson O. Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Wenke R, Noble C, Weir KA, Mickan S. What influences allied health clinician participation in research in the public hospital setting: a qualitative theory-informed approach. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e036183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Alison JA, Zafiropoulos B, Heard R. Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:277–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Williams J, Craig TJ, Robson D. Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1126.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Zych MM, Berta WB, Gagliardi AR. Conceptualising the initiation of researcher and research user partnerships: a meta-narrative review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Bowen S, Botting I, Graham ID, MacLeod M, Moissac D, Harlos K, et al. Experience of health leadership in partnering with university-based researchers in Canada - a call to “Re-imagine” research. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(12):684–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Hoekstra F, Mrklas KJ, Khan M, McKay RC, Vis-Dunbar M, Sibley KM, et al. A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Oliver K, Kothari A, Mays N. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Sibbald SL, Kang H, Graham ID. Collaborative health research partnerships: a survey of researcher and knowledge-user attitudes and perceptions. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Nyström ME, Karltun J, Keller C, Andersson GB. Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Uebel K, Iqbal MP, Carland J, Smith G, Islam MS, Shulruf B, et al. Factors determining medical students’ experience in an independent research year during the medical program. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(4):1471–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Hart J, Hakim J, Kaur R, Jeremy R, Coorey G, Kalman E, et al. Research supervisors’ views of barriers and enablers for research projects undertaken by medical students; a mixed methods evaluation of a post-graduate medical degree research project program. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):370.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernández ME, Abadie B, Damschroder LJ. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: The health service perspective on determinants of success in allied health student research project collaborations: a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Authors: Rebecca L. Angus
H. Laetitia Hattingh
Kelly A. Weir
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10599-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The health service perspective on determinants of success in allied health student research project collaborations: a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Costs and scale-up costs of community-based Oral HIV Self-Testing for female sex workers and men who have sex with men in Jakarta and Bali, Indonesia

Two-year follow-up of a clustered randomised controlled trial of a multicomponent general practice intervention for people at risk of poor health outcomes

Barriers and facilitators to guideline for the management of pediatric off-label use of drugs in China: a qualitative descriptive study

Implementation of a multi-site neonatal simulation improvement program: a cost analysis

Hospital readiness for the provision of care to critically ill patients in Tanzania– an in-depth cross-sectional study

Healthcare workers' attitudes toward and factors influencing their acceptance of an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine: a cross-sectional study in Palestine